[HN Gopher] Event-level prediction of urban crime reveals a enfo...
___________________________________________________________________
Event-level prediction of urban crime reveals a enforcement bias in
US cities
Author : darkscape
Score : 29 points
Date : 2022-07-02 18:33 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
| mdp2021 wrote:
| We discussed this same article one day ago at
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31941781
| s1artibartfast wrote:
| In other fields, this is called triage. Some communities are
| bleeding profusely and police can only temporarily stem the
| symptoms because the root cause is much deeper. In other
| communities, quick intervention can stabilize the situation
| point_blank wrote:
| Locked to the public. Sci-hub does not have the document either.
| mastercheif wrote:
| Found it here:
| https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349228599_Precise_E...
| balderdash wrote:
| Wow this thing is impossible to decipher
| samatman wrote:
| That's because the product of value to the 'researchers' is
| the title.
| abduhl wrote:
| " These precise predictions enable equally precise evaluation of
| inequities in law enforcement, discovering that response to
| increased crime rates is biased by the socio-economic status of
| neighborhoods, draining policy resources to wealthy areas with
| disproportionately negative impacts for the inner city, as
| demonstrated in Chicago and six other major U.S. metropolitan
| areas."
|
| In other words, cops abandon poor neighborhoods when crime goes
| up there and mobilize to rich neighborhoods when crime goes up
| there. I'd be interested to know the other 6 metro areas,
| although I have a suspicion of which ones they are and their
| flavor of DA.
| ezekiel11 wrote:
| Korean immigrants found that out the hard way almost 30 years
| ago in LA.
| bergenty wrote:
| No they knew. It's just that riots don't happen that often so
| they were willing to take the risk and the opportunity cost
| since other Americans wouldn't do it.
| civilized wrote:
| So, they fit a fancy model, played with it, and claim the result
| says something about the real world?
|
| I have never seen a valid social science result derived by this
| method. This is just fancy model lovers dabbling.
|
| If the patterns they claim are real, they can be exposed with
| much simpler and direct methods. Let's talk after that's been
| done.
| mulmen wrote:
| What are those simpler and direct methods? Have they been done?
| bergenty wrote:
| Is fancy supposed to be derogatory in this statement?
| civilized wrote:
| Too fancy for anyone to be confident in what it's doing or
| whether it reflects real patterns.
|
| 0.90 AUC doesn't mean everything you can get this model to
| tell you is real.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-07-02 23:00 UTC)