[HN Gopher] A Swedish skier was basically frozen, but lived (2016)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Swedish skier was basically frozen, but lived (2016)
        
       Author : Anon84
       Score  : 165 points
       Date   : 2022-04-24 14:07 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.atlasobscura.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.atlasobscura.com)
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | What's cool, is that it does not seem to have resulted in
       | permanent injury.
       | 
       | She is currently an MD at a Norwegian University hospital, and
       | looks to be doing great.
        
         | worldsayshi wrote:
         | This article makes me wonder if rapid cooling could help save
         | you from brain damage in case of a stroke or similar.
        
           | dreamcompiler wrote:
           | Yes.
           | 
           | https://www.brainandlife.org/articles/cooling-to-prevent-
           | str...
        
         | Rastonbury wrote:
         | I wonder what caused the neck down paralysis initially and how
         | it recovered, usually there isn't much scope for recovery from
         | that.
        
           | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
           | >I wonder what caused the neck down paralysis initially
           | 
           | Nerve damage.
           | 
           | >and how it recovered
           | 
           | The nerves healed.
        
             | sterlind wrote:
             | nerve damage to the spinal cord? or peripheral nerves? why
             | did the nerve damage there take longer to reverse than
             | nerve damage in the brain?
             | 
             | also, what do you mean by damage exactly? the axons
             | presumably weren't damaged. the neurons were apparently not
             | "online" but presumably didn't go through apoptosis. do you
             | mean metabolic dysfunction?
        
       | Noe2097 wrote:
       | I discovered a few years ago that thanks to this kind of
       | "experience", forced hypothermia is now used to prevent brain
       | damage to new borns who suffered from loss of oxygen during
       | delivery.
       | 
       | Our second son was (initially, thankfully) stillborn after a
       | complicated delivery, yet the medical team managed to revive him
       | and immediately put him in hypothermia (to 34deg C), surrounding
       | his head with some apparel containing essentially ice. Fast
       | forward the 5 most painful days of my life, doctors warmed him
       | back very slowly. He is now 4, and showing completely "normal"
       | (in the statistical sense of the term) development.
       | 
       | Indeed, brain damage is not immediate in case of oxygen loss. It
       | happens in phases. I am no expert, but I understood that most
       | damage happen not immediately, and happen even if oxygen has been
       | restored. Slowing down the body through hypothermia, seems to
       | avoid the brain to "collapse".
       | 
       | Discussing with the head of the department (for a mandatory
       | "retrospective"), he explained me that this technique had been
       | devised after seeing that people who drowned in very cold water
       | could be revived with less "impact" on their capacities than
       | others. He also explained me that the technique was not always
       | successful, but was the only "treatment" that had shown actual
       | improvement of recovery chances in this kind of cases.
        
       | js2 wrote:
       | There's more detail on her wikipedia page:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Bagenholm
       | 
       | These are the tidbits I found most interesting:
       | 
       | > A team of more than a hundred doctors and nurses worked in
       | shifts for nine hours to save her life. Bagenholm woke up ten
       | days after the accident, paralyzed from the neck down and
       | subsequently spent two months recovering in an intensive care
       | unit. Although she has made an almost full recovery from the
       | incident, late in 2009 she was still suffering from minor
       | symptoms in hands and feet related to nerve injury.
       | 
       | > "Her body had time to cool down completely before the heart
       | stopped. Her brain was so cold when the heart stopped that the
       | brain cells needed very little oxygen, so the brain could survive
       | for quite a prolonged time."
       | 
       | > "victims of very deep accidental hypothermia with circulatory
       | arrest should be seen as potentially resuscitable with a prospect
       | of full recovery. The key success factors of such marginal
       | resuscitation efforts are early bystander actions with vigorous
       | CPR and early warning of the emergency system, early dispatch of
       | adequate rescue units (ground and air-ambulances) and good co-
       | ordination between the resources outside and inside the hospital,
       | aggressive rewarming and a spirit not to give up."
       | 
       | > Bagenholm [upon waking paralyzed] feared she would spend the
       | rest of her life on her back, and was angry with her colleagues
       | for saving her. Bagenholm soon recovered from the paralysis,
       | however, and later apologized to her friends; "I was very
       | irritated when I realized they had saved me. I feared a
       | meaningless life, without any dignity. Now I am very happy to be
       | alive and want to apologize."
        
         | ever1 wrote:
         | Thanks, the temperatures in the article means nothing for those
         | who don't speak Fahrenheit...
        
           | DougMellon wrote:
           | 56.7F = 13.7C
        
           | kurthr wrote:
           | Because 12C ~ 21F there are some convenient temperatures to
           | interpolate between.
           | 
           | of course 0C = 32F and -40C = -40F but also (within a degree
           | F):                 04C =  40F       16C =  61F       28C =
           | 82F       40C = 104F
           | 
           | note that the last two digits are always reversed.
           | 
           | below 0C they get less useful                 -08C =  18F
           | -19C =-1.9F       -31C = -23F
        
             | rags2riches wrote:
             | "When it's springtime in Alaska, it's forty below". That's
             | all I have managed to memorize about temperature conversion
             | so far in my life.
        
