[HN Gopher] Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]
        
       Author : Jimmc414
       Score  : 368 points
       Date   : 2022-07-12 01:08 UTC (21 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (jimedwardsnrx.files.wordpress.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (jimedwardsnrx.files.wordpress.com)
        
       | s1k3s wrote:
       | This looks very similar to the deliverables I get from my UX
       | designers. And then I get a $400 bill with "Research on choosing
       | the fonts", the fonts being Roboto.
        
       | pelario wrote:
       | Based on a sibling comment[1], it seems that this document is
       | authentic.
       | 
       | I had seen it before (maybe here in HN), but I was convinced that
       | it was a prank.
       | 
       | Can anyone confirm the authenticity of this ?
       | 
       | 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32064781
        
       | mushufasa wrote:
       | despite how silly this may seem to many in the HN audience, I
       | will contend that:
       | 
       | if you were running a multi-billion dollar sugar water company
       | whose main moat is the brand, and spent hundreds of millions on
       | ads each year as one of the key line items in the budget, you too
       | would want this level of sophistication and thought put into a
       | brand refresh. Probably even more.
       | 
       | And you can imagine that this document was debated for weeks or
       | months by the highest level executives as well as whole
       | departments of marketers. They probably had multiple documents
       | like this from multiple agencies. With that level of internal
       | debate, all the granular side-by-side process diagrams are a
       | necessary part of the UX here, to guide along the audience that
       | only sees the pdf and can't talk to the agency designers.
        
         | jorgesborges wrote:
         | I agree that brand and marketing is of paramount importance
         | here. But to say this is sophisticated and well-thought is a
         | stretch. It's funny precisely for its lack of sophistication,
         | for how many millions of dollars and countless hours were spent
         | creating something that lacks real value, that's crafted
         | together with the well-meaning exuberance of a teenager trying
         | to look "deep" or earn brownie points.
        
           | eternalban wrote:
           | I think the sophistication is lacking in the criticisms
           | voiced in the comments.
           | 
           | Regardless of the excessive & laughable b.s. factor of this
           | high level design concept document, the proposal meets its
           | brief: design a rebranding strategy that can be used in 2d,
           | 3d, kiosks, blah, etc. as required, without each needing
           | their own design proposal.
           | 
           | So this designer latched onto geometric features of original
           | pepsi logos, extracted some pattern, adjusted the sizing
           | using golden ratio (thus the art history tour), and then went
           | on to apply it to various use cases.
           | 
           | So maybe the design sucks, or possibly you can think of a
           | more sophisticated approach to providing what is effectively
           | a meta-design for a product suite, but this fairly simple
           | approach that is proposed can in fact satisfy the design
           | brief, in a fairly simple manner. Simple is good, right?
        
             | asxd wrote:
             | > fairly simple approach
             | 
             | I think we can all agree this PDF goes out of its way to
             | convince the reader that it's anything but simple.
             | 
             | - Pepsi DNA
             | 
             | - Pepsi Energy Fields
             | 
             | - The Pepsi Universe
             | 
             | It's all gold, to be honest. I love this document.
        
         | moralestapia wrote:
         | LOL, this is not "sophistication", this is bullshit.
         | 
         | A million(s?) dollar study for a global brand is justified by
         | things like:                 * Research to see if the brand
         | logos/names are misunderstood or offensive for a particular
         | market/culture.            * Research regarding brand
         | recognition before/after the proposed changes.            * A
         | lot of design/thought behind how the brand will look in the
         | many communication channels/products that it owns.
         | 
         | There's nothing even close to that in this document. Actually,
         | the first time I saw it posted I thought it was a joke from
         | some internet troll, but no, it turned out to be the real
         | thing.
        
           | dhsysusbsjsi wrote:
           | > Research to see if the brand logos/names are misunderstood
           | or offensive for a particular market/culture.
           | 
           | Can verify this is highly important. E.g. using the letters
           | 'Af' as a prefix for a product marketed in Africa. Turns out
           | that is a very offensive word.
           | 
           | https://dsae.co.za/entry/af/e00076
        
           | flycaliguy wrote:
           | It's a now legendary document designed to promote Pepsi's
           | brand. They nailed it. That other stuff was covered in
           | another document.
        
             | Teever wrote:
             | So, first of all, was this document actually meant for
             | public consumption like you suggest?
             | 
             | Second of all, do you actually think anyone who reads this
             | document will associate positive feelings with Pepsi?
             | 
             | All it's making me think is "Man, those Coke ads with the
             | polar bears were pretty cool."
        
               | omnimus wrote:
               | It doesnt matter. It's all freestyling. All the wild
               | bullshit in the document is there because some pepsi
               | execs reacted to it positively so they went all in on
               | that. Then the document becomes infamous so they will say
               | it was purposely nuts and use it for their own marketing.
               | 
               | These things are done for the execs not consumers. Same
               | goes for Tropicana.
        
             | dereg wrote:
             | I don't think so. My visceral reaction was: _SMH, this is
             | why I stick with Coke_.
        
               | awestroke wrote:
               | Why are you promoting the Coca Cola Company? I assume
               | you're not paid to do so
        
               | just-tom wrote:
               | Yes, they paid him to promote Coke on HN comment section.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | spoonjim wrote:
         | It's not the level of effort that's weird, it's the terrible
         | output despite the level of effort.
        
           | civilized wrote:
           | And the unsettling question: is this terrible output actually
           | good? Do I just not have what it takes to recognize great
           | sugar water salesmanship?
        
           | twobitshifter wrote:
           | My question is, bullshit aside, can we measure how effective
           | this new logo was for Pepsi? Did it have any effect at all?
        
             | awad wrote:
             | The stock has been on a tear since then, so there's that.
             | Hard to say what all the inputs were, but it didn't hurt,
             | at least, observationally.
        
         | rvba wrote:
         | They were supposed to make on field consumer tests - by showing
         | them the new logotype.
         | 
         | Consumer research existed long before IT started A/B testing
         | everything.
        
         | deltaonenine wrote:
         | Metrics to drive up numbers are the way forward. You need to
         | test theories and prove them with data and experiments. THIS is
         | what is expected in a report; and I see nothing I expect in
         | this report.
         | 
         | Everything you see here is NOT sophistication. It has no
         | science it's just an illusion.
         | 
         | The use of geometry and technical jargon gives the illusion of
         | legitimacy however this stuff is no more legit then the word
         | 'science' in 'scientology'. Which means that exactly like
         | scientology, the content is illegitimate but borrows vocabulary
         | from legitimate fields like "science" to make it seem real.
         | 
         | The use of analogies like DNA help people form connections with
         | irrelevant things and these analogies don't actually
         | communicate any new information. They serve to create a feeling
         | of catharsis when you realize that there is a connection, but
         | the connection is actually worthless. You learn nothing new.
         | 
         | Take the analogy: "Life is like a box of chocolates. You never
         | know what you're gonna get." The quote is worthless. You
         | already know life is random. You already know chocolate boxes
         | are random. A comparison is made and a new connection is formed
         | in your brain. But is there actually any new information here?
         | No. It's a trick to make you think the quote is profound when
         | it is really a bunch of mundane stuff you already know.
         | 
         | You've been bamboozled, along with every exec that fell for
         | this report. Possibly the person who wrote this report tricked
         | himself as well.
        
           | simondotau wrote:
           | Maybe this is a generational thing, but the idea of not
           | knowing what you'll get in a box of chocolate is an entirely
           | foreign notion to me.
        
             | quickthrower2 wrote:
             | Never had favourites, quality street or roses? Maybe these
             | are only in the UK? You know what you could get, but not
             | how many of each type.
        
             | deltaonenine wrote:
             | It's from the US. Sees candy boxes are loaded with random
             | chocolates and you won't know what the chocolates contain
             | until you put one in your mouth.
             | 
             | The quote was made famous by an old US movie starring Tom
             | Hanks. The movie is called Forrest Gump. Fittingly, the
             | character who said that quote is mentally challenged.
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJh59vZ8ccc
        
         | rawoke083600 wrote:
         | >you too would want this level of sophistication and thought
         | put into a brand refresh. Probably even more
         | 
         | Yes "sophistication, data-science, a/b testing, consumer
         | science(the real type)". None of that is in the pdf.
        
         | awad wrote:
         | I always fall back to the Dropbox show and tell post on HN and
         | the iPod is lame slashdot meme as a point to everyone on my
         | team because it reinforces that the building part is just one
         | aspect of a business.
         | 
         | I can laugh at this as agency nonsense with the rest of the
         | crowd, and I think some of it may be warranted. But, it is
         | still ultimately how business works insofar as brand matters,
         | small tweaks to brand can have huge ripple effects; mightily so
         | when the product is the brand, and disregarding anything brand
         | or marketing related is foolhardy.
        
