[HN Gopher] Local detection of dark matter with future missions ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Local detection of dark matter with future missions to Uranus and
       Neptune
        
       Author : ArtWomb
       Score  : 54 points
       Date   : 2022-04-19 15:25 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arxiv.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arxiv.org)
        
       | Baopab wrote:
       | There's also a Cambridge study from ~1 year ago that could be the
       | first direct detection of dark energy in an experimental dark
       | matter detector. I can't seem to find it again though...
        
         | Sporktacular wrote:
         | Please link if you find it.
        
       | scld wrote:
       | Layman here: Does this mean that they'll launch orbiters around
       | Neptune and Uranus and, by measuring the doppler shift in comms
       | back to Earth against their simulations, determine if there's
       | enough dark matter to be impacting the doppler shift?
        
         | goodcanadian wrote:
         | No, or not exactly. It appears to me that they are suggesting
         | (or rather, modelling) using the doppler shift to precisely
         | measure the trajectories of the spacecraft on the way to those
         | planets in order to get a measurement of the gravitational
         | field that is acting on them and thus a measurement of any dark
         | matter that may be present.
        
           | rich_sasha wrote:
           | Hmm, but if we're suspended in a homogeneous "soup" of Dark
           | Matter, the surely such forces would cancel out?
           | 
           | Do we except Dark Matter to be distributed inhomogeneously
           | around the Solar System? I thought it is only in homogenous
           | at ~galactic scales.
        
             | treeman79 wrote:
             | https://xkcd.com/2186/
             | 
             | Earths dark matter is equivalent to one squirrel.
        
               | rich_sasha wrote:
               | Right, but even that link suggests dark matter is pretty
               | homogeneous around Solar System, right? If it's simply
               | described as a density number.
               | 
               | Is the suggested experiment just measuring that
               | homogeneous density? Or hoping to find some distribution
               | around the Solae System?
        
               | flqn wrote:
               | We've only been able to infer dark matter densities over
               | galactic scales so I'm not sure that density applies at
               | planetary system scales. It's like trying to use the
               | density of iron to say where the atoms in a chunk of it
               | are.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | enkid wrote:
             | Warning, I am also a layman, but I don't think we know how
             | clumped dark matter is. We know it has to be spread out on
             | galactic scales, but that doesn't mean it's spread out at
             | solar system scales. Some people even suggest dark matter
             | could be black holes with intermediate masses. If we can
             | figure out how concentrated or spread out dark matter is at
             | the solar system level, it constrains the models that would
             | fit the new data.
        
           | Sporktacular wrote:
           | How do they propose differentiating the gravity due to normal
           | matter from dark matter?
        
             | goodcanadian wrote:
             | Basically, we can see the normal matter.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | waynecochran wrote:
       | It's cool there is a "Code & Data" link for papers at arxiv (alas
       | there is "No official code found" for this paper -- not that I
       | expect there would be).
        
       | zionic wrote:
       | This is random but I really want to get some high end instruments
       | in geosynchronous orbit with Jupiter/one of the gas giants
       | opposite the sun. Seems like the perfect place to get low-noise
       | measurements.
        
         | krisoft wrote:
         | It sounds more like what you are saying is you want instruments
         | orbiting around the L2 lagrange point of the Jupiter-Sun
         | system. Do I understand you right?
         | 
         | At first I was confused because the "geo" in geosycnronous
         | means that the orbit is centered around the Earth. But you are
         | talking about Jupiter, so I thought maybe you mean a
         | "jovisyncronous" orbit? One orbiting around the Jupiter with
         | the same orbital period the Jupiter rotates with. But then you
         | also say opposite the sun, and that orbit would be on the
         | opposite side from the Sun only some of the time (because
         | Jupiter is not tidaly locked with the Sun). So my best guess
         | now is that you mean L2.
         | 
         | What kind of measurement would you want to do there? And how
         | would you get the results back to Earth?
        
       | throwawayboise wrote:
       | Queue the jokes about studying dark matter on Uranus.
        
         | rich_sasha wrote:
         | I'll stick to M'ars
        
         | Sharlin wrote:
         | *cue. As in, a theatrical cue to enter the stage.
        
           | sdflhasjd wrote:
           | No, this is the line for a queue of these jokes. ;p
        
           | throwawayboise wrote:
           | I wondered about that, I chose queue as in "line up the
           | jokes"
        
             | kzzzznot wrote:
             | Now you've said that, I think I prefer it
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-19 23:01 UTC)