[HN Gopher] New map of meaning in the brain changes ideas about ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       New map of meaning in the brain changes ideas about memory
        
       Author : nsoonhui
       Score  : 161 points
       Date   : 2022-02-10 10:41 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
        
       | novacane wrote:
       | It's fascinating to see that the human brain is so adaptive, and
       | that we think more linguistically than we previously thought.
       | 
       | Maybe this is also related to the fact that we are primary think
       | in our native language.
        
         | tsimionescu wrote:
         | I do wonder if neuroscience may validate Chomsky's hypothesis,
         | that langauge evolved and serves primarily as a tool for
         | thought and not as a tool for communication, in his lifetime.
        
         | yboris wrote:
         | Anecdata: I was born in Russia but came to the US at the age of
         | 11 years old. I think in English exclusively.
         | 
         | One tidbit I read is that people who think in a foreign
         | language like me are in some decision processes more-rational
         | [0]. I think I don't get hung up on emotionally-stirring words,
         | or get offended by vulgarities, as they feel more abstract to
         | me than visceral. May be the same mechanism.
         | 
         | [0] https://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-04-foreign-language-
         | peop...
        
           | PhantomGremlin wrote:
           | _I think in English exclusively_
           | 
           | But can you still think in your native language if you try
           | to?
           | 
           | I was born in the USA, a child of immigrants. So I didn't
           | speak English until perhaps 3 or 4 years old.
           | 
           | But I can still think in my native language if I really try.
        
             | yboris wrote:
             | I can think in Russian, but with a 5th-grader-like
             | vocabulary I'm missing out on ways of articulating some
             | things. It also takes effort. And now that I'm trying it
             | out as an experiment - it feels like I have a concept/idea,
             | and then I'm simply trying to narrate it.
             | 
             | I speak Russian to parents and my brother, but it often
             | feels like I have a concept I want to articulate and have
             | to use a bunch of non-SAT words to vaguely gesture at what
             | I want to say; or, I simply don't know a word like "easel"
             | in Russian and feel like I'm playing the game "taboo" :P
             | 
             | I think naturally I gravitated out of thinking in Russian
             | since it's too much effort for no payoff. One thing I miss
             | about Russian are all the prefixes you can add to a verb,
             | like "drive over", "drive into", etc are accomplished with
             | short prefixes: "pere-" or "v-". It doesn't sound like
             | much, but when you can apply the dozen-ish prefixes to the
             | word "fuck" you realize the potential English is missing ;)
        
       | MauranKilom wrote:
       | Hidden in the article is this link:
       | 
       | https://gallantlab.org/huth2016/
       | 
       | Honestly, this is kinda scary. Some of the concepts that are
       | stored in close proximities feel like they tell... stories.
       | Possibly very individual ones.
       | 
       | For example, this is the "tag cloud" for voxel [26,35,42] right
       | ("Good, very reliable"):
       | 
       | > housekeeper, landlord, husband, wife, refused, apartment,
       | husband's, parents, wife's, jail, bedroom, servant, family,
       | pregnant, insisted, wives, refusing, pleaded, lawyer, ill
       | 
       | Here's another one ([22,42,31] right):
       | 
       | > wife, husband, afterwards, afterward, aunt, staying, months,
       | weeks, slept, waited, month, leaving, leave, until, pregnant,
       | decided, date, hadn't, wife's, stay
       | 
       | Like, it doesn't seem that far from here to something like "your
       | brain connects child, death and jail very strongly - did you
       | murder a child?"...
       | 
       | Of course, I'm theorizing ideas into research that I know very
       | little about. But if it's true, it's hard to put back into the
       | box...
        
         | arbol wrote:
         | This brain map was constructed from fMRI scans of participants
         | listening to fictional podcasts called "The Moth". The fact
         | these words are all grouped together suggests a high level of
         | `arousal` which may be related to an emotive part of the
         | story's narrative. You may very well have deduced part of the
         | story.
         | 
         | "child" does seem like an outlier when you consider individual
         | words but it's the overall context that's important.
         | 
         | Your second example highlights many words that related to time.
         | 
         | wife, husband, *afterwards*, *afterward*, aunt, *staying*,
         | *months*, weeks, *slept*, *waited*, *month*, *leaving*,
         | *leave*, *until*, pregnant, decided, *date*, hadn't, wife's,
         | *stay*
         | 
         | Being able to visualise general concepts like this is one of
         | the main benefits of the brain map. Reading anything more into
         | it is prone to error.
        
