[HN Gopher] Things the CSS spec folks got right
___________________________________________________________________
Things the CSS spec folks got right
Author : feross
Score : 16 points
Date : 2022-02-24 21:02 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (blog.jim-nielsen.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (blog.jim-nielsen.com)
| jay_kyburz wrote:
| Whats good about arbitrary 100-900? I would think a float would
| have worked fine.
|
| The whole idea of different levels of boldness is not great
| anyhow. If you really care you would use a spercific font to get
| the weight you want.
| codeptualize wrote:
| It's nice to read some positive content about CSS. I personally
| love CSS.
|
| I see CSS as a massive toolbox full of awesome tools, some old,
| some new, some I use all the time, others I barely know they
| exist, but it's nice they are there when I need them.
|
| It also has improved significantly over the years, it's quite
| remarkable; transforms, transitions, flex, grid, media queries, I
| could go on, we even have CSS vars!
|
| I've written/styled UI in quite a few ways, and I still much
| prefer CSS. I even use it for design, I often find it quicker to
| write a few lines of css than doing things in graphics software.
|
| > This is all a way of extending a big "thank you" to the CSS
| spec authors
|
| Seconded! I am very grateful for CSS and everyone who contributed
| to it.
| kroltan wrote:
| I agree, for all its quirks and layers of layout generations,
| CSS is still mostly a very pleasant experience, especially
| since it is so comprehensive.
|
| Nowadays most of the web-design-y things I do have more CSS
| than HTML in them, my element trees are shallow and my
| stylesheets long.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-02-24 23:00 UTC)