[HN Gopher] Turkmenistan's leader wants 'Gates of Hell' fire put...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Turkmenistan's leader wants 'Gates of Hell' fire put out
        
       Author : boulos
       Score  : 47 points
       Date   : 2022-01-08 20:08 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | user568439 wrote:
       | Can't they use it to generate electricity? I know it can stop
       | burning any moment, but closing it also has it's costs and risks
       | of releasing methane instead of CO2 if not done properly.
        
         | stefan_ wrote:
         | Turkmenistan has lots of natural gas, why would you take it
         | from the one site that is already an ecological disaster?
         | 
         | I feel another Soviet nuke operation coming:
         | https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/02/archives/soviet-discloses...
        
         | sparkling wrote:
         | It would be a challenge from a engineering perspective, but
         | yes. However there is no real incentive to do so, they have
         | plenty of gas and oil in places that have accessible
         | infrastructure in place.
        
       | blamazon wrote:
       | I guess putting resources towards this wasn't a priority when the
       | same leader instead erected a literal golden monument to himself
       | in 2015. [1] Wonder what has changed since then.
       | 
       | [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arkadag-binasy-
       | statu...
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | >Wonder what has changed since then.
         | 
         | The monument is complete now. Time for next
        
       | roter wrote:
       | Reminds me of "Fire In The Earth" by Liu Cixin [0].
       | 
       | [0] https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250306081/toholdupthesky
        
       | mrtksn wrote:
       | Here is the president of Turkmenistan driving around the burning
       | hole and being cool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOTPht4kAL0
       | 
       | Maybe he doesn't want anyone to outdo his coolness? I'm not
       | joking, Turkmenistan is the most weird place on earth. The father
       | of friend of mine worked in a construction project there and I
       | remember him described it as "Not a real country but a theme
       | park".
       | 
       | According to this BBC short documentary[0], the standart practice
       | in natural gas extraction is to burn off the excess(it's called
       | flaring) to prevent uncontrolled explosions that may happen if
       | the gas builds up. It's also better for the environment to
       | release CO2 instead of methane, therefor the official statement
       | given by the Turkmen president doesn't seem to add up.
       | 
       | [0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWUoAoeJb08
        
       | rpeden wrote:
       | If all else fails, the nuclear option has worked before!
       | 
       | https://interestingengineering.com/soviet-engineers-detonate...
        
         | Breazy wrote:
         | I don't think that would work in this case. In that fire, all
         | the fuel was coming up through a well pipe, and by detonating a
         | nuke adjacent to the pipe they were able to crimp the whole
         | pipe closed. But with this crater fire, I don't think the fuel
         | is coming up through a single pipe but rather through the earth
         | itself. Detonating a nuke there would probably make the problem
         | worse, by shattering all the rock and making it even more
         | permeable to the gas already seeping through it.
         | 
         | This animation shows the nuclear pipe crimping effect:
         | https://youtu.be/3kwQfjGnVpw?t=68
        
         | 8bitsrule wrote:
         | Since the USSR tried it in 1979, the nuclear option has failed
         | before! (See: 'Yunkom mine')
         | 
         | https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ukraine-s-war-torn-donbas...
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | rackjack wrote:
       | Half-joking: turn it into a tourist destination? "Visit the Gates
       | of Hell, then the pearly gates of Turkmenistan!"
        
         | throwaway89292 wrote:
        
       | teruakohatu wrote:
       | So instead of burning the gas they will release it into the
       | atmosphere? Or is there a way to cap it and prevent release?
       | 
       | Methane is apparently 33x worse for warming (over a century) than
       | CO2:
       | 
       | https://arstechnica.com/science/2014/02/methane-burned-vs-me...
        
         | Breazy wrote:
         | From what I understand (after reading the wikipedia page about
         | it) the crater probably isn't putting out much more methane
         | than the rest of the ground in the surrounding area. Wikipedia
         | says the flames are seen there because the shape of the crater
         | allows the gas to accumulate into concentrations that support
         | flames, while in the rest of the area the gas leaking from the
         | ground is rapidly diluted by the wind, but is nevertheless
         | being released.
         | 
         | Looking at the thing, this makes some sense to me. There are
         | flames coming out the side of the walls of the crater all along
         | the perimeter, from only a few meters below where the surface
         | of the ground would be. The gas is obviously very shallow below
         | ground in that region, and unless the top layer of soil is
         | impermeable to gas I think a ton of it must be leaking out all
         | over the area.
        
         | toomuchtodo wrote:
         | Doesn't seem too big to cap with a concrete dome rolled in
         | place on rails (similar to the Chernobyl sarcophagus install),
         | with the methane captured and burned off (perhaps even used for
         | electrical generation).
        
           | cbsmith wrote:
           | Isn't that effective like what the crater is currently doing?
           | It's effectively already concentrating the methane and
           | burning it off before it fills the atmosphere.
        
           | Dylan16807 wrote:
           | Or, like, a tarp, but either way you have to worry about the
           | gas going around if you're not capturing it just right.
        
             | toomuchtodo wrote:
             | Can a tarp withstand the heat currently generated? I
             | suppose any material with high heat resistance, low weight,
             | and not too gas permeable would do. Snuff the fire (once
             | capped, it should naturally burn out from a lack of
             | available oxygen), pump and productively burn the gas.
        
               | Dylan16807 wrote:
               | Since this comment chain was about the worry of methane
               | release after stopping the fire, I'm assuming the fire
               | would already be put out if necessary.
        
               | i_am_proteus wrote:
               | Perhaps there is a nearby source of sand.
        
       | l0b0 wrote:
       | Erika Fatland's _Sovietistan: Travels in Turkmenistan,
       | Kazakhstan, Tajikistan_ (originally published in 2014, so pretty
       | recent) is a fascinating view into those countries from a lone
       | traveller.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-01-08 23:01 UTC)