         | bonoboTP wrote:
         | No, that's your fantasy and I wonder what dark thoughts _you_
         | have that you made this leap. For example you inserted  "death"
         | (and for that matter "child") out of the blue when it wasn't
         | even there! Out of thre 3 words you speculate about, only one
         | is in the list above, two are purely your own mind's product.
         | 
         | The first cluster seems to do with homemaking, accommodation-
         | finding, living arrangements and stresses involving this.
         | 
         | The second one is about family and processes/conflicts/stress
         | around it.
        
         | jerry1979 wrote:
         | These collections remind me of Burroughs cut-up technique:
         | https://languageisavirus.com/creative-writing-techniques/wil...
        
       | cestith wrote:
       | To take a single-sentence stab at summary: It seems the brain
       | stores semantic descriptions of what we perceive, and memories
       | are reconstructions from those descriptions rather than retrieval
       | of the actual perception.
        
       | mike_ivanov wrote:
       | "Neurons that fire together, wire together" --Donald Hebb
        
       | evancoop wrote:
       | The ability to generalize patterns is the link between current
       | brain-computer-interface (BCI) technology that must be
       | recalibrated daily and solutions that might generalize for a
       | single brain across time or even multiple brains (of which no two
       | are alike).
       | 
       | Clearly, we respond to our fellow human beings not by processing
       | the activity of their 80 billion neurons, but by recognizing
       | latent patterns in their expressions and the vibrations of the
       | air around them (sound/speech).
       | 
       | It looks like these models are the beginning of a path where
       | software ascends that learning curve.
       | 
       | Exciting!
        
       | magicalhippo wrote:
       | About 20 years ago I read about an experiment, where they played
       | a game involving a ball with some young kids that had just
       | started to learn to speak. They did a test to evaluate their
       | vocabulary and played the game. Then they came back a year later.
       | Again they evaluated their vocabulary, and asked if they recall
       | the game.
       | 
       | The interesting part was that the kids that had not learned the
       | word ball when they first played, but since learned it, would not
       | use that word when recalling the rules of the game. Based on this
       | experiment, they suggested that there was a close link between
       | the available vocabulary and formation of memory.
       | 
       | I told my dad about this. He had his major in Norwegian (our
       | native language) and had taught Norwegian to immigrants from
       | Pakistan and similar in the 70s, and had a keen interest in
       | languages.
       | 
       | He found it very interesting, as he had read studies showing that
       | immigrants who lost their native language also lost knowledge
       | they learned before they emigrated. Things they had learned at
       | school or university for example.
       | 
       | So both sets of studies seemed to point to the same cause, that
       | the memories formed were closely linked to the language you know
       | at the time of formation.
       | 
       | As such I'm not terribly surprised that the same seems to be
       | happening with visual memories, as this article suggest. Then
       | again, totally not my field.
        
         | mike_ivanov wrote:
         | "immigrants who lost their native language also lost knowledge
         | they learned before they emigrated"
         | 
         | I think that talks a lot about the quality of the study. I'd
         | like to see how they exactly came to that conclusion.
        
           | whatshisface wrote:
           | People who forget things, forget things. I'm not sure if it
           | needs any more explanation than that.
        
         | Swizec wrote:
         | As an ESL who grew up in Slovenia, did most of his work in
         | English, and now lives in USA with full immersion[1] - the
         | memory language barrier is very noticeable.
         | 
         | Talking to my mom and sister about things that happened in
         | Slovenia is easy and fluent. Talking about things that happened
         | in USA is ... hard. I have to translate, I can't find words,
         | the concepts make no sense, everything is awkward.
         | 
         | Make me talk about software engineering in Slovenian and I
         | sound like a bumbling fool. It just doesn't work. Every 3rd
         | word is English. Entire sentences sometimes.
         | 
         | [1] I speak Slovenian maybe a couple times per month nowadays
        
           | bsd44 wrote:
           | I think that's fairly normal. When you learn a concept in a
           | language it's difficult to convey it in a foreign language if
           | you don't have the vocabulary, even if you're a native
           | speaker. That happens to me all the time.
        
