[HN Gopher] Getting a vanity phone number with four consecutive ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Getting a vanity phone number with four consecutive digits
        
       Author : jonluca
       Score  : 68 points
       Date   : 2022-05-30 14:25 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blog.jonlu.ca)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blog.jonlu.ca)
        
       | ghostly_s wrote:
       | whilst the author seems to have partially corrected it, it seems
       | this applies to many commenters here as well:
       | 
       | consecutive != repeated
        
       | koofdoof wrote:
       | This post reminds me of the chapter in Steve Wozniak's biography
       | dedicated to his obsession with phone numbers. It details his
       | favorite owned numbers and attempts to convince phone companies
       | to sell him numbers that make have interesting properties when
       | converted to binary.
        
       | phphphphp wrote:
       | I just bought one off eBay, cost ~$100. Totally pointless but
       | what's an overpaid software engineer to do with their money if
       | not vanity.
        
         | nuclearnice1 wrote:
         | > what's an overpaid software engineer to do with their money
         | 
         | https://beatmalaria.org/donate/
        
         | xeromal wrote:
         | Thank god there are some real people in here. haha
         | 
         | How was the handoff process for the number?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | andygcook wrote:
       | I had a friend in high school who was randomly assigned a mobile
       | number that contained exactly two digits - 3 & 9 (excluding the
       | +1 for the US country code.) Over a decade later, it's one of the
       | few phone numbers I can remember off the top of my head where the
       | person isn't in my immediate family.
        
         | gmac wrote:
         | In the UK, when I was at school and at a time when numbers were
         | shorter, I had a friend in the mid Sussex area (dialling code
         | 0444) with a number that was mostly 4s.
         | 
         | That made his number from anywhere in the world +44 444 4x4y4.
         | I've always remembered his number too.
        
       | Waterluvian wrote:
       | In high school my friend got the number 500-0001 and I was always
       | so jealous. But I think the number has become kind of irrelevant
       | these days.
        
         | caboteria wrote:
         | When I was in high school, numbers with 0 in them were the
         | worst because of how long they took to dial using a dial phone.
        
       | whoopdedo wrote:
       | When I signed up for GVoice it gave me the option to enter the
       | last 4 digits and it would give me the number if it was
       | available. I took advantage of this to make my phone number a
       | palindrome (except for the area code).
        
         | gurjeet wrote:
         | I took advantage of this same Google Voice feature, and got
         | myself a number with _7_ consecutive digits. So my phone number
         | for an international caller is +1-234-567-xyzy.
         | 
         | It was very easy for my kids to memorize as they were growing
         | up.
         | 
         | Sometimes, when I'm telling them my number for them to note
         | down, people stop midway through until they realize I'm not
         | really pranking them.
         | 
         | I'm sure people would not take me seriously if my number had
         | all 10 digits in a sequence and started to repeat after that.
        
           | kelseyfrog wrote:
           | I've got one that ends in xxx-6789. It makes it easy for kids
           | to remember and it gets a nice little "huh!" from people when
           | I tell them. Seven though, that's a whole 'nother ball game.
        
         | endtime wrote:
         | Back in the day, Google Voice let you find a number that
         | matched a string, as in 1-800-LAWYERS. I got a number that,
         | inclusive of area code (!), is of the form XYXY-<my first
         | name>. It has a couple other interesting and obvious properties
         | I can't share without making it too easy to guess the number,
         | so I'll just say that it's a great number and I hope I never
         | lose it.
        
       | addingnumbers wrote:
       | > I went through and bought a dummy number to figure out how to
       | purchase the number programatically, and then did the same method
       | as above to purchase it.
       | 
       | This guy is going a little hard on the automation at the end
       | there, what's the point of automating a one-in-a-lifetime task?
       | 
       | Just buy the one number you want instead of the dummy number and
       | you're done.
        
         | soared wrote:
         | Exploration and fun
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | happyopossum wrote:
         | You have to be presented the number in the UI to buy it in the
         | UI...
        
