[HN Gopher] The Sound of Bells - The acoustics, sound, tuning an...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Sound of Bells - The acoustics, sound, tuning and history of
       church bells
        
       Author : belkarx
       Score  : 105 points
       Date   : 2022-05-10 15:03 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.hibberts.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.hibberts.co.uk)
        
       | enriquto wrote:
       | As if there was just material for a single PhD thesis! I would
       | guess that the mathematical theory of bells is pretty much open.
       | The shape of a bell (a solid of revolution) can be described by
       | one function u:R->R. Given u, you can compute the vibration
       | spectrum of the sound by standard methos. But if you are given a
       | desired timbre, how to find u? Nobody knows. The most that we can
       | do is optimization starting from a close solution candidate.
        
         | nonrandomstring wrote:
         | This site is quite old and IIRC I had bachelors students
         | building additive synthetic bells from the amazing data he's
         | collected. Also great tales of acoustic archaeology, building
         | bell sounds based on models from the foundry drawings and
         | metallurgy data.
        
           | crustycoder wrote:
           | It's been around for a while but he's still active in the
           | field (he recorded & analysed our bells a couple of years
           | ago) and he's revamped the site fairly recently.
        
         | sitkack wrote:
         | If drums are bells, you should see how Nicolas Bras [1]
         | modifies the sound by damping some of the nodes of the drum.
         | Are you saying all bell are radially symmetric?
         | 
         | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXavtyyyj34
        
         | hprotagonist wrote:
         | The pitch perception work alone is probably a few degrees, if
         | you get deeper into it.
        
         | Someone wrote:
         | > The shape of a bell (a solid of revolution) can be described
         | by one function u:R->R
         | 
         | If you phrase it that way "surface of revolution" describes
         | bells much better than "solid of revolution".
         | 
         | I think "solid of revolution" is the better term, though. That
         | allows you to model varying wall thickness. You'd need more
         | than a function u:R->R to do that.
         | 
         | Also, I don't a priori see why the shape of a bell would be
         | limited to such functions. If the edge of a bell bends inwards
         | into the bell and goes up a bit, I think I would still call it
         | a bell, especially if it somewhat sounds like one.
         | 
         | Finally, rotational symmetry isn't required for a bell. Your
         | typical cow bell, for example, is elliptical or even
         | rectangular
         | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowbell_(instrument))
         | 
         | = the design space is a lot larger than you indicate.
        
           | cpp_frog wrote:
           | Surface of revolution is 'okay', 'solid' would mean its
           | interior is completely filled. What you're describing is an
           | active area of research in numerical analysis (adjacent to my
           | own MS thesis topic, buckling of shells).
           | 
           | > That allows you to model varying wall thickness
           | 
           | That's mentioned in the first chapter of this book [0].
           | 
           | [0] _The Finite Element Analysis of Shells - Fundamentals_ ,
           | Chapelle & Bathe
           | 
           | EDIT: I'm aware it is not a surface, but the notion is closer
           | than that of a solid of revolution.
        
             | nomel wrote:
             | > Surface of revolution is okay
             | 
             | But surface, by definition, has no concept of thickness,
             | right? Surely there's a better term?
             | 
             | > 'solid' would mean its interior is completely filled.
             | 
             | I think the easiest way to define a bell would be the
             | difference of two solids of revolution (front surface, back
             | surface). What do you call the difference of two solids of
             | revolution?
        
               | cpp_frog wrote:
               | I meant it from a numerical analysis/differential
               | geometry perspective (the reason I attached the
               | reference). While not being strictly a surface, it _is_
               | characterized by a mid-surface, and a thickness _t_.
               | After having that information, for each point in the mid
               | surface, a normal vector is drawn and scaled by a
               | magnitude of _t_ /2 in both directions of the normal,
               | giving a thickness of _t_ to the object that, I should
               | have made it clearer, is not a surface but characterized
               | by one.
        
               | enriquto wrote:
               | I don't think that a bell is correctly modelled as a
               | shell of variable thickness. The inner surface is smooth,
               | and the outer surface has _ridges_. These ridges are
               | apparently important to the timbre, thus it may be more
               | appropriate to consider it as a solid volume of arbitrary
               | shape. Of revolution, if you want to stay with a one-
               | dimensional model.
        
               | crustycoder wrote:
               | Nah, the mouldings are entirely decorative. And bells are
               | tuned by taking off material on a lathe at various
               | positions on the inside of the bell.
               | 
               | https://funwithbells.com/nigel-taylor/
               | 
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEJkMalMVv4
        
               | enriquto wrote:
               | Wow, it's good to know, thanks for the clarification!
        
