[HN Gopher] Show HN: Colorvote.io - ranking all sRGB web colors ...
___________________________________________________________________
Show HN: Colorvote.io - ranking all sRGB web colors by popularity
Author : gcuth
Score : 225 points
Date : 2022-07-11 09:05 UTC (13 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.colorvote.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.colorvote.io)
| miqueturner wrote:
| This ranking is not useful. Color is appreciated or not depending
| on context. This ranking has no context.
| jbmny wrote:
| Fun idea, but I agree. I was greeted with a shade of cyan and a
| shade of lavender. Apples and oranges.
| Majestic121 wrote:
| I was going to comment that it's a joke project, so there is no
| need for usefulness, but then I realized your comment might be
| a joke comment and I'm lost in confusion now
| ralusek wrote:
| 2 colors appear on both best and worst. Each lists a maximum of 5
| colors. That should be enough to stop the experiment right there,
| unless your goal is to find the most controversial colors.
|
| The takeaway seems to be that color preferences are highly
| subjective to the point that you might just be getting noise.
|
| Also how is it that people are even seeing the same colors for
| this to have happened? Even with birthday problem seems unlikely
| that two of the exact same hex colors would end up on the two
| very short lists. Are you sure you're shuffling these?
| NazakiAid wrote:
| Whoops! Left Dark Reader on which has caused my votes to be based
| on the wrong colours
| bil7 wrote:
| awesome. Maybe make the ranks and wtf buttons more visible.
| xiconfjs wrote:
| Thanks, I clicked about 50 to 100 times and waiting for a final
| result...
| TrickyRick wrote:
| Currently #d8e3a8 is the 4th best but also the second worst.
| Likewise #cce0c9 is the 5th best and 3rd worst. Has there been
| fewer than 10 colors voted on or what gives?
| manquer wrote:
| It is more likely that votes are very thinly spread out that
| any color with some votes would surface
| qainsights wrote:
| qq: How are the initial color codes getting generated? Is it from
| app.js? Please clarify. Thanks!
| beeskneecaps wrote:
| Excited to see some results from this. I was disappointed that
| there was no real payoff as an end user who voted. Any way to see
| the current overall status of like the top 100?
| aetherspawn wrote:
| People would probably vote more if they had to vote at least 5
| times to see the ranks, i.e. say "3 more votes to see ranks" in
| top center, and then pop up the ranks automatically.
|
| I don't think anyone would be mad.
| iso1631 wrote:
| I voted 15 times and no results
| tgv wrote:
| Look for "RANKS" on the bottom of the page...
| OJFord wrote:
| And then click it (even though it's the one area of the
| page that _doesn 't_ have a cursor:pointer (took me some
| time too, even after coming back here to check comments)).
| kortex wrote:
| Here I am clicking color after color like a dunce, wondering
| when I get to see the ranking. After 20-30 or so clicks I
| finally notice the ultra-tiny-low-contrast "Ranks" text.
|
| In my defense I'm outside with a ton of glare...
| ryantgtg wrote:
| I didn't even know I was voting on anything during my first
| three clicks. "Choose a color" doesn't equate to "vote on a
| color" in my mind. I thought I was "choosing a color" to see
| its rank (and I didn't get why it was showing me two on the
| page). I must be the lowest common denominator in this case.
| allendoerfer wrote:
| So people with the worst vision have the biggest say in what
| is the best color.
| viggity wrote:
| I wrote this blog post many many moons ago, but it'll give you
| the optimal color (black or white) for any given
| color/background. Should be quick and easy conversion from c# to
| javascript.
|
| http://blog.nitriq.com/BlackvsWhiteText.aspx
| heliophobicdude wrote:
| #988edc Appears as fifth best and as third worst
|
| https://imgur.com/a/jZRQyt3
| yreg wrote:
| Reminds me a bit of Colourlovers[0]. That website is
| unfortunately rather bloated though.
|
| Obviously, the best color is #BADA55
|
| [0] - https://www.colourlovers.com/colors/most-loved/all-
| time/meta
| bhouston wrote:
| I think that if there is voting, one should sort of do some type
| of spreading algorithm where the color you vote on, is sort of a
| much weaker vote for the surrounding colors.
|
| There is just too many colours, especially in this color space,
| and it is sort of hard for humans to really differentiate them.
