[HN Gopher] Heated Debate Rises over Hints of Superconductivity ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Heated Debate Rises over Hints of Superconductivity Above Boiling
       Temperatures
        
       Author : taubek
       Score  : 44 points
       Date   : 2022-04-17 08:07 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.insidescience.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.insidescience.org)
        
       | mrtnmcc wrote:
       | May be relevant to theories about the Earth's core and magnetic
       | field.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | DiabloD3 wrote:
       | Somebody waited their entire career to write that headline.
        
         | dvh wrote:
         | "Foot Heads Arms Body"
         | 
         | On 22 June 1978, The Guardian ran an article with the headline
         | "Foot hits back on Nazi comparison". Reader David C. Allan of
         | Edinburgh responded with a letter to the editor, which the
         | paper ran on 27 June. Decrying the headline's apparent pun,
         | Allen suggested that, if Foot were in future to be appointed
         | Secretary of State for Defence, The Guardian might cover it
         | under the headline "Foot Heads Arms Body". The belief later
         | gained currency that The Times actually had run the headline.
         | Some decades later, Martyn Cornell recalled the story as true,
         | saying he had written the headline himself as a Times subeditor
         | around 1986. The headline does not, however, appear in The
         | Times Digital Archive, which includes every day's newspaper
         | from 1785 into the 21st century.
        
           | pcl wrote:
           | That reminds me of the classic "Headless Body in Topless Bar"
           | headline: https://nypost.com/2015/06/09/new-york-post-editor-
           | and-film-...
        
       | 8bitsrule wrote:
       | Related: _Physics_ 2019 article  "A Prediction for "Hot"
       | Superconductivity" [https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/96]
       | (followed by 9 citations)
        
       | nootropicat wrote:
       | While stable high temperature superconductors would usher in a
       | scifi revolution alone, their critical magnetic field is also
       | very interesting. Not an expert in the field, but from what I
       | gather 200T would be enough for car sized proton-boron fusion
       | power plants.
        
       | Trouble_007 wrote:
       | High-Temperature Superconductors (high-Tc or HTS) :
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-temperature_superconducti...
        
       | Havoc wrote:
       | To what end?
       | 
       | Surely room temp at atmosphere is the ultimate prize? Room temp
       | has already been achieved so I would have thought lowest pressure
       | is now the metric that matters
        
         | ianai wrote:
         | RT superconductivity has been discovered? When/where/what?
        
           | Panzer04 wrote:
           | Likely referring to high-pressure room temperature
           | superconductivity, which is about as practical as the low
           | temperature versions (if not even less so)
        
           | Havoc wrote:
           | >RT superconductivity has been discovered? When/where/what?
           | 
           | See first sentence of article we're commenting on
        
         | magicalhippo wrote:
         | As I understand it, superconductors aren't quite as binary as
         | the media portrays them as.
         | 
         | The temperature, current density and magnetic fields they can
         | tolerate while remaining superconducting varies between the
         | various kinds of superconductors.
         | 
         | Most interesting use-cases outside the lab would involve at
         | least non-trivial current densities, so that's one metric where
         | one might still want to search for a better material even
         | though one already exists.
        
           | willis936 wrote:
           | LTS are pretty binary compared to HTS. Look at the resistance
           | vs. temperature plots of different cables at a given current
           | and magnetic field.
           | 
           | Additionally, quench propagation is much slower in HTS so
           | safe current dumping has a lot more time between quench
           | detection and thermal runaway.
           | 
           | https://youtu.be/xJ2h3vbOag4&t=21m58s
        
             | magicalhippo wrote:
             | Binary was a poor choice of words I guess.
             | 
             | My point was that if the current material only supports
             | very low current densities at this high temperature, then
             | that restricts the use-cases for it. I feel much of the
             | popular science press makes it sound like all
             | superconductors are equal, apart from the critical
             | temperature.
        
               | willis936 wrote:
               | Ah, yes. If superconductors were actual magic and had
               | infinite current and magnetic field capacities our
               | society would look pretty different right now. :)
        
         | xoa wrote:
         | > _Surely room temp at atmosphere is the ultimate prize?_
         | 
         | First, the science and engineering is interesting regardless.
         | Better understanding of superconductivity and how we can
         | achieve it will be helpful in applying it anywhere. Second,
         | while RT is clearly a huge deal hotter is always better if
         | possible. It means it can be used with less cooling in more
         | extreme environments which would further expand the
         | possibilities in industry. Just as there has been effort to
         | make (and you can buy) electronics that are functional in
         | extreme environmental and high radiation conditions that would
         | kill consumer kit.
         | 
         | Also, "achieved" is doing quite a bit of work in your second
         | sentence. Other material properties, including as you say
         | operating pressure but also more basic stuff like pure
         | flexibility or strength are important in how it can be used in
         | practice right? Research pushing other limits may pay off down
         | the road in new ideas elsewhere. Obviously speculative, it may
         | not, but it's well worth pursuing many avenues in such a
         | potentially valuable area even if most are dead ends.
        
         | Trouble_007 wrote:
         | _> To what end?<_ : Different Horses for different Courses
         | 
         | Liquid Nitrogen : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_nitrogen
         | 
         | Search: 'High Pressure Liquid Nitrogen Superconductors' @DDG :
         | <https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q='High Pressure Liquid
         | Nit...>
         | 
         | Railgun : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun
         | 
         |  _> A railgun is a linear motor device,
         | typically designed as a weapon, that uses electromagnetic force
         | to launch high velocity projectiles.<*
         | 
         | Pentagon to build nuclear micro-reactor to power far-flung-
         | bases : https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-
         | military/2022/04/15/...
         | 
         | Scramjet : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramjet
         | 
         | Just a Thought._
         | 
         | Edit: Add; Russia-Ukraine Conflict Prompted US to Develop
         | Autonomous Drone-Swarms And 1,000-Mile Cannon :
         | 
         | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/russia-ukraine-co...
         | 
         | - Edit:2 fixed @DDG search URL, truncated in first edit!
        
         | derefr wrote:
         | Inside fusion reactors? They're pretty hot.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | _Room temperature superconductivity reportedly appeared at 267
       | gigapascals, more than 2,400 times the pressure at the bottom of
       | the Mariana Trench, the deepest point in the ocean._
       | 
       | That's a lot of pressure. That's like 40x the pressure needed to
       | make diamonds.
        
         | iancmceachern wrote:
         | It's funny, this is like a how many engineers does it take
         | joke.
         | 
         | The whole point in finding a room temperature super conductor
         | is that it's difficult to maintain those low temperatures in
         | practice. So if we want to put super conductors in practice, we
         | need to figure out how to do it a different, more practical
         | way. 40x the pressure needed to make diamonds doesn't seem
         | practical. Maybe there is some material property magic like
         | thermal quenching or tempering that could allow for a final
         | product that has those kind of internal pressures in a steady
         | state object.
         | 
         | You see this everywhere in the engineering world. I'm not
         | saying this particular work will not lead somewhere, just that
         | it is an example of a broader challenge I've seen in
         | engineering, bridging the gap between practical every day use
         | and research.
        
           | s1artibartfast wrote:
           | I think you see it everywhere because you essentially
           | described exploratory science vs engineering. First humans
           | understand how the physical world behaves, then they see if
           | that knowledge is usable.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-17 23:02 UTC)