[HN Gopher] When you get locked out of your Google account, what...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       When you get locked out of your Google account, what do you do?
       (2021)
        
       Author : cube00
       Score  : 164 points
       Date   : 2022-04-18 14:16 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.linkedin.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.linkedin.com)
        
       | wrren wrote:
       | This is one reason why I decided to switch to ProtonMail a couple
       | of years ago as the account backing most of my internet services.
       | 
       | Given that I pay them money, I figure they're at least somewhat
       | invested in keeping me happy as a customer. Google clearly don't
       | give a shit.
        
         | niuzeta wrote:
         | I'm thinking of doing this and I haven't yet figured out how to
         | migrate all the accounts I have associated with my GMail
         | account. Do you have any suggestion/tips for a fellow potential
         | immigratnt? :)
        
           | peepop6 wrote:
           | I moved to Tutanota and what I did is forward all my Gmail
           | emails to my Tutanota email. It made it much easier to switch
           | because I could immediately start using Tutanota and then
           | migrate my accounts overtime to eventually delete Google
           | completely.
        
       | abbabon wrote:
       | Soooooo the main take here is to not put all your eggs in Google
       | One basket?
        
       | gigglesupstairs wrote:
       | Considering how much our digital lives are interwoven with our
       | real lives, who will be held responsible if someone takes their
       | life in shear helplessness basis Google's absolutely thoughtless
       | and inhuman actions and unresponsiveness in the wake of them?
       | 
       | It might seem hyperbole but it isn't. Who is to say it hasn't
       | already happened?
        
       | adamc wrote:
       | Good reminder that I need to migrate my data away from Google.
       | They are notorious for terrible customer support. I'd rather pay
       | someone competent.
        
       | jeroenhd wrote:
       | Putting any Google service connected to your account as a
       | recovery method for your Google account seems like a problem to
       | me. I don't know why the author didn't get any alternative
       | recovery options if they had those configured like they said, but
       | this is a good reason to only enter external services as any kind
       | of contact or recovery mechanism.
       | 
       | Worryingly, after the whole ordeal the author still seems to
       | choose to rely on their Google account now as much as before this
       | all happened. It's kind of a miracle they got through to Google
       | in the first place and it definitely won't happen again; it
       | worries me that this post doesn't end with "and that's why I
       | split my life across separate dedicated services". It feels like
       | the author learned This One Cool Trick instead of the underlying
       | lesson, which is that Google (or Apple, or Microsoft, or any big
       | provider) cannot be trusted to not randomly cut you off without
       | warning.
        
         | user3939382 wrote:
         | Unfortunately even doing everything right is no guarantee. I
         | have Google accounts that Google will not let me into even
         | though I have the correct password because it requires a
         | connection from the same network as past logins, which are in
         | places I no longer live. I've read accounts from others in the
         | identical situation.
         | 
         | My answer to this is that I've completely moved off of Google
         | except for an account I use for YouTube/Maps access that I
         | could painlessly lose.
        
           | e40 wrote:
           | _> I have Google accounts that Google will not let me into
           | even though I have the correct password because it requires a
           | connection from the same network as past logins_
           | 
           | I don't get how that can possibly be a requirement. I mean,
           | it's trivial to dream up a scenario where it is 100% legit to
           | be in this situation.
           | 
           | What is wrong with Google?
        
             | javajosh wrote:
             | _> What is wrong with Google?_
             | 
             | They made a rational 80/20 decision and then got insulated
             | from feedback on the 20.
        
           | medstrom wrote:
           | Yup, I'm in the same boat. I have no "past logins" because
           | VPN, so haven't been able to access my Google accounts for
           | years.
        
             | guessmyname wrote:
             | There must be something else in your inability to access
             | your account because I have been using a VPN for more than
             | nine (9) years, changing locations every 5-7 days, and I
             | have no problems accessing my Google account.
             | 
             | Interestingly, I remember creating a new Google account a
             | couple of years ago from the Philippines, without a VPN,
             | and when I moved back to the US I couldn't access it
             | anymore.
             | 
             | I believe the account's age has something to do with the
             | restrictions.
        
