[HN Gopher] A Visual Guide to the Aztec Pantheon
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Visual Guide to the Aztec Pantheon
        
       Author : sdoering
       Score  : 248 points
       Date   : 2022-06-17 08:21 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (pudding.cool)
 (TXT) w3m dump (pudding.cool)
        
       | christkv wrote:
       | I'll post this great documentary about the rise and fall of the
       | Aztec empire. This is the first part https://youtu.be/f8JVdpWCKeM
        
         | AlotOfReading wrote:
         | Worth pointing out that while that documentary isn't
         | irredeemably bad, it gets a _lot_ of information wrong. The
         | whole point about the timing of corn domestication, for
         | example? Wrong dates, and corn wasn 't even close to the first
         | crop domesticated. Squashes were and evidence for their
         | domestication in the Americas extends to at least 11k BP. The
         | bronze-making thing? Mesoamerica was notoriously late to game
         | as far as American metallurgy goes, but it had been present in
         | mesoamerica since around the 7th century.
         | 
         | The second has much the same issues with being unfamiliar with
         | current knowledge and an uncritical acceptance of literary
         | sources/narratives.
        
       | scaglio wrote:
       | Amazing work! I'd just like the final table to be interactive as
       | soon as it becomes visible, but it's a great site.
        
       | bigmattystyles wrote:
       | I was going to make an NFT joke but these illustrations are so
       | cool they don't belong in the same breath.
        
         | 1shooner wrote:
         | I was thinking that minting deities would get us even further
         | into Stephenson territory, which means its probably happening
         | already...
        
       | whatshisface wrote:
       | More than one of these purports to have become the moon; I'm
       | skeptical.
        
       | jamal-kumar wrote:
       | Very interesting, would love to see something similar for what we
       | know of the Mayan deities and beliefs too.
        
       | JoeDaDude wrote:
       | The author mentions being inspired by the anime The Mysterious
       | Cities of Gold. I found that anime to be historically well
       | informed (informed, but not historically accurate, just consider
       | the flying Conder machine). This led me to do some digging on the
       | story and I found the real, historical inspirations for the
       | characters.
       | 
       | Shameless plug, read my findings here:
       | 
       | https://jeffzurita.com/2019/05/19/estevan-and-the-cities-of-...
        
       | TheMerovingian wrote:
       | I'd love to see this for the old Slavic gods (e.g. Perun, Vales,
       | etc).
        
       | AnthonBerg wrote:
       | Here's a wonderful series of comments on Aztec culture and
       | thought, here on HN:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19060487
       | 
       | The post and discussion recommend the book _Aztecs - An
       | Interpretation_ by Inga Clendinnen:
       | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589094#fndtn-information
       | 
       | It's a captivating book. Truly.
       | 
       | From the Cambridge Books site:
       | 
       |  _Book description:_
       | 
       |  _In 1521, the city of Tenochtitlan, magnificent centre of the
       | Aztec empire, fell to the Spaniards and their Indian allies. Inga
       | Clendinnen 's account of the Aztecs recreates the culture of that
       | city in its last unthreatened years. It provides a vividly
       | dramatic analysis of Aztec ceremony as performance art, binding
       | the key experiences and concerns of social existence in the late
       | imperial city to the mannered violence of their ritual killings._
       | 
       |  _Reviews_
       | 
       |  _' ... a fascinating, thought-provoking book. Aztecs offers a
       | gripping account of an alien society and thus enlarges our
       | apprehension of the sheer diversity of human culture.'_
       | 
       |  _Source: London Review of Books_
       | 
       |  _' This is an outstanding book ...'_
       | 
       |  _Source: The Times Higher Education Supplement_
        
         | bradrn wrote:
         | I recall thinking that was an excellent blog post too... until
         | I actually mentioned it to someone who knew something about the
         | Aztecs, at which point we realised that both it and Clendinnen
         | badly misremresented Aztec society as compared to European
         | society. The relevant conversation may still be found at
         | http://verduria.org/viewtopic.php?p=33912#p33912.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | armandososa wrote:
       | > But, despite this enchantment, Quetzalcoatl and Tlaloc were the
       | only gods I could identify, while I could name dozens of Greek,
       | Egyptian or Norse Gods.
       | 
       | I think this is related to racism. The Aztecs were short and
       | brown people who were considered inferior by the europeans who
       | "conquered" them. Thus, their deities and religion are
       | unimportant.
       | 
       | My middle name is "Quetzalcoatl" and I spent most of my life
       | ashamed of it, and hiding it, because of the bullying. I would've
       | been call an "indio" (I'm short and brown) and indios are
       | supposed to be stupid and ignorant. These days I would like to
       | proudly present myself as Quetzalcoatl, but the prejudice is
       | still there.
        