         | bigDinosaur wrote:
         | You could say that about _anything_ that looks silly. At some
         | point you gotta actually just say outright and unequivocally
         | that something _is_ silly. If this logo redesign wasn 't
         | absurd, nothing is.
        
           | hyperhopper wrote:
           | Exactly. The above commenter is saying a lot of effort went
           | into this. I don't think anybody would disagree.
           | 
           | It's just that the effort is making something completely
           | ridiculous
        
         | dymk wrote:
         | Pepsi. Universe.
        
         | pwillia7 wrote:
         | they lost me at pepsi universe
        
           | jachee wrote:
           | So they had you right up to the end!
           | 
           | It's interesting to contrast this with the same company that
           | had the awareness to recognize that basically no one ever
           | types out "Mountain Dew" in its entirety and adopted the _de
           | facto_ name it had acquired in the new millennium: mtn dew.
        
           | gonzo41 wrote:
           | No Pepsi Boson. I left disappointed.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | russelldjimmy wrote:
         | Here's how I believe it works:
         | 
         | 1. A link is posted to HN whose content can easily be made fun
         | of, because it appears bizarre without context.
         | 
         | 2. People on HN jump at the opportunity to make fun of said
         | link so they have something to take a dump on. It's a wonderful
         | ego-trip. They cannot get enough of it. Most of those who do
         | not need the ego-trip to feel better about themselves usually
         | move along without comment.
         | 
         | 3. Comments like yours which are trying to be curious instead
         | of mocking are "raining on their party", i.e., ruining their
         | ego-trip.
         | 
         | 4. Instead of engaging with you on a level of thoughtful
         | discussion, i.e., "let's explore why such a bizarre document
         | exists instead of just mocking it because there is nothing to
         | be gained by doing that", such commenters are more than happy
         | to take a dump on your comment too.
         | 
         | Instead of engaging with your comment in its entirety, they
         | will nit pick on the fact that your comment features the word
         | "sophisticated" and base their entire response on that.
         | Anything to keep the ego-trip and judgement going.
        
           | isametry wrote:
           | In general you might be right. But let's be honest - in this
           | case, despite _any_ amount of context, respect, critical
           | thinking or benefit of the doubt, the content of the link is
           | still just stupid. No way around it.
           | 
           | Now granted, there's a lot of ignorance, also in this thread,
           | as to why companies develop elaborate philosophies behind
           | their brands to an extent which seems far-fetched for the
           | average person. But it's also true that in the marketing
           | field, especially on the higher levels, it's _really_ easy to
           | start bullshitting. And this document is not only a great
           | example of this, it's an example dialed up to 11.
           | 
           | I agree with you that content which is presented "to be
           | laughed at" inherently spawns some degree of non-productive,
           | toxic discussion. But I also believe that we should never
           | _not_ call out bullshit when we see it.
        
             | russelldjimmy wrote:
             | Yes, we are in agreement.
        
               | chris_wot wrote:
               | But are you? He contradicted you on a number of points.
        
           | eyelidlessness wrote:
           | And if this wasn't spot on already: those taking a dump do so
           | with the most recent design critique that most resonated on
           | HN, hence the dozen or so comments I found on my way to this
           | one bemoaning "sans serif" as if it's some newfangled design
           | trend and not the font style they've most commonly
           | encountered on screen for 30 years.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | If I dump ten pounds of Lego on your desk, that's not
         | sophistication.
        
           | seba_dos1 wrote:
           | In a right context, it very well could be.
        
           | paulcole wrote:
           | Depends on how much you charge.
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | Nearly agree -- you would want the level of sophistication that
         | this pretends to have. That it tricked management into thinking
         | it has? (pretty damning if so)
        
           | SicSemperUranus wrote:
           | Any rational individual can see this is chicanery of the
           | highest level. It takes an entire committee to be able to
           | rationalize away the absurdity.
        
         | DrewADesign wrote:
         | I agree that design is far more complicated than most
         | developers realize, but I'd be careful to avoid mistaking
         | detailed explanations for accurate explanations, and heavily
         | discussed topics for usefully discussed topics.
         | 
         | Most of my BFA is in graphic design and it's not my only art
         | and design education, so I'm pretty well-versed in artsy fartsy
         | Bauhausian high-concept visual communication. From the very
         | first days as a Freshmen you start with exercises like finding
         | as many ways as you can to create a palpable sense of tension
         | with only two black squares on a white background by changing
         | the scale and placement, or making two identically colored
         | swatches look like two different colors by placing them on a
         | field of a different color. Professors deliberately don't give
         | you a set guidelines in these exercises because the artistic
         | roots of design don't work that way-- you have to understand
         | the way visual components work together on a visceral level
         | before you can effectively reason about them... even pretty
         | straightforward things like effectively setting paragraphs of
         | text or kerning letters can be pretty nebulous, and that's much
         | more straightforward than at abstract logo design.
         | 
         | Could you imagine the pressure of being the art director
         | wielding those nebulous and subjective processes revamp a
         | worldwide household name in one of the most image-focused
         | markets to ever exist? Or being the executive with zero domain
         | knowledge tasked with evaluating the work of this firm? And
         | while the early parts of the process can be subjective, there
         | are vastly more wrong answers than right ones when it comes
         | time to reveal your final product.
         | 
         | This tension means selling your vision is just as much a part
         | of the design process as creating it, and that's a tough job.
         | Check out this 27 minute long pitch film legendary designer
         | Saul Bass made to sell his rebranding of Ma Bell:
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKu2de0yCJI
         | 
         | That was a huge initiative and it required a lot of
         | explanation-- not just explanation of individual decisions and
         | the reasoning behind them, but explaining how he saw the
         | context of the company, all its individual parts, and how
         | people perceived them before deciding how he was going to
         | affect the changes he was hired to affect. But it's all very,
         | very digestible because he's a designer and that's what
         | designers do. They figure out how to take complex or nebulous
         | ideas and concepts and efficiently and effectively communicate
         | them (usually) visually.
         | 
         | And while some of this breathless report makes good sense, much
         | is far from digestible. Parts of it brought to mind this famous
         | Francis Ford Coppola quote:
         | 
         | "We were in the jungle, there were too many of us, we had
         | access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by
         | little we went insane."
         | 
         | It dabbles in bits of knowledge most folks would consider
         | obscure, presents not-obviously-useful conclusions based on
         | them and then wraps the whole burrito up in a cloak of
         | grandiosity. I mean, when someone places the theoretical
         | framework of a corporate identity revamp on a timeline with
         | some of humanity's most significant achievements, you better
         | strap on your bullshit-proof vest. It seems more designed to
         | make readers feel insecure about not connecting the dots (or
         | maybe zillions of circles) and therefore less likely to
         | confidently push back. I'm really not sure how else the
         | assertion that a circle trisected by two very deliberately
         | placed, but relatively straightforward lines could even
         | subconsciously conceptually intersect with the earth's magnetic
         | field. 90% of that study of perimeter oscillations was psuedo-
         | analytical pointless bullshit.
         | 
         | This sort of thing annoys the hell out of me because it
         | reinforces the view of design as entirely subjective fluff
         | propped up with bullshit when most professional design is
         | actually pretty well reasoned.
        
         | vlark wrote:
         | Gravitational. Pull. Of. Pepsi.
        
         | ErikVandeWater wrote:
         | Something tells me the HN crowd wouldn't be looking to invest
         | in whether the "Pepsi Energy Fields" are "symmetrical" and "in
         | balance."
         | 
         | I agree though that the HN crowd as a CEO would want lots of
         | effort to study how to make the most recognizable and liked
         | brand.
        
       | ianseyer wrote:
       | Worth mentioning that this is the same design company that blew
       | $35MM on a terrible redesign of Tropicana Orange Juice, which
       | they reverted back within a couple days (but kept the mock orange
       | cap)
       | 
       | https://www.thebrandingjournal.com/2015/05/what-to-learn-fro...
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | I don't know how management allowed them to kill the metaphor
         | of the straw tapping an orange. It's a good metaphor for the
         | product's "fresh" marketing message (putting aside the "flavor
         | packets" thing.
         | 
         | The one thing I think the new design had right was the lighter
         | green for the type. That's about it.
        
           | exodust wrote:
           | The straw in orange is also a fun and friendly image, without
           | going overboard. It invites people to "solve" the visual
           | equation. Straw + orange = fresh juice. A clever design for
           | young and old. Amazing they replaced it with a boring glass
           | of OJ.
           | 
           | Replacing the horizontal convex "Tropicana" with the straight
           | vertical and using a more serious font, was another blunder.
        