               | e40 wrote:
               | Has your account been locked by google and you recovered
               | it OK?
        
         | jmuguy wrote:
         | I kind of hope she reached that conclusion but just didn't
         | include that in the post. In particular having your primary
         | phone and email tied to Google is just a bad idea, period. They
         | do not care. They do not have the capacity to care, by design.
        
       | tempnow987 wrote:
       | Hahah. Some stories like these.
       | 
       | My elderly parents were on google forever. Forgot password
       | because they'd just stayed logged in.
       | 
       | What was weird is even though they had a recovery email (mine)
       | that we were able to get a code too google had a second check - a
       | requirement to TEXT a code to the phone number on the account.
       | Unfortunately my elderly parents had put a landline phone down -
       | which doesn't accept text messages.
       | 
       | I gave google the benefit of the doubt on that, because they'd
       | actually forgotten the password.
       | 
       | More seriously, I was doing an apps setup (way way back) for a
       | nonprofit. They give you a weird temp email domain, then you port
       | in your domain etc etc. Some issue (no fault of ours) got the
       | state stuck in a doomloop. Even though it was a paid service,
       | there was no support.
       | 
       | I contrast that with AWS. Fine support on store side and on
       | compute side in my experience.
        
         | ASalazarMX wrote:
         | In this case I'd consider Google Workspace. It costs, but it
         | gives you ironclad control over the accounts, and your parents
         | won't lose access to their accounts no matter what they do.
         | 
         | As a bonus, Workspace is sold by partners, so you contact
         | actual humans if Google does anything weird.
        
           | Melatonic wrote:
           | Yeah I agree - this is the real comparison to AWS. You have
           | to pay for AWS which is mostly a professional service (even
           | if there are free aspects) vs Google services that are mostly
           | all free. In my professional experience the support for
           | Workspace has been excellent. Luckily I have never had to
           | contact their support for my personal stuff.
        
       | frfl wrote:
       | Post on Hacker News or Twitter for customer support.
        
         | djbusby wrote:
         | Looks like LinkedIn is in the mix. Hat-Trick!
        
           | taneq wrote:
           | Step 1: Be important enough that your causing a stink gets
           | attention.
        
         | kurthr wrote:
         | Nope. As the article says... contact the FTC to port the phone
         | number since they (or their supplier) are in violation of
         | law... get response within a day and number ported within 30
         | days.
        
       | metalforever wrote:
       | I had this happen before and I was asked a bunch of obscure
       | questions such as the month the acct was opened. They restored
       | access but it took a few months.
        
       | taneq wrote:
       | Think hard about this question _now_ and start working on
       | reducing your reliance on any such freely registered online
       | account. That goes a hundredfold for the email account you use as
       | a recovery address.
        
       | amf12 wrote:
       | > And since Google Voice is my main phone number,
       | 
       | There are enough comments about Google supports, so I won't
       | comment on that. OP however has worked in tech for 20 years, yet
       | made a very naive mistake - circular dependency, so to speak.
       | They used a VOIP number from the same account as the recovery
       | phone number.
        
       | steveylang wrote:
       | I got locked out of my Gmail over a decade ago when it was just
       | another webmail service (but with 1GB of free storage.) I believe
       | there was some sort of unauthorized log in attempt, I couldn't
       | find any answers or get any help from Google until I started
       | googling for random Google employees and found a phone number for
       | one.
       | 
       | He was a bit put off by getting my rando phone call, but I
       | explained my predicament and he took the time to look into it and
       | helped get my account restored. Thanks Google engineer guy!
       | 
       | This probably doesn't work in 2022 though. ;-)
        
       | favourable wrote:
       | I propose Google Human(tm), a new service that gets you in
       | contact with a Google support person, where you pay a rate of
       | $5.00/mo to get premium Human(tm) support services, so you can
       | get back into your account without having to yell over social
       | media in an outrage and 'escalate' your issue to Google employees
       | over Hackernews or Twitter.
        
