[HN Gopher] One man's fight to end California's ban on ferrets
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       One man's fight to end California's ban on ferrets
        
       Author : danso
       Score  : 91 points
       Date   : 2022-06-27 17:52 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.latimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.latimes.com)
        
       | Zak wrote:
       | Given that ferrets are legal to keep as pets in Arizona, Nevada,
       | and Oregon, it's probably not terribly difficult to quantify the
       | ecological and agricultural impact in places similar to
       | California.
       | 
       | I don't know if any such research has been done, but I _suspect_
       | if it was done and found significant harm, there would be a
       | movement to ban ferrets in one or more of those states. My very
       | brief web search did not find one.
        
         | sigzero wrote:
         | Ferrets are only illegal in Hawaii, California, DC, and NYC at
         | this point.
        
       | mensetmanusman wrote:
       | Favorite story of ferrets:
       | 
       | https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/felicia-ferret-particl...
       | 
       | They found a way to use them to clean metal debris :)
        
       | mattanimation wrote:
       | when I read this I immediately just thought of the neighbor in
       | Silicon Valley
        
       | AlbertCory wrote:
       | My brother had a ferret. It was a lousy pet, not remotely
       | "cuddly" or "playful." As soon as you let it loose, it would run
       | behind the washing machine and hide. He also had a (de-scented)
       | skunk; also a lousy pet.
       | 
       | I really don't understand why non-farmers feel this desire to
       | have pets other than dogs or cats, or rabbits, or reptiles, or
       | birds, or any of the other legal pets. If you really need to feel
       | different, paint yourself blue.
        
       | wildekek wrote:
       | I owned two ferrets for a few years. You can have all the time in
       | the world and read up as much as you want, but very few people
       | have what it takes to deal with these wonderful feral shitheads.
        
       | conradfr wrote:
       | Surprisingly it wasn't Noah the neighbor from Silicon Valley.
        
       | dboreham wrote:
       | Learned from this that Ferrets are a domesticated species (like
       | dogs and cats). I'd only heard of them in the context of Monty
       | Python and affinity for trouser legs and assumed they were a wild
       | animal.
       | 
       | Also, they're _big_ : we have a kind of Weasel (Ermine) in
       | Montana and I've seen then drag an adult rabbit carcas over long
       | distances. Ferrets look to be around twice their size.
        
         | vrc wrote:
         | The black footed ferret is native to the US, wild, and
         | endangered. The domestic ferret is thought to be from the
         | European polecat
        
         | gadders wrote:
         | They're not that big, at least in the UK. They're about the
         | size of your forearm.
        
         | pxc wrote:
         | > Also, they're _big_ : we have a kind of Weasel (Ermine) in
         | Montana and I've seen then drag an adult rabbit carcas over
         | long distances. Ferrets look to be around twice their size.
         | 
         | Most pet ferrets come from one inbred line produced by one
         | monopolist who breeds ferrets for research (testing drugs and
         | chemicals on animals) and for sale in pet stores. Those ferrets
         | are pretty small (2-4 lbs), in part because they're virtually
         | all pediatric neuters, and never go through puberty.
         | 
         | There are also very small numbers of ferrets available from
         | small breeders in some states. They tend to be a bit larger,
         | and additionally those breeders also sometimes sell hybrids
         | (ferrets crossed with wild polecats), who are quite a bit
         | bigger.
         | 
         | Anyway I think of domesticated ferrets as pretty small! And I
         | guess they're much smaller than whatever wild/feral relatives
         | they're sometimes crossed with in the hopes of improving health
         | or genetic diversity.
        
         | EdwardDiego wrote:
         | In NZ the ferrets tend to specialise in rabbits, the stoats and
         | weasels go for rats, mice, and birds.
         | 
         | Although I did once see two stoats coursing a brushtail possum
         | to death, it was nasty AF.
         | 
         | But yeah, apparently stoats and weasels can't be domesticated
         | like ferrets.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | We probably could, but we definitely don't want it.
           | 
           | They have a different sense of time and are just too much
           | energetic to be bearable.
           | 
           | Would be like having a children with the most severe case of
           | ADHD jumping over you each five seconds non-stop after
           | drinking ten coffes and doing cocaine. Just watching a stoat
           | to play is exhausting.
        
         | cmrdporcupine wrote:
         | My younger brother had a pet ferret growing up. It wasn't that
         | big. But it had no fear. Our large dog (rhodesian ridgeback X
         | black lab cross) was scared of it. They'd "play" but the dog
         | always backed off.
         | 
         | They only have two modes: sleep and play/hunt. Ours learned to
         | play with us without puncturing our skin, but its play still
         | involving biting and tugging incessantly.
         | 
         | Once a squirrel had gotten into a wall cavity. The ferret knew
         | and paced outside of the wall for days, every waking hour, just
         | obsessed.
         | 
         | It smelled pretty bad. The scent gland had been removed but it
         | still had a musky odor that got through the whole house.
         | 
         | One day it escaped the confines of the house and got over to
         | one of the neighbours. It got into their garage and killed an
         | entire litter of little kittens.
         | 
         | We think an owl caught it not long after.
         | 
         | Their status as pets is a bit dubious IMHO. They'd also be a
         | real problem anywhere near where people keep poultry or
         | rabbits. They're notorious serial killers. Weasels get into
         | chicken coops and slaughter whole flocks seemingly for fun,
         | killing like crazy but actually eating very little.
        
           | surfpel wrote:
           | > killing like crazy but actually eating very little
           | 
           | For a domesticated species it sounds like that is the main
           | function.
           | 
           | That is, it would make sense that humans domesticated
           | multiple species (cats, dogs, ferrets, minks, etc..)[1] to be
           | adept at killing just for killing sake, probably with
           | different niches. Dogs for defense, and all of them able to
           | offer pest control for various sizes of pests.
           | 
           | This is pure speculation on my part however. Any experts care
           | to weigh in?
           | 
           | 1 - (dogs and minks killing lots of rats)
           | https://youtu.be/SM4C3_nMN_g
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | cmrdporcupine wrote:
             | The thing is that the wanton serial seemingly-senseless
             | slaughter isn't confined to domesticated weasels. Wild
             | weasels do it too. We keep chickens and have heard so many
             | stories of people coming out to find that a fisher has
             | gotten into their coop and destroying 20, 30 chickens and
             | then just leaving with maybe one. Their instinct to kill is
             | so strong and they're intensely efficient at it it seems to
             | go well beyond hunting for hunger.
             | 
             | Yes, cats are a bit like this, too, but not to this scale.
             | And cats are remarkably more parsimonious with their energy
             | usage. They'll beat up a mouse for an hour, and then just
             | sleep like crazy. Or stalk a single bird, and be satisfied
             | with that.
        
