[HN Gopher] Sequoia PGP is looking for sq stakeholders
___________________________________________________________________
Sequoia PGP is looking for sq stakeholders
Author : todsacerdoti
Score : 44 points
Date : 2022-02-01 14:21 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (sequoia-pgp.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (sequoia-pgp.org)
| mfer wrote:
| I want to give them props for doing this. Some of the successful
| projects I've worked on talked with people, outside of issue
| queues and slack, to understand their needs. It worked out well
| in crafting _useful_ solutions.
| egberts1 wrote:
| Wish I knew what sq adds to the existing gnupg suite.
| encryptluks2 wrote:
| They say on their website what they believe they add, but
| unfortunately right now it still isn't in a stage to replace
| GnuPG. I will say trying to automate GnuPG key management sucks
| right now, so at least Sequoia might be able to get the DevOps
| crowd.
| pzduniak wrote:
| The only way to programmatically interact with GnuPG is through
| spawning the CLI. Not good.
| egberts1 wrote:
| Best summarization evah!
| sreevisakh wrote:
| What's wrong with gpgme?
| tptacek wrote:
| It's thousands of lines of C code that just wraps an actual
| execution of the `gpg` binary?
| upofadown wrote:
| That sounds like a lot of pointless work. I had a quick
| look and could not find anything about that. Do you have
| a reference?
| franknord23 wrote:
| It can encrypt for expired keys.
| woodruffw wrote:
| I might be missing a legitimate use case, but that doesn't
| seem like a good thing in general.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-02-01 23:02 UTC)