         | stuff4ben wrote:
         | To be deprecated and sunset within 2 years for no apparent
         | reason.
        
           | Tagbert wrote:
           | And partially replaced by a new product, Sapiens(tm), which
           | includes some of the same features but not all of them.
        
             | ncmncm wrote:
             | And, in particular, not the ones you relied on.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | Google One comes with phone, chat, or email support in 23
         | languages. Hit the support button and they call you within
         | minutes, which is a support system on par with Bloomberg
         | terminals. $1.99/month.
        
           | cube00 wrote:
           | _> Under the locked account, I have a paid subscription with
           | both Google One and YouTube Music._
           | 
           | According to this article being a Google One member didn't
           | help them.
        
           | tyingq wrote:
           | I wouldn't be terribly surprised if none of those options
           | would actually fix "locked out of your Google account".
        
           | Melatonic wrote:
           | Didnt know this - I was gonna subscribe potentially to GSuite
           | for personal stuff but I guess I already have official
           | support. Probably will just stick with that then!
           | 
           | edit: As people are pointing out below, however, is there no
           | way to use Google One support if you are locked out of your
           | account?
        
           | mysterydip wrote:
           | That's a good metric, but can they solve any of the "locked
           | out of account" problems?
        
             | dmd wrote:
             | No, because you need to be logged in to use it.
        
         | erdos4d wrote:
         | This has so much extortion potential I'm surprised all the
         | major tech companies aren't doing it and milking it for all
         | it's worth. It's amazing they have left this cash on the table
         | for this long.
        
         | nosianu wrote:
         | Too bad low-level support workers cannot do anything. All they
         | will be able to do is read the AI-auto-generated text to you
         | and answer your questions by reading from the prepared
         | responses. You pay for having a human read to you what the
         | computer system produced. For supporters to be cheap and
         | exchangeable (for the business) they are bound to executing the
         | prepared algorithm and script without option to deviate. Often
         | they cannot even access relevant information about you, never
         | mind updating anything in the database.
         | 
         | To get someone able to actually make decisions, especially when
         | they are against a measure the system automatically put in
         | place following its programmed or AI-.derived rules, you need
         | to go at least two levels higher. Even "managers" often -
         | usually? - only have digression within pre-determined
         | possibilities and scenarios.
         | 
         | It's going to be like this:
         | https://twitter.com/cnbc/status/1447916881009127430
        
           | ricardobayes wrote:
           | 100% true. What to say to get escalated to these levels? In
           | situations like this I asked to escalate it but was denied.
           | Said there was 'nothing they could do' and parroted the
           | relevant sections to ad nauseum.
        
             | favourable wrote:
             | Largely, support has been relegated to very extensive and
             | exhaustive FAQs and if your issue is not found in them, you
             | have to pick up the phone and spend 5 hours trying to reach
             | a human at Google, or yell all over social media as a last
             | resort.
        
               | bluGill wrote:
               | You can find a number for google? I've been trying to
               | find Ebay's number for months. Support told me I have to
               | call them, but they are not allowed to tell me the phone
               | number.
               | 
               | I'm not enough of an influencer to get my rants here
               | noticed.
        
           | SteveGerencser wrote:
           | What I find funny is that low level support at Google can't
           | do anything at all to help you, unless it's a low level
           | Google Ads rep. Then they ask for carte blanche access to
           | make any and all changes to your Ads account to 'help you'.
           | 
           | It all comes down to which direction, and how much, the money
           | is flowing with them.
        
         | tptacek wrote:
         | This isn't really a story about missing access to human tech
         | support at Google so much as it is a story about Account
         | Recovery, The Hardest Problem In Authentication. Anything
         | Google did to make it take just a day or two to recover a
         | totally locked account would be abused ceaselessly to take over
         | people's accounts.
         | 
         | There are no good answers here. A lot of things that work as
         | one-offs or rarities will stop working if everyone does them.
         | If there's a FCC form you can file that short-circuits Google's
         | current process, and it becomes popular, that form is going to
         | stop working. Restoring your access to a locked account is
         | simply less important than ensuring strangers can't "restore"
         | access to your account.
         | 
         | Obviously, one good change Google could make here would be to
         | refuse to accept Google Voice numbers as an authentication
         | factor.
        