| Thus spread out the vote based on average human visual perception
| differentiability capabilities.
|
| Also this color space (R x B x G box color space) spends too many
| bits on low intensity and high intensity colors. When a color is
| near white or black, we can not easily tell the hues apart.
|
| A much better color space to vote on would be something akin to
| the Pantone color list or paint swatches. Way less colors but
| still roughly covering the whole color space.
| elil17 wrote:
| They're already about 1/500th of the way through the color
| space.
| spookthesunset wrote:
| > Also this color space (R x B x G box color space) spends too
| many bits on low intensity and high intensity colors.
|
| Isn't that what the gamma is for?
| bhouston wrote:
| Yes! sRGB includes a gamma transform already. You can go much
| further though.
| bestouff wrote:
| Also this depends on the color calibration of your computer and
| monitor chain, so merging adjacent colors would effectively be
| a good idea.
| johnmaguire wrote:
| I think there is probably a bias (to your brain) based on the
| last two colors shown as well.
|
| Similar to those "these boxes/squares are the same color"
| illusions.
| bhouston wrote:
| I believe that illusion is based on our visual processor's
| reliance on local contrast in order to adjust the perceived
| true color to the inferred lighting conditions. So local
| adjacency information here is what is being used, rather
| than just temporal recently.
| brudgers wrote:
| Picking a color from a pallet of similar colors is explicitly
| rejecting the nearby colors on the swatch.
|
| It is exactly the opposite of a weak vote for nearby colors.
|
| Of course, "nearby colors" depends on which axis (or axes) of
| the color space is/are changing, the rates of change, and what
| is the criterion for ordering the aspects of color.
|
| Historically, voting on colors is a strong tradition in color
| science.
|
| Because color is a property of human perception not a property
| of the external world...turn out the lights and the apple isn't
| red any more.
| tshaddox wrote:
| > Picking a color from a pallet of similar colors is
| explicitly rejecting the nearby colors on the swatch.
|
| > It is exactly the opposite of a weak vote for nearby
| colors.
|
| Surely that is demonstrably false in cases where you could
| experimentally prove that two adjacent colors are below the
| voter's threshold of color discrimination.
| brudgers wrote:
| To riff on Hume, all colors are indistinguishable in total
| darkness.
|
| Or to be Wittgensteinian, that's not how "of different
| colors" is used in ordinary language.
|
| In terms of additive color science, different combinations
| of RGB (or XYZ) light can produce the same color
| perception.
|
| In part because the human visual system (green cones) has a
| negative response to a particular frequency band and
| additive light can't have negative green values.
|
| At the edge of current color science is accounting for
| tetra-chromatic perception...not to be confused with tetra-
| chromatic response which occurs in about 1% of humans.
|
| Which is all to say that there's a lot of baggage to a
| logical argument based on voting.
| tshaddox wrote:
| I'm not sure how any of that contradicts what I said,
| which is simply that when someone selects one option from
| among multiple options that they themselves cannot
| distinguish from one another, that does not constitute
| explicit rejection of the options which were not
| selected.
| enahs-sf wrote:
| This was oddly satisfying and I voted on a bunch of colors.
| Definitely a bias towards my personal preferences and also what I
| think would be useable for websites but fun idea! Will be great
| to see the resulting data.
| mensetmanusman wrote:
| There are colors our eyes can see that no monitor can output.
| bulbosaur123 wrote:
| They should create a little "status map" which shows the entire
| palette of all available sRGB colors and fills out those who have
| been voted on.
|
| That would at least make it interesting to keep voting and seeing
| the map fill out.
| google234123 wrote:
| I thought this would be a ranking using crawled data on the
| web... kind of disappointed.
| 867-5309 wrote:
| note to self
| akerr wrote:
| 1. White
|
| 2. Black
|
| 3. Colours (mostly blue)
|
| Still disappointed?
| emsixteen wrote:
| Yep.
| mcv wrote:
| 1. White
|
| 2. Light grey
|
| 3. Some other light grey
|
| ...
|
| 235. dark grey
|
| 236. slightly bluish dark grey
|
| 237. slightly yellowish dark grey
|
| ...
| GekkePrutser wrote:
| Of course, but you could ignore all the obvious ones.
|
| Keeping track of this would also show interesting trends
| over time. Do web designers favour 'hard' colours or
| pastels? Do they favour blue or less melatonin-generating
| colours. Stuff like that.