             | js2 wrote:
             | Interesting strategy. I long ago memorized 20C = 68F and
             | then adjust in increments of 5/9, which works well enough
             | for the range of temperatures I consider habitable. I've
             | gotten so good at this I once translated on the fly between
             | some fellow American and European runners during a
             | marathon. :-)
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | js2 wrote:
         | As to the first point, the cost of this care had to be in the
         | millions, or would be in the U.S. anyway. My MIL recently had
         | extended care due to a fall and the bill was $500K. Fortunately
         | after Medicare, cost to her was $1300.
         | 
         | In any case, it's still an extraordinary allocation of
         | resources to save one life. According to
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Norway:
         | 
         | > Expenditure on healthcare is about 7,727 USD per person per
         | year in 2020, among the highest in the world. While the
         | availability of public healthcare is universal in Norway, there
         | are certain payment stipulations. Children aged sixteen or
         | younger, and several other groups (such as nursing women and
         | retirees) are given free healthcare regardless of the coverage
         | they may have had in previous situations. All other citizens
         | are responsible for paying a certain amount in user fees. If
         | they reach a certain amount of money paid out-of-pocket, they
         | receive an exemption card (frikort for helsetjenester in
         | Norwegian) for public health services, and they no longer have
         | to pay user fees for the remainder of the calendar year. The
         | amount is 2460 NOK in 2021, or about 264 USD. Everything above
         | this amount is given for free for the rest of that year.
         | 
         | She went on to become a radiologist so probably pays a decent
         | amount in taxes now. As well, as a radiologist, she now helps
         | to care for others. But still, she'll never "pay back" what was
         | expended on saving her life.
         | 
         | I'm not trying to make any point here, other than that humans
         | are weird in how we allocate resources to each other.
         | 
         | Edit to add:
         | 
         | I didn't mean to spawn a whole conversation about U.S. vs
         | European healthcare, and my point above is not well made.
         | 
         | I'm just lamenting how 100 humans will come together to save
         | one life while we still allow over a half million people a year
         | to die from malaria. You'll see a dozen humans rescue a dog
         | during a flood while I don't even want to look up the number of
         | dogs that are euthanized. How the world came together to save
         | those kids from the Thai cave, but we can't collectively figure
         | out how to deal compassionately with immigrants.
         | 
         | I know we're just doing the best we can as a species. But I can
         | still be both amazed by a symphony orchestra and sad that we
         | use those same brains to build F-22s.
         | 
         | Also, FWIW, as a U.S. citizen, my vote is for Medicare For All,
         | or failing that, a price-regulated multi-payer system like
         | Germany's.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | > But still, she'll never "pay back" what was expended on
           | saving her life.
           | 
           | I'm not so sure. In direct taxes, maybe not. But she earns a
           | wage and and spends that too. The shops she spends at pay
           | tax, and that money goes around. Unless she burns her money,
           | her contribution to society in money alone is a lot greater
           | than just her own tax bill.
        
           | ajsnigrutin wrote:
           | Why would it cost millions? The private US hospital might
           | charge millions, but if you have a government healthcare
           | system, the cost is basically paychecks + rent + equipment
           | amortization + medicine + "other" (food, cleaning,...).
           | 
           | I'm not sure what exatly they did to the frozen woman, but
           | for your MIL, that would probably take a few dedicated
           | doctors hours, a few dedicated hours of nurse care (both
           | spread out over the whole stay), some xrays and other scans,
           | and all together would get up to a few thousands of euros
           | max.... usually even less.
        
             | karencarits wrote:
             | I guess the numbers are difficult to get exactly right but
             | the cost per day at ICU seems to be about 50 000 2019-NOK
             | in Norway [1] (70 000 the first day, half the next).
             | 
             | By comparison (in 2005 dollars), "Using data from 253 U.S.
             | hospitals, Dasta and colleagues found that the average
             | daily cost for ICU patients decreased from $7,728 to $3,872
             | to $3,436 on Days 1 to 3" [2].
             | 
             | $7 700 in 2005 is about $11 000 today, and 70 000 NOK is
             | about $9 100 using exchange rate from 2019 and adjusted for
             | inflation
             | 
             | [1] https://legemiddelverket.no/Documents/Offentlig%2520fin
             | ansie...
             | 
             | [2] https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.20150
             | 6-366...
        
           | mint2 wrote:
           | The high cost difference part is remarkable but the "she'll
           | never pay it back" part seems to me like observing a mega
           | millions lottery winner will never pay back the prize money
           | with future ticket purchases. Isn't that the whole point of
           | the lottery or health insurance? Getting a benefit that
           | society as a whole can afford but no reasonable individual
           | can.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | largbae wrote:
             | This, and furthermore the scientific value of proving that
             | this can be done has value too. Imagine trying to
             | compensate someone to undergo this experiment willingly...
        
