[HN Gopher] Electrical engineers on the brink of extinction thre...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Electrical engineers on the brink of extinction threaten entire
       tech ecosystems
        
       Author : anxrn
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2022-07-18 19:47 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theregister.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theregister.com)
        
       | texaslonghorn5 wrote:
       | It seems like undergrads are entering ECE/EECS departments with
       | far more programing experience as well, and there is far more
       | awareness / advertisement / (over)hyping of "glamorous" FAANG-
       | type environments and trajectories. As compared to EE companies
       | where the perception is that jobs are far more "traditional".
       | 
       | Regarding the article's comments on the decline of tinkering,
       | either it's causal or correlated, but it seems like students have
       | far less physics (E&M) exposure than programming experience, and
       | many don't want to grind through the math required (differential
       | equations is often taught poorly, contributing to this
       | phenomenon). So it's seen as far simpler to just do as little EE
       | as possible to finish the degree and get the sweet SWE job.
        
         | idrios wrote:
         | I finished undergrad with a biomedical engineering degree and
         | minors in EE & physics.
         | 
         | Outside of the university I didn't have the money to buy a
         | bench, some optical lasers, detectors, machine parts, etc --
         | nor room to keep that stuff at my parents house.
         | 
         | I didn't even have money to buy the full diversity of simple
         | electronic components that I would have wanted to tinker with,
         | though I did at least buy some stuff.
         | 
         | But I had a laptop and that's all you need to do any kind
         | software development, short of running ML algorithms that
         | require massive computation, or running a very high-traffic
         | server.
         | 
         | I wish I had a use for all the levels of calculus, physics,
         | circuits that I learned in college, and I'm massively envious
         | of the people working on, e.g. this optogenetics project that
         | was just posted [1] but I am quite certain the problem stems
         | not from a lack of experience but rather the lack of
         | opportunities, all driven by natural economic incentives.
         | 
         | As a BME there was maybe 1 relevant job posted on Indeed per
         | week. For something purely electrical engineering it was maybe
         | 1 per day. In software, there are pages of new positions posted
         | daily.
         | 
         | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32140661
        
       | jaygreco wrote:
       | I graduated with a BSEE and worked as an EE for 6~ yr in hardware
       | design, mostly as a generalist before switching outright to
       | embedded FW. I make more money and have greater autonomy. I like
       | hardware but enjoy firmware an equal amount and would only switch
       | back into a role that encompassed both (like engineering lead,
       | etc)
        
       | SilverBirch wrote:
       | I graduated in EE and this is no surprise- hardware is hard and
       | Google will throw you $500k a year to tweak the font on their
       | internal compiler. Optics, Power engineering, ASIC design, it's
       | all fascinating and * really hard * and * really underpaid *.
       | 
       | It's worrying in the long term, the industry's been built on
       | underpaid geniuses. We need them, but you can't begrudge them
       | moving to the money.
        
       | humanwhosits wrote:
       | Perhaps there will be a wage spike if there's less EEs
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | The tools for EEs are old, creaky, text-based stuff from the DOS
       | days.
       | 
       | Time to finally turn EE into a software discipline. Then some
       | decent tools will be developed and normal folk will be willing to
       | design stuff.
        
         | schlauerfox wrote:
         | A poor workman blames his tools.
        
           | JoeAltmaier wrote:
           | So you'll sign up to use crappy tools to design hardware with
           | millions of elements?
           | 
           | This isn't about chest-beating. Its about attracting people
           | to a discipline which is currently arcane because of obtuse
           | tools.
        
       | Daishiman wrote:
       | In a software engineer. My cousin is an electrical engineer
       | working at a large power distribution firm.
       | 
       | For all intents and purposes his job is absolutely critical to
       | society. I basically fumble around and do a few projects for my
       | clients.
       | 
       | I get paid several times more than him.
       | 
       | I am happy for myself but it makes no sense to me how society is
       | mispricing our work.
        
         | aerostable_slug wrote:
         | Mechanical engineers are similarly low-paid.
         | 
         | Some time back I hired a few MechE's (with advanced degrees) to
         | write simulation code for a startup. I paid them what I thought
         | was fair for a Bay Area coding role, which turned out to be a
         | significant amount more than the same job would have paid if
         | they had a different title (they would have been doing
         | substantially the same work at Honda/John
         | Deere/Ford/Boeing/Lockheed/etc.).
         | 
         | Strange.
        
         | supertrope wrote:
         | Supply and demand is a cruel mistress. If power electronics
         | could scale up to hundreds of millions of customers with
         | relatively flat headcount and capital intensity you might see
         | unicorns too.
        