| gitgud wrote:
| Nice idea, but the _name_ doesn 't quite fit the _game_... I
| would expect to be able to vote for my favourite color, this is
| more like a "color election"
| akerr wrote:
| ...and what would you do in a colour election?
| [deleted]
| scheesman wrote:
| Pick the option that least sucks amongst options selected by
| someone other than myself.
| mcv wrote:
| Vote for the lesser ugly.
| sweezyjeezy wrote:
| That won't give you a ranking in practice - you'd get 90% of
| colours receiving 0 votes so there's no way to distinguish
| them. I think the output of this game would be more interesting
| to analyse.
| andsoitis wrote:
| takes too long to vote.
| layer8 wrote:
| Two comments:
|
| - I don't think the ordering relation is acyclical if no specific
| usage scenario is given for the color.
|
| - After grading a dozen of color pairs or so and then looking at
| the rankings, I noticed that I had Smart Invert Colors turned on
| and had thus voted on the inverted colors. (I noticed because it
| seemed unlikely to me that most of the highest-ranking colors
| would be shades of brown. ;))
| anonymous_sorry wrote:
| Huh, stumbled upon a strange visual effect. I got #0cc3bf (sorta
| cyan) above #acc2e0. When looking at the cyan, the other colour
| appeared lighter shade of blue/cyan in my peripheral vision. When
| I then looked straight at the lower colour it turned lilac.
| Almost pink to begin with. The effect was quite striking
| initially, to the extent that I suspected the page was varying
| the colour.
|
| I'm on mobile. The phone was perhaps a little over a foot from my
| face. It's a sunny day in a room with a South facing window. I
| have a warmish LED light on (3000K).
| irrational wrote:
| Every one was easy to pick my preferred color until I got to
| 824268 and 199989. I honestly couldn't choose which I preferred.
| I sat there for awhile trying to decide when the colors changed.
| Is it on a timer or did I accidentally choose one of the colors,
| even though I don't think I did?
| game-of-throws wrote:
| This is a perfect example of why we need ranked choice voting. I
| think #BD60E2 is best, but due to its unpopularity I'm forced to
| vote #BD60E1 if I want my vote to matter.
| LeonB wrote:
| Die hard #BD60E2 voters are splitting the vote and giving an
| advantage to non #BD60E1 voters.
| spiderfarmer wrote:
| What would be a suitable algorithm?
| PaulHoule wrote:
| You'd need some algorithm that works on continuous variables,
| that is, #44E205 should rank closely to #44E106. Somehow you
| need to learn a function over rgb sampling only some of the
| points. Maybe you average over votes for colors that are
| close to a color in rgb space.
|
| 16 million collars aren't that many compared to large-scale
| internet systems. If you got 160 million+ votes you'd start
| getting meaningful results without any averaging.
| tgv wrote:
| Idk if you're serious or not, but this site actually does
| ranked voting: you don't get to choose your favorite color out
| of 17M, but you rank pairs. The problem here is that you can
| vote a variable number of times. I guess it's possible to come
| up with different algorithms to determine the winner.
| mcv wrote:
| Based on the title, I imagined crawling all websites and counting
| how many pixels used each colour.
| irrational wrote:
| I bet the most popular would be ones where one or more of the
| RGB are 00 or FF.
| BudaDude wrote:
| I was thinking the same thing. But they could exclude them
| since they are not real colors.
| croes wrote:
| Why is FF0000 not a real color or FF5687?
| drewzero1 wrote:
| Ultimately, wouldn't that just see which is the most popular
| background color? Pixel-for-pixel the background takes up the
| largest percentage of screen space on most websites.
|
| Though I would also be interested to see what the most popular
| background colors are. My money's on white and off-white.
| kadoban wrote:
| You could, instead of counting pixel-by-pixel, count once per
| specified color. Eg count #000000 once per css rule it's
| specified in, once per image it's used in, etc.
| GekkePrutser wrote:
| Yeah me too..
|
| That would have made a lot more sense than what they're doing.
| I'd really like to see the outcome of that. Not this random
| comparison.
| michaelmior wrote:
| > random comparison
|
| While certainly different individuals are going to vote on
| colors differently, I doubt that the aggregate results would
| resemble randomness.
| GekkePrutser wrote:
| I mean random as in the two colours are selected at random.
