[HN Gopher] Former juvenile lifers talk about the meaning of sec...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Former juvenile lifers talk about the meaning of second chances
        
       Author : gmays
       Score  : 23 points
       Date   : 2022-07-23 14:52 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.brproud.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.brproud.com)
        
       | bryanrasmussen wrote:
       | This content is not available in your country/region.
       | 
       | so archive.org:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20220724192109/https://www.brpro...
        
       | jjulius wrote:
       | What's with the voting options for this post? There are no
       | up/downvote arrows, but I didn't vote for it. If I had, there'd
       | be an "unvote/undown" option, but it's not there, either. Never
       | seen that on HN before.
        
         | astura wrote:
         | I see the normal up arrow fwiw.
        
         | Macha wrote:
         | Downvotes are only available for comments, not posts. Posts can
         | only be upvoted or flagged.
         | 
         | for what it's worth, I have the option to upvote as usual
        
       | GameOfFrowns wrote:
       | Thanks a lot.
       | 
       | Article carefully avoids mentioning why these individuals had
       | received lifetime sentences. I assume their murder victims didn't
       | get "second chances".
        
         | cltby wrote:
        
           | throwaway5959 wrote:
           | What if they murdered murderers? Wouldn't their actions make
           | you safer, if safety is your priority?
        
             | cltby wrote:
             | Yes, I would happily reconsider in this case.
        
           | t-3 wrote:
           | > Perhaps they'll make suitable service workers, but future
           | physicists these are not.
           | 
           | How do you know that?
        
             | cltby wrote:
             | They have a demonstrated capacity for cruelty and sadism.
             | They have revealed no commensurate intellectual prowess.
        
               | boeingUH60 wrote:
               | Cruelty/Sadism and intellectual prowess aren't mutually
               | exclusive. From my high school days...I remember some
               | really smart people who were atrocious bullies, and I
               | mean extreme bullies.
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | Famously, Goring scored 138 and another prominent Nazi,
               | Arthur Seyss-Inquart, 141 on their IQ tests when
               | incarcerated in Nuremberg. Both were sentenced to death
               | later.
               | 
               | That said, their case shows the principle that high-IQ
               | psychopathic people tend not to end up among common
               | criminals. They find other, legal or "legal" (as in "it
               | was legal in Nazi Germany") ways to satisfy their urges.
        
               | t-3 wrote:
               | No, they have not. They've been convicted of crimes.
               | Nothing about their intellectual ability or "capacity for
               | cruelty or sadism" can be inferred from that.
        
           | spoonjim wrote:
           | Their economic output has nothing to do with why they should
           | be locked up until they die. If Elon Musk commits murder he
           | should be locked up for the remainder of his natural life as
           | should these lowlifes.
        
             | cltby wrote:
             | Agreed. Just want to preempt any arguments about
             | incarceration "wasting their potential."
        
       | spoonjim wrote:
       | The country that has places no value on life is the one that lets
       | murderers out to walk free among civilization.
        
         | w-j-w wrote:
        
         | vkou wrote:
         | The median time served for murder in the US is 13.4 years.
         | 
         | But, not all things are equal. For some reason, both the
         | lengths of these sentences, and the frequency of receiving life
         | without parole (or life without parole as a child offender)
         | vary widely... Across racial lines.
         | 
         | Weird, huh?
        
           | deepdriver wrote:
           | Let's look at the data. Between 2012-2016, black male
           | offenders in the federal court system received setentences
           | 19.1% longer on average than similarily-situated white male
           | offenders:
           | 
           | https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-
           | reports/demographic-d...
           | 
           | However, this analysis doesn't control for income level or
           | socioeconomic status. There are major differences in economic
           | propsperity between black and white populations, and as a
           | consequence major diffences in the quality of their legal
           | counsel. This is hinted at in the 2012 Booker Report:
           | 
           | https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/news/congressio.
           | ..
           | 
           | >During these periods, Black male offenders were more than 20
           | percent less likely to receive a non-government sponsored
           | below range sentence than White male offenders were. These
           | differences may contribute to the difference in sentence
           | length between Black and White male offenders.
           | 
           | The quality of your counsel has a big impact on whether you
           | can get "non-government sponsored below range sentence", as
           | this one law firm suggests:
           | 
           | https://alanellis.com/sentencing-tips/
           | 
           | >The foregoing trend makes reinforces the importance of using
           | a sentencing specialist able to help humanize your client,
           | preferably someone familiar with the federal system's many
           | nuances.
           | 
           | Much like the gender pay gap, the closer you look at the
           | racial sentencing gap the smaller it gets, and the more it
           | looks related to wealth rather than race. The racial wealth
           | gap is its own separate issue, but it seems to me like
           | solving that problem could do much to fix the disparity in
           | sentencing.
        
         | jon_adler wrote:
         | There should be a reasonable age for criminal responsibility.
         | Compare the different approaches of the British [1] who tried
         | 10 year olds as adults and the Norwegians [2] who took a
         | different approach. Which is more civilised? Which is more
         | likely rehabilitate the offender?
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger [2]
         | https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2010/mar/20/norway-t...
        
           | darkerside wrote:
           | You couldn't have picked a worse case for trying juveniles as
           | adults. I think any country that wouldn't try these animals
           | as adults couldn't be called civilized. Torturing and
           | mutilating a 2 year old at the age of 10 is not recoverable
           | human behavior.
           | 
           | And of course...
           | 
           | > Venables was sent to prison in 2010 for breaching the terms
           | of his licence, was released on parole again in 2013, and in
           | November 2017 was again sent to prison for possessing child
           | sexual abuse images on his computer.
        
             | jon_adler wrote:
             | I beg to differ. As revolting as their actions were, it is
             | hard to consider 10 year olds as adults and treat them as
             | such in the eyes of the law. The recidivism you raise could
             | actually support my argument rather than strengthen yours.
             | Had they been treated differently (I.e. more as children)
             | perhaps they might have been rehabilitated and ended up
             | more "normal".
             | 
             | Don't misunderstand my position. What they did was vile
             | beyond comprehension, but were 10 year olds _fully
             | responsible_ for their own behaviour at this age?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-07-24 23:02 UTC)