           | melony wrote:
           | AWS has a decent (corporate) solution to this. They simply
           | outsource account recovery and user attestation to the state
           | and the finance industry. You stake money on a financial
           | medallion (a contractual instrument that's a guarantee of
           | sorts). Presumably you will get sued and armed men will come
           | after you if you commit fraud. It doesn't scale well outside
           | of the big cities but it could be a viable option for Google.
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | Requiring physical presence in some manner makes identity
             | verification, if not failsafe, a lot harder and riskier to
             | spoof. I observe that my broker was allowing transfers over
             | the phone early in the pandemic. But when I did a similar
             | transaction earlier this year, they were back to needing me
             | to go into an office.
        
           | keskival wrote:
           | Most civilized countries have strong authentication methods
           | which are behind easy and cheap APIs for Google and others to
           | use if they really care about restoring access.
        
           | underdeserver wrote:
           | I completely disagree.
           | 
           | There have been complaints after complaints about people
           | being locked out of accounts, and there are no easy ways to
           | recover - often no way at all.
           | 
           | To say that the paid support you're paying for can't help you
           | access the service you're paying for, that's a bit rich.
           | 
           | > Restoring your access to a locked account is simply less
           | important than ensuring strangers can't "restore" access to
           | your account.
           | 
           | That's a false dichotomy. If you can pay, say, $200, and get
           | 30 minutes with a tech who has access to your email and can
           | go through a manual, interactive process to verify you are
           | who you say you are - for example, if you can prove you hold
           | the credit card that's been used to pay for Google One for
           | the past couple of years - well, these "strangers" are going
           | to have to work REALLY hard to "restore" their access to your
           | account. Probably well more than $200 and more than it costs
           | to install a keylogger and sniff your password anyway.
        
             | tptacek wrote:
             | It doesn't so much matter if you like the current state of
             | affairs; it is what it is. If paid Google support could
             | easily reset accounts (or, really, reset accounts at all),
             | the accounts of paid support subscribers would regularly
             | get taken over. Try to design an account recovery program
             | for a service with, say, more than 10,000 clients to see
             | why.
             | 
             | Think through what you'd hope Google would be able to do
             | here. How do they authorize the request to unlock the
             | account? Now imagine a well-funded adversary that knows
             | exactly how Google's processes work (probably because they
             | continuously pay for accounts and have them reset, to track
             | what Google's doing). What's the reliable signal Google can
             | use here, one the majority of their users actually have
             | access to, that they can quickly execute on?
             | 
             | There are companies that have relatively quick Account
             | Recovery processes through customer support. But those
             | companies either aren't worth defrauding, or are regularly
             | but quietly defrauded.
        
               | jfim wrote:
               | At least for accounts that have services that have a
               | billing address, they could send a postcard with a
               | special code to unlock the account. In the case of the
               | OP, that would have solved the problem.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | Historically, that's how things like PINs were often
               | reset. Of course, the more frictions and tie-ins to
               | physical things you throw in, the more people will have
               | legitimate sob stories about how they don't have that
               | phone number any longer or they just moved and so forth.
               | There's always going to be tradeoffs.
        
               | tptacek wrote:
               | To what address would Google send such a postcard? What
               | do you do about the problem of estranged spouses and the
               | like triggering recovery to break into their partners or
               | ex-partners account? It's a mess. All the options are.
               | 
               | Remember, this is the most valuable account most people
               | possess.
        
               | vageli wrote:
               | > What do you do about the problem of estranged spouses
               | and the like triggering recovery to break into their
               | partners or ex-partners account? It's a mess. All the
               | options are.
               | 
               | Nothing? Google sends postcards to verify business
               | addresses already. If it's good enough for the bank to
               | send me a card and PIN via post it should be good enough
               | for Google. We have laws in place to deal with estranged
               | spouses breaking into accounts.
        