             | Someone wrote:
             | > 'solid' would mean its interior is completely filled.
             | 
             | I disagree. Mathematically, I wouldn't know how to define a
             | solid other than "anything with a volume".
             | 
             | Certainly, a bell, when defined as a surface of revolution,
             | doesn't have an interior in a mathematical sense
             | (https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Interior.html), does it?
             | 
             | There's the convex closure, but that would, for the
             | prototypical bell, add volume 'outside' the bell, too.
             | 
             | Also, I think varying wall thickness in bells for centuries
             | was the only known way to tune them. https://en.wikipedia.o
             | rg/wiki/Pieter_and_Francois_Hemony#Lif...:
             | 
             |  _"When struck, a bell produces a number of partials which,
             | if imprecisely tuned, can create an unpleasant sound and
             | which prevents it from harmonizing in accordance with other
             | bells. To address this problem, the Hemony brothers gave
             | their bells a particular profile and thickened it in
             | certain places. The bells were then tuned by hollowing
             | ridges from specific parts of the inner wall until the
             | first few partials were acceptably in tune."_
             | 
             | (Aside: if you want your work to be used for centuries,
             | becoming a professional bell caster seems a good bet)
        
           | a1369209993 wrote:
           | > You'd need more than a function u:R->R to do that.
           | 
           | Actually, if you normalize the bell height to 1, you can take
           | u from 0 to 1 as the inner surface (tracing down from the
           | top), and u from 1 to 2 as the outer (tracing back up from
           | the bottom). I'm not sure that's mathematically convenient,
           | but it does work. (You could also use a periodic function on
           | 0..pi for inner and pi..tau for outer, which might be nicer
           | math-wise and also allows you to say that the height (pi) is
           | half of whatever the function's period is.)
        
         | cpp_frog wrote:
         | Yes, it's a vibration of an elastic axisymmetric thin shell
         | (surface of revolution, as you meantioned). Going deeper into
         | the theory, to know or characterize the sound it makes one
         | should have a model of _free_ or forced vibration and find the
         | eigenvalues of the resulting linear system. That system is
         | typically (K-omega^2 M) U = F, where K is the stiffness matrix
         | of the material, M the mass matrix, U the displacement matrix,
         | F the force matrix and omega the frequency.
         | 
         | Now, to find the displacement given the eigenvalues (spectrum)
         | is possible in a finite-dimensional setting, in infinite
         | dimensions it's trickier. I'm sure there are approximation
         | results of this kind, but not if there is an exact way.
        
       | elijahwright wrote:
       | I read a few pages of this and found it most enjoyable. The sheer
       | nerdiness of tuning bells and improving them - it's great!
        
       | pradn wrote:
       | Tarkovsky's Andrei Rublev has an extended sequence where a
       | bellmaker's young son agrees to pour a bell for a local lord. You
       | see the entire process of making the mould and pouring the metal.
       | It has a town-fair atmosphere. But at the end, there's tremendous
       | pressure on the young bellmaker to have the bell ring properly
       | and have no cracks. And it does. The protagonist, the lapsed monk
       | Andrei Rublev, regains his faith, seeing the result of the young
       | bellmaker's hope.
        
         | aeolis_mons wrote:
         | One of my favorite sequences in any movie. I will never forget
         | the visuals of workmen sweltering in front of flaming portholes
         | in the bell's cast. Enduring a little inferno, to create the
         | sound of heaven! Thank you for reminding me of it. :)
        
           | pradn wrote:
           | It's an unforgettable 40 minutes. So lucky to have seen it on
           | the big screen the first time I saw the film.
        
         | scarecrowbob wrote:
         | I can't recall as it has been a number of years, but my
         | impression was that the young bell maker was lying about his
         | father having given him the "secret" to making the bell, hence
         | the anxiety about the success of the project. Am I
         | misremembering that, or was I just not reading it correctly?
        
           | gregsadetsky wrote:
           | That's exactly it --
           | https://www.villagevoice.com/2018/08/20/the-secret-of-
           | andrei...
           | 
           | "The boy, named Boriska [...] claims that before his father
           | died, he revealed to him the secret of casting a bronze bell"
           | 
           | "Amid his tears, Boriska reveals that his father never
           | imparted to him the secret of bell making"
        
           | pradn wrote:
           | Yes, exactly. The father also died of a plague before they
           | came to the son, if I recall.
        
       | h2odragon wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing your joy in bells. That's an awesome
       | collection of knowledge.
        
