[HN Gopher] Cathode Ray Television (1933)
___________________________________________________________________
Cathode Ray Television (1933)
Author : takiwatanga
Score : 26 points
Date : 2022-04-10 10:24 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.r-type.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.r-type.org)
| Animats wrote:
| That's a very good receiver for 1933. Most television of that era
| was still rotating-disk systems. This receiver is intended to
| receive signals meant for Baird rotating-disk receivers. 12.5
| FPS, 30 lines is the rate they give, although there was no firm
| standard at that point.
|
| For more info about early TV systems, see the Early Television
| Foundation.[1]
|
| [1] http://earlytelevision.org/
| buescher wrote:
| "The views of Popular Wireless on the subject are too well known
| to require reiteration here, and our scepticism of the
| possibilities of the mechanical methods of transmission and
| reception have frequently been expressed."
|
| "When I was working at the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge I
| once get a bad attack of X-ray burn on the face, which was very
| irritating and painful for a few days - for all the world like
| extreme sunburn - but the tube I was using was not a cathode ray
| tube, it was very much ' harder' and enormously more powerful.
| After that, you may be sure that I took extra special care to
| avoid any possibility of a recurrence of the same experience,
| and, although I have worked with all kinds of cathode ray tubes,
| I have never found it necessary to take the slightest precautions
| against soft X-rays and I have never experienced the slightest
| harm."
|
| Ah, the good old days. Dude worked with Rutherford and Thomson,
| can we find anything on him?
| holoduke wrote:
| Don't you think that x-rays have potential long term cancer
| effects? I worked with some medical devices in the past. Often
| after work I used the device in my own body or random equipment
| just for fun to see the inside. I didn't know anything about
| side effects..I am still alive 20 years later and i think it
| wasn't too bad. But still.
| buescher wrote:
| Another proponent of mechanical television!
| martyvis wrote:
| The style of writing is amazing. You would think you are reading
| about a flower show or a fashion parade.
| agumonkey wrote:
| Mesmerizing. Clearly right to repair was honored at the time :)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-04-11 23:00 UTC)