           | yashap wrote:
           | Humans place a high priority on saving the lives of their
           | countrymen/women, and IMO that makes a lot of sense. It's not
           | about "hopefully she pays that back in taxes in the future,"
           | it's "I want to live in a society where, if my life can be
           | saved, we don't let me die to save money" - or the same for
           | you family, friends, coworkers, etc.
           | 
           | Also worth noting that American healthcare is exceptionally
           | expensive, which may be biasing your view of medical costs.
           | American healthcare costs about double other similar nations,
           | per capita: https://www.cihi.ca/en/how-does-canadas-health-
           | spending-comp...
           | 
           | Whatever it did cost in Norway, it was probably very roughly
           | half what it would have cost in America.
        
           | mgdlbp wrote:
           | But it's also these extreme cases that most expand the limits
           | of our medical understanding and ability, such advancement
           | being analogous to dividends that will pay out for all
           | eternity.
           | 
           | The Wikipedia page does mention Bagenholm's case becoming a
           | literal textbook example (and links to a paywalled case
           | study).
        
           | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
           | 1. Healthcare costs in the US are artificially inflated. You
           | can't compare the two.
           | 
           | 2. This is the whole point of insurance. The majority loses
           | money overall, but the outliers win. The point is that the
           | outlier might be you.
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | >> to become a radiologist so probably pays a decent amount
           | in taxes now.
           | 
           | Specialist doctors are one of those jobs that is on the cusp
           | of tax planning/avoidance technology. Once you are touching
           | 1mil per year you have enough money to engage proper tax
           | professionals to take care of your money. In the US they will
           | run their practice as a business rather be any sort of
           | employee. Offshore trusts, spendthrifts, deferals ... I
           | wouldn't assume that every doctor suffers a huge tax bill
           | each year.
        
             | golergka wrote:
             | Do you seriously think that doctors get 1mil per year
             | anywhere outside of the US?
        
               | siva7 wrote:
               | I fear that most americans aren't aware how vastly
               | different wages are in europe and for what reasons
        
               | willbw wrote:
               | In Australia it's not uncommon but that's also
               | exceptional.
        
           | ec109685 wrote:
           | If she wasn't using those resources, would the country have
           | saved all that much? These folks were all employed and
           | working, ready for less extraordinary situations, and thus
           | available for a situation like this.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | Norwegian doctors spring into existence at the moment of
             | need and cease to exist once the need is over.
             | 
             | The accounting for things like this is the same that
             | results in saying space craft toilets cost fifty billion
             | dollars.
             | 
             | In reality there is some costs associated with consumables,
             | overtime, etc that could be avoided but it's hard to
             | account for the costs that would have been spent "anyway".
             | 
             | Perhaps you could argue that there was care neglected in
             | other aspects of the facility, but given the strangeness of
             | the situation it's likely that many involved were involved
             | only peripherally and/or would have been doing research
             | anyway.
        
             | jollybean wrote:
             | There's almost unlimited demand for Healthcare services in
             | modern countries. That said, some uses are better than
             | others.
        
           | thebruce87m wrote:
           | > Fortunately after Medicare, cost to her was $1300
           | 
           | I know what you mean here, but I can't help but read this as:
           | 
           | > Unfortunately, despite Medicare, she still had to pay
           | $1300.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | jollybean wrote:
             | ? Why would having 100 people work day and night to labour
             | over you costing $1300 be a problem. Even by a civic
             | standard it could have been very expensive and that would
             | have been 'fair'.
        
               | daleharvey wrote:
               | Because some people regard attempting to literally
               | quantify the value of someones life into a dollar amount
               | to be a "problem"
        
               | js2 wrote:
               | You pay for Medicare out of your paycheck your entire
               | career, and you continue to pay for supplementary
               | insurance after that.
               | 
               | There's an argument for paying a token user fee to
               | discourage overuse of the medical system, but that isn't
               | the case here.
        
               | blkhawk wrote:
               | Because we as a society (Germany in my case) already are
               | already paying them for their work. Why would anybody
               | bill an unfortunate soul for their misfortune?
               | 
               | This outlier is why health insurance exists in most
               | countries.
        
               | jollybean wrote:
               | This is the kind of entitled attitude that destroys any
               | hope of productive socialism.
               | 
               | As an extreme example - you don't 'pay taxes' so that the
               | government will launch a $20 million dollar rescue
               | operation to save your life from deadly illness while on
               | an arctic operation. You're just going to die.
               | 
               | We do a form medial triage on everything (there's an
               | unlimited demand for medical services) and it's largely
               | resources based.
               | 
               | Ex: COVID antivirals - not everyone gets them. They are
               | rationed.
               | 
               | Every service definitely has it's limits, costs get out
               | of hand at the far end of the spectrum on pretty much
               | everything you can imagine.
               | 
               | Which is why 'co pays' are entirely rational - and likely
               | more fair - form of paying for services, in fact it's
               | surprising they are not more common.
               | 
               | A $20K bill for having 'having a baby' is outrageous as
               | it happens in the US, but for '100 medical professionals
               | in attendance' at once isn't unreasonable at all.
        
