[HN Gopher] Bitcoin pyramid schemes wreak havoc on Brazil's 'New...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Bitcoin pyramid schemes wreak havoc on Brazil's 'New Egypt'
        
       Author : belltaco
       Score  : 55 points
       Date   : 2022-01-22 19:35 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (apnews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (apnews.com)
        
       | freitasm wrote:
       | It is always a scam. Funny how this story has similar rags to
       | riches vibes as this one
       | https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/service-station-worker-t...
       | 
       | It's all a scam.
        
       | roydivision wrote:
       | A Ponzi scheme based on a Ponzi scheme.
       | 
       | It's turtles all the way down.
        
         | cinntaile wrote:
         | 12 years and counting, is that some sort of record for a ponzi
         | scheme where people have been saying it's a ponzi scheme from
         | the beginning? I wonder when they'll realize it might be
         | something else.
        
           | Macha wrote:
           | https://www.therichest.com/nation/10-of-the-biggest-ponzi-
           | sc...
           | 
           | 15 years for number 2.
           | 
           | Madoff was first investigated in 1992 and shut down in 2008
           | for 16 years:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madoff_investment_scandal
        
             | inter_netuser wrote:
             | Ponzi and pyramid schemes are materially different.
             | 
             | Madoff was paying cashflows to his clients. Bitcoin pays
             | nobody.
             | 
             | What are the longest running pyramid schemes? Gold sees to
             | be running for nearly 5000 years, seems like plenty of
             | runway here.
        
         | bogota wrote:
        
         | mrtksn wrote:
         | Wouldn't you agree that if enough people choose to stay in
         | Bitcoin instead of simply buying for cheap and selling at
         | higher price, the structure will stop resembling a ponzi
         | scheme?
         | 
         | The Bitcoin network does actually function as advertised and
         | there's no technical reason for it not to be a decentralised
         | network of value exchange.
         | 
         | I understand that at HN even considering blockchain
         | technologies yields a strong pushback but at some point you
         | need to admit that the crypto people are onto something.
         | Bitcoin denies to die even after the rush of speculative
         | investors and get rich quick folks dies off.
        
           | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
           | _> Wouldn't you agree that if enough people choose to stay in
           | Bitcoin instead of simply buying for cheap and selling at
           | higher price, the structure will stop resembling a ponzi
           | scheme?_
           | 
           | Why would people give up the opportunity to cash out the
           | winnings of investments/gambles? People do the same with some
           | stocks.
        
             | mrtksn wrote:
             | It's a cash out opportunity for some but for others it's a
             | medium of exchange. There are also quite a lot of
             | ideological people.
             | 
             | If you believe that Bitcoin has a bright future and even
             | may become a global currency, it's a bad investment move to
             | sell your bitcoins at any time. Sure, you can argue that
             | you can sell high and later buy more for less but that's
             | timing the market and no one can actually reliably do that
             | and as a result if someone believes that BTC will be huge
             | in the future will never sell. When the mission is
             | accomplished, they will use it as money to purchase goods
             | and services.
        
               | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
               | _> It's a cash out opportunity for some but for others
               | it's a medium of exchange._
               | 
               | Here's a thought, if your medium of exchange is someone
               | else's cash-out, pump-and-dump opportunity, then maybe
               | it's not a good medium of exchange.
        
               | mrtksn wrote:
               | Maybe. But maybe it offers some value that is not found
               | in the classical systems and for many people that's good
               | enough.
               | 
               | Also don't forget that if it happens that BTC replaces
               | the government controlled currencies as some pundits
               | claim, there won't be pump and dumps etc. No one pumps
               | and dumps USD in the USA but they do it in other
               | countries.
               | 
               | A quick example is Turkey where the USD gained against
               | the Turkish lira a lot and lost over %30 value overnight
               | but USD is still good.
        
               | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
               | _> A quick example is Turkey where the USD gained against
               | the Turkish lira a lot and lost over %30 value overnight
               | but USD is still good._
               | 
               | Your comment serves to make a point for strong and stable
               | fiat like USD, not for Bitcoin which also just lost
               | around 40% of its value in a month.
        
               | mrtksn wrote:
               | Only small part of the worlds population lives in a
               | western democracy(about %10). People around the globe(the
               | %90) pump and dump all kind of currencies all the time,
               | including USD. Don't forget that sudden value increase
               | and decrease cuts both ways. BTC is just like USD for a
               | lot of people, just easier to trade.
               | 
               | BTW I don't hold any crypto, I simply find it fascinating
               | and I think there's some merit in its ideas and
               | technologies.
        
               | disruptalot wrote:
               | You make it sound like this is somehow a unique property
               | Bitcoin. In truth, every asset and even medium of
               | exchange can and has been manipulated for gain.
               | 
               | JP Morgan spoofed the precious metals market and got
               | caught.
               | 
               | In the medium of exchange category, the forex market has
               | been manipulated for decades.
               | 
               | You are more at risk of volatility and manipulation in
               | crypto markets because they are immature. Bitcoin is
               | still in the discovery stage.
        
