[HN Gopher] Southern thought, islandness and real-existing degro...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Southern thought, islandness and real-existing degrowth in the
       Mediterranean
        
       Author : cardamomo
       Score  : 19 points
       Date   : 2022-05-28 16:12 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.sciencedirect.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.sciencedirect.com)
        
       | paganel wrote:
       | De-growth means "increased poverty" for most of us, I really hate
       | this double-speak.
       | 
       | Yes, I know this continued growth thing is not sustainable in the
       | medium to long term (and saying that until very recently meant
       | you were branded as a stupid Malthusian, still does, but less
       | so), but I think we should stop f.ing around when it comes to
       | naming stuff and call it what it is: we need less stuff to
       | consume for the ecosystem to remain stable (or so we currently
       | think), which means more poverty for the majority of us.
        
         | polotics wrote:
         | Desired degrowth actually has a name: sobriety.
        
         | jaqalopes wrote:
         | With inflation and increasing inequality I'm already living a
         | more "impoverished" life than my parents when they were my age,
         | yet economic growth has been out of control. I don't think your
         | vision of "most of us" is at all connected to reality.
        
           | paganel wrote:
           | The de-growth is mostly targeted at the up and coming
           | demographic behemoths of India and China, maybe also Africa
           | as a whole. It's the West's way of telling them: "you can't
           | be like us, that would be bad for the planet".
           | 
           | Of course, many low-middle-class to working class people from
           | the West will also fall on the wrong side of all this, but in
           | a way they already have started experiencing it, like you
           | mention (you can look at existing NIMBY policies in the West
           | as de facto de-growth policies that directly and negatively
           | affect those socio-economic chunks of the populace).
        
       | heydenberk wrote:
       | As an environmentalist, I have plenty of friends who are
       | interested in degrowth, or even actively promote the concept.
       | Curiously, however, none of them are interested in moving to one
       | of the many rural counties in the US currently undergoing
       | degrowth.
        
         | soldehierro wrote:
         | Can you provide an example of one of these counties and why you
         | consider they are undergoing "degrowth"? Degrowth is usually
         | conceptualized as an intentional process, rather than economic
         | decline.
        
           | dash2 wrote:
           | That sounds suspiciously like "The reality of falling income
           | sucks, but my imagination of how it _might_ be is awesome. "
        
             | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
             | Half of global GDP growth is simply population growth.
             | 
             | You could be in place like Japan where you have lower
             | population, but still productivity growth such that incomes
             | don't decline.
             | 
             | You could also be a place like pretty much everywhere in
             | the world before the Industrial Revolution when the
             | Malthusian Trap was a popular thought - and your population
             | grows but productivity declines. GDP goes up, but you get
             | more miserable. Not great.
             | 
             | I don't think anyone imagines falling incomes as awesome.
             | 
             | Additionally, even if productivity and population decline -
             | the Fed can always devalue money such that your income goes
             | up - even if your situation is getting materially worse.
             | 
             | I don't know why people obsess over population growth. We
             | already don't want to invest in the people we have.
             | 
             | Productivity growth should be the thing we all want.
             | There's not a lot of people that are like: Damn those
             | tractors that stole all the agricultural jobs!
             | 
             | For the most part - we're happy 90% of the population
             | doesn't have to work in agriculture.
        
           | ardit33 wrote:
           | Degrowth with declining economy means Detroit. Or many other
           | rust belt cities.
           | 
           | Degrowth without economic decline, means Carmel By the Sea in
           | Ca, or those small towns in the Key West where only the rich
           | can afford to live.
           | 
           | You can put many towns in the SF Bay Area which have actively
           | stalled any growth. They have one thing in common: they are
           | super expensive.
        
         | JSavageOne wrote:
         | Rural areas in the U.S are unwalkable (not just rural areas,
         | but most of the U.S), not to mention probably devoid of people
         | and community. People value community and walkability.
         | 
         | Also degrowth doesn't imply living in rural areas.
        
       | caffeine wrote:
       | Stuff like this makes one question whether the "university" as a
       | concept has long outlived its usefulness.
       | 
       | I mean, someone wrote a grant proposal, and someone else approved
       | it, for this! (Probably.)
        
       | montefischer wrote:
       | For those interested, Ivan Illich wrote a series of books
       | criticizing the modern approach to healthcare, education,
       | transportation, gender etc. from a perspective that might be
       | called "degrowth" today. A great introductory essay on Illich
       | (https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/05/the-corruption-of...)
       | was published recently in American Affairs. In my experience, the
       | power of a single personality passionately committed to an idea
       | is usually a better introduction than an academic survey article.
       | Illich was a radical and none of his ideas come with batteries
       | included, but exploring his ideaspace was an invigorating
       | experience for someone who had hitherto only pitched his tent in
       | the libertarian technocapitalist suburbs of the mind.
        
       | ardit33 wrote:
       | Dumb paper. What the author calls degrowth, it is living in a
       | more primitive and old fashion way. Neighbor Albania and Italy
       | have this problem as well. There are plenty of villages where
       | people live like it is still the early 1900s.
       | 
       | The author forgot to mention that they have one thing in common:
       | all this villages it is mostly older people that live there, with
       | few young ones left, mostly doing agriculture related work.
       | 
       | Most young people have left these villages due to the lack of
       | economic opportunities. So, this thing called 'degrowth' is just
       | economic stagnation.
       | 
       | Also, you don't have to travel in Europe to see this. We have the
       | Amish folks here, and that's what a successful ultimate degrowth
       | is. In Southern Europe it is mostly forced due to economic
       | conditions.
       | 
       | There are a lot of left wing radicals that advocate for
       | 'degrowth', but that ultimately is advocating for poverty, and
       | bring the US back to the 70s.
       | 
       | The libertarian view of degrowth, is to leave like a 'homestead
       | farm', while the left version is to live in some giant communist
       | coop where people consume only what's needed, but this time it is
       | with the 'old fashion" twist.
       | 
       | 52 failed attempt at communism should have given them a clue that
       | it doesn't work.
       | 
       | Degrowth = poverty for the masses, while still few elites enjoy
       | and live a lavish life.
        
         | softcactus wrote:
         | I'd like to offer a differing perspective. Let's say you have a
         | company that makes shoes. You attract investors by growing
         | steadily at 3% a year. At some point, the market becomes
         | crowded or monopolized such that you can no longer grow at 3%
         | by attracting new customers or creating new products. So you
         | start to increase profit by reducing your margins-- using worse
         | materials and worse construction methods. You use planned
         | obsolescence to increase the number of times customers have to
         | buy your products.
         | 
         | Ask yourself, once this inflection point is reached and quality
         | is no longer increasing, does a growth economy make sense? At
         | this terminal stage of economic growth there is an increase in
         | negative externalities in the pursuit of ever-diminishing
         | profits. Much more waste as the shoes are built with worse and
         | worse materials. More exploitation in an attempt to reduce
         | labor costs. Do you think that over the last 30 years, shoes
         | have increased in quality relative to the profit margins of
         | these companies? If the answer is no, then it means we need to
         | figure out a way to deal with terminal-stage industries.
         | 
         | Sure, there are people advocating for everyone to go live like
         | the Amish, but to me degrowth means that if an industry can no
         | longer achieve growth through innovation or increases in
         | productivity, we should acknowledge that that industry has
         | peaked, and not try to squeeze every last dollar out of it
         | through exploitation or waste.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-28 23:02 UTC)