[HN Gopher] LMN 3, an open source DAW in a box [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       LMN 3, an open source DAW in a box [video]
        
       Author : brudgers
       Score  : 151 points
       Date   : 2022-06-22 04:13 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | bityard wrote:
       | Kudos to the author, literally everything you need to build your
       | own is nicely organized and documented on GitHub:
       | https://github.com/FundamentalFrequency
        
       | svantana wrote:
       | This is a nice project but I don't see why they need both a rPi
       | _and_ a teensy - either of them are powerful enough and have
       | enough pins to run the whole thing. The rPi is more convenient
       | for running linux-ready software, but teensy-only would have been
       | nice as it is a lot less powerhungry and can run a good while on
       | battery.
        
         | __void wrote:
         | by design, it seems that the teensy+pcb are basically a stand-
         | alone midi controller, while the raspberry instead provides all
         | the "DAW" part of the machine
         | 
         | a nice project, even separated the two elements are reusable
         | for other adventures!
        
         | FundFrequency wrote:
         | So the screen on the Pi takes up all the pins. Thats one reason
         | for using the Teensy (a different screen would be nice, but the
         | Hyperpixel is the perfect form factor and just looks nice and
         | is easy to install). Another is that using the teensy + MIDI
         | over USB keeps things flexible if the project moves to
         | something other than a Pi to run the DAW.
         | 
         | Teensy only would be nice, but it would have been much harder
         | to write the DAW for the Teensy. using the Pi + Linux, I was
         | able to use JUCE and the tracktion engine which simplifies a
         | lot and does a ton of heavy lifting.
        
         | _joel wrote:
         | Maybe for FX processing
        
       | chaosprint wrote:
       | Coolest project I have seen this year.
        
       | jimnotgym wrote:
       | I'm a hack, by ear, guitar player and have been totally bemused
       | by how anyone makes electronic music. This video kind of
       | explained the concepts along with showing off a cool machine. I
       | actually fancy building one!
        
       | redsummer wrote:
        
       | Kye wrote:
       | This is a groovebox, not a DAW. Calling it a DAW understates how
       | cool it is.
        
         | prmoustache wrote:
         | I mean it is running a daw so...
         | 
         | I think there are two valid reason to call some grooveboxes
         | daw-in-boxes:
         | 
         | - if it has a song mode allowing one to do a complete
         | composition without having to record his live performance
         | 
         | - if it allows the installation of audio plugins
         | 
         | For example the akai mpc series are basically computers running
         | linux and the mpc software DAW preconfigured to make use of the
         | physical knobs and pads. Same for the NI Maschine+. To me they
         | are Daws in boxes.
         | 
         | However an elektron machine will be more a groovebox.
        
         | throwawaycuriou wrote:
         | As a hobbyist musician I'm bemused by the stickiness of the
         | concept of a DAW. There are so many all-in-one devices that
         | meet the definition of each letter in the acronym. But DAW is a
         | proxy for something else, vaguely more professional or
         | expensive.
         | 
         | Then you have the idea of DAWless. Oh well, every field has its
         | vestigial jargon.
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | It's like you're accusing me of putting the DAW on a pedestal
           | when I said calling this a DAW diminishes it. I must have
           | misunderstood your comment.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | jbaczuk wrote:
         | I was gonna say, I would never use it as a DAW, but it is darn
         | cool!
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | iron2disulfide wrote:
       | Related to this, are there any open source audio interfaces,
       | something that can replace a Focusrite 2i2?
        
         | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
         | Basically, no.
        
       | robmccoll wrote:
       | This is great work! JUCE's licensing terms are a little confusing
       | to me - do I correctly read that you can disregard the tier
       | system as long as your usage complies with GPL3?
        
         | robmccoll wrote:
         | If you're looking to bring in more OSS and expand the sound
         | synth pallet, you could bring in some of the Mutable
         | Instruments code a la Arturia and the Microfreak.
         | https://github.com/pichenettes/eurorack
        
       | huslage wrote:
       | This is like an open source OP-1
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-24 23:01 UTC)