[HN Gopher] Ask HN: Any experienced engineers took a lower posit...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ask HN: Any experienced engineers took a lower position as a
       "vacation"?
        
       Have any experienced (10+ years) engineers gone down to say working
       as a mid-level engineer at a FAANG company just to keep getting
       paid but work at a lower responsibility, as a 1-2 year break?  Was
       it beneficial? Was it just tedious? Did it hurt your career?
       Figured I'd ask as I can't be the only person who thought of this
       as a way to still earn but handle the burnout from working a tough
       engineering job.
        
       Author : Justsignedup
       Score  : 15 points
       Date   : 2022-01-18 19:47 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
       | jstx1 wrote:
       | Stress doesn't scale with seniority. There are laid back
       | positions out there at every level so downlevelling yourself
       | seems pointless. Especially since there's a reasonable chance
       | that you'll take a paycut and get nothing in return for it.
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | I highly doubt this, at least at any occurence to reasonably
         | allow one to get such a job. I have yet to see any easy jobs
         | that are senior or higher. Even my current midlevel job sucks.
        
         | mxuribe wrote:
         | I tried this...and got as high as director (which i know isn't
         | that high)...but i started as a lowly full stack web dev...and
         | even tried moving laterally across to product management, and
         | then to director, etc...and nope...life did not get
         | easier...and i even tried at different orgs...I'm so burned
         | out...i'm thinking of leaving tech altogether.
        
       | GoToRO wrote:
       | You may end up working more. Companies that pay less do so
       | because they are inefficient. This means people work a lot more
       | but in very inefficient ways. I've found that companies that pay
       | more usually have figured out how to use the workers to produce
       | real value instead of having them use 3 different tools to ask
       | for a device f.e.
        
       | willcipriano wrote:
       | I'm about 7 years in the industry and removed all the full stack
       | stuff from my resume. I haven't been noticing a significant
       | salary delta between jobs that ask you to do front end, back end
       | and dev ops at the same time and more pure back end roles, but I
       | have noticed that I get leaned on harder than my peers have
       | specialized.
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | Yep, my company changed from dedicated roles to full stack,
         | then to devops. There was no salary range adjustment.
        
           | fvavsc wrote:
           | I hate this.. this removes any opportunity for deep work
           | instead you are constantly context switching. Your cognitive
           | load is through the roof, and you feel like you can do
           | nothing well.
           | 
           | My company did same, but they didn't hire any devops, they
           | just started calling us devops and fired sysadmins, told us
           | to figure out Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines. Our velocity is
           | less than 50% compared to before but I am sure on paper it
           | looks like company saved tons of money.
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | Exactly what I told my managers.
             | 
             | Exactly what my company did.
        
       | leros wrote:
       | I would guess that a typical good engineer could half-ass their
       | job and still get good reviews. You might lose star status on you
       | team and lose out on promotions, but I bet you could work half
       | the hours and not get called out for bad performance.
        
       | claudiulodro wrote:
       | What is mid-level FAANG a downgrade from . . ? Mid-level FAANG
       | seems like it'd be a huge "upgrade" in compensation and scale for
       | most developers, and would be the crowning jewel of their career.
        
         | Wiseacre wrote:
         | Yes I believe that is the point of this particular humblebrag
        
       | fancyfredbot wrote:
       | You might find this is not an easy thing to do! Would you want
       | someone on your team who you even suspected viewed their role as
       | a vacation? Would you hire someone like that above someone who
       | was ambitious and keen to prove themselves?
        
         | iwwr wrote:
         | I dunno, if they get their stuff done with little supervision
         | and bring in a little maturity and experience, I would call
         | that professionalism.
        
       | krasicki wrote:
       | You can be even more creative than that.
       | 
       | Almost thirty years ago, my wife and I were in the process of
       | adopting our two sons (now in their thirties). I had defined my
       | career at the time as a Software engineer for hire (consultant).
       | Technical projects, then and now, really require full attention
       | and devotion to getting things done so I had to find a way to
       | step out of that for a while without losing too much money or
       | technical chops.
       | 
       | I found a position as a Technical Writer having Software reverse-
       | engineering skills which was a step off of the more intense
       | technical treadmill. Over time I found that experience
       | complemented my original trajectory as companies are always
       | looking for better communicators.
       | 
       | Given the rate of change, managing your career in consideration
       | to your life goals is worth curating.
        
         | mxuribe wrote:
         | > ...I found a position as a Technical Writer...
         | 
         | That's quite a clever move...I would have not thought about!
         | You got me thinking; thanks!
        
       | ceras wrote:
       | Depending on your definition of mid-level, some FAANG companies
       | wouldn't allow this: companies are sometimes "up-or-out" for
       | entry-level and mid-level engineering, and require engineers to
       | get to senior engineer after about 5 years of total of relevant
       | experience or risk getting fired.
       | 
       | At such companies, someone applying with 10 YoE will only be
       | considered for senior engineer or higher roles. But you could go
       | from staff to senior if you wanted.
        
       | qazxcvbnmlp wrote:
       | I took a part time job at an airline. After we load the bags on
       | the airplane, the airplane leaves and there is no more stress. No
       | long running projects. No big egos. The pay is rough, but would
       | highly recommend.
        
         | kylehotchkiss wrote:
         | Are you at a regional airport or a larger one? Is it tough
         | being in the belly of the plane on a regular basis?
        
       | d--b wrote:
       | It's unclear what you mean here. You are a large system
       | engineering lead with a lot of pressure, and would like to go
       | back to making sketchy internal tools for HR to relief the load
       | for a while? That kind of thing?
       | 
       | I've not been in that position, but if I was, I think I'd rather
       | take a 6-month break and do nothing than spending 2 years at a
       | desk doing meaningless work.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-18 23:02 UTC)