[HN Gopher] The Learjet era ends with a final delivery
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Learjet era ends with a final delivery
        
       Author : hindsightbias
       Score  : 83 points
       Date   : 2022-04-18 16:51 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.flyingmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.flyingmag.com)
        
       | belter wrote:
       | The History of LearJet: https://youtu.be/x_VVyx9GXFo
        
       | cbsmith wrote:
       | I'm curious why the line was retired, as the brand recognition is
       | still so strong.
        
         | mumblemumble wrote:
         | I would guess the brand recognition is more driven by Microsoft
         | Flight Simulator than popularity among its target market? The
         | Source of All Truth suggests that the LearJet 70/75 hasn't been
         | selling nearly as well as some of its competitors.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | Story time: An engineer colleague of mine at Boeing working on
       | flight controls always talked about how great Learjets were, and
       | how he liked working on them. I finally asked him, "if you like
       | Learjet so much, why are you here working for Boeing?"
       | 
       | He replied: "I told Bill Lear he was an asshole."
        
         | smilespray wrote:
         | Reminds me of the time I spoke to Hakon Wium Lie and said "you
         | should let me redo Opera's GUI. Who designed this crap?"
         | 
         | He replied "I did."
         | 
         | Never got that gig.
        
       | criddell wrote:
       | > He is also known for [...] developing the technology that made
       | it possible to reduce the size of electronics
       | 
       | What technology is that?
        
         | mannykannot wrote:
         | This is based on something I read quite a few years ago, but
         | IIRC, as a hands-on partner in Motorola (in its early days, he
         | was its sole circuit designer) he led it into being an early
         | adopter of transistors and other semiconductor devices. (If
         | this is the basis for the quoted passage in the article then it
         | is arguably misleading, but using transistors to make compact
         | electronic devices required innovations in circuit design, and,
         | in general, turning new technology into useful products
         | requires vision and innovation.)
        
         | eganist wrote:
         | Wikipedia suggests it's the use of Litz wire rather than solid
         | wire in the making of radio tuning coils.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear#Radio_engineer
        
       | joeamroo wrote:
       | Go 'n ride the lear jet, baby. Go 'n ride the lear jet
        
         | kirenida wrote:
         | I'm in the high-fidelity first class travelling set
         | 
         | You know, I think I need a Lear jet
        
       | cascom wrote:
       | I think the interesting element is what it says about the market
       | for private jets in that there isn't a perceived market for light
       | jets, but that the super-midsized to large cabin+ is still very
       | viable, any thoughts on what's driving that? Interest rates,
       | Engine efficiency, fractional ownership, customer preference?
        
         | tnorthcutt wrote:
         | Not totally sure what you mean by "there isn't a perceived
         | market for light jets", but both Honda and Cirrus produce quite
         | popular light jets.
        
           | cascom wrote:
           | From a taxonomy standpoint, I think those are very light
           | jets.
           | 
           | To be clear, I'm not saying the light jet market is dead or
           | anything definitive like that, but the fact that Bombardier
           | is shutting down their well established light jet offering
           | would seem to indicate they don't have a rosy outlook for the
           | segment.
        
       | zerkten wrote:
       | Does anyone know of Learjet military use? I came across usage as
       | a decoy in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Sheffield_(D80).
        
         | buildsjets wrote:
         | The original Learjet's wings and landing gear were derived from
         | a military fighter aircraft, the Swiss FFA-P16.
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFA_P-16
        
           | joshjdr wrote:
           | >Lear started designing a private jet in the 1950s. Jet
           | aircraft were new technology, and there were many designs
           | that never made it off the drawing board. That changed when
           | Lear opted to adapt a Swiss ground-attack fighter, the FFA
           | P-16, that had never been built.
           | 
           | Source: Article
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | The C-21 is the military designation for their version of the
         | Lear 35A.
         | 
         | https://www.military.com/equipment/c-21a
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | I believe customs flew them for awhile too.
        
       | mysterydip wrote:
       | I remember kid me first discovering the Learjet in a flight
       | simulator in the 90s. I dreamed of one day being a pilot or
       | having my own airline with a fleet of them. Sad to see them go.
        
         | pseudostem wrote:
         | I might be totally wrong, but was it "press F8 for flaps"
         | before landing? MS flight simulator on 8 floppies was
         | brilliant.
        
