[HN Gopher] Yacht - A web interface for managing Docker containers
___________________________________________________________________
Yacht - A web interface for managing Docker containers
Author : indigodaddy
Score : 51 points
Date : 2022-04-27 07:43 UTC (15 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (yacht.sh)
(TXT) w3m dump (yacht.sh)
| sandreas wrote:
| I prefer lazydocker[1].
|
| 1: https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazydocker
| prtkgpt wrote:
| This is awesome! Can I help you fix the website a tiny bit to
| make it top notch and get the founders started with a content
| strategy & machine?
|
| This is purely help, 100% free. So feel free to reach out. :)
| lesgobrandon wrote:
| p2hari wrote:
| Very nice. I am thinking this to be on lines of Bitnami ...Nice
| to see basic server info also on the dashboard. Would definitely
| try this.
| ourmandave wrote:
| It froze when I tried to log in with my username: oligarch.
| 293984j29384 wrote:
| The lack of screenshots or useful videos other than the tiny
| video that can't be controlled on the doc page is poor web
| design. If you want people to use your GUI tool, they need to be
| able to see it first.
| tyingq wrote:
| The small video on imgur, which makes it a little easier to
| zoom in, but it's pretty low res:
|
| https://imgur.com/a/BRmYDfF
|
| https://i.imgur.com/2U1JvXd.mp4
| pineconewarrior wrote:
| There is a video at the top of the docs, but I agree it should
| be featured on the landing page
| Bedon292 wrote:
| Yeah, having trouble figuring out why I would want to use this
| tool. What problem is it trying to solve? How does it
| differentiate itself from other tools out there? I just get a
| list of features and a tiny video.
| shantnutiwari wrote:
| Yeah, I have no idea how it works. The docs talk about
| "container templating"-- what?
| vinnymac wrote:
| I have used portainer in the past to manage containers, curious
| whether this offers something different or if they are fairly
| similar.
|
| https://www.portainer.io/
| croon wrote:
| I don't use it anymore since I find CLI faster, and am starting
| to migrate to Nomad, but my main gripe with Portainer was the
| spotty compose support, that I basically had to write them
| outside, launch them, and then have them show up in Portainer,
| kind of defeating the point of the frontend.
|
| If the compose support in this is better I could see the value
| for people just dipping their toe in.
| cosmotic wrote:
| Unless I'm missing something, one common use case the GUI
| makes a lot faster is issuing commands that need
| container/image/volume ids. Opening a terminal in a container
| is a click or two instead of two commands where the second
| requires visually parsing some large screen of text and
| carefully transcribing a few characters. It also hard to
| remember all the command line flags and their inconsistencies
| (which commands support -a and which do not?)
| blue_cookeh wrote:
| It got significantly better in an update towards the end of
| last year (IIRC). Can also use GitHub as a source of truth
| for stacks now, and has webhooks etc.
| tgtweak wrote:
| Been using portainer for a while and it's been great.
| [deleted]
| encryptluks2 wrote:
| Neat, but it is a huge security issue to mount your Docker socket
| into a container, essentially giving it full access to all your
| containers. Shouldn't this be limited to bare API permissions as
| opposed to full access?
| lima wrote:
| Yes, it essentially gives root privileges to it.
|
| I suppose that's intended in this case.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-04-27 23:03 UTC)