[HN Gopher] Link: Simple, secure one-click payments by Stripe
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Link: Simple, secure one-click payments by Stripe
        
       Author : coloneltcb
       Score  : 52 points
       Date   : 2022-04-14 18:02 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (link.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (link.co)
        
       | mooreds wrote:
       | Come one, come all for the _fast_ jokes.
       | 
       | But seriously, I wonder if they had to pay Amazon; wasn't there a
       | patent on one-click checkout? Looks like there was some back and
       | forth but if it is in a cart, Amazon has it patented:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-Click
        
         | imwm wrote:
         | Expired in 2017 which led to the recent rise of one-click
         | checkout startups
        
         | 4lejandrito wrote:
         | I have no idea about the US patent system. But it sounds so
         | weird to me that only Amazon could do this for 20 years. It
         | seems like a simple feature to implement for any e-commerce
         | platform.
         | 
         | Did this patent apply also for non US companies?
        
         | Twirrim wrote:
         | Patents are valid for 20 years, the patent for 1-click expired
         | in 2019.
         | 
         | Huh, nope 2017? https://www.businessinsider.com/amazons-patent-
         | on-one-click-...
        
       | edwinwee wrote:
       | Edwin from Stripe here. This isn't really new--we first
       | introduced saved payment info in 2014 but started renaming it
       | last year
       | (https://twitter.com/patrickc/status/1375611432331407363). The
       | linked page is a support portal to let customers manage their
       | saved payment methods.
        
       | cmckn wrote:
       | It's wild to me that "one-click buy" has somehow become a product
       | category. If an online retailer already has your payment info and
       | shipping details, it is trivial to offer a one-click experience,
       | is it not? Couldn't PayPal offer this and leverage all their
       | existing integrations? Why haven't they?
        
         | rco8786 wrote:
         | Yea I'm right there with you. This is a feature parading as an
         | industry.
        
         | paxys wrote:
         | > If an online retailer already has your payment info and
         | shipping details
         | 
         | This is specifically for the case where the retailer _does not_
         | want to store these details. Heck they can even get away with
         | not building a user account system at all. Just a store
         | listings page and a few lines of code imported from Stripe.
        
           | cmckn wrote:
           | Totally fair, but this doesn't clarify why a company like
           | Fast needed to exist. It seems the existing payment
           | processors are able to add this feature rather easily, and I
           | don't see how a new player would be able to get over the
           | integration hurdle to supplant PayPay/Stripe/AmazonPay/etc.
        
         | stu2b50 wrote:
         | It was patent-locked until a few years ago thanks to Amazon,
         | but beyond that, handling payment information is a pretty hairy
         | process. Credit card numbers are considered to be PCI and the
         | network subject you to annoying audits and processes to be able
         | to store it.
         | 
         | So, for one thing, it's not possible for retailers because very
         | few (probably none) store payment credentials anymore. Too
         | expensive - that's what payment processors are for.
         | 
         | For payment processors themselves, clearly they can, it's the
         | subject of the parent post, but there are regulatory hurdles.
        
       | guzik wrote:
       | Something is really off under phone number validator. I can't
       | type my 9 digit mobile phone number for +48 (Poland).
        
       | rvz wrote:
       | Waited for Fast to shutdown first.
       | 
       | So, I guess that slow and steady wins the race. Not the Fast and
       | the Furious.
        
       | misterbwong wrote:
       | Isn't this basically fast with a different name?
        
       | edwinwee wrote:
       | (Dupe, see old thread from this morning:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31028131.)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-14 23:01 UTC)