[HN Gopher] 'Not' and its many permutations
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       'Not' and its many permutations
        
       Author : onemind
       Score  : 31 points
       Date   : 2022-01-23 12:04 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (theamericanscholar.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (theamericanscholar.org)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | In a disagreement over the use of "not", if neither party changes
       | their mind, it is considered a "tie".
        
         | kjhughes wrote:
         | That's knot funny.
        
       | carapace wrote:
       | "Not" is the beginning of language and rational thought. There is
       | not "not" in the pre-verbal animal mind. There is not "not" in
       | emotion. There's aversion and other "negative" emotions, but
       | these are present and positive (in the sense of existing, not
       | being defined by absence.) One is "filled" with disgust, for
       | example.
        
         | robbedpeter wrote:
         | This is not true. Pre-verbal animals like wolves know the
         | difference between rabbit in hole and rabbit not in hole.
         | Raining and not raining. Pack and not pack. Food and not food.
         | 
         | In coyotes, it is the absence of pack members in communal
         | howling that triggers hyper-fertility.
         | 
         | In arboreal primates, they tend to have three threat
         | vocalizations (air, tree, ground) and one "no threat" modality.
         | 
         | I don't think it's nearly as clear as you're suggesting. There
         | is even evidence of the use of mathematical 0 in animal
         | cognition and communication.
         | 
         | Formal verbal communication seems more a matter of physical
         | capability than cognitive capacity. Giving animals the ability
         | to speak with sign language (Koko the gorilla, RIP) or buttons
         | (like Bunny the talking dog) has shown that animal cognition
         | isn't nearly as distinct from human cognition as has been
         | thought.
         | 
         | What makes humans special is sophisticated verbalization,
         | opposable thumbs, and being the ultimate endurance/persistence
         | predator.
        
           | carapace wrote:
           | Well I did say "the _beginning_ of language and rational
           | thought ", eh? And you're picking some very intelligent
           | animals as counter-examples. :)
           | 
           | I wouldn't be surprised or disappointed to find out that non-
           | human intelligence is more common than previously suspected.
           | 
           | - - - -
           | 
           | > What makes humans special is sophisticated verbalization,
           | opposable thumbs, and being the ultimate
           | endurance/persistence predator.
           | 
           | Aye. FWIW, I would add to that list the capability for
           | recursive and self-reflexive thought.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-23 23:02 UTC)