|
| I think it's not really relevant to select colours in a
| void. Colours are good for a purpose. This is especially
| relevant on websites. I love yellow but I would _hate_ it
| when it 's used for text on a white background. Stuff like
| that.
| permo-w wrote:
| my thoughts too. while this page is interesting, I'd be much
| more interested to know the results of what you describe
|
| it would be fairly easily to implement, although probably quite
| expensive in either cost or time
| hbbio wrote:
| Would be much more interesting indeed.
|
| Could use sampling and still get reliable estimates?
| permo-w wrote:
| how would you sample reliably though?
|
| I'd imagine you get white and black in one or two, but then
| what?
|
| I bet some pretty interesting graphs could be drawn with
| the results
| tgv wrote:
| The contrast with the text that shows the hex code seems to
| interfere with my judgement. Perhaps leaving out the text, or
| showing it in smaller text on the bottom could help a tiny bit.
| But I suspect monitor quality/calibration has a larger effect.
| [deleted]
| JansjoFromIkea wrote:
| Presumably the text color will distort the preferences? You're
| not deciding you prefer a color, you're deciding you prefer a
| background color for a white font.
|
| At the moment it seems to be always white, maybe if it's always
| the opposite color on the color wheel that might offset it? Or
| maybe just have the text on a white card on the edge of the
| screen so you can focus on the color itself?
| kryptn wrote:
| After a few votes the text hex code disappeared for me so I was
| only voting on the colors.
| erichurkman wrote:
| I found myself voting against colors more than I was voting
| for colors. Anything wins against the harshness of
| chartreuse, except a somehow _worse_ chartreuse.
| ivanhoe wrote:
| It's a nice toy, but I doubt its practical value as in design you
| deal with color palettes, not standalone colors. I might be
| wrong, but my gut feeling is that "the most popular" color
| wouldn't necessarily end up as a part of the most popular
| palette, or even in top 5.
| jstummbillig wrote:
| Look, guy. Okay? Listen up here.
|
| > But which one of these motherfuckers is the best color?
|
| > Together, we've voted on 0.27834177017211914% of all colors.
|
| > (Don't worry, we'll get there.)
|
| Good news is, you are completely right and the author agrees.
| It is a joke. Which brings us to the bad news -- but it's a
| monday which is hard enough so I'll let it slide.
| throwingrocks wrote:
| I don't think the goal is to provide practical value.
| simplify wrote:
| It' a fun idea, but colors are so contextual that putting them
| next to each other for votes gives a pretty useless data set.
| mgdlbp wrote:
| HN top bar colours by popularity:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/topcolors
| cozzyd wrote:
| I see I'm not the only one to pick c0fefe as a joke...
| themikesanto wrote:
| Wait, you can change the top bar color? That's news to me.
| shultays wrote:
| Only available for premium users
|
| (Joking aside it is behind a karma limit for some reason)
| drewzero1 wrote:
| At certain karma thresholds, different things unlock. There's
| a list somewhere but I'm not sure if it's up-to-date.[0] It
| looks like top bar color can be changed once you hit 250
| karma.
|
| [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=853964
| fuckcensorship wrote:
| List of undocumented HN features:
|
| https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented
| drewzero1 wrote:
| That's the one I was thinking of, but couldn't find.
| Thanks!
| themikesanto wrote:
| Ah cool, thanks! As someone who mostly lurks, I look
| forward to engaging with some of these features in a few
| decades time.
| mgdlbp wrote:
| No, I lied! It's not sorted!
|
| The observations of the other comments would be strange indeed,
| if it were. Looking back through old discussions, it turns out
| I'd misremembered a mix of speculating comments as fact. Most
| conclusively, the order is now completely different to when the
| page was discussed last month:
|
| https://web.archive.org/web/20220615213203/https://news.ycom...
|
| (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31759722)
| sph wrote:
| What's the story with that green being the second most popular?
|
| Would be nice to see percentages/total users. It might be only
| used by 5 accounts of the same person.
| 4gotunameagain wrote:
| Green is the official h4xx0r color x)
| sebmellen wrote:
| For me, green is super useful. If the top bar is green, I'm
| logged in. If it's orange, I'm logged out.
|
| My top bar color is #ccff99.
| mhb wrote:
| People log out?