               | exhilaration wrote:
               | _Their instinct to kill is so strong and they 're
               | intensely efficient at it it seems to go well beyond
               | hunting for hunger._
               | 
               | I read up on this after our community's chickens were
               | massacred by a fox -- it's called Surplus Killing
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surplus_killing and here's
               | what's believed the key motivations:
               | 
               |  _... researchers say animals surplus-kill whenever they
               | can, in order to procure food for offspring and others,
               | to gain valuable killing experience, and to create the
               | opportunity to eat the carcass later when they are hungry
               | again_
        
               | cmrdporcupine wrote:
               | Interesting. Also gives another reason why roosters so
               | aggressively attempt to lead predators away from the hens
               | and all the hens scatter even though you'd think they
               | might have strength in numbers. Creates a situation where
               | only 1 or 2 will die, instead of the whole flock.
               | 
               | A fox got after our chickens two years ago. Our rooster,
               | a beautiful and gentle Barred Rock tussled with the fox
               | for about 300 feet down to the road (there was a trail of
               | feathers) and then dashed under a passing car which was
               | forced to stop while the fox brazenly circled. All the
               | hens scattered and hid and were fine.
               | 
               | We rescued him from under there and chased the fox away
               | and cleaned him up and gave him antibiotics but the poor
               | guy had wounds we didn't see that festered, he got a
               | fever, and died about 3-4 weeks later despite us doing
               | our best for him.
               | 
               | (Turns out foxes long teeth and mouth bacteria/biome are
               | also engineered to create a situation where prey may die
               | later even if they can't be taken right away. Then the
               | fox can come back later when it's weakened or dead)
               | 
               | I'd never been so close to an eastern red fox. They're
               | usually super skittish but this one must have been
               | extremely hungry and indignant that I took his kill from
               | him. Beautiful creature but I don't look at them the same
               | way anymore.
               | 
               | We planted a lovely native flowering Eastern Redbud tree
               | over the grave of the rooster ("Jacques")
        
             | dboreham wrote:
             | Cats seem to catch mice for fun, only eating one after
             | playing with it, and if they're feeling peckish.
        
               | yieldcrv wrote:
               | Cats tire out mice and injure mice specifically for
               | eating but sometimes they just mutilate the body, those
               | seemingly playful pats of their paw have a lot of force
               | and can send a mouse across the room. The mouse is taking
               | consequential damage on every swing, which can come in
               | quick succession, and the mouse is not fast enough to
               | escape.
               | 
               | The cats in turn avoid any bites when they go to actually
               | eat it. They could theoretically do something else to
               | kill and eat faster, but its more akin to their long
               | range attack ensuring they take no damage, avoiding any
               | skin piercing infection.
        
               | Hellbanevil wrote:
               | I had a neighborhood cat that wanted to live with me. He
               | introduced himself while I was working on my truck. He
               | would literally watch me work on my truck. He was always
               | looking on right behind me, even when under the truck.
               | (maybe because mice sometimes hide in vechicles?)
               | 
               | Anyway for months he would leave a dead mouse on the
               | house mat.
               | 
               | I felt sorry for him, and let him stay in the utility
               | room, and showed him how to use a dog door. (I would have
               | kept him, but he ended up having a home. He lived in a 8
               | million dollar mansion, and was feed fresh Salmon, he
               | hated the dog.)
               | 
               | I found all that out later. I couldn't let him in the
               | house 24/7 because of allergies.
               | 
               | He would sneak in and bring on mice. The mice were so
               | quiet, I didn't even notice them until he arrived.
               | 
               | I found out later he was going to multiple houses daily,
               | and we all spoiled him.
               | 
               | He did want to live with me, but finally gave up.
               | 
               | I think some wild animal got him though. The wealthy
               | family that owned him was devistated. People on that
               | Neighborhood social site condemned the family for not
               | keeping him indoors, but they didn't know he liked his
               | freedom.
               | 
               | He lived a full life, but killed a lot of rodents. Which
               | didn't bother me at the time. Well it kinda did, but rats
               | I just can't live with.
               | 
               | I used to believe all cats should be kept indoors, but
               | once certain cats are used to freedom it's painful to
               | watch them suffer mentally by being inside. I learned
               | where the Tom Cat phrase came from by knowing him.
        
               | kloch wrote:
               | It depends on if it's a fully domestic cat or one that
               | has spent significant time living on it's own in the wild
               | (stray/feral).
               | 
               | I've seen a domestic cat play with a mouse until it's
               | dead, then act like it doesn't know what to do with it.
               | An old stray cat (that had rejoined domestic life but
               | didn't have the energy to catch and play with the mouse)
               | would then get up and eat it in two chomps.
        
               | bbarnett wrote:
               | And the middle ground, the barn cat.
               | 
               | The barn cat knows humans, but is also not let inside the
               | house. It is also rarely fed, unless sick, but has the
               | comfort of the barn.
               | 
               | Such cats are often highly efficient, and eat all their
               | prey for food.
               | 
               | I've seen barn cats, when old, fed and kept in nicer
               | surroundings.
               | 
               | This is what cats are primarily for! To keep mice
               | populations down in barns, feedlots, groceries, etc.
        
               | clairity wrote:
               | at the cat rescue i volunteered at, the kittens who were
               | too feral/fearful to become pets were moved over into the
               | 'working cat' program. they'd be put in the storage areas
               | of the rescue and allowed to roam freely in those areas,
               | but still be near humans and be fed/litterbox trained.
               | then businessowners could adopt them to keep the rodent
               | population under control in their businesses. a real win-
               | win-win situation, considering those cats would likely be
               | put down otherwise.
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | > killing like crazy but actually eating very little.
           | 
           | That could easily apply to humans.
        
             | sph wrote:
             | I personally eat any animal that I kill on purpose.
             | 
             | I should mention that I haven't killed any yet, apart from
             | unlucky insects, but if I were to shoot a deer I'll eat it
             | too.
        
               | moron4hire wrote:
               | I have yet to eat any of the mice I have killed. Wild
               | house mice smell like death even when they are still
               | alive.
        
               | catlifeonmars wrote:
               | Technically, insects are animals too :)
        
           | hypertele-Xii wrote:
           | Ferrets were domesticated to hunt rabbits. Literally bred and
           | rewarded to kill prey, but otherwise leave intact for
           | skinning and cooking, generation after generation.
        
       | pru567 wrote:
       | There's some horror stories of ferrets around toddlers (eating
       | face/eating fingers), they seem pretty wild.
        
         | scythe wrote:
         | Based on some reading, it appears the principal risk of ferrets
         | relative to other animals is that they can climb. A crib will
         | protect a baby from a cat or dog, but not from a ferret.
         | Consequently, the most disturbing examples involve ferrets
         | attacking immobile newborns in cribs.
         | 
         | There are lots of reports of domestic pets attacking babies,
         | but ferrets are more likely than the others to have the
         | opportunity, when normal infant care is applied.
        
