[HN Gopher] Failure Is the Mother of Invention
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Failure Is the Mother of Invention
        
       Author : prostoalex
       Score  : 41 points
       Date   : 2022-06-20 16:47 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.wsj.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.wsj.com)
        
       | dredmorbius wrote:
       | Paywall: https://archive.ph/g0EXi
        
       | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote:
       | And yet at most companies, you are not allowed to even
       | contemplate such a crazy idea. Need for absolute certainty and
       | stability generate conservative committees ( and committee
       | members ), who loathe but to say anything definitive.
       | 
       | Granted, I mostly saw it in banking, but I assume it is not that
       | uncommon.
        
       | SMAAART wrote:
       | I think this is an OpEd for the book "Build: An Unorthodox Guide
       | to Making Things Worth Making" by Tony Fadell
        
       | atoav wrote:
       | I am an improvisational musician. The key to invent from failure
       | is to develope a ever present sense of observing oneself from the
       | outside. The instead of being emberassed when something goes
       | wrong, one can "feel" the potentials that might lurk in where it
       | went wrong.
       | 
       | John Cage once said: If you make a mistake, repeat it.
       | 
       | A trumpeter getting stuck _once_ in a melody is clearly a
       | mistake, them doing the same thing again, and then spinning the
       | thing into a different direction is not only perceived as
       | interesting, it is probably one of the moments where their true
       | genius will become visible the most.
       | 
       | Key to this is to not be too attached to the plan, but to the
       | goal. The plan is that melody you had in mind, or on the sheet.
       | The goal is to play interesting music. If the plan is in the way
       | of playing interesting music, ditch it. If the an is no longer
       | feasible because you fucked up, the plan needs to be adjusted.
       | 
       | This sounds logical for music, but in all other domains (except
       | maybe art and design) people have a very hard time ditching or
       | adjusting the plans immidiately at the point of failure. Kill
       | your darlings and you will get new ones.
        
         | black_knight wrote:
         | <<Once is a mistake. Twice is Jazz.>>
        
         | amfortas7 wrote:
         | One of the greatest piece of music of all time is the fruit of
         | a blatant mistake: Keith Jarrett's Koln concert.
         | 
         | Instead of the required Bosendorfer 290 Imperial, the
         | organization team brought a smaller and badly tuned piano on
         | stage. Jarrett - who was a bit of a diva at times - initially
         | refused to play, but gave in, and the recording is the thing of
         | legends.
        
         | puranjay wrote:
         | Improv of any kind, in general, is fantastic for learning how
         | to fail publicly. I do a bit of improv comedy and its fantastic
         | for getting you out to make a fool of yourself publicly. Some
         | of the best work in improv comes from people failing and
         | flailing and channeling that into something fantastic.
        
       | csdvrx wrote:
       | paywalled
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | this notion that you need to fail seems wrong. Facebook,
       | Microsoft, google never came close to failing and never had big
       | failures yet still had innovations.
        
         | soSadm4n wrote:
         | It's a poetic take on relativity and knowledge acquisition.
         | 
         | Can't be here until you observed back there, because here does
         | not exist without having moved from back there to here.
         | 
         | Qualifying it as failure is subjective and crap poetry coupled
         | to contemporary productivity culture. It's a success in that
         | you learned. It's only a failure because it didn't unicorn.
        
         | cableshaft wrote:
         | > Facebook, Microsoft, google ... never had big failures
         | 
         | Google: Wave, Orkut, Google+, Google Video, Google Glass [1]
         | 
         | Microsoft: Band, Bob, Kin, Zune, Lumia, Windows 8 [2]
         | 
         | Facebook: Poke, Parse, Beacon, Credits, Paper, Slingshot, Libra
         | [3]
         | 
         | That's just products. If you go into security breaches,
         | lawsuits, and operating procedures, you could list several
         | more.
         | 
         | These companies are large enough to have big failures and still
         | keep kicking, and have people start to forget the failures over
         | time (I had forgotten several of these myself). But they
         | definitely aren't immune to having big failures.
         | 
         | [1]: https://www.lewis-lin.com/blog/2018/2/26/googles-product-
         | fai...
         | 
         | [2]: https://gizmodo.com/microsoft-failures-windows-vista-
         | cortana...
         | 
         | [3]: https://startuptalky.com/facebook-failed-products/
        
           | danielmarkbruce wrote:
           | I think his point was their very first product was a success.
           | No failures required.
        
             | jjulius wrote:
             | >I think his point was their very first product was a
             | success. No failures required.
             | 
             | Except those companies, or the people who founded them,
             | also had early failures. For instance, Zuckerberg's
             | original site was more akin to "Hot or Not" than Facebook
             | and got shut down by Harvard. Gates certainly had failures,
             | as did Larry and Sergey. Just because the company they
             | founded was successful from inception doesn't mean it
             | wasn't a struggle to figure out how to get there. It would
             | be wild to me to assume that there are people out there,
             | walking among us, who have never failed.
        
               | danielmarkbruce wrote:
               | Gates was a teen, as was zuckerberg. They were tiny
               | failures. I don't believe Larry or Sergey failed at
               | anything much before google. It was a little problematic
               | afterwards because their mental model for building
               | businesses was pretty distorted by their immediate, crazy
               | success.
        
         | antihipocrat wrote:
         | How many iterations of search engine algorithms were tried
         | before finding a solution that beat the competition? Google now
         | kills many of its own products that don't live up to
         | expectations.
         | 
         | Microsoft has had a number of failed products, even some
         | versions of windows are considered to be failures.
         | 
         | Each company has learned from the failures though, which I
         | think is a main point of the article.
        
         | jjulius wrote:
         | >Facebook
         | 
         | https://www.vox.com/2014/2/25/11623922/meet-facebooks-gravey...
         | 
         | >Microsoft
         | 
         | Zune
         | 
         | >Google
         | 
         | https://killedbygoogle.com/
        
           | sgarman wrote:
           | This post makes me realize you really need to define success
           | before you do anything else.
        
       | gadflyinyoureye wrote:
       | Necessity is still the mother. Failure is the Mengele of
       | invention.
        
       | fennecfoxen wrote:
       | From the ashes of disaster grow the roses of success.
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOyIJVUaoeg
        
       | julienreszka wrote:
       | its not, necessity is
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-21 23:01 UTC)