       | rwmj wrote:
       | If you just like the sounds of church bells, the BBC has you
       | covered:
       | 
       | https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006sgsh
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jhallenworld wrote:
       | Here is my bell related science-fiction recommendation: Doomsday
       | Book by Connie Willis.
       | 
       | "The drop had been scheduled for noon. If she had come through on
       | time and Probability was right about the slippage, it would be
       | six o'clock in the evening, which was too late for vespers. And
       | if it were vespers, why did the bell go on tolling?
       | 
       | It could be tolling for mass, or for a funeral or a wedding.
       | Bells had rung almost constantly in the Middle Ages--to warn of
       | invasions or fires, to help a lost child find its way back to the
       | village, even to ward off thunderstorms. It could be ringing for
       | any reason at all."
        
         | InitialLastName wrote:
         | That book (that section specifically) has one of the best "slow
         | realization that you're in trouble" processes I've read.
        
       | jFriedensreich wrote:
       | why would he name his software wav"anal" when there even is a
       | concept of "rim partials". this is hilarious.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | The sound of European church bells is so lovely and charming. No
       | recording can do it justice.
       | 
       | On the other hand, the American church predilection for
       | electronic bells is an abomination.
       | 
       | My desk telephone has real bells in it for the ringer. It's from
       | the 1950s, naturally.
        
       | lqet wrote:
       | Very cool. I became fascinated with bells after watching this [0]
       | documentary on how they are made a few years ago (it's in German,
       | but that hardly matters, just watching the process is extremely
       | interesting).
       | 
       | The whole process is a combination of extreme sophistication and
       | extremely simple tools and materials, something that has become
       | quite rare nowadays. And despite an exact calculation of the bell
       | shape and thousands of years of trial and error, tradition, and
       | experience (the foundry in the video has been owned by the same
       | family for 300 years), the cast is still highly dangerous and it
       | still regularly happens that the bell just doesn't come out right
       | and cannot be saved - months of work for nothing.
       | 
       | I think that explains why on the day of the cast (which is just 1
       | or 2 times per year), everyone involved is extremely nervous. The
       | bell founder and the customer all join in prayer, and the cast
       | traditionally starts with "in God's name" [1].
       | 
       | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ8ZZV5UjcI
       | 
       | [1] https://youtu.be/OQ8ZZV5UjcI?t=1918
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Even with it being in German, I agree, I still enjoyed it. If
         | you've ever made anything or seen a different thing made,
         | you'll get the concepts of what they are doing. The scale of
         | what they are making is impressive, as well as their jigs for
         | building. Thanks for the link
        
         | crustycoder wrote:
         | The only remaining dedicated bell foundry in the UK is in
         | Loughborough - https://taylorbells.co.uk/ You can visit :-)
        
           | niccl wrote:
           | Little known fact: They made the AC/DC's original Hell's Bell
           | for the Back in Black tour. Touring with 3,000 kgs of bell in
           | a flight case made for some interesting experiences
        
       | nicwolff wrote:
       | That mug-tapping demonstration in the "Doublets or warble in
       | bells" page [0] is neat! I'll be looking for an opportunity to
       | show that to someone, ask why they think it happens, explain
       | pedantically, and yell "Science!"
       | 
       | [0] https://www.hibberts.co.uk/doublets-or-warble-in-bells/
        
       | itsoktocry wrote:
       | An interesting podcast on bells form Planet Money:
       | 
       |  _When you 've got two companies down the road from each other
       | making the same thing, you can almost guess the history.
       | Originally there was just one company, but something happened.
       | Maybe someone got angry, somebody left, and they started a second
       | business, a competitor.
       | 
       | Today on the show, the rivalry between two companies that make
       | nearly all the world's handbells. And how they eventually made
       | peace._
       | 
       | https://www.npr.org/2021/12/23/1067333584/bell-wars-classic
        
       | elric wrote:
       | Somewhat tangential; there's a company, clock-o-matic, that makes
       | hardware and software to play carillons (or single bells)
       | programatically using MIDI files.
        
       | crustycoder wrote:
       | Yes, Bill did. He's a really nice guy and the subject of bell
       | tuning has been of academic interest for a very long time,
       | because they don't produce a single note and the note you "hear"
       | isn't produced by the bell at all. See for example Nobel Laureate
       | Lord Rayleigh's paper of 1890, linked to on Bill's site.
        
         | krumbie wrote:
         | That is fascinating. I thought that bells had one or a couple
         | dominant / loud frequencies that would mostly determine pitch,
         | and the rest would just mix in to change the timbre but not the
         | main percept. I always found the sound of melodies played with
         | bells kind of uncomfortable because there is too much going on,
         | too many different frequencies interfering with each other.
        
