[HN Gopher] The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Quasirandom Sequen...
___________________________________________________________________
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Quasirandom Sequences (2018)
Author : lnyan
Score : 23 points
Date : 2022-04-10 11:36 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (extremelearning.com.au)
(TXT) w3m dump (extremelearning.com.au)
| curiousgal wrote:
| These remind me of an interview where the interviewer asked if I
| was familiar with pseudo-random generators, I told him well there
| isn't technically a way to generate a truly random numbers so all
| of the algorithms people use are PRNGs (MT, PCG, etc.). He seemed
| confused and disregarded my answer and then went on to describe
| how the Sobol sequence worked. That's when it clicked for me so I
| went "Ah you mean _Quasi_ -random!" And he was like "Quasi,
| Pseudo it's the same, these sequences are not truly random"...
| actually_a_dog wrote:
| Oh boy. Were you offered, and did you take the job? It's always
| so disheartening to see such ignorance coming from an
| interviewer, isn't it?
| gnulinux wrote:
| Ok let's be charitable here. Being confused by terminology is
| definitely not unheard-of. I don't know how well established
| these terms are, but it is true that in some fields "quasi"
| used in some way similar to "pseudo" or "lesser". If the
| interviewer previously studied these as PRNG instead of QRNG,
| I doubt that means they're "ignorant".
| curiousgal wrote:
| Obviously these things happen but his demeanor was a major
| red flag.
| curiousgal wrote:
| I was given an offer but I passed on. The entire experience
| was awful. The other interviewers did not bother to turn
| their webcams on (nor did they even bother to give an excuse
| for not doing so). The whole thing felt like an
| interrogation.
| krnsll wrote:
| Previous discussion from 2018:
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17873284
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-04-11 23:02 UTC)