           | salawat wrote:
           | This is likely because language uptake is most successful
           | when "unrooted" to a pre-existing language framework. You're
           | utilizing distinct memory/knowledge graphs.
           | 
           | You sound like a bumbling fool because you're having to forge
           | novel connections between the two recall graphs.
           | 
           | It's why I look on awe on people like my high school Spanish
           | teacher who fluently spoke 11 languages. When she got upset,
           | you never knew which was going to come out!
        
         | vanderZwan wrote:
         | > _He found it very interesting, as he had read studies showing
         | that immigrants who lost their native language also lost
         | knowledge they learned before they emigrated._
         | 
         | That example would be a negative aspect of it, but forgetting
         | things in itself can be positive. For example, I wonder if this
         | might also work for trauma and rebuilding a new life after
         | migrating to a different country.
        
       | pengstrom wrote:
       | It seems intuitive that perception and memory are one and the
       | same. How we perceive and how we recall is intrinsically bound to
       | the neuron superstructure. Changes in one affects the other. The
       | mind really is an interconnected prediction machine. Fascinating
       | stuff!
        
       | going_ham wrote:
       | It is really interesting to see how these are tangled together!
       | 
       | One simple experiment you can do is, think of a cup then a image
       | pops up. That image will likely be the image of recently used cup
       | or something you cherished deeply. Now after a while if you read
       | "a cup" you see same associations! Of course I removed a lot of
       | details, but it's really easy to verify the idea presented here.
       | 
       | And something like CLIP[0] seems to be a good direction because
       | it combines both visual and language aspect!
       | 
       | [0]: https://openai.com/blog/clip/
        
         | emsy wrote:
         | I have aphantasia and I think of a very generic cup, akin to a
         | stock image. It's only a faint image, what's more prominent is
         | the concept of a cup.
        
           | lstamour wrote:
           | Likewise. I think, "can hold liquids, handheld, might be hot
           | or cold," probably a white ceramic comes to mind, maybe
           | something I might have seen at IKEA. No handle, no
           | decorations, a cup isn't defined by those and they don't show
           | up in my imagining of one. Smaller in diameter yet about as
           | high or maybe a bit taller than a bowl. Bigger than a
           | thimble, roughly the size of my hand, or easy to palm.
           | Probably in a kitchen or on a dining table. It's all rather
           | conceptual for me.
           | 
           | What's weird for me is if I do the reverse, and instead of
           | trying to jump from visually imagining a cup to associate
           | other senses, if I instead think of the feeling of a warm cup
           | in my hands, I can more easily imagine what it smelled and
           | tasted like, and even a particular memory comes to mind too.
           | But if I try to do the reverse, such as visualizing that same
           | memory as a picture in my head, I can't recall the heat or
           | other details, I end up thinking of either concepts (words)
           | or it's like a photograph and flat, not real life. For me,
           | associations from "imagery" are harder than other kinds of
           | associations and don't have much impact at all. Strangely, I
           | can associate positionally, though. E.g. that something is on
           | a third shelf or inside a closet, and have that trigger
           | memories. But I can't do so by remembering what the shelf or
           | closet looked like.
        
         | pessimizer wrote:
         | It makes sense. If I'm asked to visualize a cup, I probably
         | first think of an emptiness that can be filled, then I enclose
         | that, while I'm enclosing it I remember that it needs a hole to
         | be filled or drunk from, and an orientation so I can put that
         | hole on the top and its opposite on the bottom so I can sit it
         | on a table - it has become a cylinder, now I remember a
         | particular, very cylindrical glass that I own that has a Norman
         | Rockwell painting screened onto it, then I realize that I've
         | thought the word "glass," so I get rid of the painting and make
         | it plastic. Then I make it blue, probably because that's the
         | first color I go to when somebody asks me to name a color.
         | 
         | If I come across the word "cup" for a little while, I'll just
         | remember that time when I tried to visualize a cup, and think
         | of a blue cylindrical cup.
        
