[HN Gopher] Stellarium
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Stellarium
        
       Author : throwoutway
       Score  : 219 points
       Date   : 2022-03-06 03:36 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (stellarium.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (stellarium.org)
        
       | 2Gkashmiri wrote:
       | there was an old software that i used back in early 2000-2005.
       | Red shift 3. it was this massive plantery astronomy whatever
       | magic that would do stars and eclipses and recordings or animated
       | eclipses and what not. i wonder if anyone is similar to that in
       | the FOSS software world. i tried stellarium i think its a star
       | map, thats it.i could be wrong but i compare all these current
       | softwares with red shift 3 in my mind and most if not all fall
       | short.
       | 
       | edit:http://archaic.maris.com/content/index520f.html
       | 
       | this looks like the software i was talking about
       | 
       | https://lowendmac.com/2001/astronomy-software-redshift-3-0-f...
       | 
       | it says for MAC but i've used it on my windows 98/2000 back in
       | the day
        
         | bscphil wrote:
         | Sounds sort of like Celestia, but I'm not 100% sure from your
         | description what the program was like.
        
           | 2Gkashmiri wrote:
           | http://archaic.maris.com/content/index520f.html
        
             | the-dude wrote:
             | 640x480 screenshots, wow.
        
           | pmayrgundter wrote:
           | I loved Celestia so much I've been working on rewriting it
           | for the web for some years
           | 
           | http://celestiary.github.io
        
             | dotancohen wrote:
             | Very nice. However, it seems to be showing a nearly-full
             | moon for today (March 6), when in fact the moon is nearly-
             | new.
             | 
             | EDIT: Another issue, if you're interested. When speeding up
             | time, it can be seen that the moon spins far too rapidly.
             | It should be tidally locked to Earth (more or less).
        
             | jazzyjackson wrote:
             | wow, really slick, I'll have to check out your code, I've
             | been wanting to try out generating sky maps.
             | 
             | Only problem I ran into is rotating on touchscreen quickly
             | got bent out of shape, not rotating the same way as I
             | dragged the screen. Could it be a gimbal lock issue?
        
         | InCityDreams wrote:
         | Similar 'old' software, I really enjoy _and it runs as
         | portable_ (on Windows): home planet
         | 
         | https://www.fourmilab.ch/homeplanet/
         | 
         | It's so old it talks about "downloading on dial-up
         | connections", though the hiomepage is up to date (and full of
         | gems)
        
       | jasonincanada wrote:
       | It's scriptable! I took far too many hours of staring and
       | pondering to come up with a set of scripts for new astronomers to
       | get a sense of the size and duration of the solar system's main
       | planets and moon orbits:
       | 
       | https://github.com/jasonincanada/stellarium-scripts
        
       | pvg wrote:
       | Some previouslies
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20901358 2019, 56 comments
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19513222 2019, 33 comments
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17906113 2018, 48 comment
       | 
       | The last one is about the web port with some interesting comments
       | from one of the developers about how they did a C rewrite in
       | order to port it to the web.
        
       | mshockwave wrote:
       | Stellarium is a masterpiece, my childhood memory, and one of the
       | most important softwares for astronomy education that doesn't
       | charge you anything!
        
       | blaeks wrote:
       | Question: Is there a possibility in Stellarium to place thyself
       | on for example Pluto/Jupiter, some comet, or some nearby star
       | (inside Milky Way or outside) - and look at the Milky Way
       | center/another random star/area of space + have trajectories
       | drawn when I "pres play on time" engine?
       | 
       | Using those perspectives - with all of the trajectories drawn,
       | alongside with the preset universal/local/celestial coordinates,
       | luminosity, maps... huge time-spans... is - informative for us
       | who want/plan and work on slingshot maneuvers through space&time
       | - it gives a spacial perspective for the game ^_^
       | 
       | Anyone remember "Red Shift 3"?
       | 
       | If (when) WW3 kicks into gear - I will most certainly spin-up a
       | virtual win98 box and revive the 20 years old pleasure engraved
       | in my teeth and synapses. Ah man - even the memory of those
       | explorations and detailed reads on any particular object/area
       | warms my broken heart.
        
         | jasonincanada wrote:
         | I wrote some scripts that let you tour the solar system on an
         | hourly loop:
         | 
         | https://github.com/jasonincanada/stellarium-scripts
        
         | moonbug wrote:
         | cool story bro
        
       | dmead wrote:
       | It kind of stinks using this over remote desktop because it
       | relies so heavily on opengl.
        
