[HN Gopher] MPLS/LDP Creation Myths
___________________________________________________________________
MPLS/LDP Creation Myths
Author : liotier
Score : 18 points
Date : 2022-04-15 13:44 UTC (9 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (blog.ipspace.net)
(TXT) w3m dump (blog.ipspace.net)
| teleforce wrote:
| If IPv6 and Segment Routing IPv6 (SRv6) are gaining momentum and
| become popular then there will be no need for MPLS/LDP. Now with
| SRv6, you can control your end-to-end connection QoS from the
| edge without touching the core. This is what networking people
| call IP 2.0 where IP is consolidating its main role as the real
| nexus of the Internet whereas IP 1.0 is just patching the IPv4
| with a duct tape MPLS[1].
|
| [1]SRv6 Network Programming: Ushering in a New Era of IP Networks
|
| https://www.routledge.com/SRv6-Network-Programming-Ushering-...
| dvno42 wrote:
| I'm understanding this all as a way to simplify designs and
| make it easier to bring in central controllers and automation
| to manage end to end 'virtual circuits'.
|
| I've never heard of segment routing (SRv6) and I'm happy to see
| it's not a proprietary feature by some vendor[1]. If I'm
| understanding correctly, segment routing allows a designer to
| cut out the traditional labeling and traffic engineering
| protocols like RSVP-TE and LDP/TDP but still retain the ability
| to do multipathing (ECMP) and traffic engineering.
|
| What I'm not sure of is if this replaces VPLS/EVPN (overlay VPN
| mechanism) or if those features still ride on top of SRv6. It
| looks like the IGP (routing protocol like OSPF) needs extension
| support for SRv6 to work.
|
| I just found a Cisco presentation that touches on a lot of
| this[2].
|
| For those wondering, these features are available today on the
| major platforms
|
| [1]https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8986 [2]https://www
| .ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/apjc/docs/2018/p...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-04-15 23:03 UTC)