           | thisOtterBeGood wrote:
           | They probably just got lost in many design reviews. At the
           | end they couln't "see" the designs anymore. Also their test
           | group was probably biased: They probably used the same guys
           | to review all design iterations, so their opinion developed
           | along with each iteration.
        
         | guerrilla wrote:
         | $35 million dollars for a package redesign... and they say
         | governments are inefficient...
        
         | bitexploder wrote:
         | I see high level design docs like this on occasion. I decided I
         | am not qualified to comment, but my opinion is very polar.
         | Either it is all a very expensive pile of poop or brilliance
         | and design beyond my understanding. When looked upon at a
         | distance I cannot discern which opinion is correct.
        
           | hammerbrostime wrote:
           | This Pepsi redesign is just particularly (spectacularly) bad.
           | There are plenty of brand briefs which are intelligent,
           | strategic and grounded in reality.
        
             | rvba wrote:
             | English Premier League had a fantastic rebrand: where they
             | selected a nice color set that stood out (it was "their"
             | color set), new font, new visual style guide including new
             | animations, new logo (that causes some controversy but it
             | prints well). They also made a piece of music that makes
             | you feel that you just watched something
             | great/fantastic/historic - even if the match itself wasnt
             | good.
             | 
             | Most of the time modernizing the logotypes and fonts to
             | make them simpler does not work, but here someone came with
             | a coherent strategy that simply looks good and is distinct
             | enough.
             | 
             | https://medium.com/look-and-logo/a-closer-look-at-the-
             | premie...
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px3NqI7-v50
        
           | duskwuff wrote:
           | It's the first one.
           | 
           | The vast majority of this strategy document is ridiculous
           | drivel, written to sound profound but conveying no meaning.
           | One early tipoff is the nonsensical timeline on page 6 --
           | it's basically just rattling off random bits of art history
           | with no relation to the brand or the proposed strategy.
        
             | autoexec wrote:
             | I'm guessing the guy who made this spent years working for
             | an art degree, getting shackled with decades of debt in the
             | process, only to find that it's nearly impossible to get
             | work as an artist doing anything meaningful so he had to
             | get a shitty 9-5 at a marketing firm and while his dreams
             | of being a true artist have been crushed years ago he just
             | wanted to do _something_ with even just a little of what he
             | learned while studying what he loved.
        
               | barbecue_sauce wrote:
               | I would say it looks more like it was produced by someone
               | who studied architecture/design, and had fun exploring
               | the aesthetics of Pepsi as a brand.
        
           | autoexec wrote:
           | As far as I can tell marketing is a very expensive pile of
           | poop used to dress up some uncomfortable underlying truths
           | about very real and unfortunate vulnerabilities we have as
           | humans. It's also one of the few places where artists can
           | reliably make money.
           | 
           | The result is that a lot of creative and talented people are
           | putting out some beautiful, powerful, and entertaining works
           | which are ultimately used to lie and to psychologically
           | manipulate the masses in order to shape their views and
           | extract money from them.
        
             | guiriduro wrote:
             | I'm wholly in favour of artists getting paid work, but
             | isn't there a vastly inefficient layer of design
             | 'consultancy' that sits in between them, effectively
             | wasting money to turn out bullshit for corporate bullshit
             | (mostly marketing) departments?
             | 
             | How many more artists could be paid and paid more by
             | cutting out the bullshit merchants both inside and outside
             | companies?
        
               | barbecue_sauce wrote:
               | But what would you pay them to do?
        
             | bqmjjx0kac wrote:
             | I always heard that advertising is the dark side of
             | psychology, but you've convinced me that it's also the dark
             | side of art!
        
         | lxe wrote:
         | Wait so this was real?
        
         | dmix wrote:
         | The lid really is great. But yeah that's a drastic change (new
         | logo, new typography, new slogan, new image, new lid). They
         | always have to throw the baby with the bath water and be
         | radically modern with every detail.
         | 
         | Reddit's new design went heavy on modern/JS styling and not the
         | raw simple HN-style text-heavy interface. They should have
         | focused on loading the links->comments, pictures, video as
         | quick as possible. They got the comments page to load async but
         | video is broken and RES plugin does inline image/video loading
         | way better. Everything else is a step back or sideways.
        
           | masswerk wrote:
           | Not so sure about the lid: if this is indeed a true quality
           | product leading the market, why does it need this gimmick?
           | You'd rather expect a basic, functional statement. Together
           | with the nondescript sans-serif type, this gives the appeal
           | of a me-too product that would want such a gimmick in order
           | to raise awareness.
        
           | chris_wot wrote:
           | The mobile app notifies me of a new comment, and I have to
           | exit the app and reopen it to see the comment.
        
           | pjbeam wrote:
           | Tangentially Reddit seems determined to make me stop visiting
           | it. When they finally kill old. I won't anymore. The new
           | reddit mobile web experience is incoherent, I get that
           | they're pushing the app but no thanks.
        
             | spython wrote:
             | I see it is a feature - the mobile web experience is just
             | bad enough to not get sucked in too much.
        
             | webmobdev wrote:
             | Came across a thread yesterday on Reddit on how ads on
             | Reddit can now be no longer downvoted. That's an indication
             | of where they are headed and who they prioritise ...
        
             | nalinidash wrote:
             | Try third party clients like infinity.They are better in
             | these things.
        
         | pcurve wrote:
         | And guess who did the new Tropicana design?
         | 
         | You guessed it. Arnell Group that did the new Pepsi logo.
         | 
         | "The campaign, which carries the theme "Squeeze it's a
         | natural," was created by Arnell in New York, part of the
         | Omnicom Group. Arnell also created the new version of the
         | Tropicana packaging.
         | 
         | "Tropicana is doing exactly what they should be doing," Peter
         | Arnell, chairman and chief creative officer at Arnell, said in
         | a separate telephone interview on Friday.
         | 
         | "I'm incredibly surprised by the reaction," he added, referring
         | to the complaints about his agency's design work, but "I'm glad
         | Tropicana is getting this kind of attention."
         | 
         | Full article about the botched campaign:
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/23/business/media/23adcol.ht...
        
           | barbecue_sauce wrote:
           | Tropicana was also owned by Pepsi at the time.
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | Their new design was just yet another example of how the
         | currently in vogue "minimalism everywhere" design aesthetic
         | sucks. The Tropicana case study is such a great example because
         | the effects were so drastic, but only really because there were
         | easily substituted goods - consumers basically thought the
         | carton was just "generic store brand OJ".
         | 
         | My guess is that other recent brand redesigns to this boring,
         | same, sans-serif minimalist aesthetic (recent HN article,
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32040506) are just as bad,
         | but with "stickier" products (people aren't likely to leave
         | Google or Facebook just because the typography is shittier) the
         | downside is less noticeable.
        
           | noir_lord wrote:
           | Years and years ago we used to have a supermarket here called
           | Kwik-Save (here been the UK) and they had a range called No-
           | Frills.
           | 
           | Their packaging was absolutely genius because it instantly
           | stood out on every shelf.
           | 
           | https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Da0flNiWkAAUda7.jpg
           | 
           | Other than the font it seems like everyone wants to got that
           | way, of course if you move with the crowd you can't stand out
           | from it.
        
           | ad404b8a372f2b9 wrote:
           | On that subject, https://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/
           | tracks the desecration of all these once colorful, beautiful,
           | expressive logos into this new bland style that's in vogue.
        
           | mrcartmeneses wrote:
           | Saying that this guy's designs were terrible therefore all
           | modern design is terrible is like saying all children's TV
           | presenters are pedophiles (apologies I know that's an extreme
           | analogy).
           | 
           | The truth is that the guy behind this design agency is not a
           | good designer at all and his career seems to have been driven
           | by confidence, greed and the incompetence of his clients.
           | It's a sample of one. He's the Jimmy Saville of bad design
        
             | thisOtterBeGood wrote:
             | Thinking the same. They've made some fatal mistakes there.
             | Heck of a lesson for the agency there :D
        
             | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
             | Which is why I linked the related recent HN post about tons
             | of different brands, across tech and fashion, that wiped
             | out any trace of their individuality for bold, sans-serif
             | logos.
             | 
             | I agree, I think this designer is just a particularly
             | shitty designer, but he's a shitty designer that's just
             | copying the broader trend of minimalist design laziness. I
             | think the last section in that linked HN article
             | (https://velvetshark.com/articles/why-do-brands-change-
             | their-...) _perfectly_ points out what went wrong in the
             | Tropicana redesign as well:
             | 
             | > There's nothing bad in wanting your logo to look simpler,
             | better, mobile-ready, or universal enough to appeal to the
             | broadest possible audience.
             | 
             | > But don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
             | 
             | > Shoot for simplicity and legibility, but keep your
             | distinguishing features. Don't throw away what the brand
             | has been working on for decades.
             | 
             | > Otherwise, you may end up in a situation where you could
             | slap any logo on any product and hardly anyone would notice
             | a difference:
        