               | thebruce87m wrote:
               | From a country that doesn't have copays, I'm happy with
               | the service I get and I don't wish for copays. My dad
               | died of cancer last year - the treatments and service he
               | received were excellent. He even got _extra_ money along
               | the way due to his illness and I'm glad my surviving
               | mother is left with the entirety of his estate instead of
               | bills to pay.
        
               | blkhawk wrote:
               | Yes that's exactly what the government collects taxes
               | for. That is what say the Bergrettung does. Or what the
               | Coast guard does if there is somebody lost at sea.
               | 
               | Also if somebody on an Antarctic base gets sick and can
               | be evacuated they get evacuated - that is also exactly
               | what you describe.
               | 
               | OFC there is triage _but_ in normal time we have no
               | medical triage aside from a very soft form of it in that
               | non-life threatening and non-urgent procedures are
               | scheduled and delayed as needed.
               | 
               | Co pays for non-elective are only rational if the amounts
               | are negligible even for the most impoverished patient and
               | then its easier and cost effective just to not haver them
               | at all.
        
           | kzrdude wrote:
           | Morbid curiosity or mean comment maybe, but what's the price
           | tag on a Sea King ambulance helicopter rescue in the U.S.?
           | 
           | But in most countries that kind of service is just not
           | available. It is highly available in Norway due to the oil
           | industry needs, the many islands and mountains making it
           | useful, and generally very high standard of living.
        
             | karencarits wrote:
             | For reference, the operating cost of such rescue helicopter
             | (including crew) is about 100 000 NOK per hour in Norway
             | [1] or ~$11 000.
             | 
             | [1] https://ambulanseforum.no/artikler/redningsaksjonen-
             | kostet-r...
        
       | jansan wrote:
       | Fahrenheit is such a dumb temperature scale. Daniel Gabriel
       | Fahrenheit simply took the lowest outside winter temperature of
       | his hometown as zero and the highest summer termperature as 100
       | degrees. If he had lived somewhere else or at a different time,
       | the temperature scale would be different.
       | 
       | Although Fahrenheit was German, Germany does not use this scale.
       | It would be nice if the remaining parts of the world that still
       | use the Fahrenheit scale could eventually switch to Celsius which
       | at least makes a little bit of sense.
        
         | hexane360 wrote:
         | Fahrenheit was actually defined so 0 degF was the freezing
         | point of brine, and 100 degF was roughly human body
         | temperature.
        
           | jansan wrote:
           | I had a different source, but Wikipedia says that you are
           | correct.
        
       | dskloet wrote:
       | > Even after a couple of hours out of the water, Bagenholm's core
       | temperature was 56.7 degrees Farenheit
       | 
       | 13.7 Celsius
        
       | hedgehog wrote:
       | Clip of a short BBC interview with her:
       | https://youtu.be/clvnGfE6ul0?t=63
        
       | moneywoes wrote:
       | Does this give credence to the freezing of brains that people
       | under go post death?
        
         | blkhawk wrote:
         | no, the person in question wasn't frozen even if the headline
         | says so. Her body temperature was lowered quite drastically and
         | that slows down any damage dramatically.
         | 
         | Actually freezing people without any type of antifreeze agent
         | usually causes ice crystals to form and that damages cells in
         | the whole body enough to make revival unlikely.
         | 
         | Modern cryo uses antifreeze agents but since the people
         | undergoing these procedure are already quite dead & those
         | agents aren't really conducive to life either most of the time
         | its still unclear if anybody frozen that way can be revived in
         | the future at all.
        
       | plebianRube wrote:
       | > "We will not declare her dead until she is warm and dead."
       | 
       | More cases of kids than adults surviving very low body
       | temperatures, but the saying is true, as long as you're not warm
       | and dead there is some hope.
        
         | dreamcompiler wrote:
         | Indeed. I'm an EMT and because of cases like this we're taught
         | not to assume a cold or drowned patient is dead until they're
         | warm and dead.
        
         | hammock wrote:
         | Not for nothing, with children there is often a greater "spirit
         | not to give up."
        
           | dreamcompiler wrote:
           | That's true, but there's also a hypothesis that kids freeze
           | quicker because of their lower body mass, which may make them
           | shut down more uniformly with less damage. Which means
           | thawing them out has a better chance of success.
        
         | User23 wrote:
         | It's absolutely true based on every EMT I've spoken to. Which,
         | by the way, I highly recommend if you have the opportunity and
         | the stomach for it. They have some wild stories to tell.
        
       | adictator wrote:
        
       | montroser wrote:
       | See also Timothy Lancaster, a British Airways pilot who survived
       | after an explosive decompression propelled his body out through
       | the windscreen into -17degC conditions at 700km/h at FL170. He
       | was pinned against the fuselage for 20 minutes with his feet
       | hooked on the control column, while the first officer made an
       | emergency descent and landed the plane.
       | 
       | Lancaster made a full recovery, and continued his career as a
       | commercial pilot for nearly 30 years following the incident.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_5390
       | 
       | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pilot-sucked-airplane/
        
         | fifilura wrote:
         | There is also an extreme accident in Sweden where a couple of
         | kids in a canoe survived (incidentially with Norwegian
         | emergency care).
         | 
         | One of them found with his face under the water at 14C body
         | temperature surviving cardiac arrest for 6 hours.
         | 
         | The extreme low body temperatures seems to be able to allow for
         | surviving under extreme conditions, even without breathing for
         | several hours.
         | 
         | (a bit too fancy) article in swedish.
         | https://mirakletiannsjon.story.aftonbladet.se/
         | 
         | (google translate to english "Canadian" is a special type of
         | canoe) https://mirakletiannsjon-story-aftonbladet-
         | se.translate.goog...
        