       | 0x20cowboy wrote:
       | I loved tinkering with electronics when I was younger - still do
       | to a smaller degree. I built my first computer by fixing some
       | blown capacitors on a motherboard I found in the trash.
       | 
       | Back in the day, lots of products came with schematics, now you
       | might get a lawsuit if you dare to take something apart.
       | 
       | It was way easier to take apart and tweak through hole components
       | too - now everything is surface mount or on chip and it's much
       | harder to get into with just a soldering iron.
       | 
       | The first thing I ever did was rewire a stereo to broadcast
       | instead of receive to make a little pirate radio station -
       | really, none of those things exist anymore.
       | 
       | I think it's just a harder thing to get into now.
        
         | fleventynine wrote:
         | Surface mount isn't that big of a deal. A cheap hot air gun, a
         | soldering iron, flux, and some solder paste are all you need to
         | work with most BGAs, QFN, and other modern packages. PCB
         | prototype manufacturing has never been cheaper thanks to
         | companies like JLCPCB. With all the fantastic learning material
         | on YouTube, open source tools like KiCad, and inexpensive
         | chinese test equipment, the kids these days can do WAY more
         | than I could dream of back in the 90s.
        
           | stas2k wrote:
           | Could not agree more. I have designed my first PCB in Kicad
           | as a MIT licence project.
           | 
           | Kicad ecosystem is very much alive and I was able to reuse
           | dimensions from another project for the same computer.
           | 
           | I made a RAM expansion board for Sharp X68000. You can check
           | it out on https://github.com/stas2k/galspanic
        
           | 0x20cowboy wrote:
           | But, I mean, you could get by with just a $10 soldering iron
           | from RadioShack. It's just harder to get into and tinker with
           | is my point - which I think you just supported?
        
         | Johnythree wrote:
         | I find SMT easier than through-hole. And I say B.S. to your
         | line of "rewire a stereo to broadcast instead of receive".
         | There's very little commonality between a stereo and a
         | Transmitter. Whatever, there are still thousands of Hams
         | building Transmitters.
        
           | 0x20cowboy wrote:
           | Don't know what to tell you other than I did. It only would
           | broadcast around the house and maybe a few houses down.
           | 
           | Here is someone else doing it as well: https://m.youtube.com/
           | watch?time_continue=27&v=AudEdHpXTi4&f...
        
       | shswkna wrote:
       | The article is basically saying that there is a focus on
       | commoditising tech talent for what builds shareholder value, and
       | a loss of the passion, imagination and richness that tech can add
       | to the world.
       | 
       | My own relationship with tech reflects in that: I despise some of
       | the things that tech is used for and has managed to amplify in
       | our species. I still pursue my passion because somewhere deep
       | down I know that it could also be different: That the power of
       | technology can also be used to magnify and infuse the world with
       | values that make our existence worthwhile and wondrous.
        
         | supertrope wrote:
         | Intel cancelled their sponsorship of Intel Science Talent
         | Search. That was a relatively cheap way to build goodwill and
         | cultivate the talent pipeline.
        
           | georgeburdell wrote:
           | ISEF was a competition among parents and professors living
           | vicariously through children
        
       | MarkusWandel wrote:
       | Tinkering with junk to develop an interest in real electrical
       | engineering: Totally resonates. Personal recollection from
       | 1983-84 or so follows.
       | 
       | We had a broken black-and-white TV that was mined out for parts
       | (tubes, resistors, capacitors etc) but the front shell with the
       | CRT, high voltage anode connector and deflection coils remained.
       | 
       | How do we make this light up again with teenager-accessible loose
       | parts? What can generate the necessary voltage? Oh, how about
       | this car ignition coil. How to tickle the coil into generating
       | this voltage, i.e. pulse its primary input? How about this
       | "vibrator" from an ancient tube car radio (a mechanical chopper
       | for turning DC into AC).
       | 
       | But how do we rectify multiple kilovolts? No suitable stack-of-
       | diodes rectifier stick on hand. Oh well, resort to the original
       | HV rectifier tube from the TV. But need to power its (directly
       | heated cathode) filament. Cop-out: Do it with a battery or two.
       | 
       | Voila, bright spot on the CRT.
       | 
       | Can we make it move? Well sure, just apply a suitable voltage
       | (trial and error!) 60Hz AC waveform to the horizontal deflection
       | coil. Voila, a line.
       | 
       | What about the Y axis? Well, we can amplify a microphone with a
       | stereo amplifier and drive the vertical deflection coil with the
       | speaker output. Amplitude? Trial and error (volume control). This
       | was getting pretty cool! Except that it was like seeing the
       | waveform wrapped around a cylinder, seen from the side, because
       | of the full sinusoid horizontal pattern. Which looked really
       | neat, but...
       | 
       | I can crank up the horizontal deflection by increasing the
       | voltage (I did have a VARIC based adjustable power supply -
       | homemade of course) until only the linear-ish part of the
       | sinewave remained onscreen. From there it was a straightforward
       | matter of an RC phase shift to drive one of the control grids
       | (found by trial and error by applying small DC voltages to
       | various pins until the beam was blanked) to blank out the right-
       | to-left direction.
       | 
       | And we had a sort of homemade oscilloscope.
       | 
       | This was cool in so many ways but only because the technological
       | underpinnings were still relevant at the time. Nowadays it would
       | be as ancient as dabbling with atmospheric steam engines. Which
       | I'm sure someone, somewhere is still doing. As an extreme niche
       | hobby without a clear track into a profitable career.
        