               | tptacek wrote:
               | What happens when you don't already have a verified
               | address? None of this is easy.
        
       | aliceryhl wrote:
       | Have anyone actually tried to file a lawsuit to get Google's
       | attention in a case like this?
        
       | _fat_santa wrote:
       | After reading stories like this, I've moved to "single purpose"
       | accounts with Google. I have a youtube account, firebase account
       | and a google analytics account, and all of them are seperate from
       | one another. My hope here is if google shuts down a single
       | account, I only loose access to what that account did.
        
         | throwawayffffas wrote:
         | Hm that sounds sketchy I am inclined to think they might think
         | you are a bot running multiple accounts and ban you and all
         | your accounts together.
        
         | taneq wrote:
         | Hope you're running all the up-to-the-minute anti-
         | fingerprinting you can find. For a long while any time I went
         | to YouTube even in a private window they'd ask me to log in
         | under my old Google account that I hadn't used on that computer
         | for years. It was creepy as hell and I'm still not sure if
         | they've stopped because they can no longer associate that
         | account with that computer or if they're just confident enough
         | now not to ask.
        
         | kazinator wrote:
         | "Google containers"
        
         | bovermyer wrote:
         | I read somewhere on HN in the last couple months that Google is
         | prone to banning/deleting accounts that it thinks are
         | associated with accounts it bans, so I would not do this.
        
           | MikeDelta wrote:
           | I even recall an article where the google developer account
           | of a company was blocked because it got associated with the
           | personal account of one of their old employees.
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30855065
        
           | favourable wrote:
           | I think Google allows 3-4 accounts since it's common for
           | families to all use Gmail, so they're lenient in that regard.
           | Obviously, creating 10 accounts with 10 Twilio numbers would
           | arouse suspicion and those accounts would be swiftly banned.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | alecco wrote:
         | Use different emails and phone numbers for each. At least that
         | used to be the trick to separate YouTube channels a while ago.
        
       | rolph wrote:
       | TLDR:
       | 
       | associate a VIOP number with your google sphere, so when it
       | happens, file an FCC complaint re undue termination of telephonic
       | service.
       | 
       | it seems this was the only thing that elicited a proper response.
       | reading the article and google response to FCC complaint makes it
       | evident, that google is full of it as far as "we cant do anything
       | about it" is concerned.
       | 
       | the only problem i see is that it seems the complaint was dropped
       | or left orphan, rather than followed up on. thats why google
       | keeps on doing it because there are no real consequences other
       | than being told to Give it Back.
       | 
       | it reminds me of when one kid swipes a toy out of anothers hands
       | and keeps doing it because there is no real deterrent in play.
       | 
       | dont drop your FCC complaint, follow up on it.
        
         | borgbean wrote:
         | It sounds like they responded to the complaint by unlocking the
         | number, allowing her to port it out. Not by restoring her
         | access. Not much of a deterrent.
        
         | wlesieutre wrote:
         | I would completely unsurprised if Google kills off Voice
         | specifically because there's a regulator who makes them provide
         | customer support and they'd rather not.
        
           | usrn wrote:
           | jmp.chat is better anyway and doesn't randomly kill your
           | account.
        
         | woliveirajr wrote:
         | (2021)
         | 
         | After the response, the best thing would be to sue Google, of
         | course. Not once, Not for big values. One small cause for each
         | small annoyance. Not at the same time nor the same
         | jurisdiction. Then read all the defences they make and mix then
         | among the causes. If their system is so fragmented that they
         | can't deal with your original problem of losing acess to your
         | account, so they'll have trouble finding the pieces to defend
         | themselves. And if they can find, even better, use it as a
         | proof that they can connect the dots when they want to.
         | 
         | IANALITUSOA
        
       | DarkSucker wrote:
       | > I'm not the type to get bitchy with customer service reps. I've
       | managed teams that do that job, and I know how scripted their
       | support has to be.
       | 
       | "has to be" burns. It could be different. Why is a script
       | essential? These support scripts drive me crazy. I would probably
       | melt down in the OP's case.
       | 
       | Answers like "they allow less skilled first line workers" don't
       | count because one could hire skillful people to solve problems on
       | first contact.
        