           | paulryanrogers wrote:
           | > ...even without breathing for several hours.
           | 
           | Isn't brain damage inevitable after just a few minutes?
        
             | retrac wrote:
             | Metabolic processes are dependent on temperature.
             | 
             | Think of yeast cells. They barely survive at 10 degC, but
             | they do get along in water and sugar, slowly. If you bring
             | them up to their ideal temperature with a lot of food, they
             | go into explosive growth and the solution starts
             | aggressively bubbling. It's orders of magnitude more
             | metabolic activity when it's warm. If you cool human cells
             | down their metabolism and oxygen demands slow down in the
             | same way.
             | 
             | (Not coincidentally, yeast's happy temperature is not too
             | different from normal human body temperature. A lot of
             | biochemical processes go their fastest around ~35 degC or
             | so without the involved molecules breaking down, and the
             | mammalian trick was to keep all our cells at a near-ideal
             | point all the time. We're aggressively bubbling solutions
             | of CO2 all the time, normally.)
        
             | fifilura wrote:
             | This is the point.
             | 
             | No it is not if you combine it with low body temperature.
             | It is pretty amazing when you read about it.
             | 
             | I think also some surgeons used this method, icing people
             | before surgery. Not sure it is used anymore though since it
             | may be a bit difficult to control.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_hypothermic_circulatory_
             | a...
             | 
             | (IIRC this kid suffered some brain damage though, but not
             | severe enough to stopping him to continue going to school)
        
             | gus_massa wrote:
             | Not if the brain is cool enough, but don't try this at
             | home.
             | 
             | IIRC the trick is to restore oxygenation and circulation
             | before restoring the temperature level.
        
             | Sharlin wrote:
             | In the end it's no different from preserving groceries by
             | putting them into the fridge. Typically chemical reactions
             | happen slower in lower temperatures, often exponentially
             | slower. Damage can only occur at a rate constrained by
             | chemistry.
        
           | pge wrote:
           | Bit of relevant trivia - in a number of languages other than
           | English, "canoe" means both the style of boat we call a canoe
           | in English and the thing we call a kayak. To distinguish the
           | two, the one we call simply a "canoe" is called in those
           | languages a "Canadian canoe" or "Canadian" for short.
        
             | codetrotter wrote:
             | My father is Swedish and used to have a Canadian canoe. He
             | would refer to the canoe by its name most of the time but
             | sometimes he and my grandfather would refer to it as
             | "kanadensaren" ("the Canadian" in Swedish), and I never
             | knew why until now. Thank you!
        
       | xaedes wrote:
       | Sounds like the ancients had similar thoughts as "We will not
       | declare her dead until she is warm and dead.":
       | 
       | https://www.sacred-texts.com/zor/sbe04/sbe0411.htm
       | 
       | From The Zend Avesta, Part I - FARGARD V.
       | 
       | 10 (34). O Maker of the material world, thou Holy One! If the
       | summer is past and _the winter has come_ , what shall the
       | worshippers of Mazda do?
       | 
       | Ahura Mazda answered: 'In every house? in every borough, they
       | shall raise three small houses for the dead.'
       | 
       | 11 (37). O Maker of the material world, thou Holy One! How large
       | shall be those houses for the dead?
       | 
       | Ahura Mazda answered: ' _Large enough not to strike the skull, or
       | the feet, or the hands of the man, if he should stand erect, and
       | hold out his feet, and stretch out his hands: such shall be,
       | according to the law, the houses for the dead_.
       | 
       | 12 (41). 'And they shall let the lifeless body lie there, for two
       | nights, or for three nights, or a month long, until the birds-
       | begin to fly, the plants to grow, the floods to flow, and the
       | wind to dry up the waters from off the earth.
        
         | alehlopeh wrote:
         | Sounds like you're referring to a pretty specific brand of "the
         | ancients" and I'm guessing it's not the ones from Stargate.
         | Unfortunately when someone refers to "the ancients" in this
         | way, my brain automatically assumes they are into some wacky
         | new age stuff.
        