           | Clubber wrote:
           | >A crib will protect a baby from a cat or dog
           | 
           | A cat can easily get into a crib, not only can they climb,
           | they can jump pretty high too. My cats regularly scale a 6"
           | wood fence in the back yard to see what the neighbors are up
           | to. The first 5" is pure jump, followed by a fairly ugly
           | pull-up.
           | 
           | >Consequently, the most disturbing examples involve ferrets
           | attacking immobile newborns in cribs.
           | 
           | My college roommate had a ferret. I don't remember him every
           | climbing anything and he could hardly jump. He was adept at
           | pooping all over the corners of our dorm room though.
           | 
           | Always keep in mind that now a days, just about anything you
           | read in a publication or on the internet is over-hyped or
           | dramatized, or sensationalized for effect.
           | 
           | "Ferrets can get into a crib and there have been instances
           | where a ferret has attacked a child, but the same holds true
           | for cats and most household pets," just doesn't sell the
           | drama as well.
        
           | ocdtrekkie wrote:
           | On the contrary, ferrets are generally kept in cages, whereas
           | dogs and cats conventionally have free roam of the house.
           | Ferrets out of their cage should be monitored, especially in
           | the presence of infants who don't know how to interact with
           | the animals yet.
           | 
           | We had some concerns about our dog around a newborn child, we
           | had to be super careful while the dog adjusted to the baby
           | being in the house, because she showed a decent amount of
           | jealousy for the attention the baby was getting.
           | 
           | I wouldn't consider allowing a ferret free roam of your
           | infant's room to be normal ferret or infant care, it'd be
           | irresponsible in terms of both.
        
         | Beltalowda wrote:
         | Keeping _any_ animal around toddlers unattended is
         | irresponsible and should never be done; this includes cats and
         | dogs. Plenty of stories about attacks from the family dog or
         | cat too.
         | 
         | That being said, one of my childhood friends had a ferret, and
         | can definitely attest they're kind bitey, more so than your
         | average cat or dog, and they also seem to have an unlimited
         | amount of energy.
        
           | Teknoman117 wrote:
           | As someone who has had dogs, cats, and ferrets - it really
           | just comes down to training.
           | 
           | The bitey-est animal I've had so far is my current cat.
           | Neither of our ferrets were bitey. The only time a bite
           | happened was when our (at the time, young) dog backed one
           | into a corner and it got scared.
        
           | tzs wrote:
           | On the other hand there are also plenty of stories about dogs
           | and cats saving kids too.
           | 
           | One of my earliest memories is from being out back and seeing
           | something interesting that I wanted to go pick up and play
           | with, and our dog (a little wirehaired terrier) getting
           | between me and it and forcing me back despite my attempts to
           | get around him to get to the interesting thing, while barking
           | his head off until my mom came out to see what was going on.
           | 
           | The interesting thing was a large rattlesnake.
        
         | pvaldes wrote:
         | Unlike dogs that sniff and bark, and cats that watch, meow and
         | rub everything, ferrets interact with the world by biting and
         | tasting.
         | 
         | If they love you, they will show it pulling gently the hair in
         | your arms with its mouth while you are watching TV. This can
         | last for a lot of time.
         | 
         | If they are startled, in pain or feel threatened they will sink
         | the fangs in your flesh and bite. Strong. Every single owner of
         | a ferret show small red spots in their arms. And they are
         | perfectly capable to chew off a finger, even if that behavior
         | is extremely rare in a domesticated animal.
         | 
         | I don't have any problem with people having them as pets in
         | Europe. They love to be cuddled, are affectionated, playful and
         | curious, but they also smell, are oily, lose the hairs when in
         | heat, and sometimes yes, they bite.
        
       | hilbert42 wrote:
       | _" The agency introduced "gripping" testimony in a Senate
       | committee meeting from a 14-year-old Nevada girl who had been
       | mauled as an infant by a ferret."_
       | 
       | No doubt a terrible tragedy for the child and parents and one
       | hopes it never happens again.
       | 
       | However, there's a reasonable compromise here - simply make it
       | illegal to own a ferret if you have children below a certain age
       | where they're incapable of defending themselves - perhaps six or
       | so. Similarly, if you own ferrets you must ensure that they don't
       | endanger other children that are not your own.
       | 
       | Overtight regulation such as banning ferret ownersip until
       | children are say teenagers is also not the answer as kids get
       | great fun with playing with them. Here sense ought to prevail.
       | 
       | As a kid I was mauled by a dog and my injuries hurt, but we don't
       | ban them nor would I ever advocate that except in exceptional
       | circumstances - or perhaps with some very vicious breeds such as
       | Rottweilers (as some municipalities have done). Similar logic
       | ought to follow with respect to ferret ownership.
       | 
       | Moreover, it seems to me that the 1933 rule banning ferrets
       | because of farmers' concern for their farmland ought to be
       | questioned. They should put up solid evidence of potential damage
       | or shutup (why is it a problem in CA to the point of banning but
       | not so elsewhere?).
       | 
       |  _BTW, my mauling was essentially my own fault, I pushed my hand
       | through a picket fence to show a schoolfriend something I 'd
       | found and in the excitement I'd forgotten his dog was vicious.
       | The dog grabbed my hand and lower arm to the point of bleeding
       | and wouldn't let go until he ordered it to do so. Incidentally,
       | I'm a dog lover and have owed dogs but never a ferret (they
       | weren't very common in my area when I was a kid or I likely would
       | have). However on second thoughts it wouldn't have been the
       | smartest idea as I owned a collection of white rats and mice.
       | Owning and looking after them was quite an interesting learning
       | experience but that's another storey._
        
         | snarf21 wrote:
         | One could easily argue that if an animal isn't safe to be left
         | alone with children 6 and under that it is a very bad choice
         | for a pet. Kids would have fun playing with a tiger cub too.
         | Just get a cat.
        
           | hilbert42 wrote:
           | I did say _perhaps_ six, that is I didn 't stipulate a
           | specific age. Moreover, I also put a caveat to the effect
           | that it ought to be illegal to own a ferret if kids were of
           | an age where they were unable to protect themselves.
           | 
           | What more could I've said to be reasonable? Clearly there's
           | no pleasing some people no matter how reasonable or
           | considered one's comments are - and you're one of them. Your
           | ludicrous implication that a ferret is as dangerous as a
           | tiger cub points to the degree of how unreasonable you
           | actually are.
           | 
           | Incidentally, despite not owing one as a pet, I've actually
           | held and played with ferrets and I found them great fun and
           | they've never bitten me - unlike some family cats I've known.
           | 
           | As I've posted previously on HN, I thank myself truly lucky
           | that I grew up in an era before overprotective helicopter
           | parenting and thus - unlike many of today's generation - I
           | along with my friends grew up with both autonomy and
           | resilience.
           | 
           | There would have been nothing further from my parents' minds
           | than the thought of my parents banning me from owning a
           | ferret and by the standards of the day they were
           | overprotective of me (I used to whinge about it when I saw
           | what my friends' parents let them get up to).
           | 
           | P.S., thanks for the downvote.
           | 
           | -
           | 
           |  _Edit /afterthought: decades ago when I was a kid I was
           | living outside the US and up to that point I'd never been
           | there let alone California. Even so, at that young age I well
           | aware of CA's well deserved reputation of being the 'whacky'
           | state - the whole world was aware of the fact. Thus it's
           | little wonder CA's the odd-man-out on ferret laws, it's just
           | acting true to form._
        
           | pxc wrote:
           | There really are no animals that are safe to be left alone
           | with children under 6. Critters of any species are liable to
           | bite or scratch if they are badly hurt, scared, or trapped,
           | and kids are clumsy, energetic, unpredictable, and often very
           | rough with animals (usually without any malice, of course).
           | And with small animals (e.g., cats, ferrets, dogs under 10
           | lbs), an unsupervised 5-year-old is a danger to the animal,
           | too. A kindergartener tripping and falling on a tiny animal
           | like that can break bones!
           | 
           | Animals can be great with kids and vice-versa, but it's
           | really important to always maintain supervision with kids and
           | animals.
        