         | Justsignedup wrote:
         | Recently we had to deal with amazon. And we try not to Karen
         | when we call any customer support. But man does the getting
         | audibly angry and asking for a manager actually get the ball
         | rolling. There's a reason people do this, and the reason is
         | because companies don't care until you show some anger.
        
       | guru4consulting wrote:
       | May be Google can have trusted contacts to help the account
       | recovery. If I set-up 5 trusted contacts, all of them would
       | receive different temp passwords and the temp passwords from at
       | least 3 would be necessary to recover. The only risk is 3 out of
       | 5 trusted contacts getting compromised at the same time or 3 of
       | them colluding which again is unlikely with trusted contacts.
        
       | bbkane wrote:
       | What a nightmare. I really should start migrating from GMail to
       | something else (or at least use my own domain in front of it).
        
         | Freak_NL wrote:
         | Just do it! You'll have to choose anyway if you are one of the
         | many folk here who use(d) a grandfathered free Google workspace
         | plan with your own domain: it ends on June 1st, or thereabouts,
         | and you'll be shunted into a paid plan (although there seems to
         | be a waiting list for a free plan).
         | 
         | I did it last week. I signed up for Fastmail, followed their
         | excellent documentation, and now only have a mandatory (new)
         | Google account for a few apps in the Play Store that are not
         | available anywhere else (but nothing paid). If I lose access to
         | my Google account, I lose nothing.
         | 
         | My Fastmail migration basically went like this:
         | 
         | * Clean up mailbox, truncate mailing list folders.
         | 
         | * Copy mail to Fastmail using their importer.
         | 
         | * Change domain settings at your domain host (changing MX-
         | records and a bunch of others); mail now goes to Fastmail.
         | 
         | * Set up mail and calendars in Thunderbird on Ubuntu and K-9
         | Mail on GrapheneOS.
        
           | stuff4ben wrote:
           | The setting up part is easy. It's migrating user logins,
           | subscriptions, and everything else tied to your GMail account
           | that takes time and energy. Someone really aught to create a
           | migrator app to get people off GMail and do the hard stuff.
        
             | ComradePhil wrote:
             | I dedicated most part of a day to migrate most of the
             | subscription to a new email. Iirc, it took me more than 8+
             | hours.
        
             | hyperman1 wrote:
             | This might actually be a great service for fastmail et al
             | to provide: after you import old mailboxes, they should
             | scan them for signup mails and show you a list with to
             | migrate accounts i.e. red marks.
             | 
             | After migrating an account, they know it, as they can scan
             | your mail. Slowly, each red mark on your dashboard gets
             | replaced with a green mark.
        
               | stuff4ben wrote:
               | Actually I was thinking it would be a good idea for a
               | password manager to implement. They have all of the
               | credential information, they'd just have to implement
               | "Change my userid" logic for all websites out there.
               | That's definitely a hard problem to solve...
        
         | dmd wrote:
         | I would love to do this - and it would be easy, as I'm already
         | forwarding from my own domain and have been for 25 years - but
         | I receive so much spam (>600 per day vs. ~20 non-spam per day)
         | that only Gmail's spam filtering is good enough. I've tried
         | others (like Fastmail) and typically ~50/day get through their
         | spam filters, vs. at Gmail where on a typical day 1-2 get
         | through.
         | 
         | As soon as anyone besides Gmail can successfully do spam
         | filtering, I'm stuck with them.
         | 
         | (Why do I get so much spam? Because I've been using the same
         | email address, never hiding it at all even on Usenet, for 25
         | years.)
        
           | wasmitnetzen wrote:
           | Have you tried training a user-specific spam filter like
           | bogofilter? You might need to save a few months of spam for
           | training. I have a quite good false positive and negative
           | rates.
        
             | dmd wrote:
             | Yeah I've been trying various filters off and on for two
             | decades.
        
         | adamc wrote:
         | Recommendations for good commercial email services?
        
