[HN Gopher] NSA employee indicted for transmission and retention...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       NSA employee indicted for transmission and retention of defense
       information
        
       Author : DyslexicAtheist
       Score  : 49 points
       Date   : 2022-03-31 20:30 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.justice.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.justice.gov)
        
       | softwarebeware wrote:
       | > Unkenholz allegedly retained the classified NDI within his
       | personal email address.
       | 
       | I love how whoever wrote this clearly does not understand
       | technology, and thinks that somehow the _data_ was stored within
       | the _address_.
        
         | softwarebeware wrote:
         | But besides that, can we just take a facepalm to recognize an
         | NSA employee sending _and_ keeping classified data in a
         | personal email server. Like, how did he not know he would get
         | caught, right?
        
           | astrea wrote:
           | Seems to be a recurring issue
        
           | mistrial9 wrote:
           | isnt it obvious that the person believes that they ought to
           | be able to trade that information? rational or irrational,
           | this looks like a fight more than a theft
        
             | softwarebeware wrote:
             | Tell me more. I would think that everyone with a TOP
             | SECRET/SCI clearance is really clear on what it entails. I
             | can't see someone thinking they could copy it to personal
             | email and send it to someone without a clearance.
        
               | trasz wrote:
               | Tbh I'd think there would be (technical) mechanisms in
               | place to make this impossible.
        
         | vkou wrote:
         | It's a useful, if not technically precise, abstraction. Since
         | it's part of an indictment, it is a magnet for pedantry.
         | 
         | Just like how a long fall doesn't kill you, the sudden stop at
         | the end does. It's a distinction without a difference.
        
           | dboreham wrote:
           | Lawyers drafting indictments directly related to a technical
           | subject should have them proof read by someone with knowledge
           | of that subject.
        
             | vkou wrote:
             | Which is excellent advice - and unless you're both a
             | lawyer, and familiar with the conventions of this
             | particular bit of law, you probably shouldn't make any
             | assumptions about what should, and should not be written in
             | this kind of indictment.
             | 
             |  _Because you don 't have knowledge of the subject._
             | 
             | The subject at hand being the law.
        
       | tomohawk wrote:
        
         | ozten wrote:
         | Do you have any links that document what she did that is worse
         | than this NSA employee's behavior?
         | 
         | My understanding is that she didn't use her personal email for
         | classified information and continued to use a government
         | provided system for that class of information.
        
           | lsh123 wrote:
           | I am the author of the flagged post with a link to Wikipedia
           | article on the subject (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary
           | _Clinton_email_controve...):
           | 
           | "The FBI investigation found that 110 messages contained
           | information that was classified at the time it was sent.
           | Sixty-five of those emails were found to contain information
           | classified as "Secret;" more than 20 contained "Top-Secret"
           | information."
           | 
           | EDIT: compare with:
           | 
           | "If convicted, Unkenholz faces a maximum sentence of 10 years
           | in federal prison for each of the 13 counts of willful
           | transmission of NDI and for each of the 13 counts of willful
           | retention of NDI."
        
             | lern_too_spel wrote:
             | The state.gov email server she was supposed to use instead
             | is also intended for only nonclassified information. It is
             | unlikely that any Secretary of State ever followed that
             | rule exactly, and we know that multiple Secretaries of
             | State have used non-government email servers for emails
             | that should have been on government email servers (or not
             | on any email server). https://www.newsweek.com/watchdog-
             | report-says-mike-pompeo-re... and
             | https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/colin-powell-
             | defends-...
             | 
             | The lapse was considered so minor that multiple
             | investigations ruled that it didn't warrant charges.
        
             | ozten wrote:
             | Thank you!
        
           | tomohawk wrote:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controve.
           | ..
           | 
           | She used her personal email for official communication quite
           | a bit. This is illegal from a public records point of view,
           | as well as from a classification point of view.
           | 
           | A review of emails found classified information there.
           | 
           | She was required to take document management and classified
           | information classes when she became Sec State.
        
             | trelane wrote:
             | I wish the government folks would actually follow the rules
             | for once. R & D seem to both be terrible, and it only seems
             | to matter when the other side does it.
             | 
             | Frickin' US politics.
        
         | paul7986 wrote:
         | At that level they all get to skate ..right, left or upside
         | down
        
       | acheron wrote:
        
       | DyslexicAtheist wrote:
       | _> According to the 26-count indictment, on thirteen occasions
       | between February 14, 2018 and June 1, 2020, Unkenholz, lawfully
       | having possession of, access to, and control over NDI, which he
       | had reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United
       | States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully
       | transmitted that information to another person who was not
       | entitled to receive it. _
       | 
       | Mark Robert Unkenholz has this patent claim for key escrow:
       | "Device for and method of cryptography that allows third party
       | access" https://patents.justia.com/patent/5631961
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | lsh123 wrote:
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-03-31 23:01 UTC)