[HN Gopher] Mathematicians Prove 30-Year-Old Andre-Oort Conjecture
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mathematicians Prove 30-Year-Old Andre-Oort Conjecture
        
       Author : theafh
       Score  : 79 points
       Date   : 2022-02-03 14:59 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
        
       | marto1 wrote:
       | > To prove the Andre-Oort conjecture, Pila needed to show that a
       | non-Shimura variety living inside a Shimura variety doesn't have
       | a lot of special points.
       | 
       | This looks just so advanced to me. Is that how people sound when
       | they talk about programming ?
        
         | xigoi wrote:
         | Yes.
         | 
         | >Build, test, and deploy with CI/CD that works with any
         | language, platform, and cloud. Connect to GitHub or any other
         | Git provider and deploy continuously.
         | 
         | (from https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/)
         | 
         | >Kubernetes, also known as K8s, is an open-source system for
         | automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized
         | applications.
         | 
         | (from https://kubernetes.io/)
        
           | bluquark wrote:
           | The paragraphs you quoted are at least partially self-
           | explanatory, mostly using common English words like
           | "platform" in a metaphorical sense. Whereas the paragraph the
           | grandparent quoted has several concepts that are opaquely
           | named after mathematicians, providing not even a hint of what
           | they might mean.
        
             | xigoi wrote:
             | "Git" is literally a random word. "Kubernetes" also doesn't
             | tell you anything.
        
         | ljhsiung wrote:
         | Just a lot of standardization and years of intuiting what these
         | mean.
         | 
         | In this case, you definitely need some intuition of elliptic
         | curves and "special points" that is hard to explain, but Quanta
         | does it decently.
         | 
         | Here's an example from the ARM Architecture Reference Manual
         | (B.2.3.6) that often throws people for a loop--
         | 
         | > For a read or a write RW1 from an Observer that is Ordered-
         | before a read or a write RW2 from a different Observer, the
         | External visibility requirement requires that RW2 is not
         | Observed-by RW1. This means that an Architecturally well-formed
         | execution must not exhibit a cycle in the Ordered-before
         | relation.
        
           | _0ffh wrote:
           | I'm not sure I understand the ARM manual example. It seems
           | obvious that an operation should not be able to see what is
           | supposed to happen "after" it executes, and that a time-like
           | construct should not contain loops (outside of SF
           | literature). I'm sure I'm missing a lot of detail here, but I
           | really can't say that I feel confused by it.
           | 
           | Ed. Oh wait, so maybe I'm just sufficiently similar to the
           | intended audience. But wouldn't everyone who reads such a
           | manual be?
        
         | bluquark wrote:
         | No, only functional programmers sound like this!
        
         | gavagai691 wrote:
         | Probably nothing is quite so abstruse as abstract mathematics,
         | and few subjects in math are as abstruse as arithmetic geometry
         | (the subject of this paper).
        
       | seemaze wrote:
       | I am consistently impressed by the publication quality at Quanta
       | Magazine. Their articles are a joy to read for an audience of any
       | background. I also enjoy Aeon[0] and Psyche[1]. Can anyone
       | recommend publishers of similar quality in other domains?
       | 
       | [0] https://aeon.co
       | 
       | [1] https://psyche.co/
        
         | gavagai691 wrote:
         | Unfortunately, I don't think anything matches Quanta for what
         | they do (covering cutting-edge advances in science in an
         | accurate and accessible manner).
         | 
         | One of the things that really helps Quanta is that if there is
         | an article about math, typically it is written by a
         | mathematician (and likewise for other areas). For "softer"
         | subjects, e.g. politics, history or law, the Atlantic is often
         | similar in this regard, and I enjoy their articles.
        
       | gavagai691 wrote:
       | Another huge advance in number theory--alongside the subconvexity
       | result posted last month--in a vastly different area of the
       | subject. 2021 was a great year for number theory. (This of course
       | assumes both results are correct!)
        
         | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
         | > 2021 was a great year for number theory.
         | 
         | Maybe it was because for the last two years everyone was stuck
         | at home because of Covid.
         | 
         | There are only so many Netflix movies/shows you can watch
         | before you start playing around with number theory out of sheer
         | boredom.
        
           | gavagai691 wrote:
           | The people who write these kinds of papers, believe it or
           | not, prefer to spend most of their time playing with numbers
           | compared to watching Netflix. (This is not to say that they
           | don't enjoy spending any time on the latter.)
        
         | ximeng wrote:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29929935 Think this is the
         | subconvexity one?
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29790830 This one is also
         | related to primes.
        
       | alex_suzuki wrote:
       | I wonder how the authors perceive the world around them. Because
       | after opening and skimming the PDF I certainly felt transported
       | to a strange, alien place... with no resemblance of my own
       | surroundings.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-02-03 23:01 UTC)