[HN Gopher] AI-guided robots are ready to sort recyclables
___________________________________________________________________
AI-guided robots are ready to sort recyclables
Author : giuliomagnifico
Score : 30 points
Date : 2022-06-25 18:48 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org)
| geuis wrote:
| I wish articles like this would just get to the point. We don't
| need yet another explanation of how recycling works, how it has
| low recovery rates, etc. Given the audience, take it as a given
| the reader has the basics down.
|
| Further down the author finally starts to talk about their topic
| (trash picking robots), but then digresses yet again. It's a
| really terrible writing style.
|
| State what your topic is up front with a brief high level, then
| you can mix in some more background while expanding on the
| details further below.
| swayvil wrote:
| If you want to be taken seriously you need to pad everything
| out to 40 paragraphs. It's some kind of unwritten rule of the
| internet. Literally. They even have bots that cull succinctity
| or label it trolly. It's psychotic.
| darepublic wrote:
| I worked at a mid sized startup where this idea was floated for
| developing a prototype. Neat to see it has become production
| level software somewhere
| sschueller wrote:
| What I find sad is to see startups here in Switzerland where we
| already separate and recycle extensively that offer a service
| where you just toss everything that can be recycled in the same
| bag. So batteries are mixed with plastic and cans. These bags
| compete with government collection facilities and are
| "reprogramming" people to be lazy. Regular trash is very
| expensive here and people who want to safe are forced to separate
| and recycle what can be.
|
| The hardest task of recycling is the separation of items.
| Centralizing this does not scale as you need to hire more and
| more underpaid worked to do this task. The task that was done for
| free before by the person throwing the item out. All the
| facilities had to do is sort the remaining small percentage of
| miss sorted items instead of all items.
| malux85 wrote:
| Nobody is suggesting hiring more low skilled people the article
| is about robotics doing the job.
|
| Robotic sorting is better because it's more consistent, most
| people are not diligent or disciplined enough to recycle at
| all, and of those that do, only a minority does it properly.
|
| We should absolutely scale this to machines, since it's a
| useful thing for society, and it gives us (humanity) practice
| at implementing robotic dexterity, which is a precursor to 100
| more even more exciting tasks
| quotemstr wrote:
| Does sorting done by the general public count as "free"? It
| takes time and effort to route garbage to the appropriate bin
| --- maybe not much, but it adds up over the whole population.
| The desire to avoid this effort doesn't strike me as "lazy" any
| more than hiring a housekeeper or landscaper is "lazy".
| Economies of scale and division of labor make our society more
| prosperous. Why shouldn't we apply these principles to trash
| disposal and recycling?
| morcheeba wrote:
| A friend of mine worked at this company, and the bane of his
| existence was one popular Arizona green tea bottle. The plastic
| and glass versions looked identical[1], so no way to sort it
| visually. Great for brand identity, bad downstream.
|
| [1] https://www.plasticstoday.com/packaging/arizona-beverages-
| sw...
| epicureanideal wrote:
| I suppose a law could be passed that versions of a product with
| different materials would need to be visually distinct? Or
| manufacturers could voluntarily do it.
| darkerside wrote:
| I wonder if echolocation could have done the trick
| swayvil wrote:
| Seriously. Give that robot some more senses. Echoic,
| magnetic, infra-ultra, spectrographic analytic, nuclear
| magnetic resonant... the whole schmeer. It's certainly easier
| than making them smarter.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-06-25 23:00 UTC)