           | xaedes wrote:
           | Specifically I was referring to the Parsis and their
           | Zoroastrian teachings. The introduction to the quoted book
           | has put it in those words:
           | 
           | https://www.sacred-texts.com/zor/sbe04/sbe0402.htm#page_xi
           | 
           | The Zend-Avesta is the sacred book of the Parsis, that is to
           | say, of the few remaining followers of that religion which
           | feigned over Persia at the time when the second successor of
           | Mohammed overthrew the Sassanian dynasty [At the battle of
           | Nihavand (642 A.C.)], and which has been called Dualism, or
           | Mazdeism, or Magism, or Zoroastrianism, or Fire-worship,
           | according as its main tenet, or its supreme God [Ahura
           | Mazda], or its priests, or its supposed founder, or its
           | apparent object of worship has been most kept in view.
           | 
           | > Indeed, they are not the Stargate ancients. But in the same
           | book they write about some other kind of "golden ring" with a
           | most interesting coldness related story:
           | 
           | https://www.sacred-texts.com/zor/sbe04/sbe0408.htm
           | 
           | 7 (17) 2. Then I, Ahura Mazda, brought two implements unto
           | him: _a golden ring_ and a poniard inlaid with gold. Behold,
           | here Yima bears the royal sway!
           | 
           | 8 (20). Thus, under the sway of Yima, three hundred winters
           | passed away, and the earth was replenished with flocks and
           | herds, with men and dogs and birds and with red blazing
           | fires, and there was no more room for flocks, herds, and men.
           | 
           | 9. Then I warned the fair Yima, saying: 'O fair Yima, son of
           | Vivanghat, the earth has become full of flocks and herds, of
           | men and dogs and birds and of red blazing fires, and there is
           | no more room for flocks, herds, and men.'
           | 
           | 10. Then Yima stepped forward, towards the luminous space,
           | southwards, to meet the sun, and (afterwards) he pressed the
           | earth with the _golden ring_ , and bored it with the poniard,
           | speaking thus:
           | 
           | 'O Spenta Armaiti, kindly open asunder and stretch thyself
           | afar, to bear flocks and herds and men.'
           | 
           | 11. And Yima made the earth grow larger by one-third than it
           | was before, and there came flocks and herds and men, at his
           | will and wish, as many as he wished.
           | 
           | 12 (23). Thus, under the sway of Yima, six hundred winters
           | passed away, and the earth was replenished with flocks and
           | herds, with men and dogs and birds and with red blazing
           | fires, and there was no more room for flocks, herds, and men.
           | 
           | > this process of using the golden ring is used multiple
           | times, with a total of 1800 winters passing
           | 
           | > but it is not over:
           | 
           | 22 (46). And Ahura Mazda spake unto Yima, saying:
           | 
           | 'O fair Yima, son of Vivanghat! Upon the material world the
           | fatal winters are going to fall, that shall bring the fierce,
           | foul frost; upon the material world the fatal winters are
           | going to fall, that shall make snow-flakes fall thick, even
           | an aredvi deep on the highest tops of mountains.
           | 
           | 23 (52). And all the three sorts of beasts shall perish,
           | those that live in the wilderness, and those that live on the
           | tops of the mountains, and those that live in the bosom of
           | the dale, under the shelter of stables.
           | 
           | 24 (57). Before that winter, those fields would bear plenty
           | of grass for cattle: now with floods that stream, with snows
           | that melt, it will seem a happy land in the world, the land
           | wherein footprints even of sheep may still be seen.
           | 
           | 25 (61). Therefore make thee a Vara, long as a riding-ground
           | on every side of the square, and thither bring the seeds of
           | sheep and oxen, of men, of dogs, of birds, and of red blazing
           | fires. Therefore make thee a Vara, long as a riding-ground on
           | every side of the square, to be an abode for men; a Vara,
           | long. as a riding-ground on every side of the square, to be a
           | fold for flocks.
           | 
           | 26 (65). There thou shalt make waters flow in a bed a hathra
           | long; there thou shalt settle birds, by the ever-green banks
           | that bear never-failing food. There thou shalt establish
           | dwelling places, consisting of a house with a balcony, a
           | courtyard, and a gallery.
           | 
           | 27 (70). Thither thou shalt bring the seeds of men and women,
           | of the greatest, best, and finest kinds on this earth;
           | thither thou shalt bring the seeds of every kind of cattle,
           | of the greatest, best, and finest kinds on this earth.
           | 
           | 28 (74). Thither thou shalt bring the seeds of every kind of
           | tree, of the greatest, best, and finest kinds on this earth;
           | thither thou shalt bring the seeds of every kind of fruit,
           | the fullest of food and sweetest of odour. All those seeds
           | shalt thou bring, two of ever), kind, to be kept
           | inexhaustible there, so long as those men shall stay in the
           | Vara.
           | 
           | 29 (80). There shall be no humpbacked, none bulged forward
           | there; no impotent, no lunatic; no poverty, no lying; no
           | meanness, no jealousy; no decayed tooth, no leprous to be
           | confined, nor any of the brands wherewith Angra Mainyu stamps
           | the bodies of mortals.
           | 
           | 30 (87). In the largest part of the place thou shalt make
           | nine streets, six in the middle part, three in the smallest.
           | To the streets of the largest part thou shalt bring a
           | thousand seeds of men and women; to the streets of the middle
           | part, six hundred; to the streets of the smallest part, three
           | hundred. _That Vara thou shalt seal up with the golden ring_
           | , and thou shalt make a door, and a window self-shining
           | within.'
           | 
           | > I don't know that that golden ring represents, maybe the
           | sun?
        