           | beardbound wrote:
           | I switched to fastmail a couple of years ago from google and
           | quite like it. I even switched some other people in my family
           | too.
        
         | martinflack wrote:
         | It's a good idea to use something like gmvault [0] to ensure
         | you have regular downloads of your mail corpus locally.
         | 
         | [0] http://gmvault.org/
        
         | thesuitonym wrote:
         | Just start doing it. It's easier than you think.
         | 
         | 1. (Optional) Register a domain (So if you need to migrate in
         | the future, you don't need to change your email address!)
         | 
         | 2. Sign up for _paid_ service somewhere else. Paid email
         | services are extremely cheap, and worth it to have a phone
         | number where you can call a real human person.
         | 
         | * If you wish to continue using the Gmail interface, skip step
         | 3 *
         | 
         | 3. Forward Gmail to the new account.
         | 
         | 4. As you see messages you want coming to your Gmail account,
         | switch them to your new account.
         | 
         | 5. (Optional) If you really like the Gmail interface, use
         | IMAP/SMTP to check your email in Gmail, even though it's really
         | coming from/to your external account!
         | 
         | It's really easy to get away from GMail, and definitely worth
         | it.
        
           | anonuser123456 wrote:
           | I've had a custom domain for some time, but it has its own
           | risks / drawbacks.
           | 
           | 1. If your registrar account is compromised, someone can
           | redirect your mail at will.
           | 
           | 2. If your payment lapses you might lose the entire domain.
           | 
           | 3. If you die, it's unlikely your family will understand how
           | to maintain the system.
           | 
           | 4. Some systems will classify your email as spam even with
           | the right MX configuration (DMARC,DKIM etc)
           | 
           | I think the right choice is having a paid relationship with a
           | mail provider that's been in the business a long time, and
           | use their domain.
        
           | drexlspivey wrote:
           | That's great and I started doing it, just don't forget to
           | renew your domain cause then you are really screwed
        
         | imtringued wrote:
         | I use gmail because it has this obscure addon thing that shows
         | the number of unread emails in the favicon. Default gmail and
         | all other email providers I have tried show the unread emails
         | count in the title which is invisible on pinned tabs.
         | 
         | I have three email accounts outside of gmail that are
         | forwarding to gmail so I can have a favicon counter. Those
         | email accounts maintain their own copies of the emails. If
         | gmail were to lock me out I would lose my favicon counter. I
         | would need to get a new phone number to create a new account
         | and set up the fowards to the new address.
         | 
         | Why do I insist on this convoluted setup? My previous email
         | client was a firefox addon that showed me that counter and it
         | made me read my emails. Every email account that doesn't follow
         | this set up that I have has lots of unread emails.
         | 
         | I have a thunderbird instance with 140 unread emails open right
         | now. I have 0 on gmail.
        
       | everyone wrote:
       | Make a new one.
        
         | rolph wrote:
         | before you make a new one you probably need to reinstal, or
         | scrub the OS for google bugs, replace the NIC, and get a new
         | router, new modem, new ISP with a new, pseudonymous/business
         | account.
         | 
         | you might be able to evade google fingerprinting if you do all
         | these things.
         | 
         | it would not surprise me if google pays to be allowed to crawl
         | everything that touches google for even one tick, so they may
         | still connect the dots when the AI sees a browser activity
         | graph just like your last one. Who knows how well a VPN my hide
         | your breadcrumbs, i just avoid making accounts with google or
         | letting any overt analytics through my browser.
        
