[HN Gopher] Eero Pro 6E and Eero 6 Review: Fast and Easy
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Eero Pro 6E and Eero 6 Review: Fast and Easy
        
       Author : ec109685
       Score  : 47 points
       Date   : 2022-04-09 06:51 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (evanmccann.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (evanmccann.net)
        
       | gkop wrote:
       | In the Models Tested table row Power input, it's USB-C for all of
       | them. How come no Power over Ethernet (PoE)?
        
         | rektide wrote:
         | Not cheap but there are PoE to ethernet+usb-pd splitters. You
         | could set up your PoE & put one of these at the end[1].
         | 
         | The dual band all ask for "15W usb-c" and the tri band all ask
         | for 27W usb-c, which is probably 5V3A and 9V3A respectively.
         | I'd expect that you could _probably_ get by with a much much
         | cheaper non-PD splitter that simply provides the expected
         | voltage.
         | 
         | This feels like a pretty good compromise. USB-C PD is, per
         | watt, often half the price or less, and it's convenience imo
         | cannot be beat since it's such a common power delivery system.
         | Small GaN based adapters with multiple ports are abundant and
         | cheap (<$0.50/watt) versus more specialized, less common gear
         | that's more expensive (often >$1.00/watt).
         | 
         | It does feel great having one and only one cable! Right now PoE
         | is the winner here, especially because it has range. I'd love
         | to see USB try & compete a little more. I'd create a USB long
         | range standard- target 5Gbps (or 2.5Gbps?) but for many meter
         | long runs, with power-delivery. Now that we have (on paper)
         | extended-power USB-C with 48V power, restricting ourselves down
         | to 1A would still be quite useful (48W)!
         | 
         | [1] https://www.amazon.com/Adapter-Compliant-Microsoft-
         | Surface-M...
        
         | wmf wrote:
         | PoE isn't used much in home networking.
        
           | mccanntech wrote:
           | Especially in mesh kits which are usually operated without
           | Ethernet backhaul. eero themselves claim 90% of their
           | deployed networks don't use any Ethernet. Hence, almost all
           | mesh kits use USB-C or a DC barrel connector.
        
       | silisili wrote:
       | I like the tests - easy to read and compare.
       | 
       | As someone who just spent a bunch of time trying to read and get
       | comparisons on a 6e setup, I think my biggest complaint is that
       | it's testing against older models.
       | 
       | The ASUS ET8 and Deco XE5300 are closer 6E comparison devices
       | than the models tested. I believe both would probably outperform,
       | one of which being half the price.
        
         | mccanntech wrote:
         | Thanks! I haven't gotten my hands on those two yet, and in
         | general haven't spent enough time with 6 GHz to say much more
         | than I did in this review.
        
       | samcrawford wrote:
       | I've been using Gen1 eeros since they were first released in
       | around 2016. They're still getting software updates and they're
       | still rock solid.
       | 
       | I'll be first in line to purchase a new set if they offer a model
       | that supports PoE here in Europe.
       | 
       | Disclaimer: I've done a bunch of work with the Eero team from
       | 2015/2016 til present day. Their team has an extremely high
       | concentration of very smart and talented people, they are great
       | to work with.
        
       | SrslyJosh wrote:
       | Note: Eero is owned by Amazon
       | 
       | (The review mentions this, but only in passing, near the end of
       | the very long first page.)
        
       | ksec wrote:
       | Slightly disappointed that WiFi 6E, on 6Ghz with 160Mhz only
       | managed ~1300Mbps. I was expecting ~1500 to 1600. And only one
       | 2.5Gbps Ethernet Port.
        
         | mikhailt wrote:
         | They explained why there is only one 2.5 port, it's the
         | limitation of the current chipset. Most of the current Wi-Fi 6E
         | routers have the same limitation.
         | 
         | > This is a limitation of the Qualcomm chipset eero are using,
         | which can't provide 2.5 Gbps connectivity on both ports.
         | 
         | > -- this is the case on the Orbi RBK960, Asus ZenWifi ET8,
         | Linksys Atlas Max 6E, Deco X90, and many others.
        
         | mccanntech wrote:
         | I did see occasional spikes to the range, 1500-1600 Mbps, and
         | I've seen that with the few other 6 GHz APs I've tested. The
         | eero's performance on the top end with a very wide channel was
         | inconsistent though. Over longer duration tests those spikes to
         | 1.5 Gbps+ evened out to what I showed in the charts. This is
         | early firmware though (6.9.2, the release version), so things
         | could improve in the future.
        