       | ncmncm wrote:
       | Pepsi, Tropicana and the like, and their parent companies, are a
       | direct cause of the Metabolic Syndrome epidemic in (particularly)
       | the US, other former UK colonies, and UK, causing many times the
       | preventable deaths from COVID, year in and year out.
       | 
       | The "cause of death" noted for these cases never mentions
       | metabolic syndrome (variously, fatty liver disease, cirrhosis,
       | processed-food disease), but rather secondary illnesses it
       | drives, most notably high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes,
       | obesity, and circulatory illness. Most of these are products of
       | high uric acid level, itself a byproduct of fructose processing
       | in the liver. Fructose is processed only in the liver, like other
       | toxins, and most similarly to alcohol.
       | 
       | The standard to diagnose high uric acid has risen sharply in
       | recent decades as levels themselves have risen with sugar intake,
       | so people with a deadly uric acid level do not learn of the core
       | problem. They instead are told of the high blood pressure and
       | diabetes, and get medication for that, masking it but not its
       | harms.
       | 
       | We should not be allowing sale of these products; or _at least_ ,
       | labels should warn of their fructose content. We could start
       | seeing "contains no fructose!" on packaging, instead of "non-
       | fat". (Because fat, even saturated fat, it now turns out, is
       | harmless.)
       | 
       | (Fructose in normal food, particularly fruit, comes with enough
       | fiber to divert most of the fructose to your gut bacteria. Juice
       | and soda strip away this protection.)
        
         | dm319 wrote:
         | Sure metabolic syndrome is a thing, but can you point to me
         | evidence it is caused by these drinks? I agree re: the
         | metabolic pathways, but yet to be convinced that most of these
         | issues are not primarily caused by obesity.
         | 
         | And sure, drinking enough sugar will result in obesity, but so
         | will eating too much carbs or fat.
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | Obesity is a separate morbidity. 30% of obese Americans are
           | not actually ill. But 40% of non-obese Americans are sick
           | with metabolic syndrome. So, more than are obese and sick, by
           | the raw numbers. Obesity is a big problem in the US, but
           | metabolic syndrome is a bigger problem, and suffering both is
           | worse than either alone.
           | 
           | Pakistan has as much metabolic syndrome as other former UK
           | colonies, but remarkably little obesity.
           | 
           | Metabolic syndrome is a product of excess fructose in the
           | bloodstream, itself a product of sugar consumed without
           | enough accompanying fiber. Beverages are a particularly
           | concentrated source, but other stuff packaged as food can be
           | as bad.
        
             | danachow wrote:
             | > But 40% of non-obese Americans are sick with metabolic
             | syndrome.
             | 
             | 40% of the non obese adult population in the US? More BS
             | dude.
             | 
             | It should be easy to point to some relatively reputable
             | public health agency or peer reviewed publication where
             | this is substantiated.
             | 
             | Among non overweight individuals I'm going to peg it more
             | around 5%.
        
         | rootsudo wrote:
         | This is interesting, would you say the same for other cola and
         | juice manufacturers? E.g. Coca Cola, Snapple, Bolthouse, etc?
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | Yes, all.
        
           | adrian_b wrote:
           | During many years, I have been very fat and all attempts of
           | losing weight have failed.
           | 
           | Eventually, I made great changes to what I was eating and I
           | began to weigh everything that I ate, to ensure that I eat no
           | more than planned, and in somewhat less than a year I have
           | lost one third of my previous weight, reaching a normal
           | value.
           | 
           | Previously, I have not been drinking much Pepsi Cola or Coca
           | Cola, but I have been drinking a lot of various fruit juices,
           | all of which contain excessive amounts of sugar.
           | 
           | By far the most effective change in my eating habits, leading
           | to weight loss and better health, has been to stop drinking
           | any other kind of beverage except water and herbal teas
           | without sugar.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | WheatM wrote:
        
         | alexb_ wrote:
         | Good point! We should also ban red meat, since it's shown to
         | have strong links with cancer and is ultimately harmful. Plus
         | we should ban all drugs, for obvious reasons. Anything with
         | high sugar needs to be out of the country, and don't even get
         | me started on these horrible "energy drinks" people nowadays
         | have been drinking.
         | 
         | This is for your own good guys, ban everything that might cause
         | harm to someone because big daddy gov't knows best
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | I.e., dying from liver disease is your God-given Right as An
           | American. Like drunk driving without a seatbelt.
           | 
           | (But you could die in a gun accident first, so why worry?)
        
         | eVeechu7 wrote:
         | There is plenty of diabetes and obesity in Australia and we
         | don't use fructose as a sweetener. I'm not sure fructose is
         | necessary.
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | Table sugar is half fructose. Likewise honey. Agave syrup is
           | much worse, 85%. Mango and pear juice, almost as much.
           | 
           | Grapes, almost uniquely among fruits, have practically no
           | fiber, so are as bad as juice.
           | 
           | The glucose part of sugar is mostly harmless. So we focus on
           | the fructose.
        
         | danachow wrote:
         | > Most of these are products of high uric acid level
         | 
         | That's a very unsubstantiated claim. I'm not debating the
         | association of hyperuricemia with metabolic syndrome or
         | cardiovascular risk factors, but I don't think we have much
         | evidence to establish a causal link between hyperuricemia and
         | all the morbidities listed.
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | Robert Lustig:
           | 
           | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kDJsxw0uMLM
           | 
           | Perlmutter:
           | 
           | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6qZKH_xuYl4
        
             | danachow wrote:
             | This is not an RCT nor does it point to one supporting your
             | uric acid claims.
             | 
             | And Lustig is well known, he's on the border of being a
             | crackpot, unfortunately. Mehmet Oz is a professor emeritus
             | of Columbia, and contributed some amazing shit to the field
             | of cardiology, but now he is undoubtedly a crackpot, so
             | just having some credentials and even a good history is not
             | an automatic pass to get out of presenting high-quality
             | scientific methods.
             | 
             | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4822166/
             | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078442/
             | 
             | And.. this is not the first time this has come up here
             | even: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15760599
        
               | ncmncm wrote:
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | You will have to take up your objections with the
           | endocrinologists. Good luck, though, 'cause endocrinologists
           | are the smartest of all medical doctors. Have to be, to do it
           | at all.
        
             | danachow wrote:
             | This is a non-response - or do you have a specific cite
             | linking uric acid as causative of diabetes or
             | cardiovascular disease? It can be in a colorectal journal
             | for all I care.
             | 
             | > Have to be, to do it at all.
             | 
             | Lol. Yeah bud, I have a ton of friends that are
             | endocrinologists, all mostly great and intelligent folks,
             | but I'm not letting them touch me with a colonoscope - or
             | pretty much any implement. It's not exactly a field for the
             | procedurally inclined.
        
               | ncmncm wrote:
               | So, ask _them_. It is their job to know. You have already
               | said you don 't trust me.
               | 
               | Be sure to report back what they tell you.
        
               | willbw wrote:
               | Ignoring who is wrong or right here - you made the claim,
               | it's not very helpful if you refuse to substantiate it or
               | suggest someone else needs to substantiate it for you.
        
               | ncmncm wrote:
               | Notably, this person has not reported any results.
               | 
               | Most likely they don't actually know any
               | endocrinologists, or were told that in fact uric acid is
               | known to be the connection between fructose metabolism /
               | fatty liver and metabolic syndrome illnesses.
               | 
               | Some people just feel compelled to jump up and defend
               | sugar anytime it is blamed for illness.
        
               | danachow wrote:
               | > this person has not reported any results.
               | 
               | Ironic since you are the one making the claim and have
               | not produced any references. I can't prove they don't
               | exist but you could easily counter if one did.
               | 
               | Furthermore I linked to one peer reviewed review article,
               | again
               | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078442/
               | 
               | that is chock full of balanced references if anyone is so
               | inclined to peruse them and takes a critical examination
               | at the various publications and the arguments can be
               | evaluated solely on merits alone. There is continued
               | research in this area but so far no smoking gun as to
               | causality.
               | 
               | There are no meta-analyses I know of on your specific
               | claim as there is a lack of primary research in human
               | subjects to even substantiate it.
               | 
               | > Most likely they don't actually know any
               | endocrinologists
               | 
               | I'm a practicing academic internist. I know
               | endocrinologists both personally and professionally. This
               | is absolutely irrelevant though as the literature is
               | available for you.
               | 
               | > Some people just feel compelled to jump up and defend
               | sugar
               | 
               | I did nothing of the sort. I treat diabetes and
               | hyperlipidemia on the daily - that would be ridiculous.
               | 
               | Edit: oh and I missed your edit - a reference to
               | Perlmutter? A celebrity neurologist who has widely been
               | debunked for making wildly unsubstantiated claims. You
               | are not arguing in good faith. You have the entirety of
               | PubMed and Google scholar on which to reference peer
               | reviewed literature - some of it is also crap - but you
               | aren't even doing that - you are sticking to the lowest
               | quality unsubstantiated celebrity bilge.
        