         | dannyw wrote:
         | I have aphantasia[0], when I think of a cup, no image pops up.
         | I can think about the properties of a cup: it holds a drink,
         | it's a physical object, and if I specifically think about what
         | color or shape a cup is, I can describe it; but I never
         | visualise it.
         | 
         | I wonder how my brain works in this context. I also have
         | wondered if this contributed to me being fairly good at
         | programming and systems thinking; but dismal at art and
         | anything creative.
         | 
         | [0]: "https://psyche.co/ideas/i-have-no-minds-eye-let-me-try-
         | to-de..."
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | tasty_freeze wrote:
           | I've read a number of times about aphantasia, but I'm still
           | unsure about things. For instance, if I'm asked to think of a
           | cup in my minds eye, I would say yes, I can. Therefore I
           | don't have aphantasia. But it is not at all like looking at a
           | real cup or a picture of a cup. It is far more liminal and
           | fleeting.
           | 
           | One bit of evidence of this is when I tried LSD a few times
           | in the past, I don't get CEV (closed eye visuals), while some
           | people report rich, colorful scenery. All the same, I do get
           | visual impressions without actually seeing anything. For
           | instance, while listening to a particular song it generated
           | nothing but blackness in my minds eye, yet all the same I had
           | the impression of looking at glossy flower made of hard
           | glass. I was getting the interpretive conclusion of vision
           | without any of the other information flow that comes along
           | with actually seeing the object.
           | 
           | When I visualize things in my mind, it is kind of like that
           | too -- I can describe what I'm seeing but I don't really see
           | it.
        
             | captaincaveman wrote:
             | Maybe because its a class of things, you can't visualise
             | 'furniture', but you can visualise instance such as an
             | office chair, or dinning table.
             | 
             | My description is poor, office chair is also a class, but
             | it not the top class ... I dunno read about this once
             | anyway, didn't make it up, honest!
        
             | ummwhat wrote:
             | I don't know how much LSD you did or what your body weight
             | was or anything else that might be chemically relevant. But
             | I would be deeply surprised by an individual being immune
             | to the closed eye hallucinations.
             | 
             | When you look at a lightbulb for a moment and then close
             | your eyes, do you get the after image? The "closed eye
             | hallucinations" are just that normal after image chopped up
             | in frequency space. LSD exposes the fact that a lot of what
             | the brain does can be understood in terms of analog signal
             | processing. The most reliable way to get a high quality
             | viewing of the crystal patterns is with TV static. Baring
             | that, any randomized constant texture such as a carpet will
             | suffice. The reason is because random noise evenly fills up
             | the entire spectrum in frequency space, so whatever
             | frequencies are cut, de-phased, or otherwise affectef are
             | guaranteed to be present in an image of pure noise. Another
             | reliable glitch is that all lines below a certain thickness
             | will tend to wobble or drift in and out of visibility.
             | Again, construct a line as a really thin gaussian wave
             | packet and see what happens when the high frequency terms
             | pick up phase drift.
             | 
             | LSD hallucinations have nothing to do with aphantasia.
        
               | tasty_freeze wrote:
               | I got vivid, rich, and colorful closed-eye imagery from
               | psilocybin (20-20mg) and no open-eye visuals from it. LSD
               | was the reverse -- obvious open eye visuals, no closed
               | eye visuals (up to 200ug).
               | 
               | LSD was brought up because of the specific experience of
               | having visual impressions of things without actually
               | seeing anything. My sober "minds eye" is like that too --
               | I can describe what I've been asked to conjure, but I
               | don't really see it.
        
           | cosmojg wrote:
           | Can you feel the cup? Can you imagine holding it in your
           | hands, caressing the rim, scooping the inside, and feeling
           | the pressure on your hands? Can you imagine your hands
           | getting wet or even the pain of a thousand shards of glass as
           | the cup suddenly shatters? Does it make a sound? Can you
           | smell the tea? Can you taste it?
        
