[HN Gopher] Stockfish vs. ChessBase for GPLv3 violation: court h...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Stockfish vs. ChessBase for GPLv3 violation: court hearing soon
        
       Author : acifani
       Score  : 177 points
       Date   : 2022-06-23 12:40 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (stockfishchess.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (stockfishchess.org)
        
       | yewenjie wrote:
       | I'm happy that after years of nonchalant abuse of GPL by
       | ChessBase, Stockfish authors have finally taken the matter to the
       | courts. I wish the damages claimed were more.
        
         | zelphirkalt wrote:
         | Lets just hope they actually win (and judges actually
         | understand the matter or people, who do advise), otherwise this
         | is a disaster.
        
           | dantondwa wrote:
           | It's not a disaster, because in Germany there is Roman law,
           | as opposed to America's common law. It's different and it
           | makes a sentence something much less disastrous.
        
           | nceqs3 wrote:
           | German courts don't have the best reputation when it comes to
           | technical subject matter.
        
             | Vespasian wrote:
             | There were already several cases (over the last couple of
             | decades) in Germany where the GPL was part of the
             | proceedings.
             | 
             | They understood the license just fine back then
        
             | xxs wrote:
             | >German courts
             | 
             | compared to what? in the case of the "round corners", the
             | Germans ruled in favor of not-infringing, while the US ones
             | awarded Apple $1B+...
        
               | imglorp wrote:
               | American courts are an extremely low bar for comparison.
        
               | nimbius wrote:
               | how about the case of Christoph Hellwig vs VMware for
               | stealing vmklinux under the GPL. german courts basically
               | dismissed him _twice_ for not being procedural, which
               | gave VMWare ample time to dodge a GPL bullet and remove
               | the code from their kernel without admitting any fault or
               | wrongdoing.
               | 
               | https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/apr/02/vmware-no-
               | appeal/
        
               | adolph wrote:
               | That was a design patent not a case of technical
               | implementation.
               | 
               |  _In the United States, a design patent is a form of
               | legal protection granted to the ornamental design of a
               | functional item. Design patents are a type of industrial
               | design right. Ornamental designs of jewelry, furniture,
               | beverage containers (Fig. 1) and computer icons are
               | examples of objects that are covered by design patents._
               | 
               | [...]
               | 
               |  _A US design patent covers the ornamental design for an
               | object having practical utility. An object with a design
               | that is substantially similar to the design claimed in a
               | design patent cannot be made, used, copied or imported
               | into the United States without the permission of the
               | patent holder. The copy does not have to be exact for the
               | patent to be infringed. It only has to be substantially
               | similar._
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_patent
        
       | ajnin wrote:
       | It's going to be interesting because it's in Germany, which is in
       | Europe. There's been a recent court case in France that ruled
       | that copyright claims based on the GPL were invalid because it is
       | a contract, and you can't claim both copyright and a contract on
       | something, so it should be dealt with in civil contract court.
       | (Or in other words, granting a license like the GPL invalidates
       | all copyright claims you might have in the future!)
       | 
       | The article is quite light on details, I wonder on what exact
       | grounds they filed their claim.
        
         | sva_ wrote:
         | I think the case you're thinking of was in France:
         | 
         | https://thehftguy.com/2020/09/15/french-judge-rules-gpl-lice...
        
         | jrochkind1 wrote:
         | > you can't claim both copyright and a contract on something,
         | 
         | That makes no sense to me. Licensing copyrighted work is pretty
         | standard, and it must be in France too? The GPL is a license,
         | which is indeed a contract. But surely people license (enter
         | into a contract between copyright holder and user which grants
         | certain allowed uses) copyrighted work in France routinely?
        
         | Vespasian wrote:
         | This is a civil case if I am not mistaken. Earlier cases in
         | Germany where decided in favour of the obligations of the GPL.
        
         | GauntletWizard wrote:
         | I can't even imagine what that means. How do stock photos work
         | in France?
        
         | yellow_lead wrote:
         | So both cases are in Europe?
        
       | omega3 wrote:
       | How were they able to acquire the source code? Is it based on
       | this reporting?
       | https://groups.google.com/g/fishcooking/c/DygaIdBvJm0/m/cjtM...
       | 
       | Even the makefile had a reference to stockfish.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-23 23:02 UTC)