[HN Gopher] Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 PeV from 12 g-ray...
___________________________________________________________________
Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 PeV from 12 g-ray Galactic
sources (2021)
Author : gone35
Score : 19 points
Date : 2022-02-13 20:12 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
| qwertyuiop_ wrote:
| For laymen, can someone who is knowledge put this into
| persepective ?
| johndough wrote:
| 1.4 PeV are about 0.224 millijoules or roughly an 8 billionth
| of a phone charge, so not much really. However, the photons we
| usually deal with are weaker by an unimaginable amount, but
| also much more plentiful. For example, a 100 W light bulb emits
| something in the order of 10^21 photons per second. If you had
| a light bulb that emitted the same amount of photons with 1.4
| PeV each, you'd have a device equivalent to one Tsar bomb (the
| most powerful bomb ever detonated in the history of mankind)
| _every second_.
| adhesive_wombat wrote:
| That's a big old phone battery: 8 billion times 0.2mJ is a
| 120000mAh 3.7V battery.
|
| But yes, it's in that ballpark and it's a loooot of energy to
| pack into a proton.
| contravariant wrote:
| It's roughly the amount of kinetic energy in a single grain
| of rice if you gently throw a handful of them. It's not much,
| but it's not an inconceivably small amount of energy either.
|
| Comparing it to a phone charge is less useful because
| batteries store _a lot_ of energy (especially when converted
| to kinetic energy).
| amluto wrote:
| I would say that 1.4 PeV is enough energy (by a large
| margin) to be audible. If that photon interacted with
| something near you and deposited any respectable fraction
| of its energy as heat or kinetic energy on a macroscopic
| scale, you would hear it!
| eesmith wrote:
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle might help.
| _Microft wrote:
| There is another, imo even better, page on this particle:
|
| https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/OhMyGodParticle/
| adhesive_wombat wrote:
| At 320 EeV, the OMG particle is over 5 orders of magnitude
| more than 1.4 PeV. It's a completely nuts amount if energy to
| have in a single particle: about the same as a decently
| moving baseball. From the particle's frame, it takes only a
| day to go a billion light years.
| ipdashc wrote:
| > about the same as a decently moving baseball
|
| I heard this, but it's hard to believe it's real (or,
| obviously, I'm misunderstanding it). What would happen if
| one of these hit a person in space? Would it be the same
| sort of feeling as getting hit by a baseball?
|
| Earlier I wondered how this much energy didn't totally
| wreck the detector, but someone else posted this link
| https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/OhMyGodParticle/, which
| says "The Fly's Eye consists of an array of telescopes
| which stare into the night sky and record the blue flashes
| which result when very high energy cosmic rays slam into
| the atmosphere". So the protons don't actually hit the
| detector. That makes more sense.
| adhesive_wombat wrote:
| It doesn't interact like a baseball, it just has the
| energy of one.
|
| If it does hit an atom, it produces a shower of other
| particles, most of which will have similarly huge
| energies and will probably go right through the rest of
| the detector and start their own showers in other matter.
| So you'll get a detector with a few atomic dislocations,
| and the rest of the energy would be distributed amongst a
| huge number of other interactions.
|
| It's actually similar to x-ray "hardening", where soft
| x-rays are filtered out by a metal shield, leaving only
| harder radiation. This is carefully calibrated to allow
| the radiation to penetrate to a certain depth, leaving
| shallower tissue unharmed.
|
| In a way, it could be better to be hit by an OMG particle
| than a less energetic particle, as the amount of energy
| that gets dumped into you is smaller: the vast, vast
| majority of it would be shotgunned deep into the ground
| under you, and only a very few molecules in you are
| actually affected.
| planck01 wrote:
| Its 100 times as much energy per photon than we as humans are
| able to accelerate particles in the cern large hadron collider
| with everything we have. It is a stupendous amount of energy
| per photon.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-02-13 23:00 UTC)