[HN Gopher] Scientists Uncover a Shady Web of Online Spider Sales
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scientists Uncover a Shady Web of Online Spider Sales
        
       Author : Petiver
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2022-05-19 22:25 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | hekisek wrote:
       | Real life animal crossing
        
       | assbuttbuttass wrote:
       | I keep several spiders as pets, so I'm a bit biased.
       | 
       | The greatest threat to these rare species isn't the pet trade,
       | it's rather the destruction of their habitat. You'll find that
       | most tarantula keepers prefer to buy captive-bred specimens, both
       | for conservation reasons, but also due to risk of parasites.
       | 
       | Mexico handles this issue better than most countries: they let
       | licensed breeders breed these animals in captivity and export
       | them for the pet trade. This strategy reduces the pressure on the
       | wild spiders, while not banning it entirely (which just leads to
       | poaching)
        
         | setgree wrote:
         | Do you find that they interact with you/recognize you?
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | bryans wrote:
           | I can't speak toward tarantulas, but some jumping spiders
           | definitely recognize, acknowledge and seemingly even
           | appreciate individuals. Honestly, they sometimes look excited
           | to see you as a dog would -- though that's likely just a
           | basic recognition that you act as their food delivery
           | service. They even appear to understand the concept (if not
           | reasoning) behind their enclosure.
           | 
           | Some folks who spend a lot of time with their jumping spiders
           | will actually leave the enclosure door open, as the spider
           | will happily stay there unless it lacks water or food for a
           | long period of time, and typically only leaves when its human
           | stops by. It will come to the door when you get close, jump
           | on your hand and hang out very calmly (some people even go on
           | walks with them), then gladly jump back into the enclosure
           | when you're done and patiently wait for you to bring it food.
        
             | haxiomic wrote:
             | When hearing annecdotes about the intelligence of jumping
             | I'm always reminded of and David Attenborough's narration
             | of Portia
             | 
             | https://youtu.be/UDtlvZGmHYk
             | 
             | Well worth the watch if it's new to you! Quite the
             | perspective shifter
        
             | wolverine876 wrote:
             | > they sometimes look excited to see you as a dog would
             | 
             | What does that look like?
        
       | erickhill wrote:
       | +1 for the clever title.
        
       | wolverine876 wrote:
       | I get the sense that something has changed about the NY Times
       | approach to journalism. Instead of uncovering, breaking, and
       | headlining news - what they were famous for and world leaders at,
       | 'all the news that's fit to print' - it's long explanatory
       | articles and narratives, and lifestyle stuff, plus their take on
       | well-known stories but not so revelatory. It's less inflammatory,
       | which is valuable, but I don't feel like it's _news_ - shining
       | light on the dark corners of power - which is an enormous loss. I
       | 'm not sure how to characterize it because I'm not sure what they
       | are doing.
       | 
       | Has anyone else noticed? It seems like it's been going on since
       | last autumn, at least.
        
         | bloodyplonker22 wrote:
         | They realized that the investigative journalism type of news
         | was too costly and produced smaller returns compared to this
         | type of lifestyle "news". In addition, a lot of investigative
         | journalism cannot even be reported on anymore because of their
         | newly acquired woke bias. The NY times used to be a
         | centrist/moderate source of news, but now wokeism has taken
         | over and it's really not the same credible publication it was
         | 30 years ago.
        
           | wolverine876 wrote:
           | > They realized that the investigative journalism type of
           | news was too costly and produced smaller returns compared to
           | this type of lifestyle "news".
           | 
           | That's been true for a long time. Do you have any evidence of
           | this decision at the NYT?
           | 
           | > wokeism
           | 
           | I think that words like that are inflammatory (as is well
           | known). Could you use more specific language and is there
           | evidence? I know that's repeated a a lot in a certain
           | segment, but reptition has no relationship with truth - facts
           | (sometimes from investigative reporters) do. Thus chemistry
           | not alchemy.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | RC_ITR wrote:
         | I mean the timeline makes things tight, but maybe you're just
         | becoming desensitized?
         | 
         | https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/2022-pulitzer-airstrikes-g...
         | 
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/31/us/police-traffic-stops-k...
         | 
         | Like sure neither of those are 'Watergate' takedowns of
         | individuals or organizations, but unfortunately, Trump killed
         | that kind of journalism.
        
           | wolverine876 wrote:
           | My impression is not simply defined and hard to provide
           | evidence for, I admit.
           | 
           | > Trump killed that kind of journalism
           | 
           | How did he possibly kill that kind of journalism?
           | 
           | Maybe that attitude explains it, in some way.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jppope wrote:
       | Wow. I literally thought this was about web crawling
       | technology...
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | debdut wrote:
         | dang me too, I thought web spiders too
        
         | SoftTalker wrote:
         | Instead it was literally about spiders.
        
       | obscuren wrote:
       | Did they use a web crawler to find this?
        
         | missblit wrote:
         | Yes. From the article:
         | 
         | > To learn more about the scale of the global arachnid trade,
         | the authors of the new paper used a handful of search terms --
         | "spider," "scorpion," "arachnid" -- in nine languages to
         | identify websites that might be selling the animals.
        
       | westcort wrote:
       | My key takeaways:
       | 
       | * An analysis of online sales listings turned up more than 1,200
       | species of spiders, scorpions and other arachnids; just 2 percent
       | of them are subject to international trade regulations, the
       | researchers report
       | 
       | * Fish and Wildlife Service trade database included only 267
       | arachnid species, the scientists found
       | 
       | * The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of
       | Wild Fauna and Flora, or CITES, which regulates the international
       | trade of a variety of plant and animal species, had just 30
       | species in its trade database
       | 
       | * Nearly 200 of the species that have been discovered since 2000
       | are already being traded; dozens were available within a year or
       | two of first being described, the researchers found
       | 
       | * In another recent study, researchers at Cornell University
       | found multiple species of endangered tarantulas being sold online
       | 
       | * "Arachnids are being massively traded," Dr. * Hughes said. *
       | "And it seems to be going completely under the radar."
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-20 23:01 UTC)