[HN Gopher] Spotify doesn't use the Spotify model (2020)
___________________________________________________________________
Spotify doesn't use the Spotify model (2020)
Author : ggeorgovassilis
Score : 70 points
Date : 2022-07-10 15:03 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.jeremiahlee.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.jeremiahlee.com)
| 2sk21 wrote:
| This is funny - back in 2015, the Spotify model became the
| organizational model for our product team at IBM Watson. It did
| not work for much the same reasons described by the author. All
| that it resulted in was an inscrutable organizational matrix
| which rapidly became ossified - the very opposite of nimbleness!
| raverbashing wrote:
| I'd blame this on consultants and other bureaucrats adding a
| heavy goop of SAFe/RUP etc on top and then calling the process
| failed
| ggeorgovassilis wrote:
| Jeremiah Lee points out that the focus on squad autonomy causes
| squads to sever ties with all dependencies in order to maximise
| autonomy, so squads grow and become unmanageable.
| wodenokoto wrote:
| The Spotify model was huge in Sweden. Everybody talked about it
| it seemed.
|
| I remember a joke about companies in the early 2000's would say
| they used Java to encourage competitors to have development
| problems because "Java sucks, haha".
|
| I wouldn't be surprised if the "Spotify model" has had adverse
| effects on the Swedish IT sector at large.
| [deleted]
| winternett wrote:
| In my 20+ years of working within and managing development teams,
| no one ever follows the book, and most project teams are flush
| with people that know the language, but nothing about the actual
| execution.
|
| Companies gush volumes about their rigid adherence to excellence
| and perfection, because proposal and marketing teams are distant
| from development teams that often scramble incessantly, not to
| innovate, but more-so to just use duct tape to keep things
| running without showing errors on the front end.
|
| Human psychology experts and product owners now also join into
| the mix for these large platforms too, which greatly contaminates
| development goals and ruins enthusiasm by overcomplicating and
| superseding the sense of accomplishment that development work is
| meant to create. It's a vicarious cycle of abuse to be an entry
| level dev on a mega corp product now... May God have mercy on
| anyone interested in working for those brutal companies... heh.
|
| As a musician that's been on Spotify for years, it really does
| not need to be exalted that much... It's music streaming that
| doesn't pay a sht on a stale bean cracker to musicans...
|
| Spotify's UI has been terrible in my opinion since it started,
| with it's full screen madness and prohibition on copying and
| pasting song titles. The song sharing features prevent much from
| being productive, and everything is designed to drive you away
| from the one artist you came to the site to hear. It's
| bewildering to me how artists are expected to pay a minimum of
| $250 US on marketing to promote themselves on the platform just
| so they can show the public they're worth being listened to based
| on the value stats that spotify prominently displays to extort
| musicians on their profiles.... They're still going to give one
| single talk show host the majority of the money you pay to them.
|
| Music streaming has literally been around since the age of
| Mp3.com, the only real advancement that's been added by Spotify
| since then is nonsensically still calling radio shows "podcasts"
| (even though iPods are retired), embedding ads into streams, and
| maybe making people spend a lot of time creating and promoting
| already popular music and playlists for money. Spotify is a
| wildly overvalued and wildly under-delivering service... At least
| YouTube has music videos to hear and view the content that it's
| very underpaid musicians create. (Just a personal blunt opinion
| though).
| tootie wrote:
| I spent a long time working in consulting where matrix management
| is a requirement since product teams spin and down every 6-12
| months. It's a pretty solvable problem to have a tech lead per
| project and separate tech manager per person. Sometimes it's the
| same person, usually it isn't. You actually get a different
| perspective as a manager hearing about the drama of projects you
| aren't working on and you have a lot more discretion to seek
| project team transfers for reports that are struggling with their
| teams. Typically (but not always) the career managers were also
| tech leads on their own projects.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-07-10 23:02 UTC)