       | knodi wrote:
       | For the price i like AmpliFi, its a easy to use but have great
       | deal more features than Eero.
        
       | ryneandal wrote:
       | Picking up a 3 pack of Eeros ~ 18 months ago was probably the
       | best tech purchase I've made in years. Incredible coverage for 2k
       | sqft split-level home, including the yard.
       | 
       | Management of our children's devices (both content and screen
       | time) is incredibly simple with profiles. Even their security
       | features have come a long way and provide significant value to
       | us.
       | 
       | I always recommend Eeros to any of our friends or family looking
       | for networking suggestions.
        
       | wtvanhest wrote:
       | Does anyone have any sense how the pro 6e will perform in the
       | city with interference vs something like google home Wi-Fi? I'm
       | having a lot of issues on video calls and hardwiring is not a
       | good option.
        
         | drewg123 wrote:
         | If you have a 6E / 6GHz capable client, a 6E router will help a
         | lot with interference. The 6GHz band is new enough that its not
         | likely to be crowded.
         | 
         | However, since its so new, you're unlikely to have a 6GHz
         | capable client... There are 6Ghz capable PCIe cards (desktop
         | and M.2 form factors), but I haven't seen any 6Ghz wifi USB
         | adapters.
        
           | wtvanhest wrote:
           | I have a new Wifi6 in my laptop, but obviously dual band. I'm
           | considering hardwiring into the nod which will be wirelessly
           | connected to the mesh, but that may solve all issues.
        
         | mccanntech wrote:
         | In my experience, very well. I only tested Google Wi-Fi for a
         | few weeks, but I was unimpressed with it overall. eero does a
         | good job at adjusting things behind the scene. It does an RF
         | scan nightly, and adjusts channels and works around
         | interference better than any other mesh kit I've tested. Most
         | just pick a wide channel and broadcast as loud as possible.
        
       | btgeekboy wrote:
       | As soon as they add support for putting wireless networks on
       | VLANs, I'm buying.
        
       | kcb wrote:
       | I've been increasingly tempted to switch to one of these consumer
       | mesh setups from my current Unifi. I just pick up two new Unifi
       | Wifi 6 APs(A U6-Pro and a U6-Mesh) and the performance is just
       | poor. I don't know whats going on. I'm lucky to get 300mbps with
       | a Wifi 5(3x3) or Wifi 6 client.
       | 
       | I'm pretty sure there's something physically wrong with the
       | U6-Mesh as it gets scolding hot in use and seems to throttle
       | between 30-300mbps. I ended up reverting back to the Wifi 5 APs
       | while I figure out what to do.
        
         | mccanntech wrote:
         | That hasn't been my experience with the U6-Pro and U6-Mesh. Are
         | you running 80 MHz channels? Do you have a lot of 5 GHz
         | interference around you? I'm typically seeing 500-800 Mbps on
         | the top end, from close range, with those APs. That's with a
         | relatively clean 80 MHz channel though.
        
           | kcb wrote:
           | Yea, I have 80 MHz channels on with one AP at 36 and the
           | other at 149. I live in a suburban area and the channels
           | definitely aren't perfect. My closest neighbor seems to have
           | quiet a few Google Wifi APs with pretty strong signal at my
           | house.
           | 
           | Did you ever notice your U6-Mesh running hot like really in
           | an alarming way?
        
             | mccanntech wrote:
             | You might have more reliable results with 40 MHz then, or
             | with moving to a DFS channel. The U6-Mesh definitely does
             | run hot, but most UniFi APs do. The U6-Mesh does seems the
             | hottest-running of the dozen plus models I've used though.
             | I know some people have had to RMA them, but it's too early
             | to know if that's a real problem or not.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | rhexs wrote:
         | I switched my family from AmpliFi to Eero --- drastically more
         | reliable. Few firmware update hiccups but they've been great so
         | far. Better speeds.
         | 
         | Only thing missing is good QoS --- the "SQM" they advertise
         | doesn't work nearly as well as true SQM on OpenWRT. In fact I
         | was never really able to see Eeros SQM doing anything on
         | multiple connection types.
        