             | hilbert42 wrote:
             | _...Seems you too didn 't read what I actually said about
             | the actual age and my caveat. Does the word 'perhaps' mean
             | anying to you?
             | 
             | May I suggest you provide me with sample text that would
             | make my points unambiguously clear?_
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | That comment wasn't talking to you, and wasn't about what
               | you said.
        
               | hilbert42 wrote:
               | Fine, I accept that, my humble apologies.
        
           | tokai wrote:
           | Cats can also be dangerous for young kids.
        
             | sigzero wrote:
             | Dogs do this as well. We've had several pairs of ferrets.
             | No incidents with 4 kids growing up.
        
               | hilbert42 wrote:
               | Correct, and as expected. Thanks for the backup.
        
         | ocdtrekkie wrote:
         | The reason this comment is at the bottom is because you managed
         | to come up with a regulatory proposal that is absolutely
         | ridiculous to both sides of this:
         | 
         | 1. The weird people in California who think ferrets are
         | dangerous and/or could cause an ecological problem, and hence,
         | think they should be banned outright.
         | 
         | 2. Anyone who's actually ever interacted with a ferret, and
         | thinks the idea you should be banned from owning one while you
         | have young children, because _that 's_ a ridiculous regulatory
         | overreach.
         | 
         | As a note, I own literally hundreds of different items that
         | could be lethal to my infant. My infant is _in the same house
         | as all these things_! I have knives, hammers, saws, a
         | lawnmower, all sorts of toxic cleaning supplies, numerous
         | electric devices which connect to 120V power. Of course, as a
         | responsible parent, I know to keep them and my infant separate.
         | The idea that a parent can 't also be responsible to not allow
         | pets access to an infant is... absolutely ludicrous, especially
         | when applied to a relatively safe pet like a ferret.
         | 
         | For those who have never actually seen a live ferret: They most
         | commonly live in cages, and are supervised when out. The videos
         | of folks you see online where they have free roam tend to be
         | the sort of people who have explicitly decked out one or more
         | rooms of their house to be safe for ferrets to run around
         | without getting hurt (which is far more likely than them
         | hurting anyone).
         | 
         | 90 years ago, some farmers got worried about ferrets, got a law
         | passed in California with no justification in science, and now
         | despite 48 other states demonstrating there's no actual risk
         | here, supposedly enlightened progressives are scared of them.
         | No wonder disinformation has thrived in today's tech platforms.
        
           | hilbert42 wrote:
           | The only additional comment I'd make is the fact that rules
           | in the vast majority of other States were made _before_ the
           | internet and social media took hold of people 's senses.
        
       | davidhegarty wrote:
       | Shout out to one of the greatest documentaries of all time: PBS's
       | 'Ferrets - The Pursuit of Excellence'.
       | 
       | It is ever bit as funny 'Best in Show'... but the characters are
       | real.
       | 
       | The only place I can find a streaming version is this low quality
       | YouTube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrhSFMO4egI&t=4163s
       | 
       | The DVD is now ~$80 on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Pursuit-
       | Excellence-Ferrets/dp/B000RL2...
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | stewx wrote:
       | Reminds me of the Silicon Valley ferret neighbour scene:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMK_GAyRY0o
        
         | lovetocode wrote:
         | I was quite literally watching SV when I saw this post
        
       | Saint_Genet wrote:
       | Also, let's not forget, let's not forget, Dude, that keeping
       | wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know,
       | within the city, that aint legal either.
        
         | tokai wrote:
         | They are not wildlife.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | projektfu wrote:
           | It was a Big Lebowski reference.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | the upper case Dude was a dead giveaway, but that's just
             | like your opinion man.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | mirceal wrote:
         | What? Are you a park ranger now?
        
         | paulgb wrote:
         | TIL that although the Dude referred to it (earlier in the
         | movie) as a marmot, the part was played by a ferret.
         | https://thebiglebowski.fandom.com/wiki/Marmot
        
         | jansan wrote:
         | "Are you familiar with the California fish and game code
         | section. 21.16-21.26 with regard to the possession and
         | harboring of ferrets?"
         | 
         | "Oh god"
         | 
         | "Oh yeah, those little shits are illegal."
        
       | pvaldes wrote:
       | And many people sweating blood and tears to save endemic fishes
       | like the Bonytail, the razorback sucker, the Colorado Pikeminnow,
       | the four Ambystoma species of tiger salamanders, the California
       | Red-legged frog, the Giant and San Francisco Gartersnakes, the
       | California Ridgway's rail. Without talking of the endangered
       | freshwater clams, snails and crustaceans of California.
       | 
       | This man is not a hero. Feral ferrets would treat tens of species
       | of endangered animals of California. They even maybe could block
       | an hypothetical future reintroduction of the American polecat
       | (unlikely, as is a pairie dog specialized hunter from Central US,
       | but not impossible as is one of the most endangered mammals of
       | US).
       | 
       | All this effort could be destroyed for the lack of vision of one
       | single man and the "but is so cute" trap. Nature is too important
       | to be left to the caprices of pet owners.
        
         | jasonhansel wrote:
         | 1. Wouldn't requiring ferrets (aside from the limited number
         | needed for breeding) to be spayed or neutered greatly reduce
         | this risk?
         | 
         | 2. Don't feral cats and dogs also pose a threat to ecosystems?
         | Why should the threat to endangered species necessarily
         | outweigh the significant psychological benefits of pet
         | ownership?
         | 
         | 3. Couldn't feral ferrets from one of the many states where
         | they are already legal easily make their way into California
         | anyway?
         | 
         | 4. Since many people violate the ferret ban anyway, wouldn't
         | legalizing and regulating the keeping of ferrets result in more
         | responsible ferret ownership?
        
