[HN Gopher] Just got this notice from my bank: No more Firefox
___________________________________________________________________
Just got this notice from my bank: No more Firefox
Author : vord1080
Score : 28 points
Date : 2022-07-19 21:11 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (old.reddit.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (old.reddit.com)
| dmart wrote:
| I wonder if people realize how low Firefox marketshare has
| fallen, or if people are stuck in a 2010s-era idea of what the
| web browser landscape is like. I also think the prevalence of
| Firefox among the (overall tiny) desktop Linux demographic tends
| to warp developer perspectives.
|
| It's under 4% - for all intents and purposes a dead browser. I
| certainly wouldn't devote any engineering hours towards
| supporting it.
| pipeline_peak wrote:
| Not to mention, the core development team has been cut.
|
| Mozilla is rebranding itself into a "Social Justice For Tech"
| marketing firm.
|
| There are two significant platforms left Chromium and WebKit. I
| hope that isn't the future, but browser dominance is such an
| obscure, indirect problem to the industry that no company would
| bother touching it.
| vord1080 wrote:
| Not sure where you got the idea that the core development
| team has been cut, Firefox development remains strong. For
| example, here's a 1,000+ line patch that just landed two days
| ago. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1779952
| pipeline_peak wrote:
| I shouldn't of said cut, but they did layoff 250 members 2
| years ago and among those were the Servo team.
|
| https://www.protocol.com/amp/mozilla-layoffs-2646950077
| rlpb wrote:
| In most industries increasing your reach by 3% is worth doing.
| the_biot wrote:
| Firefox's marketshare is hardly the point here. As bob1029
| said, there's no earthly reason why you wouldn't just build a
| standards-based site and have it work on any modern browser.
| bob1029 wrote:
| This is pretty lame BS. I am literally right in the middle of
| building a public web app ( _also_ for a bank) that does not have
| any sort of arbitrary user agent constraints.
|
| As long as your browser supports reasonably-modern things like
| flexbox and media queries, my app is just going to work on your
| machine. Even if it doesn't support these things, I don't see any
| reason to artificially get in the way of something you might
| otherwise be able to string along regardless.
|
| I roll 100% vanilla JS/CSS these days so that I can avoid getting
| entrapped in the kinds of hells that likely entrapped these mbna
| web developers. It is quite possible they use some JS framework
| that has a tight dependency on a certain cohort of browser
| vendors & versions.
| guilherme-puida wrote:
| It's Internet Explorer all over again.
| whoibrar wrote:
| Wonder what will be the next javascript of today ?
| kalupa wrote:
| javascript, just like it was before today.
| pipeline_peak wrote:
| wasm
| ratsmack wrote:
| My bank (B of A) started complaining about Debian's firefox-esr
| being too old and out of date, so I loaded the bleeding edge
| version just to access my bank account, but use the esr version
| for general browsing.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-07-19 23:01 UTC)