           | anyfoo wrote:
           | Immediately thought of that as well. I still play MSFS4 from
           | time to time in dosbox. I sat down with dosbox's internal
           | debugger one day and patched the .EXE so that it properly
           | works with joysticks, and now use a Bluetooth game pad to fly
           | the Learjet from SFO over the Golden Gate Bridge to Seattle
           | navigating via radio from VOR to VOR every now and then.
           | 
           | There's just something about this "light" simulation. I can
           | just go for a "simple fly in a Learjet" (hah) while doing
           | other stuff.
        
             | paulmd wrote:
             | That sounds useful. If this isn't something you found
             | elsewhere, please document what you did and put it up in a
             | github gist or a pastebin or something!
        
               | anyfoo wrote:
               | Sure, it was just a small thing pertaining to gamepads.
               | If you have joysticks with an extra throttle control you
               | can likely ignore it.
               | 
               | FS4 had joystick support for the analogue joysticks of
               | the time already, and dosbox properly emulates those. But
               | the problem I ran into is the limited configuration
               | options for the joysticks:
               | 
               | * "Joystick A" controls the yoke.
               | 
               | * "Joystick B" controls either trottle+brakes, or
               | throttle+rudder.
               | 
               | Again this should be fine if you actually have a physical
               | throttle control and can split up the two axes to
               | different joysticks (as you're not likely to actually
               | have throttle and rudder on the same joystick), which
               | dosbox/dosbox-x should be able to do.
               | 
               | But for this "quick flying", I'm often on my laptop and
               | using a Bluetooth gamepad with two analogue thumb sticks:
               | https://www.8bitdo.com/sn30-pro-g-classic-or-sn30-pro-sn/
               | 
               | In that case, having the throttle forcibly on any thumb
               | stick axis is terrible: Throttle adjustments are done
               | comparatively rarely, so the self-returning nature of a
               | thumb stick means that you're constantly having to hold
               | the axis in the same position with your thumb. In
               | addition, typically one stick will be fully occupied by
               | the yoke, so the other stick will have to be throttle
               | _and_ rudder, which is just unnatural and weird.
               | 
               | I put throttle increase/decrease on buttons instead (not
               | ideal, but works out pretty well), but unless you turn
               | off "Joystick B" entirely, which implies also losing
               | rudder control, FS4 can't be made to ignore the throttle
               | axis, and will override the throttle setting with
               | whatever the current value of the axis is. Mapping the
               | axis to "nothing" in dosbox does not help, since that
               | will just keep the throttle at 0.
               | 
               | So I spent half an hour or so dumping memory state,
               | diffing, and single-stepping through the assembly, just
               | so that I could patch out the instructions that set the
               | throttle value from joystick input with NOPs, effectively
               | ignoring it.
               | 
               | To do that, patch out the bytes from 0x776c to 0x7771
               | (inclusive) to be 0x90 (a NOP) in FS4.EXE. This is for
               | V4.0b of FS4 specifically, but if there is a reason to
               | use an earlier version I'm not aware of it.
        
           | mysterydip wrote:
           | Pretty sure it was MS flight sim, but not sure which version
           | anymore
        
         | LeftHandPath wrote:
         | There's still a possibility of that. The company I work for has
         | a small fleet of legacy-model Learjets for both business and
         | certification use.
        
         | tomatowurst wrote:
         | Still fond memories of landing in O'hare airport at dusk with
         | the dim orange light illuminating the dashboard with looping
         | jet sounds.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIhey40rjks&t=1787s
        
           | holoduke wrote:
           | I used to play an even older version.
           | https://youtu.be/JhTM1dYu7HA The Learjet was so cool and
           | fast.
        
       | lesgobrandon wrote:
        
       | ilrwbwrkhv wrote:
       | I have flown in two of these planes. Absolutely fascinating and
       | it's sad they are no longer being produced.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | I've only been a passenger on a private jet once: a lightly
         | loaded Lear 60. The takeoff was amazing; there was a fairly
         | high level of initial acceleration and the acceleration got
         | stronger and stronger as the airspeed built on the runway. I
         | went up to the cockpit door early in the climb and we were
         | climbing at over 5K feet per minute. It was obvious that the
         | aircraft was not short on engine power. :)
         | 
         | 611mi (641mi flown) in 1h09m for an average speed of 531mph
         | direct (557mph/485 knots as flown). Peak climb rate per
         | flightaware (slightly noisy): 5781 fpm.
        