               | nradov wrote:
               | The "evidence" of forex market manipulation seems to
               | consist primarily of sore losers complaining that their
               | trading strategies should have been profitable in theory
               | but lost money in practice. Sure if you're trading some
               | obscure low volume currency pair then there can
               | occasionally be some temporary funny business, but no one
               | other than central banks has sufficient capital reserves
               | to significantly manipulate the major reserve currencies.
        
               | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
               | _> In truth, every asset and even medium of exchange can
               | and has been manipulated for gain._
               | 
               | Well yeah, that was my point. That's why in many
               | countries with rampant inflation they use USD or EUR, as
               | mediums of exchange because they're currencies controlled
               | by powerful economies and governments which have proven
               | to be mostly stable throughout recent history, save for
               | major disasters, therefore their currencies exert a large
               | amount of trust and stability on the financial markets,
               | vs BTC that fluctuates more extremely more quickly
               | without any brakes from any government as the BTC you got
               | yesterday for selling your PS4 on ebay could maybe now
               | buy you a yacht or maybe not even a big mac.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | ffggvv wrote:
           | yes it's just that no one has any use for the network other
           | than as a ponzi/speculative investment. not store of wealth
           | or currency
        
             | razemio wrote:
             | I use it to prove that my legal / important documents
             | aren't faked / altered and existed at a given time. Only
             | Bitcoin (Blockchain Tech) can do that if I am not mistaken.
        
               | cookingrobot wrote:
               | Why don't you put multiple versions of your important
               | documents on the blockchain, and then later you can pick
               | and choose which version you want to "prove" are real?
        
             | anf0 wrote:
             | I use it for remittances
        
           | dandanua wrote:
           | 1. It's not an exchange, it's a transfer. Irreversible.
           | 
           | 2. It's not a value, it's a numerical record.
           | 
           | 3. What do you mean by "as advertised"? It's "advertised"
           | that bitcoin can solve world's hunger...
           | 
           | 4. There are numerous technical reasons not to use it
        
           | rzwitserloot wrote:
           | > Wouldn't you agree that if enough people choose to stay in
           | Bitcoin instead of simply buying for cheap and selling at
           | higher price, the structure will stop resembling a ponzi
           | scheme?
           | 
           | Wouldn't you agree that if enough people keep their flower
           | bulbs instead of simply buying for cheap and selling at a
           | higher price, the structure will stop resembling a ponzi
           | scheme?
           | 
           | Your statement boils down to: Yes, but.. what if... we don't
           | TREAT it as a ponzi scheme? See! Now it isn't a ponzi scheme!
           | 
           | Yes. And IF only the moon was made of cheese, then the moon
           | would be made of cheese.
        
             | mrtksn wrote:
             | > Wouldn't you agree that if enough people keep their
             | flower bulbs instead of simply buying for cheap and selling
             | at a higher price, the structure will stop resembling a
             | ponzi scheme?
             | 
             | I agree, that's how we have gold as a value store. However
             | flower bulbs are not durable like gold and can grow
             | exponentially on supply through farming - no surprise we
             | don't store value in flower bulbs today. Bitcoin doesn't
             | suffer from these issues.
        
               | ChuckNorris89 wrote:
               | _> that's how we have gold as a value store._
               | 
               | Except for one, not anymore, and two, the value of gold
               | doesn't only come from speculation like in BTC, but from
               | supply and demand from real world applications of gold,
               | like semiconductors, electronics, aerospace, automotive,
               | medical, etc. since it's one of the best electrical
               | conductors and heat reflecting materials we have.
               | 
               | Without gold, we'd be screwed royally, making the current
               | supply chain disruptions seem like a walk in the park.
               | Without BTC, we could fork 1000 other crypto-coins onto
               | which people can speculate on and nothing would be lost.
        
               | bshipp wrote:
               | if there was only one possible cryptocurrency then I'd
               | agree that supply can't be grown exponentially.
               | 
               | However, there are new cryptos coming online every week
               | it seems. Almost like growing different colored tulips.
        
           | skybrian wrote:
           | Yes, "ponzi scheme" is over-used, though it seems to apply to
           | the schemes in Brazil.
           | 
           | Bitcoin is more like infrastructure that people can use to
           | play pump-and-dump games. We've seen with meme stocks (and
           | previously, penny stocks) that just about any financial asset
           | can be used for these games. It doesn't need to be
           | intentionally set up for that. It's structural in having a
           | limited supply, a volatile price, and continuous trading.
           | Just add hype, which serves as coordination among the players
           | about which financial asset to use to play the game.
           | 
           | One difference is that a cryptocurrency's value can come
           | primarily though not exclusively from its usefulness for
           | playing pump-and-dump games. High fees and volatility deter
           | most usage for payments, and there is no income stream other
           | than new investors buying in.
        
             | pnutjam wrote:
             | Here's a good documentary that explains how something like
             | bitcoin works. =D
             | 
             | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3105306/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-22 23:01 UTC)