[HN Gopher] Relearning to Learn
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Relearning to Learn
        
       Author : sourceless
       Score  : 66 points
       Date   : 2022-06-19 08:33 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (sourceless.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (sourceless.org)
        
       | joebob42 wrote:
       | Having a goal, and creating an environment where you can
       | frictionlessly work towards it for a little bit of time most
       | days, is such an unreasonably effective tool. You'll never become
       | a true, deep expert in something with 10 or 15 minutes a day, but
       | in my experience that's all it takes to become perfectly capable
       | at a lot of things.
       | 
       | A few years ago I started having an hour most days that I devote
       | to learning and trying new hobbies / habits / whatever, and when
       | I find something interesting I start giving it a 20 minutes slot
       | in that hour until I stop liking it or I feel I've gotten what I
       | want to out of it. I'm nowhere near a professional at any of this
       | stuff but I have a fulfilling level of competence in a ton of
       | interesting things now, and it's brought me a lot of pleasure.
        
         | agumonkey wrote:
         | And even then, the "expert" goal may be foolish, these days I'm
         | much more about feeling new things, new ideas, at my level. And
         | then let the "little bit" process take me to where I can go. I
         | may never end up an expert but everyday will have been fun and
         | happy.
        
           | joebob42 wrote:
           | Absolutely. When I was younger I was pretty competitive and
           | tried to be good at everything. These days I'm an expert
           | engineer, and I try to let myself do the rest of the stuff I
           | do just for enjoyment.
        
       | BeetleB wrote:
       | Some notes from an older person:
       | 
       | The best approach will vary based on topic, age, and constraints
       | (e.g. professional with kids).
       | 
       | When I was a teenager, I learned Calc I, II, III and a first
       | course of differential equations. I retained most of it. When I
       | decided to take more advanced math courses later on (just a few
       | years later), I was always saddened by my inability to retain
       | much after the course was over. I kept wondering if I'm in my
       | decline (at the old, old age of 25).
       | 
       | No - I was not. The nature of the material had changed. Whereas
       | stuff you learn in Calc I and Calc II is material you can easily
       | and often apply in engineering, some random theorem in group
       | theory is not. When you study a theorem in Calc II, the frequency
       | with which that theorem is invoked in the same book is high. When
       | you get to higher math, it does become somewhat broader: Most
       | theorems are invoked only a few times in the book.
       | 
       | There's also raw talent vs techniques. Younger me got by with raw
       | talent, but at some point the material you're learning will
       | supersede your talent. You then need to strategize (and different
       | topics may require different strategies). Don't knock raw
       | talent/skills - they can be honed and it may be worth honing
       | them. But broadly: The person who has good systematic study
       | skills will eventually overtake the raw talent person.
       | 
       | Most of the approaches that will work if you have all the time in
       | the world will fail you when time becomes constrained. I started
       | using spaced repetition a few years ago and it has been a game
       | changer. I can study things for a bit, take a break for a few
       | months, and mostly can pick up where I left off despite not
       | practicing that material in those months.
       | 
       | Having said that, most of Becky's advice is good. The one thing
       | I'd disagree with is:
       | 
       | > "Five minutes every day is better than an hour once per week"
       | 
       | This definitely depends on the material. You're not going to get
       | far in math on just 5 minutes a day. Some topics will need a
       | lower bound of minimum time per session.
        
       | bmitc wrote:
       | Learning and reading is something I've been struggling with. One,
       | getting older, even at a relatively young age is definitely
       | taking its toll. It's mainly my memory. I've always had great
       | recall, but it has gotten slower. Secondly, I believe computers
       | and in particular phones and tablets have partially destroyed my
       | attention span and ability to be comfortable inside a book for a
       | long period of time. I read all the time, but not in a deep,
       | concentrated way. Despite knowing these things are problems, even
       | though I typically read or learn on them and do not play any
       | games on mobile devices, it has taken me to admit to myself that
       | I absolutely _must_ distance myself from mobile devices, and even
       | my computer, if I want to get back to long-form, deep learning.
       | Both are going to take some practice and discipline.
       | 
       | One thing that has helped is signing up for actual university
       | classes as opposed to online courses. Online courses are of
       | course awesome, but taking a few graduate level mathematics
       | courses at a local university really got me back into deep
       | reading, of at least technical material.
       | 
       | Another thing is trying to reduce my anxiety. Instead of worrying
       | about all the books I have that are unread, of which there are
       | hundreds and maybe even over a thousand (yes, I have a problem
       | collecting books), I'm trying to just concentrate on one or two
       | and actually finish before switching or moving on. This is one of
       | the hardest things when your interests change fast, but I am
       | really trying to bolt myself down on this one. I'm not quite
       | there yet.
        
         | blinkingled wrote:
         | > computers and in particular phones and tablets have partially
         | destroyed my attention span
         | 
         | Right on. That and the constant, never ending polling for
         | information that comes with it leaves you with no downtime and
         | a very worn out feeling. We need downtime throughout the day -
         | pick up a task, do it, put it down and do nothing for a while
         | before switching to another. Without that you can't focus and
         | that leads to irritation which makes things worse.
        
         | orbit7 wrote:
         | Understanding the zeigarnik effect and assigning a the literal
         | next action to everything made a dramatic difference for me in
         | this respect its alike to shutting down a ton of background
         | processes with pop-ups. The subconscious keeps bubbling up
         | stuff. On the positive side its also a useful to use as a
         | memory tool for pinging up stuff you need to remember.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-19 23:00 UTC)