           | guerrilla wrote:
           | > Don't feral cats and dogs also pose a threat to ecosystems?
           | 
           | Yes, but that doesn't mean we should make it worse.
           | 
           | > Why should the threat to endangered species necessarily
           | outweigh the significant psychological benefits of pet
           | ownership?
           | 
           | Because ecosystem collapse could kill us or at the very least
           | be very expensive in the long run. We're not gods, so we
           | depend on the ecosystem working.
           | 
           | > Couldn't feral ferrets from one of the many states where
           | they are already legal easily make their way into California
           | anyway?
           | 
           | Maybe, but that doesn't mean we should make it worse.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | 1. Neutered animals still hunt, one single racoon released in
           | a small Spanish Island by idiots almost wiped the entire
           | colony of an endangered marine bird in two years.
           | 
           | 2. One problem does not exclude the other. Ferrets live in
           | freshwater systems. Can swim and eat amphibians, fishes and
           | molluscs. They know how to manage toads to remove the poison
           | glands and then eat the toad entire. Feral cats don't like
           | frogs, and avoid entering in water unless necessary. Cats
           | favor to live near humans and are quickly extirpated from
           | wild areas with raptors. Ferrets instead, dive into crevices
           | and rocks, remain hidden and are much more hard to hunt.
           | 
           | 3. They could and they should be eliminated if you want to
           | save the Californian fauna. In any case "I want to be allowed
           | to violate the law in my state, because the other states
           | don't care and is free for all there" is a false dichotomy.
           | 
           | 4. Not. You would just increase the number of ferrets and the
           | probability of escape. To start, entire litters would be
           | released by the animalist crew (100% of probability if the
           | species is legally allowed to breed). Moreover, ferrets
           | aren't dogs, they enter in each hole of crevice that see, and
           | need to investigate it, even for days. They will not return
           | to you when you call them so (unlike cats and dogs), if you
           | let your pet play in the garden alone for one minute, you
           | will lose it. Entire females in heat are an "hormonal bomb"
           | they either mate or die by stress if let alone. This mean
           | that they travel a lot in search of a male.
        
             | scythe wrote:
             | >one single racoon released in a small Spanish Island
             | 
             | Island fauna are uniquely ignorant of threats. On some
             | islands, birds will literally walk right up to humans -- a
             | huge, mean apex predator. The situation in California is
             | not reasonably comparable.
        
             | pxc wrote:
             | > They will not return to you when you call them so (unlike
             | cats and dogs),
             | 
             | Ferrets can be recall trained using literally the exact
             | same methods as one uses for cats and dogs. They learn the
             | same way.
             | 
             | > if you let your pet play in the garden alone for one
             | minute, you will lose it.
             | 
             | Yeah, this kind of thing likely surprises a lot of new
             | ferret owners. People I've seen who are serious about
             | caring for their ferrets never leave them unsupervised
             | outdoors, ever. Leashes, backpacks, and fully enclosed
             | structures (like 'catios') are popular tools. Even
             | supervised outdoor play requires a lot of preparation and
             | vigilance.
        
             | olalonde wrote:
             | > one single racoon released in a small Spanish Island by
             | idiots almost wiped the entire colony of an endangered
             | marine bird in two years
             | 
             | That's crazy. Do you have a link to that?
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | Let me refresh my memory
               | 
               | Checked. I stand corrected. It was a few months, not two
               | years and the seabird was not an endangered species
               | globally (but can be locally).
               | 
               | It happened in the National park of Timanfaya almost
               | twenty years ago. At the end of June-2003, a trail of
               | depredated corpses of Scopoli's shearwaters started to
               | appear.
               | 
               | The area is dry and the invisible predator left no traces
               | and almost no faeces to examine. The National Park staff
               | suspected a ferret as main candidate. Dogs, cats or even
               | badgers were also in the list, some camera traps were set
               | and eventually show a racoon.
               | 
               | Until caught at the end of the summer, the final
               | "bodycount" was 100 shearwaters killed (plus the orphaned
               | chicks unable to survive without the parents). This just
               | by one single racoon in a single summer. The animal was
               | tame, not afraid of people and was clearly a released
               | pet. If it hadn't happened in a national park no one
               | would have bothered to hunt it.
               | 
               | I only found a link in Spanish, you can use google
               | translate if you are curious about the details.
               | 
               | https://www.abc.es/espana/canarias/abci-capturado-
               | mapache-ca...
        
               | xbar wrote:
               | Similar but different, invasive rats in Galapagos have
               | been particularly destructive in the past 50 years.
               | 
               | https://galapagosconservation.org.uk/invasive-black-rats-
               | in-...
        
               | cmrdporcupine wrote:
               | "Wild" North American raccoons here in their native range
               | are also completely unafraid of people. Or even dogs. At
               | least in urban areas. They basically "know" that they
               | can't really be messed with, because it's not typically
               | legal to shoot them, they have nasty teeth and claws, and
               | they're ridiculously smart.
        
               | navbaker wrote:
               | I found this in the first google result ( https://www.sci
               | encedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896971... ), but
               | my first pass at the article didn't mention anything
               | about a marine bird it threatened.
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | Different cases and different places. Mallorca Island is
               | located south of France. Lanzarote Island is located to
               | the west of the Sahara.
               | 
               | The Mediterranean Islands had pygmy elephants, endemic
               | goats, bunny like rodents with short ears and forests
               | with many trees that were extinct long time ago. All
               | fauna now is similar to the continent, and seabirds know
               | since long time ago that there are small carnivores
               | roaming; and that some places are safe to nest and other
               | not.
               | 
               | Canary islands have their own biodiversity area and
               | remained much more isolated with no native wild carnivore
               | predators.
        
               | tomc1985 wrote:
               | A couple of housecats multiplied and wiped out a bunch of
               | native species on California's San Clemente island a
               | while back. A friend of mine was a contractor doing work
               | for the Navy on that island (it's USG property) and told
               | me stories about how some of the other folks stationed
               | there would grab a shotgun and Jeep and go cat huntin'
        
               | clsec wrote:
               | They also have a huge racoon problem in Japan where they
               | were introduced.
               | 
               | https://www.dw.com/en/raccoons-wreak-havoc-with-
               | agriculture-...
               | 
               | edit: link
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | Can't fall to mention that the "racoon" shown in the
               | photo is a Japanese native mammal :-)
        
             | jasonhansel wrote:
             | I think we may be in agreement about the potential risks of
             | ferret legalization, even if we disagree about the
             | likelihood of the worst case scenario.
             | 
             | But regardless, you need to weigh those risks against the
             | enjoyment and psychological benefit that owners derive from
             | pet ferrets, just like with pets of any other species.
        
               | mikestew wrote:
               | _But regardless, you need to weigh those risks against
               | the enjoyment and psychological benefit that owners
               | derive from pet ferrets, just like with pets of any other
               | species._
               | 
               | I need do no such thing, especially when the argument is
               | one logical step away from "but ma freedumbs!". Or
               | whataboutism, I haven't decided. But "yeah, we might lose
               | an endangered species or two, but what about _my_ needs?
               | " is what I'm reading here.
        
               | rexpop wrote:
               | > you need to weigh those risks against the enjoyment and
               | psychological benefit
               | 
               | The risks are massive, and the opportunity cost
               | miniscule.
        
               | wcarron wrote:
               | The enjoyment and psychological benefit of pet ownership
               | is of exactly zero consequence.
        
               | armada651 wrote:
               | > But regardless, you need to weigh those risks against
               | the enjoyment and psychological benefit that owners
               | derive from pet ferrets, just like with pets of any other
               | species.
               | 
               | What's the unique psychological benefit that owners get
               | from a ferret that they wouldn't be able to get from a
               | cat, dog or any of the numerous already legal pets?
        
