[HN Gopher] Ethernet's Emergence from Xerox PARC
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ethernet's Emergence from Xerox PARC
        
       Author : rcarmo
       Score  : 69 points
       Date   : 2022-03-23 09:59 UTC (13 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (r6.ieee.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (r6.ieee.org)
        
       | Angostura wrote:
       | Token Ring's where it's at - you mark my words.
        
         | aksss wrote:
         | Tolkien's ring has a better story.
        
         | kstrauser wrote:
         | Pfft. It's ATM, everywhere, for all the things.
        
       | jccalhoun wrote:
       | I recommend The Triumph of Ethernet: Technological Communities
       | and the Battle for the LAN Standard by Urs von Burg for a great
       | history of Ethernet.
        
       | Lamad123 wrote:
       | when Silicon Valley still had a stomach for true innovation!!
       | It's sad how the pinnacle of innovation today is one big company
       | copying some stupid thing from another big or small company, like
       | the stupid so-called shorts of youtube!!!
        
         | kkfx wrote:
         | When means when big companies _free_ labs exists, ruled by
         | technicians not managers, without time-to-market pressure, with
         | public funds.
         | 
         | https://blog.dshr.org/2020/05/the-death-of-corporate-researc...
         | https://archive.vn/CKdqr
         | 
         | That's the "when"... To reproduce it we need similar
         | conditions, the opposite of actual neoliberal agenda...
        
           | pinewurst wrote:
           | Thank the triumph of 'shareholder dominance' and such
           | creatures as Jack Welch for starving blue-sky R&D to death.
        
       | ksec wrote:
       | >This presentation will trace the history and development of
       | Ethernet as a 10 Mb/s
       | 
       | And we will [1] have 800G and 1.6T Ethernet [2] around 2025 -
       | 2030. That is 200 _GB_ /s.
       | 
       | [1] https://ethernetalliance.org/wp-
       | content/uploads/2022/03/Ethe...
       | 
       | [2] The Case for 1.6 Terabit Ethernet
       | 
       | https://www.ieee802.org/3/B400G/public/21_05/dambrosia_b400g...
        
       | omarhaneef wrote:
       | I remember a Jobs interview when he says he visited PARC and they
       | showed him 3 things:
       | 
       | Windows environment (windows, icons, mouse, pull down menu and
       | please appreciate that, back then, all of them were innovations)
       | 
       | Object oriented programming
       | 
       | Connectivity (he didn't call it Ethernet in his interview. He
       | might have called it the internet)
       | 
       | Amazing!
        
         | TradingPlaces wrote:
         | https://youtu.be/J33pVRdxWbw?t=396
        
       | GnarfGnarf wrote:
       | I worked for Xerox in 1979-1980. The general Xerox organization
       | was too copier-focused to appreciate the treasure they had at
       | PARC. It's ironic that every new hire was given a copy of "The
       | Billions Nobody Wanted" (by John H. Dessauer), a bio of Chester
       | Carlson, the inventor of xerography.
        
         | matt_s wrote:
         | One perspective Alan Kay had was that no company could really
         | capitalize on so many different things that came out of PARC.
         | Xerox picked laser printing and capitalized it to the point of
         | being forced by the government to release patents.
         | 
         | How to Invent the Future (2 parts), Alan Kay talking at
         | Stanford - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id1WShzzMCQ
        
         | vaxman wrote:
         | I did some contract work for them in 80s and asked why they
         | were letting Microsoft and Apple blow up the universe..the
         | response (from senior, or should I say Sr. ) management was
         | that they were waiting to see which one won and would then "sue
         | the winner". Somehow they wound up suing Apple and famously
         | lost on statutory grounds. (For the under-40 crowd: Before
         | Apple ripped off Xerox and Microsoft ripped off Apple for the
         | Graphical User Interface, they both were ripping off CP/M that,
         | in turn, was a ripoff of RSX-11, which followed norms
         | established by IBM, some 30 years earlier! The passage of time
         | has shown those companies couldn't research their way out of a
         | plastic bag --2022 and we get the same UX with all kinds of
         | smoke and mirrors to explain how cool Taiwan's new 5nm
         | fabrication is.)
        