| M3L0NM4N wrote:
| Pro-tip, that also works with all other colors except
| green.
| sebmellen wrote:
| Fair point, but I do think that given the "traffic-light"
| connotation, green indicating a "logged-in state" makes
| sense.
| michaelmior wrote:
| All colors that are sufficiently distinct from the
| default that is.
| WrtCdEvrydy wrote:
| I mean, default is pretty interesting that it's at the top.
| blululu wrote:
| Even more bizarre is that 15-25 spots are mostly different
| hues of orange. A bit improbable to have that many land so
| close.
| eganist wrote:
| Why are you specifically capturing the pixel size of the
| viewport? and likewise the user agent separately from request
| headers?
| Kiro wrote:
| What is your comment referring to?
| Aachen wrote:
| What network requests the site makes, presumably. On mobile
| though so I can't verify my assumption as easily
| eganist wrote:
| Yes. Here's the json for one sample post request:
| { "winner": "#e28b20", "useragent":
| "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64)
| AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)
| Chrome/103.0.5060.114 Safari/537.36 Edg/103.0.1264.49",
| "loser": "#997e79", "time": "20220711T161234",
| "inner-width": 3840, "uuid":
| "4f076d53-5d84-4b4d-923e-803db7ca6150", "color-a":
| "#e28b20", "color-b": "#997e79", "inner-
| height": 2040 }
| ollifi wrote:
| https://colornames.org/ Has 17.9% colors named already.
| vesinisa wrote:
| Might work as a joke but several of those colors will be
| indistinguishable to human eye, yet have completely different
| crowd-sourced names.
|
| Or - could you ever tell the difference between "Amateur
| Rockstar Bright Pink" (#ff1aab) and "Pink Soul Of Heart"
| (#ff1bab) even if your life depended on it?
|
| The fact that 24-bit RGB can represent 16 million colors does
| not mean our vision is capable of telling such number of colors
| apart from each other. Creating a coherent and concise naming
| system for _all_ them could be an interesting (and perhaps
| quite challenging) technical task, but I don 't believe crowd-
| sourcing those will yield any usable results. Or - how many
| colors with "poop" in their name do you think is acceptable?
| https://colornames.org/search/results/?type=partial&query=po...
|
| And how about "asdf" (the first four letters on the home row of
| a QWERTY keyboard - an age-old internet troll version of
| "foobar")?
| https://colornames.org/search/results/?type=partial&query=as...
| bufferout wrote:
| Look at the bigger picture: given the data is open, if you
| wanted a solid depiction of what colour best represents
| "poop" you could average those results.
| ollifi wrote:
| The non-joke use case could be memorizing / communicating
| bunch of colors. Those human readable names are lot easier to
| remember than hex values.
| vesinisa wrote:
| Not sure if "Asdfgtyuhijokl'" is easier to memorize than
| #33-51-B5 .. :) https://colornames.org/color/3351b5
|
| The problem with anything crowd-sourced is always that
| without moderation the results are garbage, and moderation
| is generally expensive or at least requires passionate
| volunteers. Crowd-sourcing 16 million unique color names is
| bound to be problematic and very difficult to moderate.
|
| I actually gave this a second thought as a technical
| problem. The CSS defines 140 color names. It would probably
| not be infeasible to crowd-source / invent 4,096 base color
| names spread out _exactly_ evenly across the 3-dimensional
| RGB space (e.g. "maroon", "deep sky blue", "slate gray"
| and so on.) If we could then further name 64 "tints" (like
| "reddish", "dark bluish", "purple hazed"), one could
| express about 250,000 colors with base color + tint pairs
| (like "reddish deep sky blue" or "purple hazed maroon").
| This should be already sufficient for expressing almost all
| colors normally needed for UI designs etc.
|
| If even more fidelity was somehow desired, one could then
| add one more of the 64 tints from the same vocabulary with
| some qualifier, like 'slightly'. So e.g. "slighly purple
| hazed dark bluish slate gray". This system could express
| the full RGB space, and there would be always possibility
| to find a closeby very similar color with shorter name -
| e.g. "slight dark bluish reddish deep sky blue" => "reddish
| deep sky blue" => "deep sky blue".
| ollifi wrote:
| You mean "Easy To Remeber Blue"?
|
| Joking aside I agree with you that it is useless to name
| 16 million colors but I appreciate the futile effort.