             | lstamour wrote:
             | Not the same person, but have a similar condition, so I'll
             | take a go at it. Sample size of one here.
             | 
             | > Can you feel the cup?
             | 
             | No. There really isn't a specific cup.
             | 
             | > Can you imagine holding it in your hands, caressing the
             | rim, scooping the inside, and feeling the pressure on your
             | hands?
             | 
             | Yes, I can imagine these actions, but it's more about
             | remembering what it might be like to feel that sensation
             | again and is somewhat disconnected from the cup. I end up
             | wanting to remember a different, real cup, when I might
             | have done those actions. Like how I can remember when I
             | last cut off circulation in my hands carrying a heavy
             | plastic bag, say. I know how that feels, but it's not
             | something I'm particularly good at imagining visually -
             | with a mental image.
             | 
             | > Can you imagine your hands getting wet or even the pain
             | of a thousand shards of glass as the cup suddenly shatters?
             | 
             | Not quite, and no, I can't really imagine the shattering. I
             | mean, I can remember a time when a cup fell and shattered
             | and sort of associate that, but just "visualizing" the pain
             | or shattering seems impossible. I can play concept
             | association and "imagine" the cup exploding outwards like a
             | grenade, but it's not visual or concrete, it's more
             | conceptual and I lose any connection to pain or feeling or
             | hands and fingers. The more I try to make up without
             | associating with a memory, the more abstract (verbal, less
             | real) the "imagining" seems.
             | 
             | > Does it make a sound?
             | 
             | I can imagine sounds, and get songs stuck in my head, so I
             | have some idea of how mental visualization should work for
             | me, but it doesn't visually work that way. It's interesting
             | that to me, just now, imagining the sound of a cup
             | shattering produces an associated concept mentally than the
             | reverse ... I can't easily go from a shattered or falling
             | cup concept to the sound, but I can relatively easily do
             | the reverse: I can go almost instantly from imagining the
             | sound of a shattered cup to thinking of a shattered or
             | falling cup and what that might look like or how the shards
             | might feel.
             | 
             | > Can you smell the tea?
             | 
             | Again, thinking of smells first brings back sounds and
             | memories more strongly than visuals would for me, and when
             | I was trying to think of an image, it was abstract - there
             | were no sounds or smells in particular and it wasn't
             | something I could interact with. More of a model of a cup.
             | Even thinking of the interactions or how something would
             | feel, I now realize, is thinking about feelings and
             | memories of feelings - that visualizing my other senses
             | such as touch, smell or hearing is much easier for me than
             | to visualize based on appearances.
             | 
             | > Can you taste it?
             | 
             | Not from the mental imagining of the cup, no. If I remember
             | the sounds of when I was at a tea house, or if I pull up a
             | photo of a cup of tea on my phone, then I can imagine the
             | taste. But it feels disconnected to try and purely jump
             | from a "visual" cup to thinking, it tastes like tea.
             | Thinking of how certain foods taste does bring up memories
             | and can make my mouth water imagining or remembering how
             | certain foods tasted, though. Thinking of a taste can bring
             | back the smells, the feeling of heat rising off a dish or
             | hot plate, the sounds of sizzling, and a memory of what it
             | would look like. But there still isn't really a "picture"
             | and if I wasn't looking at a photo on my phone, all I could
             | tell you about my visual imaginings would be words or
             | concepts. I can tell that something is missing in my
             | imagining because of how different it is to go from non-
             | visual senses to other non-visual senses. But visuals ...
             | don't have the same mental impact unless I can see them in
             | front of me, e.g. on a computer screen. For others,
             | remembering a layout might trigger memories of details, for
             | me it is the opposite - I remember the layout of a
             | flowchart by remembering which details are connected and
             | then from there I can describe the diagram's layout in my
             | head.
             | 
             | But again, sample size of one here.
        
         | cosmojg wrote:
         | > That image will likely be the image of recently used cup or
         | something you cherished deeply.
         | 
         | I ended up imagining a comically ornate, little, blue, fine-
         | china teacup. It's not one I've used recently. In fact, I can't
         | remember ever using such a thing! But the image arose
         | effortlessly so I must have seen it at some point, no? Maybe in
         | a videogame or at a friend's house?
         | 
         | I don't know; the same thing happens when I attempt this
         | exercise with the words "tree" or "car" or "pencil". It's
         | almost like I'm imagining my own, personal platonic ideals.
         | 
         | On the other hand, when I think of a duck, it's a mallard
         | rather than a call duck, and I definitely see more mallard than
         | call ducks in my day-to-day life.
        
         | dEnigma wrote:
         | I've just imagined the most bland white cup, almost like the
         | platonic ideal of a cup. None of my cups, or the cups at work,
         | look like that.
        
