[HN Gopher] How to stop USPS junk mail
___________________________________________________________________
How to stop USPS junk mail
Author : user3939382
Score : 26 points
Date : 2022-06-04 21:54 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (consumer.ftc.gov)
(TXT) w3m dump (consumer.ftc.gov)
| thenerdhead wrote:
| I was looking for this website again for junk mail. It looked so
| sketchy the first time, but I'm gonna bite the bullet and see if
| this saves me time over the next ten years from having to throw
| away junk mail. $2 is worth the experiment.
| jrockway wrote:
| I did this many years ago. 99.9% of my mail is still junk, just
| junk where I have some sort of weaselly pre-existing
| relationship with the company sending mail. ("You donated money
| to us! Can we have some more!? We spent it all on this
| marketing campaign and now it's gone!")
| anonymousisme wrote:
| I've done this and it makes a big difference, but I still get a
| lot of junk from local businesses. Either those businesses are
| not part of the DMA, or they are ignoring the opt-out list. I'm
| not sure what to do about it.
| btrettel wrote:
| I've done this as well. Another issue I've noticed is that when
| a certain item is set to go to "all" addresses, the mail
| carrier will simply give one to everyone until they run out.
| This is probably right most of the time. But I would
| consistently get junk mail for my neighbor with an apartment
| number one higher than mine.
|
| I recall reporting this to the USPS multiple times without any
| effect. The only thing that helped was putting a note inside my
| mailbox to check for my neighbor's mail.
| thrill wrote:
| Probably works just as well as the do not call list.
| ghaff wrote:
| Honestly, it used to be far more of an issue when going away for
| more than one or two weeks at some times of the year resulted in
| a mailbox full of stuff--meaning you really had to get your mail
| held. These days I find far fewer catalogs--and certainly thick
| catalogs--get sent.
|
| I did get a larger mailbox, mostly for packages. And I still get
| a fairly high junk to organizations I do business with to
| actually important mail ratio. But I can mostly ignore my mailbox
| for a week at a time easily.
| slang800 wrote:
| As a matter of principle, I am not paying a $2 "processing fee"
| to stop people from sending garbage to my mailbox.
|
| Also, the permanent credit card offer opt-out requires me to
| print and send a letter from each address I live at. This is
| clearly designed to be as annoying as possible so nobody does it.
| gaadd33 wrote:
| 1.6 cents per month seems pretty reasonable to solve what would
| otherwise just consume some of your time. An ideal world, there
| wouldn't be a processing fee but we don't live in that world.
|
| Aa far as the credit card opt out, you can also freeze your
| credit and I believe that has a similar impact since no one can
| make unauthorized inquiries.
| toomuchtodo wrote:
| I've done both and it was worth it. Highly recommended.
|
| One can also consider a mail processor if you're nomadic or on
| the road often; you give out that address, pay $10-$20/month
| for the service, and they dispose of the junk mail and scan in
| any mail of value.
| tablespoon wrote:
| > As a matter of principle, I am not paying a $2 "processing
| fee" to stop people from sending garbage to my mailbox.
|
| I feel like that must be relatively new. I swear I used that
| site and I'm pretty sure I didn't have to pay a fee.
|
| I bet they added it to discourage people from going through
| with the process.
| ceejayoz wrote:
| A $1 authorized charge would work for a little bit of "real
| person here" verification, but I'd imagine the $2 is to
| discourage auto-filling an entire town's worth of people via
| a script; all you'd need is, say, a voter registration list
| to get the necessary info of name and address.
| ceejayoz wrote:
| I kinda love that they're offering PayPal Credit as a payment
| option. A six month loan for a $2 purchase?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-06-04 23:00 UTC)