[HN Gopher] Supersonic CO2 flow during champagne cork popping
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Supersonic CO2 flow during champagne cork popping
        
       Author : goatsneez
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2022-05-25 12:31 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (aip.scitation.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (aip.scitation.org)
        
       | gus_massa wrote:
       | The PDF (free, linked in the page) has nice photos of the popping
       | in page 8 and graphics of the simulation in page 11 and 12.
        
       | btilly wrote:
       | I can't be the only one wondering this...
       | 
       | How many bottles of champagne were purchased for this research,
       | and what was done with their contents afterwards?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | > Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations revealed the
         | formation, evolution and dissipation of shock wave patterns
         | during the first millisecond following champagne cork popping.
         | 
         | Probably not many, maybe even none.
        
           | jaywalk wrote:
           | Considering they have actual pictures of the cork popping,
           | it's safe to say that they purchased at least one bottle of
           | champagne.
        
             | qsi wrote:
             | They seem to have done measurements at different
             | temperatures, so we can nudge the lower bound higher.
             | 
             | They also said they used transparent champagne bottles...
             | Did they use Cristal for this? Now I really want to know
             | what happened to the champagne! Although Cristal at 30 C
             | may not be ideal to drink...
             | 
             | And what was their budget?
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | Plausible candidate for an Ig Noble Prize!
        
       | londons_explor2 wrote:
       | Ooh - Figure 4 of the linked PDF shows temperatures as low as
       | -120 Celcius! And thats from a champagne pressure of just 4 bar.
       | 
       | Does that imply that a carefully shaped and designed nozzle,
       | combined with slightly higher pressures, attached to a regular
       | air compressor could be used to make liquid nitrogen?
        
       | MichaelZuo wrote:
       | It's amazing how often effects go to supersonic speeds in
       | everyday life. It really makes sense why our hearing is
       | logarithmic, otherwise we'd all be deaf just from a cork popping.
        
       | bunabhucan wrote:
       | https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1273542/v1
        
       | anti_froid wrote:
        
       | julienchastang wrote:
       | Related: "Ophthalmologists warn: Flying champagne corks cause
       | serious, blinding eye injuries each year" [0]
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121217091015.h...
        
         | Gys wrote:
         | To prove your point, it can happen to the best. This was May
         | 17th: https://www.eurosport.com/cycling/giro-d-
         | italia/2022/biniam-...
        
           | latchkey wrote:
           | switches vpn to the uk...
        
       | asimpleusecase wrote:
       | The end of a whip is supersonic when it "cracks". It is thought
       | that when towels are "popped" they too can be supersonic at the
       | tip end.
        
       | aristophenes wrote:
       | These are some very smart academics who have figured out how to
       | get their institutions to fund their parties, and probably became
       | very popular in their social circles
        
       | 71a54xd wrote:
       | This is cool, but thank some higher power I decided against
       | getting a masters / PHD. Imagine years of your life dedicated to
       | understanding how a champagne cork explodes. Nightmare material.
        
         | solveit wrote:
         | Clearly you've made the right decision for yourself, but this
         | is unironically the dream for some other people (a very
         | specific type of person, I'll admit, but this type happens to
         | include me and half the HN userbase).
        
       | knolan wrote:
       | Here is a similar visualisation from Phantom using Schlieren:
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/kEw2msVaVy0
        
       | bernulli wrote:
       | The conditions to reach sonic flow are surprisingly modest!
       | 
       | It's fully characterized through the pressure ratio between high-
       | pressure reservoir (here: inside of bottle) and low-pressure
       | surroundings, and a parameter characterizing the molecular
       | structure, the isentropic exponent.
       | 
       | For diatomic molecules (our air), the isentropic exponent is 1.4,
       | and the critical pressure ratio at which Mach 1 will be reached
       | is ~0.5, i.e. as long as the high pressure is twice as high as
       | the surrounding pressure, the flow will reach the speed of sound.
       | For more complex molecules the isentropic exponent approaches
       | 1.1, and for steam 1.14, with a critical pressure ratio of ~0.58.
       | 
       | I.e. when you release air from a >2 bar (30psi) car/bike tire,
       | you have sonic flow right there!
        
         | cevn wrote:
         | Fascinating... I would like to subscribe to your newsletter!
        
         | robonerd wrote:
         | Unfortunately this seems to be well beyond what the human lungs
         | can do. I found this paper
         | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501025/
         | suggesting that the most human lungs can do is about 1 meter of
         | H20, or about a 0.1 bar. So it seems supersonic whistling isn't
         | possible. Oh well.
        
           | Arrath wrote:
           | I swear my ears beg to differ at the tones some people can
           | reach, ow.
        
             | h2odragon wrote:
             | _super_ sonic, as in whip crack or jet plane sonic boom,
             | no.
             | 
             |  _ultra_ sonic, frequencies beyond the range of most human
             | hearing, most certainly yes.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-25 23:02 UTC)