       | LinuxBender wrote:
       | Before someone does this, consider one possible risk. People can
       | easily remember vanity numbers. That is the risk.
       | 
       | I did this when I worked in a wireless provider and it was a
       | mistake in my case. It was _one of the_ factors that made me the
       | go-to person for just about any problem and I was the default
       | person to call for a myriad of issues. I was so happy to rid
       | myself of that number. As a positive note this helped enforce a
       | discipline in me to guide people to a ticketing system.
        
         | PainfullyNormal wrote:
         | I'd settle for a number that wasn't previously used. I've had
         | my current number for 8 years and the caller id still shows the
         | previous owner. I still get all manner of calls for the
         | previous owner too, everything from local politicians asking
         | for money to old friends asking if he's in town and wants to
         | hang out.
        
       | twhb wrote:
       | I got a memorable phone number a while ago. Websites like
       | numberbarn.com make it relatively easy. A key realization I had
       | is that repeating numbers aren't the thing to look for, because
       | they're what everybody is depleting and marking up, and actually
       | aren't a very good proxy for what you really care about, which is
       | memorability and maybe aesthetics. For example, 34567 is better
       | than 37771, and also more likely to be available and cheap.
       | Repeating digits and their associated markup are also about
       | typability, but that probably barely matters to you if people are
       | almost always calling from their address book.
        
       | LordDragonfang wrote:
       | On a similar note, if you ever need to provide a (US) number for
       | a discount and they don't verify it (like at grocery stores) you
       | can almost always just use a 555 number [1] in the format:
       | XXX-555-01XX
       | 
       | These are designated as "fake" numbers and are used in TV and
       | film when they need to show a number on screen but don't want to
       | open up some random person to prank calls.
       | 
       | Also, these numbers are almost always going to already be
       | registered in a rewards program:                 XXX-555-5555
       | 555-555-5555       XXX-867-5309
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/555_(telephone_number)
        
       | asdkhadsj wrote:
       | I had one a long time ago i liked, from Google iirc, something to
       | the effect of 454-5451 (but different, ofc). To which i would
       | rattle off "45 45 45 1" and confuse the hell out of every
       | listener i was trying to convey the phone number.
       | 
       | As much as i loved it, i stopped using it because of how confused
       | it made literally everyone i gave it to in my unexpected format
       | haha. The novelty wore off when i would inevitably have to repeat
       | myself in the normal format.
        
         | gtirloni wrote:
         | _> The novelty wore off when i would inevitably have to repeat
         | myself in the normal format._
         | 
         | Same with a custom domain I had for emails. People just expect
         | you to say "@gmail.com".
        
           | MivLives wrote:
           | I had both of these problems. My number used to be something
           | like 555-348-8889. My email uses a domain hack of my last
           | name so like Bob@smi.th. The former eventually changed to
           | something equally ridiculous but easier to say, the latter
           | I'm still trying to figure out how to say out loud after 8
           | years.
        
           | logifail wrote:
           | > Same with a custom domain I had for emails. People just
           | expect you to say "@gmail.com"
           | 
           | Yup. For a looong time my email address has been the same:
           | $firstname@$lastname.com
           | 
           | When I'm giving it to someone new it usually takes a few
           | tries for them to get it right, _even if they already know
           | both my first and last names_ : /
        
         | RC_ITR wrote:
         | What's amazing about that, is if you did "454" "54" "51" people
         | would probably react positively because they would feel like
         | they "figured it out".
         | 
         | Your problem was a) breaking convention b) not letting the
         | other party get their own dopamine boost.
        
           | skinnymuch wrote:
           | Yeah letting people figure it out or giving obvious but not
           | complete hints so they figure it out would Bork great. It
           | would make it more memorable for me.
        
       | michaelterryio wrote:
       | When I was a CSR at old AirTouch Cellular I would look for cool
       | numbers and when 999-9999 in Phoenix came available I snapped it
       | up for my employee phone benefit. You can't imagine how many
       | wrong dials and prank calls you get. I gave it up after a month.
        