           | crustycoder wrote:
           | For literally centuries European bell tuning was all done by
           | rule of thumb, with results varying from to sublime to
           | abysmal. It was all finally figured out by Canon Simpson in
           | 1895/6 who described the relationship between the 5 main
           | components of a bell's strike note - the hum, prime, tierce,
           | quint and nominal.
           | 
           | https://www.hibberts.co.uk/building-a-bell-sound/
        
       | raymondgh wrote:
       | "Someone wrote a PhD thesis on bells" is a clickbait title. It
       | implies the value of the content is merely the surprising or
       | shocking concept that the content even exists. But looking at the
       | page, that's not what the content is about. It's an earnest study
       | into bells. Are we meant to point and laugh?
        
         | crustycoder wrote:
         | I wouldn't worry, if that was the intent, I think it backfired
         | ;-)
        
         | skocznymroczny wrote:
         | I thought it's clickbait because I expected that the text of
         | the thesis was etched on the bells somehow.
        
           | misterprime wrote:
           | Nice joke, Dad.
        
         | belkarx wrote:
         | I agree, title was a bit clickbait but I was surprised that one
         | would dedicate their life to something that specific. Hyper-
         | specialization at its finest, and the passion is something I
         | can appreciate
        
           | twangist wrote:
           | The doctoral candidate didn't "dedicate their life" to the
           | topic, merely wrote a thesis on it. So, just an intense part
           | of their life. Perhaps they'll remain focused on bells,
           | perhaps not. Probably all PhD theses are 'hyper-specialized',
           | unless they're surveys by an author who won't be continuing
           | as an academic researcher. It's not surprising that people
           | would want to understand these complex inharmonic sounds
           | we've been making for centuries.
        
             | belkarx wrote:
             | I mean ... they continued their work on bells, and appear
             | to have done (and continue to do) a fair amount of work
             | concerning them
        
           | enriquto wrote:
           | > Hyper-specialization at its finest
           | 
           | Don't be so sure. At least for mathematicians, the "bell" may
           | be just an excuse to make the subject cool. Many of the
           | underlying problems are very general. For example, the
           | inverse spectral problem (vibration modes of a complex shape)
           | is the basis of the interaction between proteins, enzymes,
           | and the huge molecules of cell walls. At the cell scale,
           | Brownian motion shakes everything in all possible
           | frequencies, but molecules can only vibrate at a specific set
           | of frequencies (their spectrum). The act of "matching"
           | different molecules happens when they have some common
           | frequencies, often with localized modes of vibration.
           | 
           | You may think that you are _just_ modeling church bells, but
           | everything that you do has immediate application to the
           | understanding of some organic chemical interactions, which
           | are a deep mystery yet.
        
           | WhyOhWhyQ wrote:
           | 'Bells' are pretty un-specific as far as specialization goes.
           | The average person actually knows what a bell is. The PhD
           | theses in mathematics are likely far less applicable and far
           | more specific. Check out the titles on arxiv and let me know
           | if you think any of these are less specific than 'bells'.
           | 
           | https://arxiv.org/list/math/new
        
           | pvg wrote:
           | You should still stick to original titles like the site
           | guidelines ask
        
             | belkarx wrote:
             | Ah, apologies. I will keep that in mind in the future
        
               | dang wrote:
               | Thanks! We've changed the title above to the page title
               | now.
               | 
               | The submitted title was "Someone wrote a PhD thesis on
               | bells". Sometimes a title like that has the virtue of
               | getting an obscure, interesting submission onto the front
               | page. The sin is venial when the submission is
               | particularly good (and mortal when it's dreck, which alas
               | is more often the case.)
        
         | blipvert wrote:
         | I wrote a lot of my undergraduate dissertation on Bell's too.
         | Maybe that's why I got such a poor degree.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | jmmcd wrote:
       | Bells is also one of the sub-themes in the Polifonia EU-funded
       | research project (disclaimer, I'm involved in a different theme).
       | It's more about documentation of historical bells in open/linked
       | data, rather than acoustics.
       | 
       | https://polifonia-project.eu/
        
         | crustycoder wrote:
         | In the UK we have 61,626 documented bells (a lower bound)
         | spread across 7,148 towers. https://dove.cccbr.org.uk
         | 
         | In the last year unaffected by COVID, there were 10,701
         | recorded performances and many more unrecorded ones and
         | practices. https://bellboard.uk/
         | 
         | There are 23,397 Methods and 52,650 Compositions available,
         | where a Method is roughly equivalent to a piece or song in
         | traditional music terms. http://methods.ringing.org/intro.html
        
           | Veen wrote:
           | I used to enjoy listening to the church bell practice
           | sessions on summer evenings when I lived by a church (not so
           | much being woken on Sunday mornings though). Annoyingly, they
           | eventually shortened and lessened the frequency of practice
           | because newcomers to the village complained that their
           | idyllic second home in the countryside was affected by "noise
           | pollution"-- something that has been a regular feature of
           | village life since the bell tower was built in 1545.
        