           | Terry_Roll wrote:
           | I've flown with these guys, all ex RAF Red Arrow Pilots,
           | didnt need a sick bag! https://theblades.com/corporate-and-
           | private-events/
           | 
           | Thing is, if you have the gift of the gab get into politics
           | and then you have the use of various taxpayer funded aircraft
           | at your disposal, or make it rich, or be a head of state!
        
       | zabzonk wrote:
       | "Then you flew your lear jet up to Nova Scotia To see the total
       | eclipse of the sun"
       | 
       | Carly Simon - "you're so vain".
       | 
       | Edit: Rather strange downvotes? I was intending on illustrating
       | how the Lear Jet had slipped into our culture.
        
         | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
         | Also mentioned in the Pink Floyd song "Money":
         | 
         | "I'm in the high-fidelity first-class traveling set and I think
         | I need a Learjet"
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | You're so vain you probably think this song is about you ...
         | 
         | The song contains a parse error in the lyrics, causing half of
         | HN to blue screen.
        
       | a4isms wrote:
       | > Aircraft aren't the only thing [Bill] Lear invented. He is also
       | known for developing the 8-track cartridge audio tape
       | 
       | Did they ever ship a Learjet with an 8-track system for playing
       | music in-flight? Wikipedia's entry doesn't mention using it in
       | aviation, just home audio and--of course--automobiles:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8-track_tape
        
         | scoopertrooper wrote:
         | I imagine they'd be rockin' reel-to-reels.
        
       | starwind wrote:
       | Whenever I'm talking to a pilot who flies a Lear I refuse to
       | pronounce the company name as anything other than "Bomb-ba-deer"
       | cause I think it sounds super cool and I can't pronounce anything
       | vaguely French
        
       | tomatowurst wrote:
       | I see many learjets on sale, do you think its safe to purchase a
       | jet made in the late 90s, early 00s? seems to be selling at huge
       | discounts.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | Some of the Lear models don't meet noise regulations and need
         | modifications to continue to be used.
         | 
         | But in general, older aircraft are safe. (For years, I flew a
         | 1967 C182 piston single.)
         | 
         | Thirsty jets are selling at a discount in times when oil is
         | expensive. Pre-COVID, you could buy an airworthy Cessna
         | Citation for basically the value of the remaining time on the
         | engines. They got to be worth more after that for a couple of
         | reasons, but the cost of buying the airplane is not the last of
         | your spending in the airplane world and especially not in the
         | jet world.
         | 
         | I could easily afford to _buy_ a clapped-out legacy Citation. I
         | could not afford to _feed and maintain_ a legacy Citation. It
         | might be similar to horses in that regard, just with extra
         | zeroes.
        
         | dijonman2 wrote:
         | Proper maintenance and periodic inspections lead to the
         | eventual replacement of all parts before their failure sans the
         | airframe, when it is typically cheaper to buy a new aircraft.
         | 
         | You could be seeing such an airplane for sale.
        
         | buildsjets wrote:
         | This is typically because they have timed out engines, are due
         | for major inspections, or require expensive mandatory
         | modifications such as RVSM or hushkits. That said, I know
         | someone who purchased an original Lear 24 in the low 6 figures
         | that needed everything. He spent more than 1M, but less than 2M
         | on overhauled and hushkitted engines, overhauling and
         | refinishing the airframe, major avionics update including ADS-B
         | and RVSM, and other upgrades, and now had a machine that can
         | FAR outperform an Eclipse 550 at lower cost.
         | https://www.newunitedgoderich.com/projects/bombardier-learje...
        
           | Miserlou57 wrote:
           | I was a kid in the 90s Los Angeles, and being somewhat
           | familiar with jets from kids books and MSFS, is it me or does
           | anyone else seem to remember the Learjets in the air at the
           | time being the absolutely loudest sound they've ever heard?
        
           | tomatowurst wrote:
           | oh wow that thing is made in the 1966!!!! that's absolutely
           | insane
           | 
           | I guess the overhaul is roughly the same regardless of the
           | year? There's a 1981 learjet that is roughly 600k and I see
           | another one from 1994 at 700k. I guess you would just
           | discount this as the airframe price?
           | 
           | so cool that somebody out there has done this.
        
         | addaon wrote:
         | A properly maintained aircraft is safe at any age. However,
         | some aircraft have fatigue life limits on either the airframe
         | as a whole or parts that are cost-prohibitive to replace on an
         | old aircraft, such as wing spars. Talk to your (future)
         | mechanic, who can look up ADs (airworthiness directives) and
         | other limitations.
         | 
         | Do make sure you look into operating costs (maintenance,
         | insurance, fuel, etc -- and some of these are fixed costs even
         | if the aircraft hardly flies at all) before you buy something!
        
