[HN Gopher] Computerized Cooking (1985)
___________________________________________________________________
Computerized Cooking (1985)
Author : Tomte
Score : 32 points
Date : 2022-07-13 09:36 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (diyhpl.us)
(TXT) w3m dump (diyhpl.us)
| don-code wrote:
| While not cooking, per se, Grocy (https://grocy.info/) is able to
| store recipes organized by ingredients, and do interesting things
| like tell you what you can cook without running to the store.
| rockostrich wrote:
| I haven't gotten this far yet with my Notion, but I'm fairly
| certain it can do this as well (and I assume Coda could also do
| it).
| selfhoster11 wrote:
| This seems to be referencing Cocina, an application for
| Macintosh, but I wasn't able to find any references online. Is
| there any more information about this software?
| FunnyBadger wrote:
| You can say the same thing about law and how 50% of it operates -
| just a computer program missing a language to represent it.
| Except it's more complicated than that.
| nyx wrote:
| I've given this problem a lot of thought, particularly the notion
| of cataloging recipes in some machine-parseable format and using
| them to either generate shopping lists or suggest meals based on
| pantry contents.
|
| I think it's a non-trivial problem. Even with a relatively
| limited set of go-to dishes and ingredients, it seems to me like
| the data entry alone would be a herculean effort: making sure
| everything is normalized, operations like chop vs. mince vs. dice
| are standardized, etc. Currently, I'm relying on my fragile meat
| brain and a folder full of text files, skimming a directory
| listing of the folder for inspiration, and using individual
| recipes to build shopping lists.
|
| I totally agree with the premise of the original article, that
| you can reduce recipes to trees and describe them with a formal
| language, but once I take off my computer scientist hat and look
| at this behavior critically, it seems horrifically asinine.
|
| Anyone have a better solution? I know there are a couple of open
| ones out there, and I'm sure some of you nerds have homegrown
| something way more sophisticated. I've also got a hunch that this
| would be a great problem to throw language models at...
| ComputerCat wrote:
| Well, I'll never look at a recipe the same way again...
| kleer001 wrote:
| Lovely, beautiful, what a wonder.
|
| That said I've been leaning towards a jazzier and improvised kind
| of cookery. But now I know where to look if I want to logically
| encode it.
|
| For example, if anyone cares, I've recently added the pasta-
| beans-cheese meta recipe to my repertoire after seeing it played
| out a few times in different guises. I think this where the real
| power lies, generalizing, right?
| rexreed wrote:
| This approach to standardizing recipe formats was done with XML a
| few decades ago as well: http://www.formatdata.com/recipeml/
| chromaton wrote:
| I've always missed having an equipment list in recipes in
| addition to ingredients.
|
| I think the tree idea is good, as it shows what steps can be done
| in parallel. It would also be helpful to show how long each
| subtree is expected to take with working time and waiting time.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-07-14 23:01 UTC)