[HN Gopher] What's down the road for silicon?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What's down the road for silicon?
        
       Author : DamnInteresting
       Score  : 23 points
       Date   : 2022-05-16 17:02 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | neonate wrote:
       | http://web.archive.org/web/20220516161310/https://www.nytime...
       | 
       | https://archive.ph/dKV1U
        
       | kurthr wrote:
       | What an odd article.
       | 
       | It talks about the move from Si switching power supplies to
       | SiC... and now to GaN. This has been going on for years to the
       | point that many new high power wall plugs are moving to GaN. It's
       | true that EVs need power efficient supplies and drive part of the
       | market, but I don't see evidence that they've radically
       | accelerated the shift.
       | 
       | I don't see evidence that SiC or GaN supplies are noticeably more
       | available (other than being higher margin and thus more likely to
       | be prioritized) than Si with shipping issues and the Shanghai
       | shutdown. I also don't see evidence that location of volume
       | (lower margin) manufacturing are likely to be different for these
       | SiC/GaN components until geopolitical events push them to.
       | Certainly, component assembly is unlikely to shift to the US.
        
         | philipkglass wrote:
         | It's a bit garbled as you'd expect from a non-specialist
         | publication, but I thought it did a decent job of highlighting
         | recent trends in wide band gap power electronics. I think that
         | battery electric vehicles are the "killer app" bringing silicon
         | carbide to the mainstream. The technology itself has been
         | developing for a long time, certainly, but BEVs combine some
         | key attributes to drive SiC demand:
         | 
         | - Efficiency has a high value, since a dollar's worth of SiC
         | electronics can save more than a dollar's worth of battery
         | capacity to reach the same driving range. Vehicle range is one
         | of the key attributes for prospective BEV buyers.
         | 
         | - The devices need to handle high power, which mostly rules out
         | gallium nitride for vehicle power trains at present.
         | 
         | - The market is large and growing rapidly, thereby justifying
         | forward looking investments in new manufacturing capacity (like
         | the New York fab mentioned in the article).
        
           | kurthr wrote:
           | I'll agree EVs are scaling the business since they use very
           | large areas (roughly proportional to peak power) and they
           | certainly have high marginal utility due to battery cost. In
           | particular, just 1million EVs with 300kW supplies are 300GW
           | of power supply, while 200Million mobile chargers at 80W are
           | only 16GW of power supply area.
           | 
           | Still, the size of the market is only ~$1B growing to $3B
           | over the next 5 years.
           | 
           | It's also worth noting that GaN can also be grown on SiC
           | wafers so there is utility even when the industry shifts to
           | even higher performance. I didn't realize that 5G base
           | stations were also a significant consumer of GaN.
           | 
           | https://www.yahoo.com/now/sic-wafer-market-growth-
           | trends-100...
        
           | nikanj wrote:
           | If efficiency had high value, cars would look very different.
           | We'll end up repeating the same "I've got a V8 F-350 for my
           | office commute" thing with electric vehicles
        
         | Terry_Roll wrote:
         | Bosch opened a new fab recently.
         | https://www.golem.de/news/halbleiterwerk-bosch-beginnt-bau-n...
        
       | hristov wrote:
       | Pretty good article for the new york times non-technical
       | audience. Power electronics is becoming and will become ever more
       | important with everything around us getting electrified and
       | silicon carbide and gallium nitride will become more important
       | within it.
       | 
       | Couple of things that I do not agree with: I am not sure whether
       | the silicon shortage has really helped adoption of wide bandgap
       | semiconductors. I think the answer is maybe yes for the cheaper
       | gallium nitride, probably not for silicon carbide. Silicon
       | carbide is arguably in bigger shortage than silicon.
       | 
       | And also I would not get excited about the new shiny things like
       | diamond and gallium oxide. In this field it takes a lot of time
       | to bring a new thing online. Customers tend to have very
       | stringent reliability requirements. And bringing production to
       | the quality and profitability levels of silicon carbide and
       | gallium nitride will require a lot of investment over many years.
        
       | sydthrowaway wrote:
       | How about photonic circuits?
        
         | galcerte wrote:
         | You can't transmit large amounts of power through a photonic
         | circuit, so forget about using them to replace power
         | electronics.
        
         | FunnyBadger wrote:
         | Photonics doesn't buy you much.
         | 
         | The primarily limit on speed in large chips like processors is
         | NOT the transistors but the transmission lines connecting the
         | transistors. And those are already operating at 50%-75% of the
         | speed of light. The gain going to photonics doesn't justify the
         | cost at this point.
         | 
         | Another factor: pretty much EVERYTHING in current
         | microelectronics gets dumped in the garbage if you were to 100%
         | switch to photonics and that's a step too far. There is
         | relatively little in electronics that can be leveraged to
         | photonics.
         | 
         | In general you need about 80% overlap with the prior major
         | technology to justify a jump that big. This was true of tubes
         | to transistors, and then transistors to ICs. You'd see the
         | exact same circuit used in the prior technology being
         | repurposed to the new one - almost verbatim. And it's that
         | leverage that justifies the inevitable higher cost of any new
         | technology - at least you can re-use designs, skills and
         | concepts.
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | They're still at the basic research stage, with no real path to
         | practical applications yet.
        
       | LordDragonfang wrote:
       | Perhaps someone here can answer this, but why are wide-bandgap
       | materials like SiC and GaN considered so promising for power
       | applications but not more traditional semiconductor applications
       | (CPUs, GPUs, SOCs, etc)? Seems like the ability to perform more
       | efficiently and at higher power efficiency should be useful there
       | too.
       | 
       | Is it just an issue of not being able to make crystals of the
       | same defect-less purity that we've achieved for silicon? And is
       | it a fundamental issue, or one that can be overcome by developing
       | a similar level of expertise?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-16 23:01 UTC)