       | carabiner wrote:
       | My cat sitter's number legit ends in -0000. Couldn't believe it.
       | She said it was just the number she was given.
        
       | h4waii wrote:
       | The author mentions it, but Burp Suite has both a "Repeater" and
       | "Intruder" mode which can be used to do all of this without
       | writing a single line of code.
        
       | nayuki wrote:
       | When I and my friends in Toronto signed up for mobile phone
       | service about 15 years ago, we simply got to pick our last 4
       | digits. I saw examples like picking the same suffix as their
       | landline, picking a mnemonic for their name (e.g. MARY -> 6279),
       | picking lots of trailing zeros.
        
       | anonymousiam wrote:
       | I've had a non-vanity phone number with five consecutive (non-
       | repeating) digits for over 25 years. Even before the advent of
       | phone spam and robocalling, it was receiving a lot more calls
       | than my other phones. Many of the calls were from kids playing
       | with a phone. It seems to be more likely than not that people
       | press consecutive digits when dialing a "random" phone number.
       | 
       | Separately, I once bought a cell phone in a city with a brand new
       | overlay area code, and they gave me this number: 424-210-0000.
       | They were really surprised when I told them that I did not want
       | it and had them port my old cell phone number to it instead. I
       | suppose I could have kept it and then sold it to someone else.
       | Apparently such things have value to some people, mostly
       | businesses.
        
         | gtirloni wrote:
         | _> Apparently such things have value to some people, mostly
         | businesses._
         | 
         | It was more valuable when we didn't have smartphones or
         | couldn't just look up any number online at any time. There was
         | an advantage in having an easy to remember number that didn't
         | require people to look in the yellow pages.
         | 
         | Yes, I was there 3000 years ago.
        
           | jffry wrote:
           | I remember it being very common for taxi numbers to have
           | 555-5555 in their local area code
        
       | baobabKoodaa wrote:
       | Fun fact: in the beginning of the 90's some Finnish telecom
       | operators sold people short phone numbers, such as 050 1984.
       | Today there exists a black market for these "lyhytnumerot" and if
       | you want one, you'll have to pay thousands for it. But they exist
       | and they still work.
        
       | stevesimmons wrote:
       | My vanity phone number has the year I was born and 6502, the CPU
       | in my first computer.
        
       | Joe8Bit wrote:
       | I had a UK mobile number that had seven consecutive digits (e.g.
       | 079* 444 4444). I got it through a friend who worked in
       | provisioning at a new mobile operator that had just been assigned
       | its new number blocks.
       | 
       | The problem was people would constantly try to "steal" the
       | number. Four or five times a year my phone would just stop
       | working because someone had "persuaded" a call-centre worker at
       | my provider to assign the number to a new SIM they could sell on
       | eBay. Apparently people pay a LOT of money for vanity numbers.
       | 
       | No matter what additional "security locks" they put on my account
       | it kept getting hijacked, so eventually I just got a new (much
       | less interesting) number.
        
         | jhgb wrote:
         | > Four or five times a year my phone would just stop working
         | because someone had "persuaded" a call-centre worker at my
         | provider to assign the number to a new SIM they could sell on
         | eBay
         | 
         | And they were unable to add a note to that account to the
         | effect of "don't do X under any circumstances"?
        
           | Joe8Bit wrote:
           | They put all kinds of locks on the account but they never
           | worked, my assumption was that people who worked at the
           | provider (who could unlock anything) were the ones stealing
           | it!
        
             | thatguy0900 wrote:
             | When i worked at att all of those things were just notes on
             | the bottom of the account. You had to specifically scroll
             | down and try to read it.
        
             | jhgb wrote:
             | And there was no audit trail for their actions? Wow.
        
               | thatguy0900 wrote:
               | Assuming that its similar to att, there is an audit
               | trail, but noone will care to look at it for you. They
               | will give your number back and consider it solved.
        