| throwaway290 wrote:
| Colors is where X > Y > Z doesn't mean X > Z.
| whoomp12342 wrote:
| this makes me feel like I am at the eye doctor.
| gauddasa wrote:
| I clicked on the right door about 10 times and the left door
| about 10 times but did not receive any car or a goat in any of
| them.
| overlordalex wrote:
| The hex codes cannot be selected/copied out which was
| disappointing, but perhaps worse is that the hex codes slowly
| fade away completely!
|
| I only noticed the first time because there was a gorgeous
| gold/purple combination that I wanted to save, which makes me
| think there might be another layer of combination that can be
| saved which is worst/best combinations of colour.
| mysterydip wrote:
| Do they strictly increase vote on only the hues shown? Having a
| weighted multiplier of the vote on nearby hues that decreases the
| further away you go would reach a conclusion quicker.
| lukaszkups wrote:
| What am I looking on? How to see the rank of the colors?
| forgetfulness wrote:
| I felt my vote was very influenced by how many times I had
| already seen that hue. I probably would have voted more often for
| certain shades of green if I hadn't seen a slight variation of
| them three times already, for instance.
| zachrip wrote:
| Just a heads up, if you're using any dark mode extension you'll
| want to disable it for this site. (op, probably worth getting
| your site added to the global dark mode list)
| 867-5309 wrote:
| you'll need to explain why
| boredpudding wrote:
| Dark mode extension adjusts colors. Which... is a bit not
| great on a website that ranks colors.
| 867-5309 wrote:
| it was working fine with android dark mode
| emi2k01 wrote:
| > dark mode extensions These change the css colors. It's
| not referring to the OS color scheme preference
| sangupta wrote:
| Curious to understand why are you capturing inner width/height
| and the user-agent as part of JSON payload to server?
| nixpulvis wrote:
| Cool idea, horrible implementation. I have no better suggestions
| other than to reduce the color space however...
| Philip-J-Fry wrote:
| My votes are based on which colours burn my retinas the least.
| Aachen wrote:
| I'm voting nearly the exact opposite. Hadn't thought of it this
| "burning" way (on mobile it's smaller, maybe that's why?) but
| bright colors are fun colors for me.
|
| Mobile vs desktop, OLED votes vs. LCD votes, indoors vs
| sunlight etc. would also be interesting to compare.
| ryanbrunner wrote:
| Voting on all 16 million is a cool concept, but given that this
| is probably going to be popular for only a day or so, probably
| not achievable. From your own ranks, only 0.27% of colours have
| been voted on at all, and most likely the majority of those voted
| on have a single vote.
| runnerup wrote:
| Personally I think that's okay. I also think it might make
| sense for any summary to lump colors together using clustering
| and averaging the group using a colorspace like Oklab.
|
| There's lots of room for different types of analyses here!
| ryanbrunner wrote:
| That's a super cool idea! You could have it adapt so that
| depending on the number of votes the clusters get smaller so
| it returns the most specific data it can.
| brian_herman wrote:
| Where is the results?
| andy_ppp wrote:
| I think nearly 17 million colours is too many! Maybe grouping
| close colours could be better.
|
| The "best" colours also seem really bad, I wonder if what they
| appear next to gives false results. Still, interesting idea!
| excitom wrote:
| Huh, #987fb1 is in both Best and Worst lists (at the time I
| viewed the ranks).
| qurashee wrote:
| I'm more interested in the algorithm behind the pairing. I wonder
| if it's randomly pairing colours or using something similar to
| adaptive comparative judgement.
| codingdave wrote:
| I suspect people are choosing more because of hue and undertones
| than strictly on RGB colors. It would be more interesting to
| aggregate the results up into more general conclusions - do
| people like pastels or earth tones better? How bright of a color
| is too bright before people stop voting for it? How dark?
| mikkergp wrote:
| I've been into 70's colorscapes recently, so when given the
| chance I vote for earthy tones, then beyond that I may pick
| colors I know i like, or based on emotional gut reaction, it
| depends how hard the gut reaction hits me. I'd be curious to
| have these stats as well. I'd also be curious to know, how
| often do I pick the colors I think are my favorite. Purple is
| my favorite color, but it doesn't appear often in earthy tones
| and I think I would prefer an earthy or washed out orange or
| green to a washed out purple.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-07-11 23:01 UTC)