           | chipsa wrote:
           | /me looks at B-52, currently planned to be used until they're
           | 100...
        
             | throwawayboise wrote:
             | ... thanks to a basically unlimited budget for maintenance.
        
           | FredPret wrote:
           | If the aircraft gets old enough it ends up like the Learjet
           | of Theseus
        
             | CPLX wrote:
             | Pretty much all airplanes fit that description. I guess not
             | literally since the core fuselage is usually continuous but
             | just about every moving part.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | A jet is a hole in the air you throw money into.
         | 
         | The purchase price is just the start.
        
           | Beldin wrote:
           | This reminds me of a statement about yachting, roughly: if
           | you want a cheaper hobby, you could always learn to enjoy
           | burning $100 bills.
        
             | function_seven wrote:
             | I heard it as: "If you're considering buying a boat, step
             | into the shower, turn the water on, and stuff $100 bills
             | down the drain while you get drenched. Same experience."
        
       | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
       | Lear also made great mainframe terminals in the 1970s.
        
         | throwawayboise wrote:
         | Was that the same company? Never knew that....
        
           | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
           | I don't know if it was the same corporate entity, but Bill
           | Lear was behind both of them.
        
       | 88840-8855 wrote:
       | As a middle class person who would never have the chance to fly
       | those things, i don't care.
       | 
       | Used to work at a airport for some time and work on Learjets,
       | doing maintenance. Nice planes for sure, but customers are not
       | the folks i want to exist.
       | 
       | I don't like ultra rich people.
        
         | busterarm wrote:
         | One of the best perks of Gulfstream was being shuttled between
         | sites on the company's own planes.
        
         | oneoff786 wrote:
         | They don't like you either
        
           | technothrasher wrote:
           | This little one's not worth the effort. Now let me get you
           | something.
        
         | shockeychap wrote:
         | This just sounds envious and resentful.
        
           | 88840-8855 wrote:
           | yes, it is. I'm not hiding it. those are human emotions.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | mumblemumble wrote:
         | I used to work for a company that had a corporate jet as a cost
         | saving measure. They were located at a smaller market where
         | commercial flights tended to be expensive, involve multiple
         | hops, and require extra days of travel (and therefore hotel
         | bills) in order to make schedules line up. It didn't make sense
         | to fly a single person, of course, but if there were several
         | people who needed to go to the same place at the same time,
         | flying the corporate jet was often the less expensive way to
         | go.
         | 
         | I wouldn't advise being too envious, if I were you. It was
         | noisy and cramped. You couldn't really stand up to stretch your
         | legs. And you had to carefully watch how much you drank due to
         | the lack of decent bathroom accommodations. Many of my
         | colleagues loved it, mostly for the "we're in a private jet!"
         | factor, and I suppose a larger plane might be more comfortable,
         | but, at least as far as that one was concerned, I personally
         | preferred flying commercial.
        
         | thriftwy wrote:
         | Yandex founders rode business jets when preparing for IPO. They
         | are/were nice guys. Segalovich sometimes played freesbie with
         | us devs in the cloister.
        
           | beaned wrote:
           | There are casual millionaires everywhere. People only notice
           | the ones who prefer to stand out, who are probably the
           | minority.
        
         | usrusr wrote:
         | The insurance that paid my Learjet ambulance ride after an
         | accident in a neighboring country goes for a single digit rate
         | (EUR), per year. I don't consider myself ultra rich.
        
           | mmaunder wrote:
           | Friend was running overland trucks in Southern Africa and
           | same deal - a client almost lost his arm due to a croc attack
           | and they broke out the jet to evacuate him to a hospital.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | mmaunder wrote:
         | If you live in the USA you're ultra wealthy compared to middle
         | class people in many countries. And surprise - they'll probably
         | really like you when they meet you, and not just because you
         | have electricity, sanitation and running water.
        
           | dotancohen wrote:
           | And the roads.
        
       | candlemas wrote:
       | John Lear, Bill Lear's son, died last month. He was an
       | interesting guy. Told a lot of stories about UFOs and aliens and
       | soul catchers on the moon.
        
         | user3939382 wrote:
         | I've spent many hours listening to his interviews on Art Bell,
         | I didn't know he passed away. That's really sad that they're
         | both gone :(
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-18 23:00 UTC)