         | zasdffaa wrote:
         | Oh give over. Norse gods are european, and with greek, roman
         | and egyption gods, we've had thousands of years awareness &
         | contact with those cultures.
         | 
         | > who were considered inferior by the europeans who "conquered"
         | them
         | 
         | Anyone who wasn't a catholic was probably considered subhuman
         | by the truly appalling conquistadors
         | 
         | > indios are supposed to be stupid and ignorant
         | 
         | news to me.
        
           | calibas wrote:
           | > Oh give over. Norse gods are european, and with greek,
           | roman and egyption gods, we've had thousands of years
           | awareness & contact with those cultures.
           | 
           | Ah, eurocentrism. It's forgivable since you were likely
           | educated this way since birth, but it comes off as hideously
           | insensitive to other cultures.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | >but it comes off as hideously insensitive to other
             | cultures.
             | 
             | more ignorant than insensitive. it's not that they aren't
             | showing concern because they don't like and feel it is
             | inferior, it is just unknown in totatlity to them. is being
             | unaware of something's existence being insensitive to it,
             | or have others become hypersensitive?
        
           | cambalache wrote:
        
         | whatshisface wrote:
         | The Aztec religion before the plague and the establishment of
         | that awful island empire might have been very different -
         | imagine what would happen of American Christianity if 90% of
         | the population died and a bloodthirsty militant faction took
         | over the remnants. Maybe some of it will turn up over the next
         | century of archeology.
        
           | pookah wrote:
           | Be lucky you live in 2022. In the 1500's the Aztecs routinely
           | sacrificed children for Tlaloc. And these weren't clean
           | deaths. The children were tortured by the high priests and
           | crowds to induce hysteria and sobbing before having their
           | hearts ripped out of their chests. They were then skinned and
           | the priests would wear the flayed skin for 20 days. And it
           | goes without saying that these kids weren't willing
           | participants.
           | 
           | https://www.mexicolore.co.uk/acrobats/319_1.pdf
           | 
           | There's a reason the Aztec had so many enemies and why the
           | locals embraced a religion where the sacrifice was Jesus.
        
           | ch4s3 wrote:
           | Probably not so different. There were numerous dialogues and
           | debates between Mexica priests and Jesuits, as many priests
           | survived the collapse of Tenochtitlan so there's good second
           | hand evidence about their beliefs. Nahuas were writing their
           | language using the Spanish alphabet by 1528 and there are
           | accounts written by Mexica that remembered the time prior to
           | the arrival of the Spanish. There's also a lot of
           | archeological evidence that's turned up in the lat decade
           | including in 2020 a skull tower that scholars had previously
           | thought was an invention of Spanish writers.
        
             | whatshisface wrote:
             | That's not the apocalypse I meant, I was talking about the
             | one that _Produced_ Tenochtitlan. The deaths from smallpox
             | and the vanishing of the cities they 're now finding
             | evidence of happened before the Spanish conquests.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | The first know case of smallpox in Mexico was in 1520.
               | It's REALLY unlikely that small pox reached anywhere near
               | Tenochtitlan before Cortes, after all he arrived there in
               | 1521, a mere 29 years after Columbus' initial landing.
               | Cortes was part of the first wave of explorers in Mexico.
               | Tenochtitlan was founded in the 1320, a full 500 years
               | after the collapse of the Mayan city states. Teotihuacan
               | which was near Tenochtitlan also collapsed during that
               | period. When the Mexica arrived at lake Texcoco, there
               | were already several thriving city states, that didn't
               | collapse and two of them became part of the Triple
               | Alliance with the Mexica.
               | 
               | I've never seen evidence of smallpox preceding the
               | Spanish in Mexico, as it did above the RIo Grande.
        
               | ALittleLight wrote:
               | This period is well recorded. Cortes made it to
               | Tenochtitlan the first time before small pox. Cortes and
               | company were driven from the city and nearly killed. The
               | Spaniards regrouped and were reinforced while small pox
               | devastated the Aztec population - including Tenochtitlan.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | Yes, that's exactly what I'm pointing to.
        