               | sigzero wrote:
               | Go watch videos of ferrets playing. They are amazing
               | animals. I love mine and would rather have a ferret than
               | a cat but maybe not a dog.
        
               | pxc wrote:
               | Or if you're not in CA, see if you can find a ferret
               | rescue willing to let you meet some in person.
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | There is also enjoyment and psychological benefit in
               | watching native animals in nature. Who has the priority?
        
               | ocdtrekkie wrote:
               | Ferrets are, like dogs, heavily play-focused animals. For
               | people who can't own a dog-sized animal, ferrets are an
               | excellent choice for active pet owners. Your rabbit or
               | guinea pig is literally going to sit there, eat, and
               | poop. Ferrets are one of the only small pets you can
               | really actually play with.
               | 
               | I think they're extremely good pets for kids, because
               | they're friendly, active, (relatively) robust and much
               | less likely to cause harm to a kid than a larger animal
               | like a dog.
        
               | nomel wrote:
               | My small dog is about 2 lbs heavier than a ferret, and
               | shorter in length.
        
               | hgomersall wrote:
               | Arguably cats and dogs should be banned too!
        
               | nomel wrote:
               | Cats definitely. I've seen outdoor cats kill many birds,
               | and have even come across house cats out on hiking
               | trails. What do dogs do to native wildlife though? I've
               | never seen this argument made before. Wild dog packs are
               | very rare, and usually taken care of since they're
               | dangerous. Ferrel cats aren't all that different from
               | house cats, and can be found everywhere.
        
               | Clubber wrote:
               | Just ban people from California and be done with it. 99%
               | of all of California's ecological problems would be
               | solved right there.
        
               | rcpt wrote:
               | At the very least allow people to kill cats when they're
               | on your property.
               | 
               | Instead you can face a year in jail if you put down the
               | cat that's been hunting your rabbits and chickens
        
               | cmrdporcupine wrote:
               | People have problems with cats and chickens? Dogs, sure,
               | but cats?
               | 
               | Our chickens stare down the neighbour's barn cat (who
               | hunts full size rabbits BTW) and the cat is like...
               | hm.... not worth it, and she moves on.
               | 
               | Now, I wouldn't want cats around when they're still
               | chicks, true. A rooster comes in handy then, though.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | hgomersall wrote:
               | A few years ago someone in the UK put an electric net
               | over their vegetable patch, probably to stop cats. Long
               | story short a cat was killed by said electric net. He was
               | prosecuted but only got a fine of PS60 or something. I
               | suspect he might have felt that was good value to
               | eliminate the cat shit from his veggies.
        
               | sanedigital wrote:
               | > But regardless, you need to weigh those risks against
               | the enjoyment and psychological benefit that owners
               | derive from pet ferrets, just like with pets of any other
               | species.
               | 
               | This almost sounds like satire. You can't have a ferret.
               | Dad said so. Go play with something else.
        
               | mikeyouse wrote:
               | Right. It's such a tiring method of argument -- "You
               | can't do anything until you exhaustively quantify the
               | plusses and minuses." Some things are self-evidently bad
               | ideas with potential costs so large and "benefits" so
               | imperceptible that they can be safely ignored out of
               | hand.
               | 
               | Sorry man, you don't get to have ferrets. You also can't
               | own a cheetah or a chimpanzee. Get a hamster, cat, dog,
               | tarantula, python, goat, chicken, alpaca, chinchilla,
               | fish, parakeet or one of the dozens of other options.
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | > It's such a tiring method of argument -- "You can't do
               | anything until you exhaustively quantify the plusses and
               | minuses."
               | 
               | It takes like ten seconds to go over the benefits of
               | ferrets. Why be lazy? I don't think it's a bad idea to
               | briefly weigh both sides in just about every situation.
        
               | alistairSH wrote:
               | Sure...
               | 
               | - Pluses: furry animal in the house. This benefit can be
               | bestowed by a dog or a hamster.
               | 
               | - Minuses: annihilation of several wild species native to
               | CA. Neither dogs nor hamsters pose this risk.
        
           | ip26 wrote:
           | _Don 't feral cats and dogs also pose a threat to
           | ecosystems?_
           | 
           | Yes. Cats in particular are a disaster. Ecologists have been
           | trying to figure out how to effectively control feral
           | populations and convince people to stop letting domestic cats
           | outdoors for decades.
           | 
           |  _" It's already a disaster so what's the harm in making it a
           | whole lot worse"_ is not the most compelling argument.
        
             | Dylan16807 wrote:
             | Keep in mind that ferrets will displace some amount of
             | cats.
        
         | oldstrangers wrote:
         | A lot of these "ferret fears" come from ignorance about what
         | happened in New Zealand in the late 1800s / early 1900s.
         | Domestic ferrets were crossbred with European polecats and
         | brought to New Zealand specifically to counter rabbit
         | overpopulation.
         | 
         | They introduced a man made killing machine to run through
         | rabbit populations, and unsurprisingly the hybrid ferrets did
         | the job very well. Now they thrive on the island as an invasive
         | species. All that said, these ferrets are genetically distinct
         | from domesticated ferrets. They are not remotely the same
         | thing.
         | 
         | A domestic ferret in the US would last all of 8 minutes in the
         | wild.
        
         | ramblerman wrote:
         | Honest question, what makes you more qualified? You talk as if
         | there is "some" desired state for nature to be in, and that you
         | know what it is.
         | 
         | To be clear, I have no issue with you lobbying your viewpoint,
         | but I find it takes a bit of hubris to pretend to do it on
         | behalf of "nature".
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | > Honest question, what makes you more qualified?
           | 
           | More qualified than whom?
        
         | sigzero wrote:
         | Except that hasn't happened in any other State where Ferrets
         | are legal and have been for many many years. Hmmm.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and maybe we
           | are just not looking carefully at it. Or maybe the damage was
           | yet done.
           | 
           | In any case this is the old area of distribution of the
           | American polecat. Is extinct from all the red area. If you
           | look carefully you will spot three tiny blue dots. This is
           | the area with actual wild populations of American polecat, in
           | the entire planet.
           | 
           | https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8qbxp4Sx6gI/W3S5UtX7E3I/AAAAAAABD.
           | ..
        
             | technothrasher wrote:
             | > Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
             | 
             | Absence of effect is not absence of evidence.
             | 
             | > maybe we are just not looking carefully at it. Or maybe
             | the damage was yet done.
             | 
             | That's a shifting of the burden of proof in an attempt to
             | prop up a claim for which you not only have no evidence,
             | you in fact have counter evidence.
        