       | sayhello wrote:
       | When I was a Google employee, I helped a friend go through their
       | account lockout issue. It was because they used MFA to a phone
       | number, but later changed their phone number, which made them
       | unable to login. He tried so many times that some velocity
       | threshold was hit, further limiting the possibilities.
       | 
       | My friend needed to respond to some interview scheduling, so, it
       | was a stressful situation.
       | 
       | Part of the problem was that it was hard for my friend to find a
       | way to create a support ticket. He did in the end and got in a
       | line of communication via an alternate email.
       | 
       | There were many miscommunications from both my friend and the
       | support agent. While Account Recovery or even basic
       | identification are hard to navigate for technically-minded folks,
       | it's even more challenging for non-technical folks, including the
       | support agent.
       | 
       | In the end, I got in touch with the support person, helped
       | translate what they wanted to know to my friend, and likewise,
       | translated what my friend was saying in a way that the support
       | person could understand.
       | 
       | I don't think I was able to see the support ticket itself,
       | because of PII restrictions. In the end, my friend was able to
       | restore service. I doubt he'd have been able to without my
       | support in time to respond to the interview scheduling.
       | 
       | It still took a couple of days.
        
         | muh_gradle wrote:
         | This was more or less my exact same scenario as well. MFA with
         | an old phone number makes account recovery from Google about
         | close to impossible. I had a friend who worked at Google that
         | was able to create a support ticket for me. Before talking to
         | my friend, every single customer service support rep more or
         | less confirmed that I was completely SOL.
         | 
         | It is the reason why I have transitioned from Google.
        
           | bogomipz wrote:
           | I'm curious was the second form of auth an SMS text with an
           | auth code or is their Google Authenticator app somehow tied
           | to the phone number?
        
       | Tozen wrote:
       | Google is a monster that people should know not to trust. Better
       | to not use a Google account for anything serious or unless you
       | really have to. Even then, expect and prepare for the worse. Way
       | too many, "Google locked me out.", stories.
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | > _She said that the recovery team is allusive_
       | 
       | Accidentally apt malapropism/typo? They keep alluding to the idea
       | that there may be something that can be done, but it remains
       | illusive. :)
        
         | breischl wrote:
         | I assumed that she meant "elusive", but it could also be
         | "illusive" in the sense that it's merely an illusion. :P
        
           | lamontcg wrote:
           | allusive (adj):
           | 
           | 1. Containing or characterized by indirect references.
           | 
           | 2. Figurative; symbolical.
           | 
           | 3. Having reference to something not fully expressed;
           | containing an allusion.
           | 
           | 4. Containing or making use of indirect references or hints.
           | 
           | 5. characterized by indirect references
           | 
           | Sounds about right for Google tech support really. I'll allow
           | it.
        
       | rdl wrote:
       | I think for most people on HN the answer is "contact a friend who
       | works at Google"; I don't know the general solution.
        
         | yreg wrote:
         | And hope the ai didn't ban your account with one of the reasons
         | no one wants to touch.
        
       | Melatonic wrote:
       | I have considered paying for a personal GSuite account partially
       | because of this - I use my Google account for a lot of MFA stuff
       | so it is fairly critical to things I do. At work we have a
       | corporate account and their support is pretty solid (especially
       | the chat support - I seem to get someone very quickly and they
       | are way better than your typical tier 1 drone). I get that people
       | are upset over this but are we REALLY surprised that we get shit
       | support for a FREE service?
       | 
       | They also have a separate site / login / forum for proposing new
       | ideas, bugs, etc etc that you can use if you have an actual
       | corporate account (strangely it requires creating a separate
       | login and password). I have found that using this forum you can
       | also get some decent support for weird issues or bugs or
       | suggestions (sometimes from other users as well).
        
       | waynesonfire wrote:
       | create a business account so you have support.
        
       | psanford wrote:
       | I wonder what happens if you have no recovery methods enabled on
       | your account?
        
       | johnklos wrote:
       | Google is just one of many companies that are too big to actually
       | communicate (like Verizon, AT&T, Amazon, Microsoft) and have to
       | be forced to do anything if you're not paying them tons of $$$.
       | They do what they want.
       | 
       | If your livelihood is tied to your email / phone, then you really
       | should consider a company with which you can communicate.
        
       | wereHamster wrote:
       | Google's response... <<We are disappointed that [...] experienced
       | [...] difficulties [...]>>... ah stfu, you are lying, you are not
       | at all disappointed. They also show no intention at all to find
       | out what happened so they can improve their internal processes.
       | Working as intended...
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-18 23:02 UTC)