[HN Gopher] Improving Calc support for 16384 columns
___________________________________________________________________
Improving Calc support for 16384 columns
Author : mariuz
Score : 28 points
Date : 2022-06-29 15:12 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (llunak.blogspot.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (llunak.blogspot.com)
| rbanffy wrote:
| LibreOffice is still my default office application for making
| spreadsheets and other documents I don't need to share or edit in
| collaboration. This allows it to be used on many datasets that
| didn't fit in the previous versions and this is amazing.
| trelane wrote:
| I also use it regularly and have no shame about sharing them
| around. Nobody seems afraid to require I get a multi-hundred
| dollar software package when they send me docx/xslx/pptx, so
| seems fair to ask they download a free and Free OpenDocument
| implementation if they can't open it yet.
| kzrdude wrote:
| Shouldn't Excel open ODS? I thought standards support was a
| box they ticked for contract reasons
| rbanffy wrote:
| There is very little incentive for Microsoft to make Excel
| work well with ODS
| trelane wrote:
| There are a number of things that should open at least some
| versions of OpenDocument files. If they have an issue, the
| can still get LibreOffice for free. Much better than the
| reverse situation, especially if they don't send ooxml
| nyanpasu64 wrote:
| I'm not a fan of the spreadsheet paradigm, and unlimited columns
| even if you never use them, requiring lazy-initializing them on
| first access to avoid prohibitive performance penalties. I'd much
| rather define a set of global columns for each table (like a SQL
| database with computed view columns and a table editor attached,
| rather than a freeform canvas with a formula engine and automatic
| copy-paste attached).
| Dylan16807 wrote:
| You still have to have roughly the same code to support the
| variable number of columns per sheet. It just changes the UI
| slightly between "doesn't exist" and "is not initialized".
| zokier wrote:
| While improvement, even 16k feels arbitrarily low limit. These
| days I would expect either unlimited columns, or some silly high
| limit like 2^64.
| danachow wrote:
| Has this limit (it's the same in Excel) one you have or someone
| you know ever encountered or even come close to in practice? If
| not then it's a BS expectation.
| _uy6i wrote:
| I've seen people hit the 1m row limit plenty of times
| Dylan16807 wrote:
| Row limit is easy to hit. But I don't think anyone is
| importing a massive dataset sideways.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-06-29 23:02 UTC)