             | gwern wrote:
             | > Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and maybe
             | we are just not looking carefully at it. Or maybe the
             | damage was yet done.
             | 
             | If it existed, then enemies of ferrets like yourself, who
             | go so far as to trot out anecdotes about raccoons halfway
             | across the world, would know after all these decades. And
             | the California state regulators would quickly invoke it in
             | their defense. It doesn't exist because it doesn't exist,
             | not because no one cares or is ignorant.
             | 
             | This whole topic does illustrate the benefit of federalism
             | in serving as 'the laboratories of democracy': if ferrets
             | were banned federally, how would we ever know how absurd
             | and false all your arguments about the vast ecological
             | harms of ferrets were? It would be a case of the seen and
             | the unseen. But with federalism, we can simply look at the
             | other 49 states and roll our eyes at the hyperbole. They
             | aren't perfect natural experiments, but they do fine here.
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | You would be surprised about how many things we still
               | don't know in Biology.
               | 
               | But we do know a few things... for example that European
               | and American polecats are mammals in the same genus and
               | close genetically.
               | 
               | So close that both are susceptible to the same diseases
               | and in particular to the same viruses. How do I know
               | that? Because I'm interested in pathology of vertebrates.
               | 
               | We know also that the American polecat went extinct, and
               | that diseases played a main role in that. Check the
               | bibliography.
               | 
               | Are you following me?
               | 
               | So when you say that there was "not any measurable
               | effect". Yes, in fact there is a clear perfectly
               | observable effect. The closest carnivore to European
               | polecats went extinct in the wild. Why?
               | 
               | > benefit of federalism in serving as 'the laboratories
               | of democracy':
               | 
               | I refuse to enter in political stupidity molasses. We are
               | talking about nature problems here.
        
             | sigzero wrote:
             | > Absence of evidence
             | 
             | Your comment is wrong. Ferrets have been legal in other
             | States for enough years to have SOME evidence for people
             | that hate ferrets to use. It isn't there because it doesn't
             | happen.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | tzs wrote:
         | Has this happened in the 48 states (all but California and
         | Hawaii) where ferrets are not banned? How about Canada where
         | they appear to be legal in all provinces?
         | 
         | All I've been able to find on this is the paper "Environmental
         | Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic
         | Carnivores--a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies"
         | [1] which looked at the impact of non-native domestic
         | carnivores (dogs, cats, and ferrets) in the US and Canada.
         | 
         | It says this in the discussion section:
         | 
         | > Aside from an occasional "stray", there were no reports of
         | "feral (breeding)" ferrets; nor were there reports that of
         | "free-living", or "naturalized" ferrets anywhere in the
         | continental United States or Canada, including California. More
         | importantly, no jurisdiction reported ferrets impacting local
         | (native) wildlife, including ground-nesting birds, or
         | threatened, endangered and sensitive species.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664037/
         | 
         | Edit: this comment seems quite controversial. In a few minutes
         | it got several up votes, then quickly got twice as many down
         | votes, then quickly returned to about even. I'm quite confused
         | by this.
        
           | rcpt wrote:
           | > Edit: this comment seems quite controversial
           | 
           | Pet talk on the internet is like that
        
           | frosted-flakes wrote:
           | Rats are illegal in Alberta, and it is one of the few
           | populated areas of the world without rats. Of course, the ban
           | was put into place before the province was over-run with
           | them, and an aggressive rat-killing program was put into
           | place along it's eastern border with Manitoba to stop them
           | migrating any further.
           | 
           | https://www.domyown.com/images/content/rat_distribution_map_.
           | ..
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | > no jurisdiction reported ferrets impacting native wildlife
           | 
           | Hum, so what do they found that those ferrets eat? tacos?
        
           | ocdtrekkie wrote:
           | The idea domesticated ferrets would escape, breed, and
           | threaten wildlife if one of the most hilarious concepts I've
           | ever seen, starting with the fact that getting a ferret that
           | isn't already spayed or neutered is basically impossible, and
           | ending with the fact that domestic ferrets tend to get fat,
           | are lazy, and especially in the case of one of my previous
           | ferrets, remarkably dumb.
           | 
           | Of a dozen ferrets I've had in my life, I can think of one
           | that might be able to find and capture food well enough to
           | survive on his own. And he couldn't reproduce.
           | 
           | It's absolutely shocking to me still that California has this
           | weird villainous perception of these basically elongated
           | rabbits.
        
             | pvaldes wrote:
             | >The idea domesticated ferrets would escape, breed, and
             | threaten wildlife if one of the most hilarious concepts
             | I've ever seen
             | 
             | New Zealanders probably don't find it so funny
        
               | tzs wrote:
               | Ferrets specifically released in large quantity over many
               | years to breed in the wild and threaten wildlife, which
               | is the case in New Zealand (they were trying to get rid
               | of the rabbits), is hardly comparable to pet ferrets
               | which are mostly incapable of breeding and which usually
               | don't survive long if they do get into the wild.
        
             | nomel wrote:
             | > elongated rabbits
             | 
             | That eat meat.
        
           | ttyprintk wrote:
           | Tasmania and Australia proactively eradicate feral colonies.
        
           | ajford wrote:
           | It's highly unlikely, given that released/escaped pet ferrets
           | can't breed. Ferrets purchased for the pet trade are all
           | sterilized as a ferret in heat doesn't end well.
           | 
           | Females can die if they go into heat and don't have a mate to
           | breed with, and male ferrets can get very hostile around a
           | female in heat.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | hilbert42 wrote:
           | _" Edit: this comment seems quite controversial. ..."_
           | 
           | You're not alone, I watched votes on my various comments on
           | this matter oscillate in both directions then settle near one
           | or zero. I thought my comments rather mild and I wasn't
           | deliberately trying to stir up controversy.
           | 
           | A while back I also encountered this sensitivity and
           | tetchiness when discussing veganism. Seems some people
           | consider such subjects verboten and should not be discussed
           | on the internet.
        
         | jpadkins wrote:
         | > Feral ferrets
         | 
         | Citation needed. Where in the other 49 states is this scourge
         | of feral ferrets?
         | 
         | Domesticated ferrets are to known to die fairly quickly if they
         | escape to the wild. They have no hunting instincts. If you are
         | worried about feral animals, why would you allow cats but not
         | ferrets?
        
           | ip26 wrote:
           | _why would you allow cats_
           | 
           | Ecologically speaking, we shouldn't. But the cat is already
           | out of the bag, so to speak.
        
           | alistairSH wrote:
           | Who is claiming feral cars aren't a problem?
        
           | HideousKojima wrote:
           | There are also tons of people in California who _already own_
           | ferrets illegally (one of my friends growing up did) and yet
           | there 's no feral ferret problem in California. Meanwhile
           | there are now feral parrot populations (descended from
           | escaped pets) in my hometown near San Diego that weren't
           | there 15 years ago, and I haven't heard anyone talk about
           | banning parrots for that reason.
        
             | nomel wrote:
             | To be fair, parrots aren't carnivores that directly eat the
             | native wildlife.
        
             | ajford wrote:
             | It's really rare for an escaped "pet ferret" population to
             | boom on it's own, since most ferrets purchased in the pet
             | trade (i.e. not specifically purchased for breeding) are
             | already spayed/neutered. This isn't the case for most other
             | pet species.
             | 
             | IIRC, this is done because female ferrets who go into heat
             | can/do die if they don't mate and male ferrets will become
             | quite hostile when near a female in heat.
        