         | DoreenMichele wrote:
         | The traditional _wake_ is probably rooted in watching the
         | "dead" body for a few days to see if it wakes up before burying
         | them. There can be myriad things that make someone seem dead
         | temporarily, such as consuming improperly prepared fish (I
         | think puffer fish?).
        
         | Mikeb85 wrote:
         | > the ancients had similar thoughts as "We will not declare her
         | dead until she is warm and dead."
         | 
         | I mean, they lived in the aftermath of an ice age...
        
       | sethammons wrote:
       | Another one: https://allthatsinteresting.com/jean-hilliard
       | 
       | > Her skin was so frozen that they couldn't pierce it with
       | hypodermic needles -- the needles just broke on contact. Her body
       | temperature was so low that it didn't register on a thermometer.
       | Her face was an ashen-gray color and her eyes didn't respond to
       | changes in light.
        
       | petilon wrote:
       | In Siberia they do this routinely. In this video [1] doctors
       | lower the body temperature to 75 degrees Fahrenheit, which
       | basically brings the body including brain to a halt, then perform
       | the surgery.
       | 
       | Note: the audio is in Russian but there is text description below
       | the video:
       | 
       | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVMX6YKYMrU
        
       | cat_plus_plus wrote:
       | She was 0K.
        
       | paulcole wrote:
       | > It took much longer--years--for her to be able to move, walk,
       | and finally even ski again.
       | 
       | I'll take cold and dead over this, thanks. I've got a chronic
       | illness and have a good sense of my limits for what's bearable.
        
         | sterlind wrote:
         | I've got a chronic illness too. I use a wheelchair. it's very
         | bearable for me. you might be less willing to live with
         | limitations than me, though - I was never terribly athletic
         | even when I was able-bodied.
        
           | paulcole wrote:
           | Yeah, everybody's different. I thought my life was pretty
           | pointless pre-illness. Much worse and I'll have had enough.
        
         | ec109685 wrote:
         | The wiki article has her working 140 days after the accident:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_B%C3%A5genholm
         | 
         | " Bagenholm returned to work in October 1999.[12] On 7 October
         | 1999-140 days after the accident--she returned to the hospital
         | in Tromso and met the doctors and nurses that helped save her
         | life.[18]"
        
       | webchat wrote:
        
       | pmoriarty wrote:
       | _" She's ice cold when I touch her skin, and she looks absolutely
       | dead," Gilbert later told CNN. "On the electrocardiogram... there
       | is a completely flat line," Gilbert remembered. "Like you could
       | have drawn it with a ruler. No signs of life whatsoever."_
       | 
       | It sounds like they were measuring the wrong thing.
        
         | grayclhn wrote:
         | This is a little flip. They _obviously_ weren't measuring the
         | wrong thing because they kept going and resuscitated her. The
         | EKG was mentioned as one datapoint on the state of her physical
         | body.
         | 
         | Edit: I'm writing this comment because in almost any real
         | situation, some of the standard measurements won't be useful.
         | Pulling out one and concluding "EKGs are wrong" (or whatever
         | equivalent) is a pretty easy and common way to feel smart in
         | the moment and make worse choices overall.
        
           | pmoriarty wrote:
           | _" They obviously weren't measuring the wrong thing because
           | they kept going and resuscitated her."_
           | 
           | No.
           | 
           | They _disregarded_ the measurements.
           | 
           | The measurements mentioned in the story obviously failed
           | them, so they went with their own judgement instead (or maybe
           | some other measurements not mentioned in the story.. but I'm
           | just going by what's given in the story, not some imagined
           | account of what might have happened instead).
        
             | krisoft wrote:
             | > No.
             | 
             | No back to you. :)
             | 
             | > The measurements mentioned in the story obviously failed
             | them
             | 
             | The measurement didn't "fail" them. It told them the truth,
             | that is that she didn't have electrical activity in her
             | hearth. If they would have seen a different rhythm they
             | would have given her a different treatment. For example if
             | they would have seen one of the shockable rhythms they
             | would have given her the appropriate shock.
             | 
             | > so they went with their own judgement instead
             | 
             | Instead? From what you say it sounds like there is some
             | rule preventing people from continuing efforts if they see
             | a flat ECG. That is not true. The medical providers didn't
             | use their judgement "instead" of the measurement. They used
             | their judgement factoring in all the things they measured,
             | known, heard, and sensed. (including but not limited to the
             | flat ECG measurement)
        
         | darkerside wrote:
         | What would you suggest measuring?
        
       | thih9 wrote:
       | Since then there was an accident involving an even lower body
       | temperature:
       | https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/04/doctors-toddle...
       | 
       | > Two-year-old Adas was found by police unconscious near a creek
       | in the village of Raclawice, just north of Krakow, late on Sunday
       | in weather of -7C.
       | 
       | > His core body temperature had plummeted to just 12.7C (54F),
       | and doctors kept him in an artificial coma until Wednesday,
       | fearing brain damage.
       | 
       | > But after being awakened, the boy on Thursday was speaking,
       | playing and eating normally in hospital. Medical staff believe he
       | might have come through his ordeal almost unscathed, probably
       | with pneumonia but with no sign of frostbite.
        