               | coryrc wrote:
               | Now you know why SMS 2fa isn't secure :)
        
             | kuroguro wrote:
             | Could have tried transferring the number to another
             | operator if that's an option.
        
         | appleiigs wrote:
         | At work the telecom guy was proud of the telephone number he
         | gave me ("very easy to remember!" he said). Well, it turns out
         | it was one digit off of the local Alcoholics Anonymous help
         | line. I had digit "1" and AA had "7". I got a lot of drunken
         | phone calls and voice messages. All depressing since they were
         | asking for help. Figured it out after a few calls, but from now
         | on I'll take the ugly telephone numbers.
        
         | interestica wrote:
         | This is why the idea of 2FA using a mobile number is so absurd.
        
         | kingcharles wrote:
         | I had the same problem. Same type of 07 number as you - all
         | consecutive. It was too much hassle. Also, with that number and
         | my 07969696969 number that I thought was hilarious, I just had
         | infinity prank calls all day, and worst of all, _all night_...
        
         | seanmcdirmid wrote:
         | In China, that would be the unluckiest phone number ever. My 30
         | story Beijing apartment building lacked floors 4, 14, and 24
         | due to superstition about 4 meaning death.
        
           | wincy wrote:
           | That sounds absurd. I can't believe a civilized society would
           | exclude so many floors! In the US where we are completely
           | reasonable and rational we only exclude the 13th floor. I
           | used to work on the "14th floor" (actually floor 13) and I
           | thought this was hilarious.
        
             | ecommerceguy wrote:
             | In China what happens on the 4th floor stays on the 4th
             | floor.
        
       | psim1 wrote:
       | Many VoIP providers have ordering systems that let you do vanity
       | searches, and some have APIs. Twilio is one. You can put down a
       | few dollars to start an account, buy a number, and then
       | immediately port it away to a mobile carrier if you like.
        
       | braingenious wrote:
       | From the article: >One drawback is that it's not really
       | integrated fully in your phone - for instance, iMessages to that
       | number won't work, and the calls need to be made through the app.
       | 
       | That _sucks_! I wonder if there's a way to fix that.
       | 
       | As for memorable phone numbers, one of my buddy's parents had a
       | phone number that was XXX-YYY-0001 and boy was that helpful when
       | I got arrested and couldn't remember anybody else's number.
       | 
       | Pro Tip: Memorize a few people's numbers!
        
         | pacaro wrote:
         | Also memorize a lawyers number if you're going to need it when
         | arrested. If you call a buddy the police can and will listen to
         | your call. If you call a lawyer then they can't.
         | 
         | https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/stopped-by-police
        
           | braingenious wrote:
           | That's a good link! Here is another one that everyone should
           | be familiar with:
           | 
           | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
        
       | Scoundreller wrote:
       | > and a nice number to give out when you don't want to give out
       | your real one.
       | 
       | I've setup a voip.ms number just for voicemail. Unanswered calls
       | to my phone get redirected to that number after X rings (this
       | functionality is baked into gsm). Then the voicemails get emailed
       | to me so I never deal with my provider's voicemail IVR.
       | 
       | So for people I don't want to call me, I give them that voicemail
       | number and it always goes straight to voicemail.
       | 
       | It's also nice because I can still get and keep voicemails if
       | I'm, say, out of country for 30 days because my provider deletes
       | them after 10 or something days.
       | 
       | Easy to share and save voicemails automagically.
        
         | happyopossum wrote:
         | > I never deal with my provider's voicemail IVR
         | 
         | In the era of smartphones, why would anyone use an IVR for
         | voicemail? On phone VM UI was a launch day feature for
         | iPhone...
        
           | Scoundreller wrote:
           | Only if your provider supports it. I'm in the 4th world when
           | it comes to telecoms (Canada).
           | 
           | I only set this all up in the first place because our
           | providers charged for voicemail more recently than you'd like
           | to know.
        
