[HN Gopher] Romans may have destroyed Moray metal-working site
___________________________________________________________________
Romans may have destroyed Moray metal-working site
Author : diodorus
Score : 19 points
Date : 2022-07-26 20:04 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
| dboreham wrote:
| This is a good example of why archeologists shouldn't be
| believed. They've extrapolated the universe from a piece of fairy
| cake here. They found : burned buildings and a pot inside another
| pot. There are an infinite number of explanations for those two
| findings.
| 99_00 wrote:
| You're saying that Romans destroying the mental works is just
| one possible explanation?
|
| So are the archaeologists.
|
| >Archaeologists suggest one possible explanation could be that
| it may have been the actions of Roman soldiers following their
| victory over Caledonians at the Battle of Mons Grapius around
| AD 83.
| jandrese wrote:
| It may have also been torched by the workers before they fled to
| prevent it from falling into Roman hands.
| ggm wrote:
| It's my belief, iron and ironstone being high value, they'd
| have taken what they could with them, the inputs. Charcoal
| aside, the remains otherwise are more marginal value, you can
| do Iron in a mud brick hearth, there wouldn't have been a lot
| of immovable fixed infrastructure to take really. The charcoal
| is a pain to make, time consuming. Maybe they burned that to
| avoid the romans having access, but I tend to think the Romans
| did this, to deny re-use when the inevitable re-occupation
| came. They'd have lifted what they could, and destroyed the
| rest.
|
| Not an archeologist. The best way to get good input is to post
| bad input and wait to be corrected!
| Gys wrote:
| https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-07-26 23:01 UTC)