             | crustycoder wrote:
             | The UK government did promise to reduce the grounds for
             | noise complaints about church bells, on the grounds that
             | normally they were there before the complainant arrived,
             | and would still be there long after they were gone, but it
             | appears it was like many government promises...
             | 
             | https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2018/2-february/news
             | /...
        
               | trasz wrote:
               | "The church bells had chimed unchallenged every 15
               | minutes since 1779."
               | 
               | Over _all the night_. Seriously, this appears to be quite
               | a rational complaint.
        
               | Veen wrote:
               | It was hardly a surprise, though. They must have known
               | about the bells before they bought the property.
        
               | clort wrote:
               | My sister lives about 100m from such a church tower
               | (which has 5 300yr old bells). Its not really as
               | intrusive as one might imagine..
        
               | crustycoder wrote:
               | There's usually two different things going on in UK bell
               | towers - bell ringing which involves ringing the bells
               | full-circle using the internal clappers, and clock
               | chiming which uses external hammers driven my the clock.
               | The clock chiming is much quieter than change ringing.
               | 
               | Ours only chimes on the hour but it's going 24/7 and is
               | very close to the surrounding houses (~40m) some of which
               | are uphill and directly in line with the bells. I had to
               | go in today to fettle it as it wasn't chiming and someone
               | had posted on the village FB group that they were missing
               | it. That's a fairly regular occurrence, most people
               | people like hearing them, even through the night. Any
               | complaints we get are when the clock stops.
               | 
               | It is possible to modify clocks to stop them chiming
               | overnight, although ours is still in its entirely
               | mechanical 1883 form, including me having to wind it
               | every week.
        
               | trasz wrote:
               | If people want this, then it should be fine. To me, in
               | case described in the article above the bells were to
               | stay because of the church and tradition, not because the
               | citizens wanted them.
        
               | crustycoder wrote:
               | It's usually one miserable git who complains, most people
               | who buy houses next to big sticky up things at the end of
               | religious building are smart enough to figure out what's
               | in them.
        
       | ortusdux wrote:
       | I found this video by Matthias Wandel about two-toned bells very
       | interesting:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMgmJEaYs70
        
       | Cenk wrote:
       | Thesis PDF here: https://oa.mg/work/10.21954/ou.ro.0000add2
        
       | crustycoder wrote:
       | The bells studied in the PhD thesis are primarily used for
       | English Change Ringing, which started in the early 1600s and the
       | compositions played on them (methods) are based on mathematics,
       | specifically Group Theory, rather than being tunes in the normal
       | sense - the aim is to ring all the possible permutations of the
       | bells.
       | 
       | The Mathematics of Bell Ringing
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44jXUo6KaVs
       | 
       | Performances (Peals) consist of 5040 changes (sequences), have a
       | strict set of rules and take around 3 hours 15 minutes to
       | complete, and must be rung entirely from memory, with no written
       | aids.
       | 
       | In the early 1960s a CS algorithm for efficiently enumerating
       | permutations was published, the Steinhaus-Johnson-Trotter
       | algorithm. It's in Knuth, for those who have access to a copy.
       | Unfortunately for them, it had been known by English Change
       | Ringers as Plain Changes, since around 1621.
        
         | allisvancity wrote:
         | wow. had no idea bell-ringing was so... pathological
        
           | crustycoder wrote:
           | Yeah, it's full of geeks :-]
        
           | rwmj wrote:
           | I think you mean campanological.
        
             | crustycoder wrote:
             | Ooh no, don't ever call bellringers that, unless you want
             | to cause grave offence. Campanologist is a name for wussy
             | academics, bellringers ring bells. And drink beer ;-)
        
       | bsedlm wrote:
       | There's a russian artist who's made a couple of albums about
       | "singing bronze". He plays the bronze plates, they sound a lot
       | like bells.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsZ5RIZrNKw
        
       | rpmisms wrote:
       | Grew up in a long tradition of bell-ringing. It's amazing, and
       | even more so in person.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbn_Fzcxw3o&ab_channel=petya...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-05-10 23:00 UTC)