       | sethbannon wrote:
       | One of my YC batchmates had his company acquired by Google. They
       | quickly shut down his product (shocking!) and had him product
       | manage Google Fi instead. He gave me access to the beta about 7
       | years ago. At that time, you could search for any string of
       | numbers and it would let you see available numbers containing
       | that string. I was able to get a number with 4 consecutive zeros
       | in it and to this day it brings me joy every time I see or share
       | it. Most people are not as amused but every now and then I'll
       | meet someone who lights up when they see it. Without fail, they
       | were also a math nerd growing up. I guess numbers tickle some
       | people's brains differently.
        
         | InvaderFizz wrote:
         | Google Voice had the same feature years ago. It's how I have an
         | all prime number with triple 7s in the middle as my GVoice
         | number.
         | 
         | I also have my cell phone number that I used a new GVoice
         | account to be able to search for. Got a 799-4999 like number by
         | searching for three consecutive numbers and that popped up.
         | Ported that out to my cell a few weeks later.
         | 
         | I don't actually live or work in my home state, but I keep the
         | same rural area code. Less spam overall and when I get a call
         | from a home state area code that's not in my contacts, I can
         | safely ignore it as being spam.
        
         | skinnymuch wrote:
         | I'm not a big math nerd, but I'm also a programmer so maybe I
         | have an slanted bias of what that means. Being ND also helps. I
         | would love to see four consecutive numbers. I have kept two
         | numbers around to now with 2 and 3 consecutive same digits. So
         | XYY-ZYYY numbers without area code. With area code they are
         | AYB-XYY-ZYYY for two diff area codes. I'd love giving up any Y
         | overlap if the last four can be consecutive especially if it's
         | 4.
        
           | bpye wrote:
           | I ended up picking my current number because it had a power
           | of two. A silly thing but it amused me.
        
             | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
             | Some years ago, I met someone whose license plate was:
             | 
             | 4745454B
             | 
             | I immediately felt that something was up with that, took a
             | few more seconds that I would have liked to figure out what
             | it was.
        
           | jjtheblunt wrote:
           | ND = ?
        
             | HelenePhisher wrote:
             | neurodiverse.
        
       | loxias wrote:
       | Psh. My phone number, which I got a few years ago, has the first
       | 6 digits of pi. :D
       | 
       | Took writing a script to brute force google voice, but totally
       | worth it!
        
       | oefrha wrote:
       | Pro tip: don't hit a private API in a loop without any delay like
       | the author.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | CosmicShadow wrote:
       | My wife got her phone number (randomly) many, many years ago that
       | turned out to be the old number for "The Edge" radio station and
       | got calls for years about people trying to request songs or
       | answer trivia questions. Just some of the things that happen when
       | you have one of those easy to remember numbers which are usually
       | owned by taxi companies or pizza places.
        
         | unstatusthequo wrote:
         | I have a number ending in 6969. I got some very entertaining
         | text messages and calls for a year or so.
        
       | smallerfish wrote:
       | I bought a DID on voip.ms with 5 consecutive digits. They allow
       | you to search by any substring, though you can only search within
       | a single area code, so it takes a little hunting and pecking to
       | find a good one.
        
         | skinnymuch wrote:
         | asomeone can get a nice number then port it out right?
        
       | garblegarble wrote:
       | It took me longer than I'd like to admit to realise the author
       | meant "repeating digits" when they said "consecutive digits" - I
       | was scouring the examples for "1234" etc.
       | 
       | This is a neat idea!
        
         | OJFord wrote:
         | That or 'consecutive digits _that are the same_ ', i.e. 'four
         | consecutive 1s' would've made sense, it's just mis-generalised
         | to 'digits'.
         | 
         | If anything it's the 'sequential' implication of 'consecutive
         | digits' (that I agree the phrase has) that's weird IMO.
        
         | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
         | I was also confused. I think the author is confusing the two
         | words.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-30 23:01 UTC)