         | xdfgh1112 wrote:
         | The UK uses sucrose, not fructose though?
        
           | danachow wrote:
           | Sucrose is hydrolyzed in the gut by the enzyme a-glucosidase
           | into glucose and fructose. Without any other absorptive
           | buffer, it's basically the same.
        
             | supermatt wrote:
             | > it's basically the same
             | 
             | Not really. Fructose is JUST fructose, sucrose is half
             | fructose.
        
               | wahern wrote:
               | "high fructose" corn syrup--what's typically used to
               | replace sucrose--is 55% fructose, not 100% fructose. IOW,
               | only 5% more fructose. (It can even be less than sucrose,
               | as low as 42%, but for sake of argument 55% seems fair.)
        
               | awestroke wrote:
               | ~55%, plus another 50% of the sucrose content once its
               | broken down in the gut, which means it's effectively
               | somewhere around 75% sucrose for the body to break down~
               | 
               | EDIT: nevermind, assumed the rest was sucrose rather than
               | glucose
        
               | wahern wrote:
               | I'm not following. HFCS is 55% fructose and 45% glucose,
               | not 45% sucrose.
        
               | supermatt wrote:
               | Fair point. I incorrectly assumed the parent was
               | comparing fructose to sucrose directly.
        
               | ncmncm wrote:
               | "Basically the same" _as fructose and glucose
               | separately_.
               | 
               | In soda, the ingredients say sugar, but it has already
               | been dissociated to fructose and glucose in the bottle.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | danachow wrote:
               | If we're talking about sugar soft drinks in the US this
               | is invariably HFCS.
        
               | ncmncm wrote:
               | There is no point in quibbling.
               | 
               | "High fructose corn syrup" is the same as table sugar, to
               | your body.
        
               | xdfgh1112 wrote:
               | So why do people make a big deal out of it, does it just
               | taste bad?
        
               | ncmncm wrote:
               | Hipsterism. You cannot trust the taste of anybody who
               | touches either of them.
        
         | dharmatech wrote:
         | Video that covers fructose and uric acid:
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/BzwH-94vMis
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | spaceman_2020 wrote:
         | What about diet sodas? Are they equally risky as well? Does the
         | aspartme trigger similar reactions from the body as sugar?
        
           | ncmncm wrote:
           | No.
           | 
           | Some people say artificial sweeteners have bad effects on
           | your insulin metabolism because your body reacts to the taste
           | as if a slug of sugar is on its way. But it must be
           | complicated by conditioning; seems like after years of
           | drinking it, the association would weaken.
           | 
           | I don't know of any reliable results on that.
        
       | rhabarba wrote:
       | I much prefer the earlier logos with more text and less emojis.
        
       | whywhywhywhy wrote:
       | It's as funny today as when I first saw it.
        
       | joshu wrote:
       | "graphic design is my passion"
        
       | chris_wot wrote:
       | I'd seriously reconsider using Arnell after seeing this.
        
       | kumarvvr wrote:
       | What a load of crap. Is this what design boutiques do day in day
       | out?
       | 
       | Can anyone tell me if there is even an iota of meaning in the
       | design process?
        
         | randombits0 wrote:
         | It's a somewhat clever shell script, I believe.
        
         | deebosong wrote:
         | I've worked in small and big design shops. When done right, the
         | process should make sense to a layperson, like you're
         | respecting their intelligence.
         | 
         | This Pepsi rebrand farce feels more like The Emperor's New
         | Clothes. My guess, and someone with more knowledge can
         | absolutely correct me, is that whatever agency bid for the job,
         | they knew they were basically milking Pepsi for every penny
         | they could, and it was pure greed. And in order to justify the
         | utterly exorbitant estimate, they pulled so much bullshit out
         | of their asses hoping to completely overwhelm the clients and
         | utterly baffle and confuse them and make them feel too stupid
         | to even ask about anything.
         | 
         | Basically, design process should make sense and be
         | understandable to the average empathetic, intelligent business
         | owners.
        
           | JohnBooty wrote:
           | When done right, the process should make sense to a layperson
           | 
           | Yes, absolutely. A company I worked for paid big money for a
           | design firm to do a brand makeover.
           | 
           | The head of the design firm cautioned our CEO: "If we do this
           | right, the result will not be mindblowing to you. In fact,
           | your reaction might be 'duh - that's really obvious.' Because
           | _you_ already know who you are. "
           | 
           | (paraphrased)
           | 
           | I really liked that sentiment. I thought that company did a
           | great job, both on the brand identity itself and on the
           | communication.
        
         | Brendinooo wrote:
         | Having done some identity work, some stuff is done on purpose
         | and some stuff is justified post-hoc to make the pitch better.
         | 
         | "It looks nice" doesn't play all that well, and doesn't give
         | you much protection from a decision maker who (incorrectly)
         | says "I think my idea looks nicer".
         | 
         | This is not representative of all design experiences though,
         | I'm sure.
        
       | dillondoyle wrote:
       | Breathtakingly classic every time one reads it
       | 
       | "Emotive forces shape the gestalt of the brand identity." story
       | of my life.
        
       | yarg wrote:
       | This reminded me of a presentation of progress meeting that I
       | once attended.
       | 
       | I left wondering if I was the only one that noticed they'd said
       | and shown nothing at all.
        
       | bilater wrote:
       | What the hell is this lol
        
       | dima123 wrote:
       | My favorite Pepsi ad of all time: https://youtu.be/qTaOLr9TTkM
        
       | shoo wrote:
       | PepsiCo Inc (PEP, Nasdaq) isn't merely a beverage company - as
       | explained in this strategy document - it is a space company. The
       | Pepsi Universe, with respect to its 8 light year characteristic
       | length, reflects the scale of the total addressable market (TAM)
       | that PepsiCo can expand into.
       | 
       | Noted short-seller and equity valuation skeptic Jim Chanos once
       | described the TAM of space companies as infinite, because space
       | itself is infinite. This pessimistic take anchors our low-end
       | fair value estimate of PEP to $infinity / share. Since PEP
       | currently trades at around $170 / share, we believe there is
       | considerable upside to the long term buy and hold investor.
        
         | swyx wrote:
         | i'd like to have whatever the author of this document is having
        
           | iancmceachern wrote:
           | This is good stuff, you can't make it up.
           | 
           | It looks like lots was going on at the Arnell group at this
           | time. In this article it even quotes Arnell as saying this
           | work for Pepsi in OP as "Bullshit"
           | 
           | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-the-firing-of-weird-
           | design-...
           | 
           | You can't make this stuff up
        
             | rob74 wrote:
             | Quote from the article about the "Breathtaking Design
             | Strategy" document:
             | 
             | > _February 2009: Arnell sold Pepsi a pretentious, mostly
             | made-up brand ideology document linking Pepsi to the Mona
             | Lisa, De[s]cartes and Hinduism, as part of a successful
             | logo redesign. Price: $1 million, reportedly._
        
               | _def wrote:
               | Well if I pay someone 1 million $ to redesign a logo...
               | It better comes with some life changing philosophy
        
               | throwoutway wrote:
               | Well the end of it mentions the "gravitational pull of
               | Pepsi" .it has some life changing physics at least
        
               | bobthechef wrote:
        
               | onion2k wrote:
               | The amount of media coverage they've had since (we're
               | still posting about it 14 years later...) makes that $1m
               | a bit of a bargain.
        
           | dchest wrote:
           | Oranges. Lots of oranges.
           | 
           | https://www.fastcompany.com/1661802/the-secret-to-peter-
           | arne...
        
           | askafriend wrote:
           | Looks like you'll be having a Pepsi.
        
           | Anaminus wrote:
           | I've been calling it Pepsi Logo Kool-Aid.
        
           | IncRnd wrote:
           | Quite possibly that is coke.
        
             | aaronbrethorst wrote:
             | They're required to call it "nose candy" when they work on
             | the PepsiCo account. /s
        
         | bambax wrote:
         | The document broke my BS detector; the needled appears to be
         | stuck in the red.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | tonmoy wrote:
         | It will also take infinite time unfortunately
        
         | spaceman_2020 wrote:
         | Imagine trying to conquer space when you can't even conquer
         | Coca-Cola!
        