       | runjake wrote:
       | The things not really mentioned about Eero, tailored for this
       | crowd.
       | 
       | - There is no SNMP.
       | 
       | - There is no decent network monitoring at all: on the app, or
       | available via the API, if you were to use one of the unofficial
       | API libraries off of GitHub. At all. I've put significant effort
       | into this and ultimately routed the Eero through a dedicated VLAN
       | on my network switch, and have a SPAN port up to do traffic
       | monitoring and analysis via a Linux box.
       | 
       | - The (iOS) app is pretty flakey when it comes to syncing the
       | state of the router vs what you see in the app. Eg. you'll have a
       | device paused in the app, but it's not actually paused on the
       | router and vice versa. You end up having to toggle it a couple
       | times until the settings are synced properly.
       | 
       | - The CEO/founder and engineers hang out in a certain subreddit
       | and are communicative about the underlying technology. I get a
       | strong sense they care deeply about their product -- with the
       | caveat that they are entirely focused on the non-technical
       | consumer market.
       | 
       | I still use Eero, because it's the best I've found for dealing
       | with kids and Internet use. If I didn't have kids, I'd just do
       | OPNsense on a Protectli mini-computer.
        
         | cameronh90 wrote:
         | I use Eero Pro, don't use any of the content filtering or
         | anything, and would still say it's the best WiFi experience
         | I've ever had, far better than the Unifi network it replaced.
         | 
         | However, I do wish it had battery and 4G backup. I know that
         | sounds pretty niche, but nowadays with regular consumer
         | security cameras, alarm systems, smoke detectors, thermostats,
         | etc. all running on WiFi with built-in battery backups, it
         | would be very nice if I could still connect to them all if the
         | power or internet drops out.
         | 
         | Interestingly my Ring alarm has battery and 4G backup, and
         | that's also owned by Amazon. Supposedly there's a Ring Alarm
         | Pro Base Station which is a sort of Eero/Ring hybrid device,
         | but that doesn't exist in the UK, and is equivalent to the non-
         | Pro Eero anyway.
         | 
         | I might add a Firewalla Gold and a UPS, but it's a lot of
         | hassle and negates some of the value of Eero.
        
         | m-p-3 wrote:
         | I received an Eero 6 (free loan) from my ISP and it seems
         | decent so far. Howevet, the lack of webUI, being forced to do
         | the configuration entirely through a mobile app, and being
         | forced to authenticate through an Amazon account to do anything
         | in there rubbed me the wrong way. It's good enough for the
         | average consumer.
        
       | tyjen wrote:
       | Cannot vouch for Eero Pro 6E, but I can for the Eero Pro 6. I no
       | longer wanted to waste time troubleshooting network issues at
       | home for insignificant performance gains concerning my use, so I
       | purchased several Eero Pro 6s to cover my house and property
       | perimeter. I bought them in Dec. 2020 and have had zero problems.
       | No more long trouble shooting sessions putting a damper on my
       | day.
        
       | singhrac wrote:
       | I bought a 3-pack of Eero 6s for use in a Manhattan apartment
       | where I had been struggling with interference of various kinds,
       | and it works perfectly. Really a 15 minute setup and I haven't
       | thought about it again.
       | 
       | The most convenient thing is that placing one of the Eeros next
       | to my desktop meant that I could run ethernet to it; I thought
       | that this would be awful because of the wifi hop in between but
       | surprisingly I had very consistent ~20ms ping (iirc).
        
       | andrewmg wrote:
       | > If you want to plug it in and forget about it, eero is one of
       | the best vendors for that kind of solution.
       | 
       | That has been our experience with a fleet of the original eeros
       | and, for the past year or so, eero 6s. And that's in a relatively
       | large urban home with many devices and lots of nearby networks.
       | Our setup currently uses a wired backhaul, which helps with
       | speed, but the wireless backhaul worked pretty well, too.
       | 
       | Also, for what it's worth, no hardware issues across the 8 or so
       | eeros total (1st gen and 6) that we've had.
        
         | apohn wrote:
         | I've been using consumer/home WIFI hardware pretty much from
         | the time it was cheap enough that people started using it
         | broadly (2001?). As the "computer guy" I've also dealt with so
         | many brands I can't even remember them. If they are not garbage
         | when you buy them, use it for a year until the warranty
         | expires.
         | 
         | The Eero is the only wireless hardware I've purchased in my
         | life that was easy to setup and doesn't need to be rebooted
         | every month. Plus, all the pieces in the whole mesh are still
         | working well after the warranty period is over.
        
           | thfuran wrote:
           | I don't think I've had to regularly reboot any of my access
           | points since before I got my first draft N device in...2007?
        
             | apohn wrote:
             | I'd love to say that I had some weird or crazy network and
             | that was the cause. But it was all the usual stuff. 1 TV, a
             | few phones, a few laptops, a printer, etc. Probably less
             | than 15 devices, some of which were only occasionally
             | active (e.g. printer) at any given time.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-04-10 23:01 UTC)