         | lliamander wrote:
         | > I think this is related to racism.
         | 
         | I don't know the author's cultural background, although I would
         | guess they are from either the U.K. or France (their name is
         | Breton in origin). It is at best straining the definition of
         | racism to claim that it is racist to be more familiar with
         | one's own culture (including it's historical influences) than
         | with a foreign culture.
         | 
         | It is sad to hear that you were belittled for your name (that
         | _is_ racist) but it is not because of racism that Westerners
         | are generally unfamiliar with the gods of the Aztec.
        
       | agomez314 wrote:
       | This is very useful as I've been reading Hugh Thomas' epic,
       | "Conquest: Cortes, Montezuma, and the Fall of Old Mexico"[1] and
       | having a good understanding of these deities is fundamental to
       | understand the life and culture of the Mexica people.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.amazon.com/Conquest-Cortes-Montezuma-Fall-
       | Mexico...
        
       | delaaxe wrote:
       | What JS library is used to produce this scrolling effect?
        
         | 411111111111111 wrote:
         | Likely just some custom css animations.
         | 
         | This build doesn't obfuscate what it's done with, so wappalizer
         | can show some of the technologies used. (Svelte, vite, corejs,
         | AWS, nodejs)
         | 
         | And Svelte makes it pretty straightforward to make custom
         | animations like this
        
       | joe8756438 wrote:
       | The illustrations are _so good_, beautiful work and rendered well
       | for breaking down the whole to understand the meaning of the
       | components.
        
       | zasdffaa wrote:
       | This surprises me as I read a lot about Aztecs and their
       | iconography was described by an expert as 'dense and obscure' and
       | i never found good examples of any of it, so this is ...
       | interesting.
       | 
       | Some doubts, the 'blood drops' on the skull are - I think -
       | actually pox marks from disease, quite appropriate for the death
       | god. Also, missing is a note on their sandals which if you look,
       | have a high back to them around the heel. This was apparently a
       | symbol of rank (weird eh).
       | 
       | I'd like to see clearer references to explain each, and some
       | explanation of why, as well as what. But good to see this.
        
       | derevaunseraun wrote:
       | imo the most bizarre thing about the Aztecs was the sheer
       | magnitude of human sacrifice. In order for human sacrifice to be
       | such a big tradition during times of peace implies a completely
       | different sense of self and life as a whole. When the
       | missionaries came and tried to put a stop to the sacrifices, the
       | victims actually fought to be sacrificed. It's just bizarre (and
       | unsettling) how culture can push people to do things to their own
       | detriment
       | 
       | Source (alternative frontend w/ no ads):
       | https://yewtu.be/watch?v=or6W4sXpl3c
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | But to their culture, you're not a very good whatever to not be
         | willing to sacrafice yourself for the betterment of the group.
         | 
         | Everything is a matter of perspective. You believe that the
         | gods they believe(d) in are not real, but to them, it was. They
         | were happy in their ways of life until the foreigners came in
         | and forced their beliefs on them. Are/were they better off
         | being forced to stop? No way to know. Soldiers in ancient times
         | thought it was better to die in combat than escape to fight
         | another day.
        
       | bane wrote:
       | I'm wondering if anybody can shed light on the prevalence of 'TL'
       | in so many Aztec language words? IIR it's a latinized way of
       | representing a single unique consonant, but it's fascinating that
       | it's in nearly every name and in so many other Aztec words I've
       | seen.
        
         | zasdffaa wrote:
         | I've read that 'tl' was similar to the welsh 'll' sound (a kind
         | of hissy L sound, though not really, youtube will have some
         | spoken examples) but when I've heard 'tl' spoken it usually
         | sounds like a 'tl', as in 'little'.
        
           | sudenmorsian wrote:
           | Yes, it's a very similar sound. The Welsh <ll> is the
           | voiceless lateral fricative /l/, which is effectively <tl>
           | without the initial 't' at the start of the phoneme.
           | 
           | See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_dental_and_alveo
           | lar_...
        
         | sudenmorsian wrote:
         | In Classical Nahuatl, non-possessed nouns would take the
         | absolutive case with -tl for nouns ending in vowels, and -tli
         | for nouns ending in consonants. [0] Here, as you mentioned,
         | <tl> marks a single consonant: the voiceless alveolar lateral
         | affricate /tl/ [1].
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Nahuatl_grammar#Noun...
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_alveolar_lateral_aff...
        
