[HN Gopher] What's the Problem with Old but Excellent Mac Apps?
___________________________________________________________________
What's the Problem with Old but Excellent Mac Apps?
Author : ingve
Score : 23 points
Date : 2022-03-04 10:43 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (christiantietze.de)
(TXT) w3m dump (christiantietze.de)
| bertez wrote:
| fantastical is quite nice
| Kibranoz wrote:
| I think Catalyst is no longer relevant with the SwiftUI framwork
| math-dev wrote:
| Why? I thought they go hand in hand
| gumby wrote:
| That's the plan but I don't think SwiftUI is there yet.
|
| Even the name gives it away: catalyst is like Carbon or Rosetta
| -- intended to be transitional.
| AlabasterAxe wrote:
| It's funny to me that there's no acknowledgment that high
| fidelity web apps and electron apps are taking the wind out of
| the sails of platform specific desktop app development.
| Razengan wrote:
| They're taking the wind out of the entire hardware alright.
| GeekyBear wrote:
| I would certainly rather have a Catalyst app than an Electron
| app, just from a system resources used standpoint.
|
| Slack, for example, can be absolutely ridiculous.
| kitsunesoba wrote:
| If I could run the Slack or Discord iOS apps on macOS I
| absolutely would, along with several other apps that have both
| Electron and iOS apps. Are Catalyst apps as good as true
| designed-for-mac AppKit apps? Not usually, but they're still
| several steps up from Electron apps and I'll take what I can
| get.
|
| Unfortunately the companies behind these apps have elected to
| not allow users to make this choice, so once Universal Control
| is released these apps will be permanently moving to my iPad.
| seumars wrote:
| >I'm so stuck in my daily work routine of creating apps that I'm
| not a good customer of apps
|
| Surely that can't be a good thing?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-03-05 23:00 UTC)