           | retcon wrote:
           | Remember that John Sculley has been the only one who could.
           | Kinda. Sculley invented the Pepsi Challenge, (and infamously
           | failed it on camera) signed Michael Jackson to promote and
           | went off to Cupertino and did some interesting things there
           | too. But Coca-Cola Company had Michael Bay and still does. If
           | you're dealing in visual impact imagination Michael Bay's a
           | trump card.
        
         | mherdeg wrote:
         | I imagine Pepsi's corporate culture LOVES this stuff. They must
         | drink it up like, well....
         | 
         | I'm inspired by Jello Biafra's H2K2 keynote where he brought
         | along a vinyl record of corporate training songs:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foFCd5xOrh0
         | 
         | Check it out @ 2:11:28 ; the crowd goes wild for Pepsi:
         | 
         | "Out there It's a Pepsi universe Thriving since time began
         | 
         | On a steady course At a steady pace Bringing pleasure
         | everywhere All through time and space
         | 
         | And up here In the Pepsi enterprise We have one perfect plan:
         | To bring Pepsi refreshment to all constellations
         | 
         | And if anyone can succeed We know we can It's all there on
         | history's pages One refreshment through the ages
         | 
         | [Spoken] Pepsi is the universal refreshment, but has it always
         | been that way, Professor? [Spoken] As far as I can remember.
         | 
         | We're proud that the Pepsi enterprise Never, ever stands still
         | 'Cause the company's working Side by side with our bottlers And
         | if anyone can succeed We know we WILL! "
        
         | jahller wrote:
         | you missed a chance here by using "pepsimistic"
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | muaytimbo wrote:
       | I left PepsiCo in 2020, they are still eating shit like this for
       | breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
        
       | llip wrote:
       | It's pronounced "Bepsi" on the rez.
        
       | Dave3of5 wrote:
       | I mean Pepsi sells sugary, carbonated drinks. Never thought they
       | put this much thought into the brand. I thought it was just was
       | looked cool.
        
       | jaidhyani wrote:
       | The song inspired by this document:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAG7pye0V1g&t=1s
        
         | niscocity35 wrote:
        
         | zebracanevra wrote:
         | See also https://youtu.be/fu3ETgAvQrw which I believe is the
         | official video to go with the song
        
       | Semaphore1 wrote:
       | ENERGETIC > CAFFEINE FREE PEPSI
       | 
       | C'mon man!
        
       | wlesieutre wrote:
       | The "Creation of Identity: Gravitational Pull" page is always
       | good for a laugh                 Typical Light Path > Typical
       | Shopping Aisle            Light Path with Gravitational Pull >
       | Gravitational Pull of Pepsi            Relativity of Space and
       | Time > Pepsi Proposition / Pepsi Aisle
        
       | peanut_worm wrote:
       | When they started to talk about the gravitational pull of pepsi I
       | knew they couldn't be serious
        
       | ad404b8a372f2b9 wrote:
        
       | jbullock35 wrote:
       | I am surprised at how most of the comments here are -- I am
       | guessing -- deeply misunderstanding the document.
       | 
       | The document is almost unbelievably over-the-top. I think that it
       | must be an intentional parody of marketing-speak. If you think
       | that it's not, can you offer any evidence in support of your
       | view?
        
         | devindotcom wrote:
         | It's 100% real and 100% serious. That's why it is so well known
         | in the design world.
         | 
         | I wonder if your comment exemplifies some corollary to Poe's
         | Law - that someone mistaking real for parody or vice versa will
         | confidently assert their view as obviously correct and
         | challenge others (even if they constitute a seemingly informed
         | majority) to justify their own.
        
           | jbullock35 wrote:
           | Perhaps my comment does exemplify Poe's Law. But I can't see
           | that it's more likely to exemplify Poe's Law than your own
           | comment. You've offered as much evidence for your
           | interpretation as I have for mine: none.
        
       | newobj wrote:
       | My god it's full of carbs
        
       | theptip wrote:
       | > BREATHTAKING is a strategy based on the evolution of 5000+
       | years of shared ideas in design philosophy creating an authentic
       | Constitution of Design. This chart documents the origin and
       | evolution of intellectual property.
       | 
       | Also known as "the circle".
       | 
       | Credit where credit is due, it takes confidence to make this kind
       | of pitch with a straight face.
        
       | polio wrote:
       | Somebody had a lot of fun making this.
        
       | ydnaclementine wrote:
       | Watching mad men for the first time right now, and I feel it.
       | Pepsi universe is going to be the name of my next vaporwave album
        
         | w-ll wrote:
         | Saint Pepsi fan?
        
         | wisemang wrote:
         | A follow-up to the Negativland classic Dispepsi [0]
         | 
         | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispepsi
        
           | Fargoan wrote:
           | Woah. This is exactly the type of sampling I've been looking
           | for. This is amazing. Thank you.
        
         | philshem wrote:
         | This scene lives rent-free in my brain (Kodak pitch, no
         | spoilers): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suRDUFpsHus
        
       | kache_ wrote:
       | looks like a whole lot of bullshit
        
       | stall84 wrote:
       | People get paid a LOT of money to produce a document like what
       | you (might have) had the great joy-in-humor to just read.
        
       | kizer wrote:
       | I was reading and laughing, wondering if HN was taking this
       | seriously. It's a decent logo IMO (though I think it's unpopular)
       | but obviously the paper is filled to the brim with complete
       | bullshit, LOL. The Pepsi galaxy at the end is what really got me.
       | 
       | Just use common sense and first principles and you can make a
       | logo. Make sure it doesn't look like a you-know-what and you're
       | golden.
        
       | suction wrote:
       | I can't help but feel amused and a bit annoyed when designers
       | pretend their work is like a science. Yes color theory and light
       | refraction are science-y topics, but let's face after all if the
       | people who pay you say they want it in red and bolder fonts, you
       | do it.
        
       | rodarmor wrote:
       | This is the canonical video on the subject:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmVMh-nT200
        
       | krm01 wrote:
       | Having been involved in product design at startups & (very) large
       | companies, I can unfortunately say this is what happens at most
       | of the big Co's. Which is why we try to avoid working with large
       | companies and rather partner up with Startups instead.
       | 
       | Story time...
       | 
       | This one time, I was reviewing a design with a client. We were
       | going through this new page design in Figma. In the Zoom meeting,
       | there were people from Marketing (SEO, Social, etc.), Legal,
       | Product managers, developers, and a bunch more of which I don't
       | even know why they joined the meeting.
       | 
       | What happens during those types of meetings is that someone,
       | usually the person highest in rank, puts the following words on
       | the table: "so what do you guys think, thoughts?".
       | 
       | That's where things start to get messy...
       | 
       | In a large corp, when the boss puts that question on the table,
       | people start to feel itchy. They want to say something clever and
       | impress the rest of the team. Automatically their starting point
       | is: this design isn't good and needs my clever input, so I can
       | impress the boss and put my stamp on the project.
       | 
       | The design that was basically approved by the same stakeholders
       | over email, suddenly was getting 'feedback' from left and right.
       | 
       | 'Make the font bigger'
       | 
       | 'Make the font smaller'
       | 
       | 'I don't like the shadows here'
       | 
       | 'I really like how Competitor X, does it, can we do something
       | exactly like that'.
       | 
       | I tried pushing back, but it was too late. I was getting swamped
       | in seemingly clever input from people that were just trying to
       | impress the next person.
       | 
       | We went back and designed 2 pages, one we thought was right, and
       | the other one based on all the feedback that people were sharing.
       | 
       | Their CEO went with option 1 luckily, but it wasted a ton of time
       | for no good reason.
       | 
       | Just looking at the PDF, I can imagine the conversations that
       | lead to that 'design strategy'. Large design agencies know how to
       | play this game, don't really care about great design and usually
       | employ great story tellers to sell the idea to clients for big
       | bucks.
        
         | quesera wrote:
         | I've been in these meetings too, and they're exhausting. At
         | this very moment, I'm trying hard _not_ to be a part of this
         | meeting, even though I have strong opinions that I don 't think
         | will be represented by the current lot of attendees.
         | 
         | That said, there's often a component of competitive commentary,
         | but also consider Parkinson's Law of Triviality, a/k/a
         | Bikeshedding:
         | 
         | https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/bikeshedding
        
       | Brajeshwar wrote:
       | Ah! We used to refer to this as "Pepsi's $1M Logo Redesign."
        
       | JakeWesorick wrote:
       | This is the most galaxy brain thing I have ever read.
        
       | foxbee wrote:
       | For me, 1971 Pepsi Geometries: Perimeter Oscillations was peak
       | Pepsi brand.
        
       | engineer_22 wrote:
       | It's like Pepsi had a psychotic break. Don't worry, friend, it
       | happens sometimes.
        