       | robg wrote:
       | The analytics here are really interesting but the general
       | framework is not new. I was doing this work 20 years ago:
       | 
       | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16672666/
       | 
       | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17243357/
       | 
       | The biggest challenge in neuroimaging remains the analytic
       | techniques to show signals. Kudos to this team for those
       | advances.
        
       | sireat wrote:
       | From the article
       | 
       | " memory isn't a facsimile of past perceptions that gets
       | replayed. Instead, it is more like a reconstruction of the
       | original experience, based on its semantic content."
       | 
       | I thought memories as reconstruction not recall model was an
       | already pretty commonly accepted view.
       | 
       | One of the examples were people with seemingly perfect memories
       | of their lives. On closer inspection it turned these perfect
       | memories were actual constant replays/refreshes.
       | 
       | EDIT: One example I remember reading about was that Nixon aide
       | who claimed perfect recall but actually he was was conflating
       | multiple dates into one.
       | 
       | So it is with us with our childhood memories, we might be
       | conflating multiple occurrences into one when we reconstruct our
       | stories.
        
         | causi wrote:
         | _I thought memories as reconstruction not recall model was an
         | already pretty commonly accepted view._
         | 
         | I don't see any other explanation for, for example, forgetting
         | someone's name and having it disappear from every memory you
         | have of that person.
        
         | ravi-delia wrote:
         | It is! This finding justifies that observation with
         | neurological data.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | d--b wrote:
       | Wow! When you read these things, and combine that with the
       | advances in AI, it really seems that understanding what happens
       | in the brain is within reach.
        
         | stupendousyappi wrote:
         | IMO, if that's true, it's horrifying. I think there's a great
         | risk that AGI will lead to the extinction or near extinction of
         | the human race.
        
           | tetraca wrote:
           | Do you fear that one day your child might be something
           | greater than you yourself ever could be?
           | 
           | No. There is no greater accomplishment humanity could achieve
           | than to make itself obsolete.
        
             | leobg wrote:
             | That was quite Nietzschean! What are ye but a bridge into
             | the future.
        
           | PhantomGremlin wrote:
           | Hmmm. Maybe that's why we haven't detected any signs of an
           | advanced civilization elsewhere in the universe.
           | 
           | Steps:
           | 
           | 1) quantum mechanics
           | 
           | 2) semiconductors
           | 
           | 3) AGI
           | 
           | 4) the machines take over
           | 
           | We're about 100 years into that progression, and we're well
           | into step 2. How many years do we have left? Another 100?
           | 
           | The machines are probably not "foolish" enough to announce
           | themselves to the rest of the universe.
        
             | 0ldskool wrote:
             | then wouldn't we find an advanced machine civilization???
        
           | felipemnoa wrote:
           | Not sure why you are getting downvoted. I would say that AGI
           | is even more dangerous than the Atom bomb. It will still get
           | invented though, we just cannot help ourselves. And to be
           | honest, I would be first in line to invent the thing if I
           | could.
        
           | cosmojg wrote:
           | C'est la vie.
        
         | captaincaveman wrote:
         | Less worried about AGI and all that, more worried that taking
         | away all the 'magic' of how minds work does it take away some
         | of the magic of how the minds work, i.e. it could be quite
         | depressing for many to think of ourselves as 'mechanistic'
         | automatons. Yes that has been discussed for years, but as that
         | becomes fact and with blueprints ... I dunno, I think I quite
         | liked the world how it was before that!
         | 
         | Also the more we can model the minds workings, the more some
         | sod is going to exploit that for commercial benefits i.e.
         | advertising, propaganda etc.
        
           | leobg wrote:
           | Not just for years. For centuries now. Wasn't that people's
           | main concern about Darwin, after all? "Once it is proven that
           | we have descended from apes, where does that leave us?"
        
           | Xplune13 wrote:
           | > I dunno, I think I quite liked the world how it was before
           | that!
           | 
           | I agree. I don't know why but when I read this article and
           | the responses here stating how things can be related and can
           | be measured, I suddenly felt this sigh? disappointment? for
           | 'demystifying the mind'.
        
             | salawat wrote:
             | You just know some arsehole is going to make a read
             | interface, then that'll get used for measuring, then people
             | will optimize processes around it.
             | 
             | Nightmare fuel.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-02-10 23:01 UTC)