       | coastermug wrote:
       | Engineer turned programmer in the UK. I put the salary
       | discrepancy down to the ease with which I can move jobs. In
       | programming I can bounce around different companies every couple
       | of years in the same city. In engineering things are so
       | frequently sub-industry and even employer specific. If you're the
       | only person that can operate a company's machinery that's great,
       | but if that machinery is unique to that company that doesn't mean
       | you can get employment elsewhere.
        
       | tekla wrote:
       | I moved into IT from "formal" engineering and its always
       | frustrated me that a job that involves working on extremely
       | expensive engines using upper level college math gets paid almost
       | nothing compared to people who change colors on a webpage every
       | once in a while. I've been on floors where multi-million dollar
       | pieces of equipment are used to produce parts with obscene levels
       | of precision being used by expert machinists making 80k a year
       | who risk their own personal safety making these parts.
       | 
       | I have EE friends with master degrees who design PCBs that are
       | printed millions of times that struggle to afford rent.
       | 
       | It makes no sense. Why is web software so easy to make money in?
       | Why do we value hard engineering so little?
        
         | ramesh31 wrote:
         | Profit margin. It's all profit margin. Software is reliably
         | >25%, where physical manufacturing is in the single digits.
        
           | georgeburdell wrote:
           | But the question is why? Shouldn't there be the same race to
           | single digit margins in software as well?
        
             | insightcheck wrote:
             | The distribution cost of selling software is far lower than
             | selling a physical product. For example, to manufacture and
             | sell cars, you currently have to worry about supply chain
             | considerations and chip shortages. You don't need to worry
             | about this to sell software to an interested purchaser.
        
             | simmerup wrote:
             | I think you're right.
             | 
             | It's my suspicion that eventually software engineers will
             | be paid the same as copy writers and scientists. But not
             | yet.
        
         | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
         | As someone in software with an EE background, I think it's
         | simple. There's far more demand for software people compared to
         | the available supply, so pay rates are high. Which job is
         | "harder" has absolutely nothing to do with it.
         | 
         | I noticed the trend about 20 years ago when I decided that I'd
         | never again have a job that was mostly hardware design. The
         | money's in software.
        
       | frazbin wrote:
       | Might be a language thing. Observationally, the products of
       | hardware design cross language barriers better than software/UX.
       | Therefore software producers compete mostly within their own
       | language, but hardware producers must complete globally. This
       | would tend to produce a deficit of HW engineers in countries like
       | the US/UK, just because there isn't as much money to chase vs
       | software.
        
       | fatnoah wrote:
       | I'm not surprised. I was a double EE/CS major as an undergrad,
       | and earned an MSEE. My career has been mostly software, though,
       | and the economics of what EE vs. SWE get paid makes it very
       | unlikely that I'd ever move back since it would mean (at best)
       | making < 50% of my current compensation.
        
       | devwastaken wrote:
       | Stop tying engineering to universities and the problem will be
       | solved. People want careers, they want to solve complex problems,
       | and we have more tooling and knowledge than ever to do so. The
       | problem is U S. Education is squeezing it dry.
       | 
       | In the U.K. you can go for engineering in many fields without it
       | breaking the bank or having to compete for the top 0.1% of
       | schools.
       | 
       | If india, Taiwan, and china can do better than the U.S. - there's
       | a big problem. Rebuild the system.
        
         | robk wrote:
         | I don't see us producing a surplus of EEs here despite that
        
       | barkingcat wrote:
       | This is a symptom of an outdated curriculum and lack of a future
       | in the industry in North America.
       | 
       | Electrical Engineering is a very hot and in demand degree in
       | South / South East Asia precisely because that's where all the
       | jobs are.
        
       | dusted wrote:
       | I guess the world needs orders of magnitudes more codemonkeys
       | bashing away at their proverbial typewriters than those gods-
       | amongst-men who actually build the chips on which all that
       | spaghetti code crawls along.
       | 
       | (I'm a software developer, because the other thing, while
       | obviously way cooler and more hardcore, sounded difficult and...
       | I could teach myself how to program way easier than teach myself
       | how to microprocessor design...)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-07-18 23:02 UTC)