[HN Gopher] Open and Free Plant Identification API
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Open and Free Plant Identification API
        
       Author : animal_spirits
       Score  : 188 points
       Date   : 2022-05-28 03:58 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (plantnet.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (plantnet.org)
        
       | ewuhic wrote:
       | It would have been nice if they also provided info about the
       | state of the plant you've got, e.g. needs more/less water, sun,
       | etc.
       | 
       | I've got a payed app called PictureThis, which often
       | misidentifies the plants, however have extensible sections for
       | care and problem diagnosis and mitigation. I, however, cannot
       | confirm if those are trustworthy, but it helped me cure some of
       | my plants.
       | 
       | Hope this foss API (alongside their mobile clients) would expand
       | with such info.
        
       | ta988 wrote:
       | I've been using it for a while it is extremely efficient and
       | precise even with bad pictures.
        
       | giantg2 wrote:
       | Is there something free and similar for mushrooms?
        
         | chestervonwinch wrote:
         | I use seek by inaturalist for plant identification [0]. It
         | claims to support fungi identification also, but I have not
         | used it for that personally. It's a very popular app, so
         | perhaps someone else will offer their direct experience using
         | it with fungi.
         | 
         | [0]: https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/seek_app
        
           | dunham wrote:
           | About two years ago, I posted mushrooms twice on iNaturalist
           | (not Seek) and quickly got updates with a more specific
           | identity from other users, so I think there is an active
           | community out there. They were amanita muscaria -> american
           | amanita muscaria and oyster mushroom -> summer oyster
           | mushroom.
           | 
           | The only non-mushroom confirmation / corrections I've gotten
           | on iNaturalist were a spider and a snail.
           | 
           | That said, it may be tricky to get a good identity on
           | mushrooms. There are some varieties need spore prints or very
           | careful attention to structure to identify.
        
         | animal_spirits wrote:
         | Mushroom Observer is the first that comes to mind, it doesn't
         | have an identification api but it does have tons of training
         | data to build your own model
         | 
         | https://mushroomobserver.org/articles/20
        
         | shelbel wrote:
         | iNaturalist does so for all kingdoms of life. Accuracy, of
         | course, is not perfect.
        
       | nraynaud wrote:
       | I have used this website a few times, I'm not a plant expert, but
       | I found the results credible.
        
       | nmlt wrote:
       | There is also the German project flora incognita.
       | 
       | https://floraincognita.com/
        
       | moffkalast wrote:
       | Amazing, it identified all of my plants correctly except one. Now
       | I have to go out and see what it finds in the wild.
        
       | sega_sai wrote:
       | Plantnet is great. There is also a similar app for bird song
       | identification -- BirdNet.
        
         | animal_spirits wrote:
         | I recently started using the Merlin iOS app to identify
         | birdsongs and it works really well.
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | Plantnet is cool, but there's a lot of missed potential for
       | adding discrimination questions. For example, when the result
       | isn't clear-cut, it could ask you the standard identification
       | questions and narrow it down to a specific species instead of
       | making you guess based on photos.
        
         | riffraff wrote:
         | when I was in school we had something called "dychotomic keys"
         | which were big books to recognize plants with binary questions.
         | 
         | Does it have a leaves? yes/no go to page XXX/YYY Is the leaf
         | oblong? go to page WWW/ZZZ Is the border smooth? go to..
         | 
         | I wish there was a plant identification app using _that_
         | system, it would be much more entertaining and educational to
         | use.
        
           | abibibo wrote:
           | For woody plants, VTree might fit what you're looking for.
           | It's a dychotomic key optionally augmented by your location
           | data.
           | 
           | https://dendro.cnre.vt.edu/dendrology/vtree.htm
        
           | TheaomBen wrote:
           | I've been meaning to take a crack at a software version of
           | this for insects/birds/plants, do you know of any good
           | ideally libre sources for the data?
        