         | dwringer wrote:
         | There is some limited discussion here[0] which doesn't fully
         | explain the prevalence of "tl" but suggests the word "atl"
         | meaning "water" was very common and often combined with other
         | words to create new words metaphorically.
         | 
         | [0]https://basketmakeratlatl.com/?page_id=1508
        
         | craigbaker wrote:
         | It is a common noun-forming suffix in Nahuatl.
         | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-tl
        
       | once_inc wrote:
       | This is pretty cool; a very interesting way of displaying the
       | information. The final grid and the information about the gods is
       | underwhelming though. I would have liked to know what the reason
       | for the structuring of the grid is, and would love far more
       | information about each of the gods, but especially the major
       | ones.
        
         | sparsely wrote:
         | If this was run by a major collection or archive it would have
         | been cool to link out from the gods to images of the works that
         | depict them.
        
       | timmy-k wrote:
       | Things I didn't even know I needed.
       | 
       | And a brilliant way to present the info
        
       | 725686 wrote:
       | The images are amazing an are SVG.
        
         | divbzero wrote:
         | What are the best editors for creating images like this?
        
           | youessayyyaway wrote:
           | Inkscape is a good place to start.
        
       | oersted wrote:
       | How is such particular symbolism derived and recovered in
       | practice during research? Is it from surrounding writing? How
       | explicit is it?
       | 
       | I mean, how do we know for instance that the necklace of prickly
       | pears symbolizes the human heart?
        
         | AlotOfReading wrote:
         | The prickly pear thing is pretty straightforward, it's part of
         | the founding myth of Tenochtitlan and the Aztec empire. When
         | the Mexica were wandering from Aztlan, they had a battle where
         | they cut out the heart of a demigod named Copil and threw it
         | into Lake Texcoco, where it grows into a prickly pear. Awhile
         | later, the Aztecs are ready to settle down and their patron
         | deity Huitzilopochtli told them to look for the eagle eating a
         | snake. Eventually they come to the lake and see an eagle
         | sitting on Copil's cactus heart eating a snake, so that's where
         | they founded Tenochtitlan and where the Mexican flag comes
         | from.
         | 
         | There's no single way we figure out symbolism though. Sometimes
         | it's pretty obvious, like Copil's heart. Sometimes you can just
         | ask people (ethnographic analogy). In other cases people use
         | the symbol as a reference to the deity and you figure it out
         | from context. Sometimes writings and rituals straight up say
         | it, or you can figure it out from related cultures. And
         | sometimes it's basically a pun, where the words/symbols look or
         | sound like something else associated with the deity.
         | 
         | The biblical name of Adam vs Adamah (dirt/earth) is a more
         | familiar example of the last one.
        
       | Namari wrote:
       | Nice to see something about MesoAmerican gods! I like how
       | Quetzalcoatl/Kukulkan is sometimes represented as a Viking with
       | scale and beard, makes you think there could have been "Vinland"
       | in the Gulf of Mexico too.
        
         | alehlopeh wrote:
         | The article makes no mention of this and since Vikings didn't
         | have a monopoly on beards or scales, I don't think your
         | statement earned the matter-of-fact-edness with which you
         | delivered it.
        
       | ivanhoe wrote:
       | It's not a huge deal and maybe it's just me, but I find adding
       | the word "Imaginary" in front of their Gods completely
       | unnecessary, even annoying. I never heard anyone explaining
       | Christianity by putting Imaginary in front of every mention of
       | the God, so why do it to other religions?
        
         | gfaure wrote:
         | Did you misinterpret the article? Before the section with the
         | imaginary gods, it clearly reads:
         | 
         | > The Gods illustrated below are imaginary. These made-up
         | illustrations show how symbols and attributes in real Aztec
         | iconography were composed to depict a God's domain, abilities
         | and needs.
         | 
         | The mentions of the real Aztec gods (Tlaltecuhtli and on) do
         | not suggest that they are imaginary.
        
           | ivanhoe wrote:
           | Thanks for the clarification, I totally misunderstood the
           | idea obviously... it was a long day I guess...
        
         | Seich wrote:
         | The first two are "Imaginary" in the sense that the author made
         | them up to show how the iconography works. The rest are real
         | Aztec gods and are denoted with their actual names.
        
       | rendall wrote:
       | Excellent work and work of art. It was a pleasant surprise to see
       | Svelte being used for this.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-06-17 23:01 UTC)