[HN Gopher] In sexy worms, inheritance beyond genes can help evo...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       In sexy worms, inheritance beyond genes can help evolution
        
       Author : nsoonhui
       Score  : 31 points
       Date   : 2022-04-20 13:23 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
        
       | Metacelsus wrote:
       | Just FYI the biological mechanisms at play here in worms are
       | quite different from those in mammals, so don't expect this to
       | generalize to humans.
        
         | skdk3k2 wrote:
        
         | antattack wrote:
         | "the new study provides valuable clues about the potential for
         | short-term epigenetic inheritance to influence longer-term
         | evolution, too."
         | 
         | Chemistry is different but mechanism is pretty universal,
         | across the species.
        
           | cryptonector wrote:
           | Still, genetic regulation changes would somehow have to end
           | up pushed into gametes in order to make it to the embryo. Or
           | maybe there could be a placental mechanism for passing
           | genetic regulation from the mother to the embryo. The latter
           | would be more likely to work, so I'd bet on that if the
           | mechanism exists at all. Either way, finding a bit of
           | Lamarckian flavor in nature would be something else, after
           | all these years.
           | 
           | A link I just found when searching news for lamarckian
           | evolution: https://brainblogger.com/2018/01/08/lamarckian-
           | evolution-is-...
        
       | stereocodes wrote:
       | Sexy worms... Like this
       | https://images.app.goo.gl/1o3e2ZnPsMhTpbDv6
        
       | cryptonector wrote:
       | I keep waiting for someone to discover an evolutionary mechanism
       | that looks Lamarckian. It's not that I think Darwinian evolution
       | is wrong (I don't), but that a combination of Darwinian and
       | Lamarckian evolution would be really cool and rather surprising.
       | 
       | Here's the only relevant thing on the first page of results for
       | "lamarckian evolution" in news:
       | https://brainblogger.com/2018/01/08/lamarckian-evolution-is-...
        
       | vmception wrote:
       | > But when environmental conditions become stressful, the worms
       | become sexually attractive much sooner. For them, sex is the
       | equivalent of a Hail Mary pass -- a desperate gamble that if
       | their offspring are more genetically diverse, some will fare
       | better under the new, rougher conditions.
       | 
       | I really feel like this was written for commentary and parallels
       | on humans. The article also starts with "organisms swiping right"
       | to set the tone for this "worm" based research paper.
        
       | jrhawley wrote:
       | This whole topic of trans-generational inheritance and non-
       | genetic factors affecting evolutionary fitness is, in my opinion,
       | an undervalued topic in evolutionary biology today. If treating
       | diseased cells with a particular drug elicits the over-expression
       | of a microRNA to protect the cell, could that sustained
       | expression be passed onto daughter cells without genetic
       | mutation? That would be a case of some information (microRNA
       | expression) being passed over generations of cells that
       | influences phenotype (response to drug treatment). It's not
       | strictly DNA-based, but it should still have some effect on
       | evolutionary dynamics.
       | 
       | I (unsuccessfully) tried to tackle some of these ideas during my
       | PhD, looking at other modifications to the DNA fibers like DNA
       | methylation, transcription factor binding, and the 3D coiling of
       | DNA inside the cell, and how that influences cell populations.
       | 
       | There are some interesting studies in plants from a few years ago
       | [0-1] and more recent studies using some single-cell high
       | throughput sequencing techniques [2] to investigate what role
       | these non-genetic perturbations might play in evolution and
       | disease.
       | 
       | [0]:
       | https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/jo...
       | 
       | [1]: https://academic.oup.com/genetics/article/188/1/215/6063285
       | 
       | [2]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1198-z
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | In our species, inheritance in terms of money and properties
       | means a lot in terms of "social" evolution.
       | 
       | More serious: some epigentic factors do play a role.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-20 23:02 UTC)