       | askvictor wrote:
       | Former Pepsi CEO Thomas Rattigan ran Commodore Computer for a
       | bit; former Pepsi President John Sculley ran Apple Computer. So
       | there's a certain link to computing, for some unknown reason
        
       | Reason077 wrote:
       | Thing is, the current (2009) Pepsi logo just isn't very good.
       | 
       | To me, it looks like the fat belly you're going to end up with if
       | you drink too much Pepsi.
        
       | c7DJTLrn wrote:
       | Obviously there's a lot of nonsense here but the logo is a good
       | one. In a way it's even better than Coca Cola's. I can recognise
       | the logo of both brands instantaneously but Pepsi's is simpler
       | and has no lettering. It's also aesthetically pleasing.
        
       | dirtyid wrote:
       | I couldn't decide if this was guerilla marketing at the time and
       | TBH still can't. Has there been other synapse breaking redesign
       | campaigns since?
        
       | totetsu wrote:
       | pepsi. I thought at the time that this 'leaked document' was a
       | brilliant piece of gorilla marketing. It was making an internet
       | meme before they were ubiquitous, and we're still sharing it and
       | laughing about it today. pepsi. contributing to brand omni
       | presence pepsi.
        
         | notsapiensatall wrote:
         | A subversive element is called a guerilla.
         | 
         | It's a loan word from Spanish meaning "little war".
        
         | totetsu wrote:
         | I wonder how much Richard Stallman gets paid to carry a bottle
         | of diet coke everywhere he goes..
        
       | lai-yin wrote:
       | Don Draper would have vanished for a year-long bender if he read
       | this
        
       | jimbosis wrote:
       | The current Pepsi logo has always reminded me of the SeaMonkey
       | logo:
       | 
       | https://www.seamonkey-project.org/
        
       | alberth wrote:
       | What came first: logo or journey?
       | 
       | I wonder what was created first - the agency creating the new
       | logo (and then backing into the justification for it), or did the
       | justification for it _actually_ come first  & that lead the
       | agency down the path to how the logo was ultimately created.
        
         | emehex wrote:
         | Seems all very post-hoc
        
       | dusted wrote:
       | The graphics and correlations look impressive and somewhat
       | convincing..
       | 
       | I'll expose my ignorance here though and say that to this
       | unenlightened, it looks like conjured up bullshit ..
        
       | grayrest wrote:
       | I've been laughing about this for years. I showed it to my
       | graphic designer in 2014. She was delighted and did a small
       | t-shirt run so I have the face on page 23 center row far right
       | printed on a shirt.
        
         | jat850 wrote:
         | I would have been deeply disappointed if that wasn't the face
         | you picked for the shirt. It's a complete capture of the
         | entirety of the document.
        
       | zhte415 wrote:
       | When a marketing company does it for a soft drinks company does
       | it, it gets ridiculed.
       | 
       | When an engineer does it for the design of rollercoasters or
       | boats, it gets praised.
       | 
       | https://blogs.lt.vt.edu/2ndyearidlab/author/hohsuan/page/2/
       | 
       | I see little difference of concepts used for the 'fair curve' and
       | those of designing a bottle.
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | New band name: Pepsi gravitational field
        
       | stinger wrote:
       | they came up with the design first and then the justification :P
        
       | sakarisson wrote:
       | This reminds me a lot of Time Cube
       | 
       | https://timecube.2enp.com/
        
       | stinger wrote:
        
       | edriscoll wrote:
       | prolly paid millions of dollars for this and there's a typo on
       | pg.18 smh
        
       | Yahivin wrote:
       | > The Pepsi Ratio is aesthetic geometry.
        
       | bumper_crop wrote:
       | When this came out, someone in my dorm made a mock of it on our
       | whiteboard. With a few extra lines, it looks like a fat guy
       | bending over. People always look for a human shape in what they
       | see.
        
       | foobarbecue wrote:
       | Ok I'm getting tired of seeing this on HN now
        
       | lofatdairy wrote:
       | I don't think the title prepared me for this. I saw the first
       | page and thought "oh, that's a terrible graphic, why are you
       | moving away from the future". the mona lisa and taijitsu symbol
       | seemed a bit over blown but still sorta grounded. I literally
       | burst out laughing when I saw the contour lines and energy
       | fields. Definitely was not prepared for "Pepsi Universe", either.
       | I assume that by that point in the presentation the energy in the
       | board room must be fever pitch for no one to point out how stupid
       | that looks.
       | 
       | Edit: Upon further reading about the guy who's behind this, Peter
       | Arnell, it turns out he's possibly the harvey weinstein of the
       | marketing business[^1]. It's a huge shame that neither this
       | pseudointellectual bullshit, nor his string of workplace abuses,
       | ruined his career. A consolation is that in 2011 his company got
       | bought out and he got sacked.
       | 
       | [^1]: The Newsweek article is a good read here:
       | https://www.newsweek.com/crazy-genius-brand-guru-peter-arnel....
       | There's also a Gawker piece that gives a pretty clear idea of how
       | big of a piece of shit this guy is if you can stand the fact that
       | it's Gawker: https://www.gawker.com/244608/new-yorks-worst-
       | bosses-peter-a...
        
         | iancmceachern wrote:
         | And he called this work for Pepsi "BS"
         | 
         | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-the-firing-of-weird-design-...
        
           | Gordonjcp wrote:
           | > In pre-publicity for Shift, Arnell reveals that his habit
           | of eating up to 50 oranges a day has left his hands bright
           | orange in color.
           | 
           | Bullshit. You'd be in a permanent sugar rush until your
           | pancreas went on fire.
        
             | oboes wrote:
             | I don't know about Arnell's case, but it's actually
             | possible to turn orange by eating orange things. Although I
             | think it's more common with carrots and young children.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carotenosis
        
               | doctor_eval wrote:
               | I've eaten heaps of young children and I haven't turned
               | orange. /JK
        
               | robocat wrote:
               | Not even that difficult.
               | 
               | My ex had a few excessive habits when she was 21, but one
               | was eating lots of carrots (like a bag a day?) and her
               | palms turned a distinct orange.
        
               | astrange wrote:
               | That's how flamingos turn pink.
               | 
               | Humans occasionally turn permanently blue by being
               | pranked into eating colloidal silver.
        
               | soco wrote:
               | No problem they'll just drink bleach to correct it.
        
         | lliamander wrote:
         | > if you can stand the fact that it's Gawker
         | 
         | That's a tall order. How about I just take your word for it?
         | 
         | And how is that site still I existence?
        
           | dls2016 wrote:
           | Gawker was bought during bankruptcy. I don't think there was
           | any new content for many years.
           | 
           | Since Weinstein was mentioned, I have to admit I read Gawker
           | and therefore was not surprised when hearing the allegations
           | against him in the broader media because Gawker had been
           | writing about him for years. They made some big, obviously
           | embarrassing decisions (especially Denton's stance on outing
           | people), but imo got it right much more often than they got
           | things wrong.
        
           | ycombinete wrote:
           | Gawker being terrible is a given, but they actually produced
           | some good longform stuff for a while; so it's probably a good
           | read.
        
         | NavinF wrote:
         | >Once he freaked out in a meeting because a CD did not work in
         | the CD player, so he took the CD out and smashed it in to
         | pieces on the conference room table. The IT guy , who was
         | standing behind him, ended up going to the hospital because the
         | shards from the CD flew into his eyes
         | 
         | Did the author of this article ever try breaking a CD? They
         | don't shatter like that and the shards certainly aren't gonna
         | fly far enough to hit the guy behind you. I guess this is what
         | happens when you report exclusively on gossip.
        
           | _carbyau_ wrote:
           | I sense ambiguity in the sentence: "a CD did not work in the
           | CD player, so he took the CD out and smashed it in to pieces"
           | 
           | Did he smash the CD or the CD player? What was "it"?
        
           | hamburglar wrote:
           | Having once found myself in a room with a hard tile floor,
           | sound-dampening paneling, and a very large stack of old CD-
           | ROMs that were to be thrown away, I can assure you that if
           | you work on your technique over a few dozen iterations, you
           | can reliably get them to shatter very nicely into little
           | bitty shards.
        
           | philliphaydon wrote:
           | I used to break cds into a plastic bag because of all the
           | little pieces that go flying around and difficult to clean
           | up.
        
           | scrollaway wrote:
           | It sounds like you, and the people replying to you, haven't
           | broken enough different CDs in different ways to be aware
           | that there are many different ways they can shatter. Some are
           | more rigid than others and will shatter hard and you can
           | absolutely lose an eye.
        