       | can16358p wrote:
       | This is great. I am an amateur astrophotographer, just as a
       | hobby.
       | 
       | When I'm planning for shooting a specific celestial body I can
       | easily fast forward to night and see when and how long is the
       | most suitable way to plan a shot (shooting deep space objects
       | take total of many hours of exposures, "locked" to the same point
       | in space using a tracker). Also know when moon and sun will
       | rise/set which is crucial as even a tiny amount of sunlight or
       | moonlight ruins the already-super-faint data.
       | 
       | Also has the mobile app, which is equally useful. Definitely
       | recommended if you're getting into astrophotography, or just to
       | see how time and Earth's rotation affects what is seen in the
       | sky.
        
       | krylon wrote:
       | Where I live, light pollution is a huge obstacle for observing
       | the skies, plus it is cloudy very often. Sometimes I feel like
       | it's not even worth looking at the skies.
       | 
       | Stellarium allows me a glimpse of what it would be like without
       | light pollution or clouds. I don't use it very often, but I love
       | it dearly.
       | 
       | Also, _if_ you manage to get a good look at the sky and wonder
       | what is that point of light over there, Stellarium is priceless.
        
       | JNRowe wrote:
       | The biggest improvement for my stellarium usage was creating my
       | own landscape1, as having a quick way to see whether that early
       | morning partial eclipse is behind _those_ trees is really useful.
       | Also, kinda super fun to sit in your office chair spinning around
       | your own garden.
       | 
       | I actually created a bunch of landscapes for places that I have
       | reasonable access to, so that I can choose an appropriate place
       | for observations without having to resort to guesswork.
       | 
       | I'll note that you can create usable versions with the panorama
       | function on a cheap phone and gimp.
       | 
       | 1 http://stellarium.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Customising...
        
         | nullc wrote:
         | It just took me 15 minutes to make a panorama for kstars (a
         | very similar program, I assume the same image would work in
         | both) using an android phone and the google 'street view' app.
         | 
         | The street view app is intended for making panoramas for
         | submission to google maps... but you can just not submit the
         | images, and they get stored locally in the photos folder. After
         | that you just load it in gimp to erase the sky and save the
         | result as an image with an alpha channel.
         | 
         | The hardest part was aligning the image to make north agree
         | exactly -- but unless you're going to use the image to map out
         | visibility for astrophotography you don't have to get it
         | exactly right.
        
           | bitcharmer wrote:
           | Thanks for sharing. I've been using stellarium pretty much
           | exclusively and never heard of kstars.
           | 
           | Will definitely give it a try.
        
             | nullc wrote:
             | Kstars has phenomenal astrophotography integration (as in,
             | support for taking photographs, both can display
             | photographs from network sourced databases), outside of
             | that I think stellarium gives a more slick experience--
             | closer to a planetarium show and a little less of a
             | technical tool.
        
         | bitcharmer wrote:
         | Thank you so much for this!
         | 
         | On several occasions I planned my observations in stellarium
         | and got excited about some object finally getting into view
         | only to discover my dobsonian is actually too low or the tree
         | at the back would obstruct the view at the worst possible time.
        
         | gspr wrote:
         | It is also incredibly useful when considering a property.
         | Sketching out the nearby structures and trees as a Stellarium
         | landscape is a great way to figure out what the lighting
         | conditions are during other times of the year, especially at
         | high latitudes where these things vary tremendously. I keep
         | getting surprised by how off my hunch for June lighting
         | conditions is in December, and Stellarium takes the guesswork
         | out of it.
        
           | ccooffee wrote:
           | Woah, this sounds incredibly useful. Are there any blog posts
           | / wiki pages / videos that you used as a reference when doing
           | this? I'm hoping to put a garden in my backyard this month,
           | but I'm not sure about the location.
        
             | gspr wrote:
             | I've been meaning to hack together some scripts to automate
             | the whole process, with an accompanying writeup, but I've
             | been lazy. Your comment made me want to get this done
             | though, thanks :-)
             | 
             | Short summary: I go see the property, take properly
             | geolocated photos in several important parts of it, trying
             | to keep the camera level and pointed in known directions
             | (or verift that the compass is calibrated), and trying to
             | keep easily visible landmarks and buildings in view. Then I
             | go to my country's mapping authority website and find the
             | property and the same landmarks and buildings, and simply
             | re-create them as super-crude rectangles in a Stellarium
             | landscape. I open the landscape, set the location, and then
             | check out where the sun is in the sky at several times per
             | year.
             | 
             | What I wanna automate is importing a digital elevation
             | model (many countries offer this under a liberal license),
             | and perhaps stitching the aforementioned photos into the
             | Stellarium landscape (although I bet this provides little
             | actual value).
        
       | greenSunglass wrote:
       | I love using the android version, really smooth and beautiful.
       | Kudos to the devs
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-03-06 23:02 UTC)