       | nojs wrote:
       | > By the time the rescue team showed up with a rope and a pointed
       | shovel, hacked a hole in the ice, and pulled her out, she had
       | been submerged for about 80 minutes. She had no heartbeat.
       | 
       | Interestingly people like Wim Hof have apparently trained
       | themselves to withstand the same exposure for 2+ hours with no
       | issues. The article alludes to this too:
       | 
       | > Slightly less creatively, studies have shown that when
       | experienced arctic explorers are asked to stick their fingers in
       | icy water, they feel less cold than average Joes do--their bodies
       | have slowed down their responses, trained by repeated exposure
       | into playing the long game.
       | 
       | I wonder what changes in the body with repeated exposure, and why
       | we haven't evolved to do it naturally?
        
         | maxerickson wrote:
         | It seems he has survived ice for couple hours, that's different
         | than very cold water, as the water will transfer heat away a
         | lot faster.
        
         | User23 wrote:
         | > I wonder what changes in the body with repeated exposure, and
         | why we haven't evolved to do it naturally?
         | 
         | I can't speak to the specifics, but generally speaking the body
         | will try to maintain homeostasis. A stressor that disrupts
         | homeostasis leads to adaptation or illness and death.
         | Presumably those adaptations are not metabolically free, so the
         | body prefers not to make them in the absence of stress.
        
       | mysql wrote:
       | Sounds like a similar medical miracle to I guy I knew at
       | University. https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2017/02/19/this-
       | queens-...
        
       | phendrenad2 wrote:
       | This is so weird. Is it possible that we can bring Walt Disney
       | back to life after all?
        
       | widforss wrote:
       | I live in Narvik, and I can't understand why they name the place
       | of the accident Kjolen. What I can gather from archived news
       | articles she was skiing in a very well known place called
       | Morkhola, or "the backside".
       | 
       | I have not heard of any Kjolen Mountains, and as part of a local
       | SAR team, I think I should've known about it if it existed.
        
         | gliptic wrote:
         | They probably mean Kjolen? Kjolen could be an appropriate name
         | for a mountain though, shape-wise :).
        
           | widforss wrote:
           | That's probably it :) But if they refer to the Kjolen which
           | is _the entire Scandinavian mountain range_ , that's terribly
           | imprecise.
           | 
           | Kjolen would mean "the skirt", for the anglophones reading.
        
             | areyousure wrote:
             | Please forgive me, for I am actually curious about this:
             | 
             | Were you previously aware of the term "Kjolen" to refer to
             | the (Northern) Scandinavian mountain range? And if so, when
             | you wrote
             | 
             | > I have not heard of any Kjolen Mountains,
             | 
             | were you really distinguishing between Kjolen and Kjolen?
             | Are you a native Norwegian speaker?
             | 
             | I understand that o is a "distinct" letter in Norwegian,
             | but to my uneducated eyes/ears it sounds similarly baffling
             | to a French speaker not recognizing the "Pyrenees" because
             | they're used to "Pyrenees".
        
               | widforss wrote:
               | I didn't make that connection since the term Kjolen to
               | refer to the whole mountain range is rather archaic. If
               | it was more common with this specific meaning, I may have
               | understood it.
               | 
               | I'm a Swedish native (mutually intelligible with
               | Norwegian), and yes, when I read, "o" and o/o are very
               | different and distinct letters.
        
               | gliptic wrote:
               | I'm Swedish, not Norwegian, but I can understand not
               | making the connection between "Kjolen" and "Kjolen"
               | because both of those are words and have completely
               | different meaning, and as you say 'o' is quite distinct
               | from 'o'.
               | 
               | Just to take a random example, if you were to say "Bird
               | Peak" instead of "Bard Peak" it wouldn't be immediately
               | obvious what you meant.
        
               | hansihe wrote:
               | I would probably make the connection if we are talking
               | about very commonly used words, or if I knew what to look
               | out for. In this case, I am not terribly familiar with
               | that mountain range, so I probably wouldn't make the
               | connection by myself.
               | 
               | We have 3 different "special" letters in Norwegian, all
               | of which have their own "latinifications", so it can
               | sometimes be difficult to see when it has been done. (o
               | to o, ae to ae/a/e, a to a/aa)
               | 
               | Incidentally, Kjolen and Kjolen are both nouns of their
               | own. (kjolen means "the dress" as in what a woman could
               | wear. kjolen can mean "the fridge" as in "put something
               | in the fridge"/"put something in a cool place")
        
               | gylterud wrote:
               | > kjolen can mean "the fridge" as in "put something in
               | the fridge"/"put something in a cool place"
               | 
               | I could be wrong, but I would guess "kjolen" would
               | translate to the "the keel" in this case? Perhaps
               | refering to the shape of the mountain range looking like
               | a keel up-side down.
        
         | thebruce87m wrote:
         | SAR = Search And Rescue in case anyone else didn't immediately
         | click.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-24 23:00 UTC)