           | smegger001 wrote:
           | wild cats were already here, they just have been driven out
           | by humans so house cat fill the niche while being able to
           | live beside humans successfully.
        
           | mutatio wrote:
           | > Domesticated ferrets are to known to die fairly quickly if
           | they escape to the wild.
           | 
           | Citation needed.
           | 
           | Seems like feral ferrets exist in Ireland:
           | https://invasivespeciesireland.com/species-
           | accounts/establis...
           | 
           | If ecological history has shown anything, it's that things
           | shouldn't be "tried out" to see if they do indeed become an
           | issue.
        
             | jpadkins wrote:
             | Almost all pet ferrets are sprayed and neutered. Female
             | ferrets die if they go in heat and don't mate.
             | https://www.westdavisvets.com/veterinary-topics/ferret-
             | healt...
             | 
             | Maybe CA would have a position if they banned ferret
             | breeding farms, but banning pet ferrets is simply dumb.
        
             | sigzero wrote:
             | That's a different scenario though. They were brought in to
             | curb other animals. They weren't domesticated ferrets let
             | loose in the wild.
        
         | ejb999 wrote:
         | >>Nature is too important to be left to the caprices of pet
         | owners.
         | 
         | I agree - read up on what is going on in the everglades with
         | the explosion of huge pythons (many were former pets released
         | into the wild) - they have already killed of something like 99%
         | of the small mammals in the everglades, and they are not even
         | close to containing the problem yet.
        
           | sigzero wrote:
           | The isn't happening with ferrets. Ferrets have been legal in
           | other States for many many year (over 30+ years in Virginia
           | for example) and "feral ferrets" is not only not a problem
           | but doesn't happen because they DIE quickly in the wild.
        
         | namlem wrote:
         | Ferrets are legal in neighboring Oregon and Nevada. Do they
         | cause serious problems in those states?
        
           | sigzero wrote:
           | Nope. Been legal in Virginia for 30+ years and nada.
        
         | ajford wrote:
         | So can you explain how a number of escaped pet-trade ferrets
         | can grow into a force that can threaten an ecosystem when they
         | are unable to increase their population size?
        
         | Supermancho wrote:
         | > Feral ferrets would treat tens of species of endangered
         | animals of California.
         | 
         | They die at temperatures that are a sustained sub-65 degrees or
         | sustained 100+ degrees (which you can demonstrate with a live
         | ferret, although I wouldn't recommend it).
         | 
         | The blackfooted ferret (endangered) is native to California.
         | The claim that domestic sable ferrets would be invasive is
         | ridiculous on it's face.
         | 
         | > Nature is too important to be left to the caprices of pet
         | owners.
         | 
         | The CA fish and game commission is completely ideologically
         | captured as they do not want to engage in any sort of
         | scientific study for the non-existence of existing process
         | (beyond a simple decree) or legal jeopardy that they may become
         | embroiled in, after the fact. They much rather enjoy their
         | salaries mediating the relatively safe cases of licensing and
         | managing bureaucratic rules around existing fish and game.
         | 
         | There's also the uncomfortable truth that people do possess
         | ferrets in CA. Pet stores stock goods for them and vets treat
         | them. People all around CA let their ferrets roam outside and
         | come back in when it gets colder at night (and to get
         | food/water). Young adult/College dorms and apartments are rife
         | with ferret owners. Again, the claims about ferrets being a
         | "potentially" invasive species are specious, at best.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | The European polecat (same species as the domestic ferret),
           | inhabits a territory that goes from Finland to Spain. They
           | live in western Russia and also in Morocco. They are adapted
           | to a wide range of temperatures and climates. If you think
           | that an animal living in Moscow can't survive temperatures
           | below 18 Celsius, well, think again.
           | 
           | In particular they feel pretty at home in the Mediterranean,
           | so would survive perfectly in the Mediterranean weather of
           | California as long as they find something to eat. There is
           | little doubt about it.
           | 
           | And, as is close genetically to the American polecat, and as
           | ferrets need to breed when in heat, there is a danger of
           | genetic contamination or displacement of the ultra-rare
           | American polecat.
           | 
           | I agree that most mammals will boil and turn delicious at 100
           | degrees
        
             | Supermancho wrote:
             | > If you think that an animal living in Moscow can't
             | survive snow, well, think again
             | 
             | I happen to have lots of experience seeing people who have
             | frozen their ferrets, rabbits, hamsters, rats, mice,
             | possums, etc to death. Domesticated ferrets aren't stupid,
             | but they also aren't very good burrowers. Other than
             | finding a nice gopher hole, in the 80s and 90s, a domestic
             | ferret froze to death (still floppy, not solid) outside.
             | Now CA is so hot, they would probably survive pretty well
             | but then die to dehydration and heat in the day even with a
             | burrow.
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | The problem with animalism is that it has a big, big,
               | blind spot. They see individuals named Harry and Rex, is
               | all that they can see. They are blind to the
               | relationships, the consequences, the animals that aren't
               | cute, and refuse to see the big picture.
               | 
               | But individuals don't matter.
               | 
               | Not for the science of ecology. Not for nature. Is the
               | population and ecosystem what matters.
               | 
               | Individuals in a population die all the time. They
               | freeze, starve or are predated each single night. It
               | doesn't matter.
               | 
               | It doesn't matter if 980 of each 1000 released ferrets
               | die before an hour.
        
               | Supermancho wrote:
               | While I agree, the problem is that the Black footed
               | ferret already is endangered AND the legal ferrets have
               | not crept into the ecosystem from beyond the arbitrary
               | lines humans have drawn. So at both the micro and macro
               | perspectives, you have no explosion of population.
               | 
               | Taking a large population of ferrets and putting them in
               | some California farmland and see them die off might be
               | what your conscience requires as "proper evidence", but
               | it's ironically illegal to even perform the test. Much
               | like the CA F&G, it's an ideological problem, not an
               | evidence based one for you.
        
           | pxc wrote:
           | > People all around CA let their ferrets roam outside and
           | come back in when it gets colder at night (and to get
           | food/water)
           | 
           | Do you mean 'roam' within extremely ferret-proofed yards?
           | Ferrets famously lack a homing instinct and are not likely to
           | find a way home after wandering off, if left outside
           | unsupervised.
        
           | the_watcher wrote:
           | I was just thinking about the last paragraph. I honestly
           | didn't know they were illegal in CA, since I had so many
           | friends that owned them growing up (inland southern CA). They
           | bought food at the pet store, brought them in for show and
           | tell, etc. They didn't hide it at all.
        
             | bragr wrote:
             | As apposed to all the other illegal things people do right
             | out on the open?
        
       | snug wrote:
       | Something I found out about moving to California from Texas where
       | I had a ferret. You could still buy ferret food in California,
       | even though they are banned. The ferret sadly passed away before
       | I moved, or even planned to move.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-29 23:01 UTC)