             | stevesearer wrote:
             | The US Department of Fish and Wildlife has a really useful
             | service called the Feather Atlas for identifying bird
             | feathers by their color, size, and shape:
             | 
             | https://www.fws.gov/lab/featheratlas/idtool.php
        
             | morphle wrote:
             | I'd be willing to help you. The largest dychotomic key [1]
             | is partially digitised but we could transform it into a
             | proper dataset. Copyright no longer applies to part on the
             | Flora. There are many other sources. I remember dychotomic
             | key in hypercard [2].
             | 
             | Scanning 81 million science paper pdfs will yield most of
             | the data in [1] and [2]. It would be possible to get a
             | grant to make these transformations and add them to
             | Plantnet and iNaturalist.
             | 
             | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_Europaea
             | 
             | [2] http://www.etibioinformatics.nl/faq/
        
         | agilob wrote:
         | That's correct, there's plenty of incorrectly identified
         | plants, but the app says 89% accuracy for the first result and
         | 11% for the second, so it's hard to argue. I've many times
         | encountered plants that don't in live in the UK but the app say
         | they do.
        
           | causality0 wrote:
           | The high accuracy results are not always, well, accurate.
           | Several times I've had an 85+ percent result then looked
           | closer and gone "ah shit, the leaf pattern is wrong, these
           | are alternating instead of side-by-side" or similar.
        
           | 7952 wrote:
           | Inaturalist uses GPS and date to help with this. So it
           | shouldn't show you stinging nettles in November.
        
       | tortillasauce wrote:
       | For species native to Europe there's the ObsIdentify app as well.
       | It identifies not only plants, but birds, insects, mushrooms and
       | other species groups too.
       | 
       | (disclaimer: I work there)
        
       | murphyslab wrote:
       | It's great that citizen science space for collecting ecological
       | or biodiversity data is is growing. I'm curious why the
       | consortium members behind Pl@ntNet are all French. Compare that
       | to iNaturalist, which features partner organizations in 21
       | countries. That kind of widespread buy-in is attractive and I'm
       | not sure what is limiting Pl@ntNet:
       | 
       | - https://plantnet.org/en/plntnet-consortium/
       | 
       | - https://www.inaturalist.org/sites/network
       | 
       | Personally I've found iNaturalist to be the optimum for me since
       | it partners with 4 major Canadian organizations; it allows for
       | local conservation authorities to have access to location data
       | for vulnerable species observation. It's also every branch of the
       | tree of life, not just plants, so it's allowed me to learn to
       | identify more kinds of species.
        
         | 7952 wrote:
         | My hunch is that Inaturalist gets traction because it is
         | social, which makes it fun, which makes it successful.
        
         | nthypes wrote:
         | The PlantNet Consortium is mostly made up of French
         | organizations, which may be why it hasn't gained as much
         | traction internationally. However, it's still a valuable
         | resource for plant identification and data collection.
        
         | RosanaAnaDana wrote:
         | Biggest issue with inaturalist is the extremely limited scope
         | of their api.
         | 
         | I'll be checking this one out, but inaturalist is extremely
         | tight fisted with both their data and the service, which is
         | extremely disappointing.There is a wide range of utility that
         | could be built on it's back if it were open source.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jxramos wrote:
       | Is this what iOS photos uses under the hood when it goes into
       | plant detection mode? I was photographing some bugs on a plant in
       | the garden yesterday and noticed a leaf annotation on the photo.
       | It was accurate with the "Siri knowledge result" of cucumis. I
       | wonder if Apple is contributing to this repository as it did with
       | Open Street Maps if I understood that history correctly.
        
         | knolan wrote:
         | I had to switch my iPhone's region from Ireland to the US (and
         | back again) for this feature to turn on. It's pretty nifty.
        
           | neuronic wrote:
           | It came with the iOS 15.4 update iirc. For me (Germany) it
           | just worked.
        
             | knolan wrote:
             | Ireland isn't currently listed as a supported country. It
             | appears to have stopped working shortly after restoring to
             | my region.
             | 
             | https://www.apple.com/ios/feature-availability/#visual-
             | look-...
             | 
             | Visual Look Up
             | 
             | English (United States)
             | 
             | English (Australia)
             | 
             | English (Canada)
             | 
             | English (Indonesia)
             | 
             | English (Singapore)
             | 
             | English (United Kingdom)
             | 
             | French (France)
             | 
             | German (Germany)
             | 
             | Italian (Italy)
             | 
             | Spanish (Spain)
             | 
             | Spanish (Mexico)
             | 
             | Spanish (United States)
        
               | raffraffraff wrote:
               | The feckers
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-28 23:02 UTC)