           | dspillett wrote:
           | _> try breaking a CD? They don 't shatter like that and the
           | shards certainly aren't gonna fly far_
           | 
           | We once tried to bend a CD. It took a fair amount of effort
           | but the opposite outer edges _almost_ touched. Lots of small
           | cracks appeared and there was ominous creaking... When pushed
           | a little further, I think the edges did touch first, but for
           | a fraction of a second before !CRACK!, the disk _did_ shatter
           | - there were two large parts (the outer quarters by width,
           | approximately) remaining, a few other chunks, and the rest
           | was a cloud of small parts liberally sprayed around the room.
           | We were finding them for months afterwards, and some were
           | sharply pointed. Even without a sharp point such a fragment
           | would cause significant irritation if in contact with the eye
           | just like any large particulate, and I certainly wouldn 't
           | want bits hitting the eye at the speed they must have been
           | moving to spread as far as they did.
           | 
           | While the smashing-CD-on-the-table is very obviously
           | apocryphal, perhaps holding one side on the edge of the desk
           | and impacting the other with significant momentum (with a
           | hammer?), or perhaps wedging it in place & kicking, could
           | result in a snap what would also spray matter like this?
           | 
           | Also, if that sentence is meaning he smashed the CD _player_
           | on the desk rather than the disk then I can certainly imagine
           | small parts flying around, if only bits from the plastic
           | casing.
        
           | femto wrote:
           | The whole CD doesn't shatter, but the edges of the break do.
           | To see this effect on steroids, put a CD through a shredder:
           | a common security procedure. You're playing Russian Roulette
           | with your eyeballs if you don't wear eye protection when
           | doing this.
        
             | Gordonjcp wrote:
             | What on earth are you doing that's causing this? I've never
             | seen a shredded do anything other than chop a CD into
             | little strips.
        
       | Linda703 wrote:
        
       | zaps wrote:
       | So you want to go to graphic design school
        
       | willmadden wrote:
       | That's a lot of work to get people to drink carbonated sugar
       | water.
        
       | danielvaughn wrote:
       | I've never seen this before and I feel like I need to know the
       | story. Is this satire or is it real? And if it's real, was it
       | leaked or something? No way Pepsi would willingly share this with
       | the public lol.
        
         | riffraff wrote:
         | AFAIU this is real, but I contend that it's neither satire or
         | real: it is in fact a marketing operation, and a very
         | successful one.
         | 
         | When this was "leaked" it was discussed for weeks, and you can
         | see it is still discussed more than ten years after the fact.
         | 
         | It's probably been more effective than most of the ad campaigns
         | I can remember.
        
       | henning wrote:
       | It looks like the Time Cube guy got a job in advertising.
        
         | endgame wrote:
         | "The Pepsi ratio is aesthetic geometry" could indeed be lifted
         | from the writings of Earth's Wisest Human.
        
       | stazz1 wrote:
       | it is a work of art
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | nomilk wrote:
       | Surprising just how much the logo uses the Golden Ratio in the
       | placement of the geometries [page 19], and generation of the
       | circle sizes [page 20].
       | 
       | Thought experiment: can a logo that heavily uses the Golden Ratio
       | actually look bad? It could be the ultimate 'design for dummies'
       | hack.
        
       | kens wrote:
       | The diagram of the Pepsi bottles (p7) reminds me of the classic
       | computer art from 1968: "Running Cola is Africa", which
       | interpolated between a runner, a cola bottle, and Africa. It was
       | implemented in FORTRAN running on an IBM 7090 mainframe, and
       | printed on a plotter. Maybe a bit tangential, but I've always
       | thought it was an interesting piece of art. Kind of trivial now,
       | but innovative 55 years ago for its use of interpolation to warp
       | images.
       | 
       | https://zkm.de/en/artwork/running-cola-is-africa
        
       | sakarisson wrote:
       | They should re-release this PDF as a series of NFTs
        
       | stazz1 wrote:
       | really this is a thorough study in upper-management-ese
        
       | wodenokoto wrote:
       | While we all love to hate on the design document, I actually
       | think the final logo is really good.
        
       | nprateem wrote:
       | The thing I never understood was why Pepsi got into running that
       | airline out of Korea
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | Branding hardly matters any more. If I order Diet Pepsi from
       | Safeway, sometimes they substitute Diet Coke. Which is fine with
       | me.
        
       | iammjm wrote:
       | Page 6/27: ah yes, the progress is truly inevitable - 3000 years
       | of human ingenuity, starting off with numeric harmony through
       | Euclidian Geometry, the golden proportion, the vitruvian man,
       | Mobius and le Corbusier, all just a mere foreplay for the Big
       | Thing to come around: behold, the tricolor perfecta of black
       | sugared water in a can. what a time to be alive!
        
       | JohnJamesRambo wrote:
       | I see bullshit jobs existed in 2008 also.
       | 
       | "a form of paid employment that is so completely pointless,
       | unnecessary, or pernicious that even the employee cannot justify
       | its existence even though, as part of the conditions of
       | employment, the employee feels obliged to pretend that this is
       | not the case."
        
         | niscocity35 wrote:
         | This is the most elaborate form of BS i have seen to date.
         | 
         | My only take away from this post is that I like the 1962
         | skeuomorphic Pepsi logo with the bottlecap.
        
           | silisili wrote:
           | Agreed. Really dig the 1929 and 1962 logos. It seems to just
           | keep going downhill from there.
        
       | vlark wrote:
       | Wow. They sure do a lot of work trying to justify a shitty logo.
       | And it worked. Let that be a lesson for us all.
        
       | dqpb wrote:
       | This reminds me of the pseudo science of new age "sacred
       | geometry"
        
       | Fargoan wrote:
       | I'm not even joking, was this created by someone with
       | schizophrenia or maybe during a manic episode? It reminds me of
       | the connections my ex would make while she was manic. And those
       | absurd connections made their way into her art.
        
       | verytrivial wrote:
       | Clearly, the war on drugs has been a failure.
        
       | nicosaul wrote:
       | Most expensive circle ever
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | It kind of makes me sad thinking about all the time and talent
       | and money that went into this with the main purpose of getting
       | people to buy and drink more (unhealthy) colored, carbonated,
       | sugar water.
        
         | mushufasa wrote:
         | Well, that's what happens when you make what people want... I
         | guess.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | Well, people didn't go for the uncolored version, even with the
         | movie tie-in. So unhealthy colored it is. ;p
        
           | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
           | I actually like Crystal Pepsi when it came out and was sad
           | when it was no longer available.
        
         | civilized wrote:
         | Breathtaking because of the breathing issues caused by obesity-
         | induced apnea?
        
           | bigdict wrote:
           | It kills you, literally takes the breath away.
        
       | ianseyer wrote:
       | A funny parody song of this presentation by the legendary Neil
       | Cicierega (potter puppet pals, ultimate battle of ultimate
       | destiny, brodyquest, mouth sounds, etc...)
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/fu3ETgAvQrw
        
         | agloeregrets wrote:
         | I was shocked to see this down so low. Absolute bop that
         | perfectly outlines this nutcase thinking.
        
       | jihadjihad wrote:
       | Always a classic, and it never fails to make me laugh when I
       | scroll through the smiley face section. Impossible to unsee:
       | https://www.cannotunsee.net/post/730928004/pepsi/amp
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | Kind of reminds me of Strong Sad.
        
         | jbmny wrote:
         | Anybody else see a resemblance to the awful Microsoft Teams
         | emojis?
        
         | ad404b8a372f2b9 wrote:
        
         | drivers99 wrote:
         | I was also thinking of the same thing, which goes to show how
         | great a work of culture jamming[1] it is.
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_jamming "Tactics
         | include editing company logos to critique the respective
         | companies, products or concepts they represent[...]"
        
           | guerrilla wrote:
           | AdBusters is great for this[1]
           | 
           | 1. https://www.adbusters.org/
        
         | hoistbypetard wrote:
         | Yes.
         | 
         | https://www.utne.com/arts/new-pepsi-logo-is-a-joke/
        
       | nbzso wrote:
       | A long time ago, I ran a creative agency. One day, I realized how
       | my and my colleagues' talents were being used to sell utter
       | bullshit. Closed the business and switched to web-design. In
       | early 2005, I convinced a big local banking tech company to focus
       | on UX and UCD. Started a UX design business. In late 2015,
       | overwhelmed by the infinite need for Dark Patterns by my clients,
       | I killed "the business" again and switched purely to UI and
       | frontend development.
       | 
       | So I guess this is the "progress" we can offer to humanity,
       | pretty pictures and shapes with psychological tricks for
       | corporate speculation and self-validation.
        
         | barbecue_sauce wrote:
         | There's very little in this specific document that has anything
         | to do with manipulation besides maybe the manipulation of
         | marketing executives.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-07-12 23:03 UTC)