         | panick21_ wrote:
         | What is even funnier is that half of the major companies
         | founded right after that all basically went to PARC and said
         | 'Great Idea were gone do that'.
         | 
         | Sun, Apple, Microsoft and many others were inspired by it.
        
         | Jemm wrote:
         | I read that book. It opens with statistics on the number of
         | photocopies made each year in the USA.
         | 
         | Interesting now that Xerox seems to be dropping the ball on
         | making decent reliable copiers.
        
       | haylem wrote:
       | If you like that sort of look back at tech history, and at things
       | that came out from the PARC, I highly recommend "Dealers of
       | Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age" by
       | Michael Hiltzik. It's a very well-written book with a ton of
       | insights about how a lot of the things we took for granted came
       | to be, from our printers and scanners, tablets, programming
       | languages, and more.
       | 
       | If my memory serves right, it details a bunch of things on the
       | development of laser printers, which gave Xerox a huge edge, the
       | creation of the PARC and the giants that joined it, and many of
       | the things they worked on: the Alto, Smalltalk, the Dynabook,
       | and, indeed, the Ethernet.
       | 
       | It's also pretty funny to read how some administrative red-tape
       | was sometimes being circumvented.
       | 
       | And also a bit sad to read how things went a bit south.
        
         | kQq9oHeAz6wLLS wrote:
         | Second this, great book.
        
       | vaxman wrote:
       | Ethernet was XNS/ITP when it first started. That protocol
       | splintered into DECnet, AppleTalk, Novell and TCP/IP. The advent
       | of async-TCP/IP on commodity hardware (aka Microsoft RAS) caused
       | it to takeover the game and created the dystopia we have now
       | (with nightly national news warning our parents and grandparents
       | that Russia is readying a "cyberattack" that will shutdown the
       | power running their oxygen machines and hearing aide chargers).
       | TCP/IP could transcend LANs and WANs without special NNBs (now
       | called routers) for the first time. (Prior to that, WAN
       | communications were distance-priced, making it cost prohibitive
       | for spammers or disenfranchised kids in USSR ghettos to cause
       | your local hospital to become locked out during surgeries --your
       | local hospital built from the success of the Allied Forces,
       | likely including your parents and grand parents.)
       | 
       | Disclaimer: VMS device drivers for third-party Unibus Ethernet
       | adapter board bc DEC wasn't shipping them yet (due to the
       | albatrosses of PCL, DECnet and later OSI). I later went to DEC
       | and SynOptics, but didn't even know Thompson was at SynOptics.
       | (They had hired a genius European foreign national as software
       | manager from a company down the street bc he wanted to remain in
       | US and he, in turn, hired a 70s-series Indian to mentor off me,
       | but instead he violated accepted business ethics, used our
       | practices against us and caused millions of dollars worth of
       | damage to SynOptics and Me personally...they tried to fire him
       | but HR kicked it back and in fury, they transferred him to HR and
       | ordered him not to touch any computers until he quit and went to
       | work across the street for a competitor (ultimate betrayal by
       | Valley rules) and eventually wound up a VP --of HR-- for the
       | famous Pagoda owner! Glad I can laugh about it all now. I sat
       | next to John Chaimberlain many years later when a Chinese
       | presenter said SynOpsis in a thick tone that sounded like
       | SynOptics and John raised his hand and asked why we were bringing
       | up that mess again. LoL Just ramblings of now irrelevant things
       | that went on in the exciting years before the dot-com bubble
       | changed the players.
        
       | throw0101a wrote:
       | If anyone wants to get into the low-level details of Ethernet,
       | O'Reilly has a good book (a bit old now, so may not have the
       | _latest_ releases):
       | 
       | * https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/ethernet-the-definitive...
       | 
       | A lot of interesting stuff going on with _single_ -pair (two
       | wires):
       | 
       | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_over_twisted_pair#Sin...
        
       | Jemm wrote:
       | Fun thing about early ethernet cards, they had a bad habit of
       | catching on fire. Had it happen a few times.
        
         | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
         | How does that happen? Bad capacitors?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-03-23 23:02 UTC)